贝壳电子书 > 英文原著电子书 > our androcentric culture >

第30章

our androcentric culture-第30章

小说: our androcentric culture 字数: 每页4000字

按键盘上方向键 ← 或 → 可快速上下翻页,按键盘上的 Enter 键可回到本书目录页,按键盘上方向键 ↑ 可回到本页顶部!
————未阅读完?加入书签已便下次继续阅读!



the waste of material; the waste of time and effort; are prodigious; yet
she achieves her end as we see。

Domestic Economics covers the whole care and government of the
household; the maintenance of peace; health; order; and morality; the
care and nourishment of children as far as done at home; the entire
management of the home; as well as the spending and saving of money; are
included in it。  Saving is the least and poorest part of it; especially
as in mere abstinence from needed things; most especially when this
abstinence is mainly 〃Mother's。〃  How best to spend; time; strength;
love; care; labor; knowledge; and moneythis should be the main study
in Domestic Economics。

Social; or; as they are used to call it; Political Economics; covers a
larger; but not essentially different field。  A family consists of
people; and the Mother is their natural manager。  Society consists of
people_the same people_only more of them。  All the people; who are
members of Society; are also members of familiesexcept some incubated
orphans maybe。  Social Economics covers the whole care and management of
the people; the maintenance of peace and health and order and morality;
the care of children; as far as done out of the home; as well as the
spending and saving of the public moneyall these are included in it。

This great business of Social Economics is at present little understood
and most poorly managed; for this reason; we approach it from an
individual point of view; seeking not so much to do our share in the
common service; as to get our personal profit from the common wealth。 
Where the whole family labors together to harvest fruit and store it for
the winter; we have legitimate Domestic Economics: but where one member
takes and hides a lot for himself; to the exclusion of the others; we
have no Domestic Economics at allmerely individual selfishness。

In Social Economics we have a large; but simple problem。  Here is the
earth; our farm。  Here are the people; who own the earth。  How can the
most advantage to the most people be obtained from the earth with the
least labor?  That is the problem of Social Economics。

Looking at the world as if you held it in your hands to study and
discuss; what do we find at present?

We find people living too thickly for health and comfort in some places;
and too thinly for others; we find most people working too hard and too
long at honest labor; some people working with damaging intensity at
dishonest labor; and a few wretched paupers among the rich and poor;
degenerate idlers who do not work at all; the scum and the dregs of
Society。

All this is bad economics。  We do not get the comfort out of life we
easily could; and work far too hard for what we do get。  Moreover; there
is no peace; no settled security。  No man is sure of his living; no
matter how hard he works; a thousand things may occur to deprive him of
his job; or his income。  In our time there is great excitement along
this line of study; and more than one proposition is advanced whereby we
may improve; most notably instanced in the world…covering advance of
Socialism。

In our present study the principal fact to be exhibited is the influence
of a male culture upon Social Economics and Industry。

Industry; as a department of Social Economics; is little understood。 
Heretofore we have viewed this field from several wholly erroneous
positions。  From the Hebrew (and wholly androcentric) religious
teaching; we have regarded labor as a curse。

Nothing could be more absurdly false。  Labor is not merely a means of
supporting human lifeit _is_ human life。  Imagine a race of beings
living without labor!  They must be the rudest savages。

Human work consists in specialized industry and the exchange of its
products; and without it is no civilization。  As industry develops;
civilization develops; peace expands; wealth increases; science and art
help on the splendid total。  Productive industry; and its concomitant of
distributive industry cover the major field of human life。

If our industry was normal; what should we see?

A world full of healthy; happy people; each busily engaged in what he or
she most enjoys doing。  Normal Specialization; like all our voluntary
processes; is accompanied by keen pleasure; and any check or
interruption to it gives pain and injury。  Whosoever works at what he
loves is well and happy。  Whoso works at what he does not love is ill
and miserable。  It is very bad economics to force unwilling industry。 
That is the weakness of slave labor; and of wage labor also where there
is not full industrial education and freedom of choice。

Under normal conditions we should see well developed; well trained
specialists happily engaged in the work they most enjoyed; for
reasonable hours (any work; or play either; becomes injurious if done
too long); and as a consequence the whole output of the world would be
vastly improved; not only in quantity but in quality。

Plain are the melancholy facts of what we do see。  Following that
pitiful conception of labor as a curse; comes the very old and
androcentric habit of despising it as belonging to women; and then to
slaves。

As a matter of fact industry is in its origin feminine; that is;
maternal。  It is the overflowing fountain of mother…love and
mother…power which first prompts the human race to labor; and for long
ages men performed no productive industry at all; being merely hunters
and fighters。

It is this lack of natural instinct for labor in the male of our
species; together with the ideas and opinions based on that lack; and
voiced by him in his many writings; religious and other; which have
given to the world its false estimate of this great function; human
work。  That which is our very life; our greatest joy; our road to all
advancement; we have scorned and oppressed; so that 〃working people;〃
the 〃working classes;〃 〃having to work;〃 etc。; are to this day spoken of
with contempt。  Perhaps drones speak so among themselves of the 〃working
bees!〃

Normally; widening out from the mother's careful and generous service in
the family; to careful; generous service in the world; we should find
labor freely given; with love and pride。

Abnormally; crushed under the burden of androcentric scorn and
prejudice; we have labor grudgingly produced under pressure of
necessity; labor of slaves under fear of the whip; or of wage…slaves;
one step higher; under fear of want。  Long ages wherein hunting and
fighting were the only manly occupations; have left their heavy impress。
 The predacious instinct and the combative instinct weigh down and
disfigure our economic development。  What Veblen calls 〃the instinct of
workmanship〃 grows on; slowly and irresistably; but the malign features
of our industrial life are distinctively androcentric: the desire to
get; of the hunter; interfering with the desire to give; of the mother;
the desire to overcome an antagonistoriginally masculine; interfering
with the desire to serve and benefitoriginally feminine。

Let the reader keep in mind that as human beings; men are able to
over…live their masculine natures and do noble service to the world;
also that as human beings they are today far more highly developed than
women; and doing far more for the world。  The point here brought out is
that as males their unchecked supremacy has resulted in the abnormal
predominance of masculine impulses in our human processes; and that this
predominance has been largely injurious。

As it happens; the distinctly feminine or maternal impulses are far more
nearly in line with human progress than are those of the male; which
makes her exclusion from human functions the more mischievous。

Our current teachings in the infant science of Political Economy are
naively masculine。  They assume as unquestionable that 〃the economic
man〃 will never do anything unless he has to; will only do it to escape
pain or attain pleasure; and will; inevitably; take all he can get; and
do all he can to outwit; overcome; and if necessary destroy his
antagonist。

Always the antagonist; to the male mind an antagonist is essential to
progress; to all achievement。  He has planted that ro

返回目录 上一页 下一页 回到顶部 0 0

你可能喜欢的