the spirit of laws-第31章
按键盘上方向键 ← 或 → 可快速上下翻页，按键盘上的 Enter 键可回到本书目录页，按键盘上方向键 ↑ 可回到本页顶部！
————未阅读完？加入书签已便下次继续阅读！
side； and I think that punishments are connected with the nature of governments when I behold this great people changing in this respect their civil laws； in proportion as they altered their form of government。
The regal laws； made for fugitives； slaves； and vagabonds； were very severe。 The spirit of a republic would have required that the decemvirs should not have inserted those laws in their Twelve Tables； but men who aimed at tyranny were far from conforming to a republican spirit。
Livy says；＇40＇ in relation to the punishment of Metius Suffetius； dictator of Alba； who was condemned by Tullius Hostilius to be fastened to two chariots drawn by horses； and torn asunder； that this was the first and last punishment in which the remembrance of humanity seemed to have been lost。 He is mistaken； the Twelve Tables are full of very cruel laws。＇41＇
The design of the decemvirs appears more conspicuous in the capital punishment pronounced against libellers and poets。 This is not agreeable to the genius of a republic； where the people like to see the great men humbled。 But persons who aimed at the subversion of liberty were afraid of writings that might revive its spirit。＇42＇
After the expulsion of the decemvirs； almost all the penal laws were abolished。 It is true they were not expressly repealed； but as the Porcian law had ordained that no citizen of Rome should be put to death； they were of no further use。
This is exactly the time to which we may refer what Livy says＇43＇ of the Romans； that no people were ever fonder of moderation in punishments。
But if to the lenity of penal laws we add the right which the party accused had of withdrawing before judgment was pronounced； we shall find that the Romans followed the spirit which I have observed to be natural to a republic。
Sulla； who confounded tyranny； anarchy； and liberty； made the Cornelian laws。 He seemed to have contrived regulations merely with a view to create new crimes。 Thus distinguishing an infinite number of actions by the name of murder； he found murderers in all parts； and by a practice too much followed； he laid snares； sowed thorns； and opened precipices； wheresoever the citizens set their feet。
Almost all Sulla's laws contained only the interdiction of fire and water。 To this C？sar added the confiscation of goods＇44＇ because the rich； by preserving their estates in exile； became bolder in the perpetration of crimes。
The emperors； having established a military government； soon found that it was as terrible to the prince as to the subject； they endeavoured therefore to temper it； and with this view had recourse to dignities； and to the respect with which those dignities were attended。
The government thus drew nearer a little to monarchy； and punishments were divided into three classes：＇45＇ those which related to the principal persons in the state；＇46＇ which were very mild： those which were inflicted on persons of an inferior rank；＇47＇ and were more severe； and； in fine； such as concerned only persons of the lowest condition；＇48＇ which were the most rigorous。
Maximinus； that fierce and stupid prince； increased the rigour of the military government which he ought to have softened。 The senate were informed； says Capitolinus；＇49＇ that some had been crucified； others exposed to wild beasts； or sewn up in the skins of beasts lately killed； without any manner of regard to their dignity。 It seemed as if he wanted to exercise the military discipline； on the model of which he pretended to regulate the civil administration。
In The Consideration on the Rise and Declension of the Roman Grandeur＇50＇ we find in what manner Constantine changed the military despotism into a military and civil government； and drew nearer to monarchy。 There we may trace the different revolutions of this state； and see how they fell from rigour to indolence； and from indolence to impunity。
16。 Of the just Proportion between Punishments and Crimes。 It is an essential point； that there should be a certain proportion in punishments； because it is essential that a great crime should be avoided rather than a smaller； and that which is more pernicious to society rather than that which is less。
〃An impostor；＇51＇ who called himself Constantine Ducas； raised a great insurrection at Constantinople。 He was taken and condemned to be whipped； but upon informing against several persons of distinction； he was sentenced to be burned as a calumniator。〃 It is very extraordinary that they should thus proportion the punishments between the crime of high treason and that of calumny。
This puts me in mind of a saying of Charles II； King of Great Britain。 He saw a man one day standing in the pillory； upon which he asked what crime the man had committed。 He was answered； 〃Please your Majesty； he has written a libel against your ministers。〃 〃The fool！〃 said the King； 〃why did he not write against me？ They would have done nothing to him。〃
〃Seventy persons having conspired against the Emperor Basil； he ordered them to be whipped； and the hair of their heads and beards to be burned。 A stag； one day； having taken hold of him by the girdle with his horn； one of his retinue drew his sword； cut the girdle； and saved him； upon which he ordered that person's head to be cut off； for having；〃 said he； 〃drawn his sword against his sovereign。〃＇52＇ Who could imagine that the same prince could ever have passed two such different judgments？
It is a great abuse amongst us to condemn to the same punishment a person that only robs on the highway and another who robs and murders。 Surely； for the public security； some difference should be made in the punishment。
In China； those who add murder to robbery are cut in pieces：＇53＇ but not so the others； to this difference it is owing that though they rob in that country they never murder。
In Russia； where the punishment of robbery and murder is the same； they always murder。＇54＇ The dead； say they； tell no tales。
Where there is no difference in the penalty； there should be some in the expectation of pardon。 In England they never murder on the highway； because robbers have some hopes of transportation； which is not the case in respect to those that commit murder。
Letters of grace are of excellent use in moderate governments。 This power which the prince has of pardoning； exercised with prudence； is capable of producing admirable effects。 The principle of despotic government； which neither grants nor receives any pardon； deprives it of these advantages。
17。 Of the Rack。 The wickedness of mankind makes it necessary for the law to suppose them better than they really are。 Hence the deposition of two witnesses is sufficient in the punishment of all crimes。 The law believes them； as if they spoke by the mouth of truth。 Thus we judge that every child conceived in wedlock is legitimate； the law having a confidence in the mother； as if she were chastity itself。 But the use of the rack against criminals cannot be defended on a like plea of necessity。
We have before us the example of a nation blessed with an excellent civil government；＇55＇ where without any inconvenience the practice of racking criminals is rejected。 It is not； therefore； in its own nature necessary。＇56＇
So many men of learning and genius have written against the custom of torturing criminals； that after them I dare not presume to meddle with the subject。 I was going to say that it might suit despotic states； where whatever inspires fear is the fittest spring of government。 I was going to say that the slaves among the Greeks and Romans but nature cries out aloud； and asserts her rights。
18。 Of pecuniary and corporal Punishments。 Our ancestors； the Germans； admitted of none but pecuniary punishments。 Those free and warlike people were of opinion that their blood ought not to be spilled but with sword in hand。 On the contrary； these punishments are rejected by the Japanese；＇57＇ under pretence that the rich might elude them。 But are not the rich afraid of being stripped of their property？ And might not pecuniary penalties be proportioned to people's fortunes？ And； in fine； might not infamy be added to those punishments？
A good legislator takes a just medium； he ordains neither always pecu
