the higher learning in america-第20章

按键盘上方向键 ← 或 → 可快速上下翻页，按键盘上的 Enter 键可回到本书目录页，按键盘上方向键 ↑ 可回到本页顶部！
————未阅读完？加入书签已便下次继续阅读！





dispassionate　animus　of　scientific　inquiry。



　　　　These　extenuating　considerations　do　not　touch　the　case　of



that　body　of　businessmen；　in　the　proper　sense　of　the　term；　from



which　the　membership　of　the　governing　boards　is　drawn。　The



principles　that　rule　business　enterprise　of　that　larger　and



pecuniarily　effectual　sort　are　a　matter　of　usage；　appraisement；



contractual　arrangement　and　strategic　manoeuvres。　They　are　the



principles　of　a　game　of　competitive　guessing　and　pecuniary



coercion；　a　game　carried　on　wholly　within　the　limits　of　the



personal　equation；　and　depending　for　its　movement　and　effect　on



personal　discrepancies　of　judgment。　Science　has　to　do　with　the



opaquely　veracious　sequence　of　cause　and　effect；　and　it　deals



with　the　facts　of　this　sequence　without　mental　reservation　or



ulterior　purposes　of　expediency。　Business　enterprise　proceeds　on



ulterior　purposes　and　calculations　of　expediency；　it　depends　on



shrewd　expedients　and　lives　on　the　margin　of　error；　on　the



fluctuating　margin　of　human　miscalculation。　The　training　given　by



these　two　lines　of　endeavour　　science　and　business　　is　wholly



divergent；　with　the　notorious　result　that　for　the　purposes　of



business　enterprise　the　scientists　are　the　most　ignorant；



gullible　and　incompetent　class　in　the　community。　They　are　not



only　passively　out　of　touch　with　the　business　spirit；　out　of



training　by　neglect；　but　they　are　also　positively　trained　out　of



the　habit　of　mind　indispensable　to　business　enterprise。　The



converse　is　true　of　the　men　of　business　affairs。（6*）



　　　　Plato's　classic　scheme　of　folly；　which　would　have　the



philosophers　take　over　the　management　of　affairs；　has　been　turned



on　its　head；　the　men　of　affairs　have　taken　over　the　direction　of



the　pursuit　of　knowledge。　To　any　one　who　will　take　a



dispassionate　look　at　this　modern　arrangement　it　looks　foolish；



of　course；　　ingeniously　foolish；　but；　also；　of　course；　there　is



no　help　for　it　and　no　prospect　of　its　abatement　in　the　calculable



future。



　　　　It　is　a　fact　of　the　current　state　of　things；　grounded　in　the



institutional　fabric　of　Christendom；　and　it　will　avail　little　to



speculate　on　remedial　corrections　for　this　state　of　academic



affairs　so　long　as　the　institutional　ground　of　this　perversion



remains　intact。　Its　institutional　ground　is　the　current　system　of



private　ownership。　It　claims　the　attention　of　students　as　a



feature　of　the　latterday　cultural　growth；　as　an　outcome　of　the



pecuniary　organization　of　modern　society；　and　it　is　to　be　taken



as　a　base…line　in　any　inquiry　into　the　policy　that　controls



modern　academic　life　and　work　　just　as　any　inquiry　into　the



circumstances　and　establishments　of　learning　in　the　days　of



scholasticism　must　take　account　of　the　ecclesiastical　rule　of



that　time　as　one　of　the　main　controlling　facts　in　the　case。　The



fact　is　that　businessmen　hold　the　plenary　discretion；　and　that



business　principles　guide　them　in　their　management　of　the　affairs



of　the　higher　learning；　and　such　must　continue　to　be　the　case　so



long　as　the　community's　workday　material　interests　continue　to　be



organized　on　a　basis　of　business　enterprise。　All　this　does　not



promise　well　for　the　future　of　science　and　scholarship　in　the



universities；　but　the　current　effects　of　this　method　of



university　control　are　sufficiently　patent　to　all　academic　men；



　and　the　whole　situation　should　perhaps　trouble　the　mind　of　no



one　who　will　be　at　pains　to　free　himself　from　the　（possibly



transient）　preconception　that　〃the　increase　and　diffusion　of



knowledge　among　men〃　is；　in　the　end；　more　to　be　desired　than　the



acquisition　and　expenditure　of　riches　by　the　astuter　men　in　the



community。







　　　　Many　of　those　who　fancy　themselves　conversant　with　the



circumstances　of　American　academic　life　would　question　the　view



set　forth　above；　and　they　would　particularly　deny　that　business



principles　do　or　can　pervade　the　corporate　management　of　the



universities　in　anything　like　the　degree　here　implied。　They　would



contend　that　while　the　boards　of　control　are　commonly　gifted　with



all　the　disabilities　described　　that　much　being　not　open　to



dispute　　yet　these　boards　do　not；　on　the　whole；　in　practice；



extend　the　exercise　of　their　plenary　discretion　to　the　directive



control　of　what　are　properly　speaking　academic　matters；　that　they



habitually　confine　their　work　of　directorship　to　the　pecuniary



affairs　of　the　corporation；　and　that　in　so　far　as　they　may　at



times　interfere　in　the　university's　scholarly　and　scientific



work；　they　do　so　in　their　capacity　as　men　of　culture；　not　as　men



of　property　or　of　enterprise。　This　latter　would　also　be　the　view



to　which　the　men　of　property　on　the　boards　would　themselves



particularly　incline。　So　it　will　be　held　by　the　spokesmen　of



content　that　virtually　full　discretion　in　all　matters　of　academic



policy　is　delegated　to　the　academic　head　of　the　university；



fortified　by　the　advice　and　consent　of　the　senior　members　of　his



faculty；　by　the　free　choice　of　the　governing　boards；　in　practice



drawn　out　from　under　the　control　of　these　businessmen　in　question



and　placed　in　the　hands　of　the　scholars。　And　such；　commonly；　is



at　least　ostensibly　the　case；　in　point　of　form；　more　particularly



as　regards　those　older　establishments　that　are　burdened　with



academic　traditions　running　back　beyond　the　date　when　their



governing　boards　were　taken　over　by　the　businessmen；　and　more



particularly　in　the　recent　past　than　in　the　immediate　present　or



for　the　establishments　of　a　more　recent　date。



　　　　This　complaisant　view　overlooks　the　fact　that　much　effective



surveillance　of　the　academic　work　is　exercised　through　the



board's　control　of　the　budget。　The　academic　staff　can　do　little



else　than　what　the　specifications　of　the　budget　provide　for；



without　the　means　with　which　the　corporate　income　should　supply



them　they　are　as　helpless　as　might　be　expected。



　　　　Imbued　with　an　alert　sense　of　those　tangible　pecuniary　values



which　they　are　by　habit　and　temperament　in　a　position　to



appreciate；　a　sagacious　governing　board　may；　for　instance；



determine　to　expend　the　greater　proportion　of　the　available



income　of　the　university　in　improving　and　decorating　its　real



estate；　and　they　may　with　businesslike　thrift　set　aside　an



appreciable　proportion　of　the　remainder　for　a　sinking　fund　to



meet　vaguely　unforeseen　contingencies；　while　the　academic　staff



remains　（notoriously）　underpaid　and　so　scantily　filled　as



seriously　to　curtail　their　working　capacity。　Or　the　board　may；



again；　as　has　also　happened；　take　a　thrifty　resolution　to



〃concede〃　only　a　fraction　　say　ten　or　fifteen　per…cent　　of



the　demands　of　the　staff　for　books　and　similar　working　materials



for　current　use；　while　setting　aside　a　good　share　of　the　funds



assigned　for　such　use；　to　accumulate　until　at　some　future　date



such　materials　may　be　purchased　at　more　reasonable　prices　than



those　now　ruling。　These　illustrations　are　not　supplied　by　fancy。



There　is；　indeed；　a　visible　reluctance　on　the　part　of　these



businesslike　boards　to　expend　the　corporation's　income　for　those



intangible；　immaterial　uses　for　which　the　university　is



established。　These　uses　leave　no　physical；　tangible　residue；　in



the　way　of　durable　goods；　such　as　will　justify　the　expenditure　in



terms　of　vendible　property　acquired；　therefore　they　are　prima



facie　imbecile；　and　correspondingly　distasteful；　to　men　whose



habitual　occupation　is　with　the　acquisition　of　property。　By　force



of　the　same　businesslike　bias　the　boards　unavoidably　incline　to



apportion　the　funds　assigned　for　cu