some considerations of the lowering of interest-第16章
按键盘上方向键 ← 或 → 可快速上下翻页,按键盘上的 Enter 键可回到本书目录页,按键盘上方向键 ↑ 可回到本页顶部!
————未阅读完?加入书签已便下次继续阅读!
greatest part of it; But is the Land Excus'd or Eas'd by it? By no means; but on the contrary so loaded; that in many places half; in others a quarter; in others one eighth of the Yearly value does not come into the owners Pocket: And if I have not been misinformed; the Land in some places will not pay the Taxes: So that we may say; that the Charge of the Government came not upon Commodities till the Land could not bear it。 The burthen unavoidably settles upon the Land first; and when it has pressed it so; that it can yield no more; Trade must be brought in in aid to help to support the Government rather than let all sink: But the first stress is always upon Land; and as far as that will reach; it is unavoidably carried; lay your Taxes how you will。 'Tis known what a share of the publick charges of the Government is supported by the Trade of Amsterdam alone; as I remember that one Town pays Thirty…six in the Hundred of all the publick Taxes raised in the United Provinces。 But are the Lands of Guelderland eas'd by it? Let any one see in that Country of Land more than Trade; what they make clear of their Revenues; and whether the Country Gentlemen there grow rich on their Land; whilst the Merchant having the Taxes laid on his Commerce is impoverish'd? On the contrary Guelderland is so low and out of Cash; that Amsterdam has been fain for many Years to lay down the Taxes for them; which is; in effect; to pay the Taxes of Guelderland too。 Struggle and contrive as you will; lay your Taxes as you please; the Traders will shift it off from their own Gain; the Merchants will bear the least part of it; and grow poor last。 In Holland it self; where Trade is so loaded; who; I pray; grows richest; the Land…holder or the Trader? Which of them is pinch'd; and wants Money most? A Country may thrive; the Country Gentleman grow rich; and his Rents encrease (for so it has been here) whilst the Land is Taxed: But I challenge any one to shew me a Country; wherein there is any considerable publick Charge raised; where the Land does not most sensibly feel it; and in proportion bear much the greater part of it。 We must not therefore impute the falling of the Rents; or of the price of Land; to high Interest; Nor; if ill Husbandry has wasted our Riches; hope by such kind of Laws to raise them to their former value。 I humbly conceive we shall in vain endeavour it by the fall of Interest: The number of Buyers must be increased; and Sellers lessen'd; which must be done by other ways; than regulating of Interest; or else the Landed…man will neither find Chapmen for his Land; nor for the Corn that grows on it; at the rate he desires。 But could an Act of Parliament; bring down Interest to Four per Cent。 and the lowering of that immediately raise the Purchasers Fine from 20 to 25 Years Purchase; yet it may be doubted; whether this be fit to be made into a Law; because it would be of no advantage to the Kingdom。 For what profit would it be to the Nation to make a Law; that he who sells Land should instead of Four have Five hundred pounds of the Purchaser? This indeed a little alters the distribution of the Money; we have amongst us Englishmen here at home; but neither helps to continue what we have; nor brings in more from abroad: Which being the only concernment of the Kingdom; in reference to its Wealth; is apt to be supposed by us without doors to be the only care of a Parliament。 For it matters not; so it be here amongst us; whether the Money be in Thomas or Richards Hands; provided it be so order'd; that; whoever has it; may be encouraged to let it go into the current of Trade; for the improvement of the general stock; and wealth of the Nation。 As this increase of the Fine in the purchase of Land is not an advantage to the kingdom; so neither is it to the Landholder; who is the person; that bearing the greatest part of the burthens of the Kingdom; ought; I think; to have the greatest care taken of him; and enjoy as many Privileges; and as much Wealth; as the favour of the Law can (with regard to the Publick…weal) confer upon him。 But pray consider: The raising the Price of Land in Sale by increasing the number of Years Purchase to be paid for it; gives the advantage not to the Landholder; but to him that ceases to be so。 He that has no longer the Land has the more Money; and he who has the Land is the poorer。 The true advantage of the Landholder is; that his Corn; Flesh; and Wool; sell better; and yield a greater price; this indeed is a profit; that benefits the owner of the Land; and goes along with it: It is this alone raises the Rent; and makes the Possessor richer: and this can only be done by increasing our Wealth; and drawing more Money into England; which the falling of Interest; and thereby (if it could effect it) raising the Purchase of Land is so far from doing; that it does visibly and directly one way hinder our increase of Wealth; that is; by hindring Foreigners to come here; and buy Land; and settle amongst us。 Whereby we have this double loss; First we lose their Persons; increase of People being the increase both of Strength and Riches。 Secondly we lose so much Money。 For tho' whatever an Englishman gives to another for Land; though raised to Forty Years Purchase; be not one Farthing advantage to the kingdom; yet whatever a Foreigner; who purchases Land here; gives for it; is so much every Farthing clear gain to the Nation: For that Money comes clear in; without carrying out any thing for it; and is every Farthing of it as perfect Gain to the Nation as if it drop'd down from the Clouds。 But farther; if consideration be to be had only of Sellers of Land; the lowering of Interest to Four per Cent。 will not be in their favour; unless; by it; you can raise Land to Thirty Years Purchase; which is not at all likely: And I think no Body by falling of Interest to Four per Cent。 hopes to get Chapmen for their Land at that Rate。 Whatsoever they have less; if Law can regulate Interest; they lose of their value of Land; Money being thus abased。 So that the Landed man will scarce find his account neither by this Law; when it comes to trial。 And at last; I imagine; this will be the result of all such Attempts; that Experience will shew; that the price of Things will not be regulated by Laws; though the endeavours after it will be sure to prejudice and inconvenience Trade; and put your Affairs out of Order。 If this be so; that Interest cannot be regulated by Law; or that if it could; yet the reducing of it to Four per Cent。 would do more harm than good: What then should there (will you say) be no Law at all to regulate Interest? I say not so。 For; 1。 It is necessary that there should be a stated Rate of Interest; that in Debts and Forbearances; where Contract has not setled it between the Parties; the Law might give a Rule; and Courts of Judicature might know what Damages to allow。 This may; and therefore should; be Regulated。 2。 That in the present current of running Cash; which now takes its course almost all to London; and is Ingrossed by a very few Hands in Comparison; young Men; and those in Want; might not too easily be exposed to Extortion and Oppression; and the dextrous and combining Money Jobbers not have too great and unbounded a Power; to Prey upon the Ignorance or Necessity of Borrowers。 There would not be much danger of this; if Money were more equally distributed into the several quarters of England; and into a greater number of Hands; according to the Exigences of Trade。 If Money were to be hired; as Land is; or to be had as Corn; or Wool; from the Owner himself; and known good security be given for it; it might then probably be had at the Market (which is the true) Rate; and that rate of Interest would be a constant gauge of your Trade and Wealth。 But when a kind of Monopoly; by consent; has put this general Commodity into a few Hands; it may need Regulation; though what the stated Rate of Interest should be in the constant change of Affairs; and flux of Money; is hard to determine。 Possibly it may be allowed as a reasonable Proposal; that it should be within such Bounds; as should not on the one side quite Eat up the Merchants; and Tradesman's Profit; and discourage their Industry; nor on the other hand so