the spirit of laws-第32章
按键盘上方向键 ← 或 → 可快速上下翻页，按键盘上的 Enter 键可回到本书目录页，按键盘上方向键 ↑ 可回到本页顶部！
————未阅读完？加入书签已便下次继续阅读！
added to those punishments？
A good legislator takes a just medium； he ordains neither always pecuniary； nor always corporal punishments。
19。 Of the Law of Retaliation。 The use of the law of retaliation＇58＇ is very frequent in despotic countries； where they are fond of simple laws。 Moderate governments admit of it sometimes； but with this difference； that the former exercise it in full rigour； whereas among the latter it ever receives some kind of limitation。
The law of the Twelve Tables admitted two： first； it never condemned to retaliation； but when the plaintiff could not be satisfied in any other manner。＇59＇ Secondly； after condemnation they might pay damages and interest；＇60＇ and then the corporal was changed into a pecuniary punishment。＇61＇
20。 Of the Punishment of Fathers for the Crimes of their Children。 In China； fathers are punished for the crimes of their children。 This was likewise the custom of Peru＇62＇ a custom derived from the notion of despotic power。 Little does it signify to say that in China the father is punished for not having exerted that paternal authority which nature has established； and the laws themselves have improved。 This still supposes that there is no honour among the Chinese。 Amongst us； parents whose children are condemned by the laws of their country； and children＇63＇ whose parents have undergone the like fate； are as severely punished by shame； as they would be in China by the loss of their lives。
21。 Of the Clemency of the Prince。 Clemency is the characteristic of monarchs。 In republics； whose principle is virtue； it is not so necessary。 In despotic governments； where fear predominates； it is less customary； because the great men are to be restrained by examples of severity。 It is more necessary in monarchies； where they are governed by honour； which frequently requires what the very law forbids。 Disgrace is here equivalent to chastisement； and even the forms of justice are punishments。 This is because particular kinds of penalty are formed by shame； which on every side invades the delinquent。
The great men in monarchies are so heavily punished by disgrace； by the loss （though often imaginary） of their fortune； credit； acquaintances； and pleasures； that rigour in respect to them is needless。 It can tend only to divest the subject of the affection he has for the person of his prince； and of the respect he ought to have for public posts and employments。
As the instability of the great is natural to a despotic government； so their security is interwoven with the nature of monarchy。
So many are the advantages which monarchs gain by clemency； so greatly does it raise their fame； and endear them to their subjects； that it is generally happy for them to have an opportunity of displaying it； which in this part of the world is seldom wanting。
Some branch； perhaps； of their authority； but never hardly the whole； will be disputed； and if they sometimes fight for their crown； they do not fight for their life。
But some may ask when it is proper to punish； and when to pardon。 This is a point more easily felt that prescribed。 When there is danger in the exercise of clemency； it is visible； nothing so easy as to distinguish it from that imbecility which exposes princes to contempt and to the very incapacity of punishing。
The Emperor Maurice made a resolution never to spill the blood of his subjects。 Anastasius＇64＇ punished no crimes at all。 Isaac Angelus took an oath that no one should be put to death during his reign。 Those Greek emperors forgot that it was not for nothing they were entrusted with the sword。
______
1。 In Mazulipatam it could never be found out that there was such a thing as a written law。 See the Collection of Voyages that Contributed to the Establishment of the East India Company； iv。； part I； p。 391。 The Indians are regulated in their decisions by certain customs。 The Vedan and such books do not contain civil laws； but religious precepts。 See Edifying Letters； coll。 xiv。
2。 C？sar； Cromwell； and many others。
3。 Non liquet。
4。 Quas actiones ne populus prout vellet institueret； certas solemnesque esse voluerunt Dig。 de Orig。 Jur。； ii； § 6。
5。 In France a person； though sued for more than he owes； loses his costs if he has not offered to pay the exact debt。
6。 Discourse on the first decade of Livy； i。 7。
7。 This is well explained in Cicero's oration Pro C？cina； towards the end； 100。
8。 This was the law at Athens； as appears by Demosthenes。 Socrates refused to make use of it。
9。 Demosthenes； Pro Corona； p。 494； Frankfort； 1604。
10。 See Philostratus； Lives of the Sophists； i。 Life of ？schines。
11。 Plato does not think it right that kings； who； as he says； are priests； should preside at trials where people are condemned to death； to exile； or to imprisonment。
12。 See the account of the trial of the Duke de la Valette。 It is printed in the Memoirs of Montresor； ii； p。 62。
13。 It was afterwards revoked。 See the same account； ii。 p。 236。 It was ordinarily a right of the peerage that a peer criminally accused should be judged by the king； as Francis II in the trial of the Prince of Condé； and Charles VII in the case of the Duc d'Alen？on。 To…day； the presence of the king at the trial of a peer； in order to condemn him would seem an act of tyranny。 Voltaire。
14。 Annals； xi。 5。
15。 Ibid。； xiii。 4。
16。 Histories； v。
17。 The same disorder happened under Theodosius the younger。
18。 Secret History。
19。 See Leg。 2； § 24； Dig。 ff。 de orig。 jur。
20。 Quod pater puellce abesset； locum injuria esse ratus。 Livy； dec。 I； iii。 44。
21。 And in a great many other cities。
22。 See in Tacitus the rewards given to those informers。 Annals； i。 30。
23。 Book ix。
24。 I shall show hereafter that China is； in this respect； in the same case as a republic or a monarchy。
25。 Suppose； for instance； to prevent the execution of a decree； the common people paid a fine of forty sous； and the nobility of sixty livres。 Somme Rurale； ii； p。 198； ed。 Goth。 1512； and Beaumanoir； 61； p。 309。
26。 See the Council of Peter Defontaines； 13； especially art。 22。
27。 It was made by Valerius Publicola soon after the expulsion of the kings； and was twice renewed； both times by magistrates of the same family。 As Livy observes； x； 9； the question was not to give it a greater force； but to render its injunctions more perfect。 〃Diligentius sanctum；〃 says Livy； ibid。
28。 Lex Porcia pro tergo civium lata。 It was made in the 454th year of the foundation of Rome。
29。 Nihil ultra quam improbe factum adjecet Livy； loc。 cit。
30。 They slit his nose or cut off his ears。
31。 Xenophon； Hist。； iii。 8； §§ 20…22。
32。 Of Those Who Are Intrusted with the Direction of the State Affairs； 14。
33。 See Kempfer。
34。 Collection of Voyages that Contributed to the Establishment of the East India Company； iii； part I； p。 428。
35。 Let this be observed as a maxim in practice； with regard to cases where the minds of people have been depraved by too great a severity of punishments。
36。 Collection of Voyages that Contributed to the Establishment of the East India Company； v； p。 2。
37。 Ibid。
38。 The guilty were condemned to a fine； they could not be admitted into the rank of senators； nor nominated to any public office。 Dio； xxxvi。 21。
39。 Ibid。
40。 Book i。 28。
41。 We find there the punishment of fire； and generally capital punishments； theft punished with death； &c。
42。 Sulla； animated with the same spirit as the decemvirs； followed their example in augmenting the penal laws against satirical writers。
43。 Book i； 28。
44。 Poenas facinorum auxit； cum locupletes eo facilius scelere se obligarent； quod integris patrimoniis exularent。 Suetonius in Life of Julius C？sar； 162。
45。 See the Leg。 3； § legis； ad leg。 Cornel； de sicariis； and a vast number of others in the Digest and in the Codex。
46。 Sublimiores。
47。 Medios。
48。 Infirnos。 Leg。 3； § legis； ad leg。 Cornel； de sicariis。
49。 Jul。 Cap。； Maximini duo； 8。
50。 Chapter 17。
51。 Hist。 of Nicephorus； patriarch of Constantinople。
52。 In Nicephorus' History。
53。 Father Du Halde； i； p。 6。
54。 Present State of Russia； Perry。
55。 The English
