curious republic of gondour-第4章
按键盘上方向键 ← 或 → 可快速上下翻页,按键盘上的 Enter 键可回到本书目录页,按键盘上方向键 ↑ 可回到本页顶部!
————未阅读完?加入书签已便下次继续阅读!
contribution Brooklyn could furnish。 And what would eternal happiness be
without the Doctor? Blissful; unquestionablywe know that well enough
but would it be 'distingue;' would it be 'recherche' without him? St。
Matthew without stockings or sandals; St。 Jerome bare headed; and with a
coarse brown blanket robe dragging the ground; St。 Sebastian with
scarcely any raiment at allthese we should see; and should enjoy seeing
them; but would we not miss a spike…tailed coat and kids; and turn away
regretfully; and say to parties from the Orient: 〃These are well enough;
but you ought to see Talmage of Brooklyn。〃 I fear me that in the better
world we shall not even have Dr。 Talmage's 〃good Christian friend。〃
For if he were sitting under the glory of the Throne; and the keeper of
the keys admitted a Benjamin Franklin or other labouring man; that
〃friend;〃 with his fine natural powers infinitely augmented by
emancipation from hampering flesh; would detect him with a single sniff;
and immediately take his hat and ask to be excused。
To all outward seeming; the Rev。 T。 De Witt Talmage is of the same
material as that used in the construction of his early predecessors in
the ministry; and yet one feels that there must be a difference somewhere
between him and the Saviour's first disciples。 It may be because here;
in the nineteenth century; Dr。 T。 has had advantages which Paul and
Peter and the others could not and did not have。 There was a lack of
polish about them; and a looseness of etiquette; and a want of
exclusiveness; which one cannot help noticing。 They healed the very
beggars; and held intercourse with people of a villainous odour every
day。 If the subject of these remarks had been chosen among the original
Twelve Apostles; he would not have associated with the rest; because he
could not have stood the fishy smell of some of his comrades who came
from around the Sea of Galilee。 He would have resigned his commission
with some such remark as he makes in the extract quoted above: 〃Master;
if thou art going to kill the church thus with bad smells; I will have
nothing to do with this work of evangelization。〃 He is a disciple; and
makes that remark to the Master; the only difference is; that he makes it
in the nineteenth instead of the first century。
Is there a choir in Mr。 T。's church? And does it ever occur that they
have no better manners than to sing that hymn which is so suggestive of
labourers and mechanics:
〃Son of the Carpenter! receive
This humble work of mine?〃
Now; can it be possible that in a handful of centuries the Christian
character has fallen away from an imposing heroism that scorned even the
stake; the cross; and the axe; to a poor little effeminacy that withers
and wilts under an unsavoury smell? We are not prepared to believe so;
the reverend Doctor and his friend to the contrary notwithstanding。
A COUPLE OF SAD EXPERIENCES
When I published a squib recently in which I said I was going to edit an
Agricultural Department in this magazine; I certainly did not desire to
deceive anybody。 I had not the remotest desire to play upon any one's
confidence with a practical joke; for he is a pitiful creature indeed who
will degrade the dignity of his humanity to the contriving of the witless
inventions that go by that name。 I purposely wrote the thing as absurdly
and as extravagantly as it could be written; in order to be sure and not
mislead hurried or heedless readers: for I spoke of launching a triumphal
barge upon a desert; and planting a tree of prosperity in a minea tree
whose fragrance should slake the thirst of the naked; and whose branches
should spread abroad till they washed the chorea of; etc。; etc。 I
thought that manifest lunacy like that would protect the reader。 But to
make assurance absolute; and show that I did not and could not seriously
mean to attempt an Agricultural Department; I stated distinctly in my
postscript that I did not know anything about Agriculture。 But alas!
right there is where I made my worst mistakefor that remark seems to
have recommended my proposed Agriculture more than anything else。 It
lets a little light in on me; and I fancy I perceive that the farmers
feel a little bored; sometimes; by the oracular profundity of
agricultural editors who 〃know it all。〃 In fact; one of my
correspondents suggests this (for that unhappy squib has deluged me with
letters about potatoes; and cabbages; and hominy; and vermicelli; and
maccaroni; and all the other fruits; cereals; and vegetables that ever
grew on earth; and if I get done answering questions about the best way
of raising these things before I go raving crazy; I shall be thankful;
and shall never write obscurely for fun any more)。
Shall I tell the real reason why I have unintentionally succeeded in
fooling so many people? It is because some of them only read a little of
the squib I wrote and jumped to the conclusion that it was serious; and
the rest did not read it at all; but heard of my agricultural venture at
second…hand。 Those cases I could not guard against; of course。 To write
a burlesque so wild that its pretended facts will not be accepted in
perfect good faith by somebody; is; very nearly an impossible thing to
do。 It is because; in some instances; the reader is a person who never
tries to deceive anybody himself; and therefore is not expecting any one
to wantonly practise a deception upon him; and in this case the only
person dishonoured is the man who wrote the burlesque。 In other
instances the 〃nub〃 or moral of the burlesqueif its object be to
enforce a truthescapes notice in the superior glare of something in the
body of the burlesque itself。 And very often this 〃moral〃 is tagged on
at the bottom; and the reader; not knowing that it is the key of the
whole thing and the only important paragraph in the article; tranquilly
turns up his nose at it and leaves it unread。 One can deliver a satire
with telling force through the insidious medium of a travesty; if he is
careful not to overwhelm the satire with the extraneous interest of the
travesty; and so bury it from the reader's sight and leave him a joked
and defrauded victim; when the honest intent was to add to either his
knowledge or his wisdom。 I have had a deal of experience in burlesques
and their unfortunate aptness to deceive the public; and this is why I
tried hard to make that agricultural one so broad and so perfectly
palpable that even a one…eyed potato could see it; and yet; as I speak
the solemn truth; it fooled one of the ablest agricultural editors in
America!
DAN MURPHY
One of the saddest things that ever came under my notice (said the
banker's clerk) was there in Corning; during the war。 Dan Murphy
enlisted as a private; and fought very bravely。 The boys all liked him;
and when a wound by and by weakened him down till carrying a musket was
too heavy work for him; they clubbed together and fixed him up as a
sutler。 He made money then; and sent it always to his wife to bank for
him。 She was a washer and ironer; and knew enough by hard experience to
keep money when she got it。 She didn't waste a penny。 On the contrary;
she began to get miserly as her bank account grew。 She grieved to part
with a cent; poor creature; for twice in her hard…working life she had
known what it was to be hungry; cold; friendless; sick; and without a
dollar in the world; and she had a haunting dread of suffering so again。
Well; at last Dan died; and the boys; in testimony of their esteem and
respect for him; telegraphed to Mrs。 Murphy to know if she would like to
have him embalmed and sent home; when you know the usual custom was to
dump a poor devil like him into a shallow hole; and then inform his
friends what had become of him。 Mrs。 Murphy jumped to the conclusion
that it would only cost two or three dollars to embalm her dead husband;
and so she telegraphed 〃Yes。〃 It was at the 〃wake〃 that the bill for
embalming arrived and was presented to the widow。 She uttered a wild;
sad wail; that pierced every heart; and said: 〃Sivinty…foive dollars for
stoofhn' Dan; blister their sowls! Did thim d