fundamental principles of the metaphysic of morals-第3章
按键盘上方向键 ← 或 → 可快速上下翻页,按键盘上的 Enter 键可回到本书目录页,按键盘上方向键 ↑ 可回到本页顶部!
————未阅读完?加入书签已便下次继续阅读!
be brought about by it in favour of any inclination; nay even of the
sum total of all inclinations。 Even if it should happen that; owing to
special disfavour of fortune; or the niggardly provision of a
step…motherly nature; this will should wholly lack power to accomplish
its purpose; if with its greatest efforts it should yet achieve
nothing; and there should remain only the good will (not; to be
sure; a mere wish; but the summoning of all means in our power); then;
like a jewel; it would still shine by its own light; as a thing
which has its whole value in itself。 Its usefulness or fruitfulness
can neither add nor take away anything from this value。 It would be;
as it were; only the setting to enable us to handle it the more
conveniently in common commerce; or to attract to it the attention
of those who are not yet connoisseurs; but not to recommend it to true
connoisseurs; or to determine its value。
There is; however; something so strange in this idea of the absolute
value of the mere will; in which no account is taken of its utility;
that notwithstanding the thorough assent of even common reason to
the idea; yet a suspicion must arise that it may perhaps really be the
product of mere high…flown fancy; and that we may have misunderstood
the purpose of nature in assigning reason as the governor of our will。
Therefore we will examine this idea from this point of view。
In the physical constitution of an organized being; that is; a being
adapted suitably to the purposes of life; we assume it as a
fundamental principle that no organ for any purpose will be found
but what is also the fittest and best adapted for that purpose。 Now in
a being which has reason and a will; if the proper object of nature
were its conservation; its welfare; in a word; its happiness; then
nature would have hit upon a very bad arrangement in selecting the
reason of the creature to carry out this purpose。 For all the
actions which the creature has to perform with a view to this purpose;
and the whole rule of its conduct; would be far more surely prescribed
to it by instinct; and that end would have been attained thereby
much more certainly than it ever can be by reason。 Should reason
have been communicated to this favoured creature over and above; it
must only have served it to contemplate the happy constitution of
its nature; to admire it; to congratulate itself thereon; and to
feel thankful for it to the beneficent cause; but not that it should
subject its desires to that weak and delusive guidance and meddle
bunglingly with the purpose of nature。 In a word; nature would have
taken care that reason should not break forth into practical exercise;
nor have the presumption; with its weak insight; to think out for
itself the plan of happiness; and of the means of attaining it。 Nature
would not only have taken on herself the choice of the ends; but
also of the means; and with wise foresight would have entrusted both
to instinct。
And; in fact; we find that the more a cultivated reason applies
itself with deliberate purpose to the enjoyment of life and happiness;
so much the more does the man fail of true satisfaction。 And from this
circumstance there arises in many; if they are candid enough to
confess it; a certain degree of misology; that is; hatred of reason;
especially in the case of those who are most experienced in the use of
it; because after calculating all the advantages they derive; I do not
say from the invention of all the arts of common luxury; but even from
the sciences (which seem to them to be after all only a luxury of
the understanding); they find that they have; in fact; only brought
more trouble on their shoulders。 rather than gained in happiness;
and they end by envying; rather than despising; the more common
stamp of men who keep closer to the guidance of mere instinct and do
not allow their reason much influence on their conduct。 And this we
must admit; that the judgement of those who would very much lower
the lofty eulogies of the advantages which reason gives us in regard
to the happiness and satisfaction of life; or who would even reduce
them below zero; is by no means morose or ungrateful to the goodness
with which the world is governed; but that there lies at the root of
these judgements the idea that our existence has a different and far
nobler end; for which; and not for happiness; reason is properly
intended; and which must; therefore; be regarded as the supreme
condition to which the private ends of man must; for the most part; be
postponed。
For as reason is not competent to guide the will with certainty in
regard to its objects and the satisfaction of all our wants (which
it to some extent even multiplies); this being an end to which an
implanted instinct would have led with much greater certainty; and
since; nevertheless; reason is imparted to us as a practical
faculty; i。e。; as one which is to have influence on the will;
therefore; admitting that nature generally in the distribution of
her capacities has adapted the means to the end; its true
destination must be to produce a will; not merely good as a means to
something else; but good in itself; for which reason was absolutely
necessary。 This will then; though not indeed the sole and complete
good; must be the supreme good and the condition of every other;
even of the desire of happiness。 Under these circumstances; there is
nothing inconsistent with the wisdom of nature in the fact that the
cultivation of the reason; which is requisite for the first and
unconditional purpose; does in many ways interfere; at least in this
life; with the attainment of the second; which is always
conditional; namely; happiness。 Nay; it may even reduce it to nothing;
without nature thereby failing of her purpose。 For reason recognizes
the establishment of a good will as its highest practical destination;
and in attaining this purpose is capable only of a satisfaction of its
own proper kind; namely that from the attainment of an end; which
end again is determined by reason only; notwithstanding that this
may involve many a disappointment to the ends of inclination。
We have then to develop the notion of a will which deserves to be
highly esteemed for itself and is good without a view to anything
further; a notion which exists already in the sound natural
understanding; requiring rather to be cleared up than to be taught;
and which in estimating the value of our actions always takes the
first place and constitutes the condition of all the rest。 In order to
do this; we will take the notion of duty; which includes that of a
good will; although implying certain subjective restrictions and
hindrances。 These; however; far from concealing it; or rendering it
unrecognizable; rather bring it out by contrast and make it shine
forth so much the brighter。
I omit here all actions which are already recognized as inconsistent
with duty; although they may be useful for this or that purpose; for
with these the question whether they are done from duty cannot arise
at all; since they even conflict with it。 I also set aside those
actions which really conform to duty; but to which men have no
direct inclination; performing them because they are impelled
thereto by some other inclination。 For in this case we can readily
distinguish whether the action which agrees with duty is done from
duty; or from a selfish view。 It is much harder to make this
distinction when the action accords with duty and the subject has
besides a direct inclination to it。 For example; it is always a matter
of duty that a dealer should not over charge an inexperienced
purchaser; and wherever there is much commerce the prudent tradesman
does not overcharge; but keeps a fixed price for everyone; so that a
child buys of him as well as any other。 Men are thus honestly
served; but this is not enough to make us believe that the tradesman
has so acted from duty and from principles of honesty: h