lect06-第5章
按键盘上方向键 ← 或 → 可快速上下翻页,按键盘上的 Enter 键可回到本书目录页,按键盘上方向键 ↑ 可回到本页顶部!
————未阅读完?加入书签已便下次继续阅读!
the King of the Romans' (S。 M。; ii。 225)。 The commentary goes on
to say that sometimes' it is by the successor of Patrick that the
stock is given to the King of Erin; 'and this remarkable passage
seems to show that an Irish writer spoke of the successor of St
Patrick; where a writer of the same approximate period in England
or on the European Continent would assuredly have spoken of the
Pope。
I hope it is unnecessary for me to insist on the interest
which attaches to this part of the Brehon law; it has been not
uncommon; upon the evidence furnished by the usages of the
Scottish Highlanders; sharply to contrast Celtic tribal customs
with feudal rules; and doubtless between these customs and
feudalism in its perfected state there are differences of the
greatest importance。 Yet; if the testimony of the Brehon tracts
may be trusted; such differences arose; not from essential
distinctions; but; in some measure at all events; from
distinctions of degree in comparative social development。 The
germs of feudalism lay deep in the more ancient social forms; and
were ready to assert their vitality even in a country like
Ireland; which; after it was once Christianised; can have
borrowed next to no institutions from its neighbours; cut off as
it was from the Continent by distance; and from England by
stubborn national repulsion。 It is also worthy of observation
that this natural growth of feudalism was not; as some eminent
recent writers have supposed; entirely distinct from the process
by which the authority of the Chief or Lord over the Tribe or
Village was extended; but rather formed part of it。 While the
unappropriated waste…lands were falling into his domain; the
villagers or tribesmen were coming through natural agencies under
his personal power。
The Irish practice of 'giving stock' seems to me also to
connect itself with another set of phenomena which have generally
been thought to belong to a very different stage of history。 We
obtain from the law…tracts a picture of an aristocracy of wealth
in its most primitive form; and we see that the possession of
this wealth gave the nobles an immense power over the non…noble
freemen who had nothing but their land。 Caesar seems to me to be
clearly referring to the same state of relations in the Celtic
sister society; when he speaks of the Gaulish chiefs; the
Equites; having one principal source of their influence in the
number of their debtors。 (B。 G。; i。 4; B。 G。; vi。 13。) Now; you
will remember how uniformly; when our knowledge of the ancient
world commences; we find plebeian classes deeply indebted to
aristocratic orders。 At the beginning of Athenian history we find
the Athenian commonalty the bondslaves through debt of the
Eupatrids; at the beginning of Roman history we find the Roman
Commons in money bondage to the Patricians。 The fact has been
accounted for in many ways; and it has been plausibly suggested
that it was the occurrence of repeated bad seasons which placed
the small farmers of the Attic and Roman territory at the mercy
of wealthy nobles。 But the explanation is imperfect unless we
keep in mind the chief lesson of these Brehon tracts; and
recollect that the relative importance of Land and Capital has
been altering throughout history。 The general proposition that
Land is limited in quantity and is distinguished by this
limitation from all other commodities which are practically
capable of indefinite multiplication; has always of course been
abstractedly true; but; like many other principles of Political
Economy; its value depends on the circumstances to which it is
applied。 In very ancient times land was a drug; while capital was
extremely perishable; added to with the greatest difficulty; and
lodged in very few hands。 The proportionate importance of the two
requisites of cultivation changed very slowly; and it is only
quite recently that in some countries it has been well…nigh
reversed。 The ownership of the instruments of tillage other than
the land itself was thus; in early agricultural communities; a
power of the first order; and; as it may be believed that a stock
of the primitive capital larger than usual was very generally
obtained by plunder; we can understand that these stocks were
mostly in the hands of noble classes whose occupation was war;
and who at all events had a monopoly of the profits of office。
The advance of capital at usurious interest; and the helpless
degradation of the borrowers; were the natural results of such
economical conditions。 For the honour of the obscure and
forgotten Brehon writers of the Cain…Saerrath and the
Cain…Aigillne; let it not be forgotten that their undertaking was
essentially the same as that which went far to immortalise one
great Athenian legislator。 By their precise and detailed
statements of the proportion which is to be preserved between the
stock which the Chief supplies and the returns which the tenant
pays; they plainly intend to introduce certainty and equity into
a naturally oppressive system。 Solon; dealing with a state of
society in which coined money had probably not long taken the
place of something like the 'seds' of the Brehon law; had no
expedient open to him but the debasement of the currency and the
cancellation of debts; but he was attacking the same evil as the
Brehon lawyers; and equally interfering with that freedom of
contract which wears a very different aspect according to the
condition of the society in which it prevails。
The great part played in the Brehon law by Cattle as the
oldest form of Capital ought further to leave no doubt of the
original objects of the system of 'eric'…fines; or pecuniary
composition for violent crime。 As I said before; no Irish
institution was so strongly denounced by Englishmen as this; or
with so great a show of righteous indignation。 As members of a
wealthy community; long accustomed to a strong government; they
were revolted partly by its apparent inadequacy and partly the
unjust impunity which it seemed to give to the rich man and to
deny to the poor。 Although the English system of criminal
penalties which they sought to substitute for the Irish system of
compositions would nowadays be described by an ordinary writer in
pretty much as dark colours as those used by Spenser and Davis
for the Irish institution; it is very possible that in the
sixteenth century it would have been an advantage to Ireland to
have the English procedure and the English punishments。 There is
much evidence that the usefulness of 'eric'…fines had died out;
and that they unjustly profited the rich and powerful。 But that
only shows that the confusions of Ireland had kept alive beyond
its time an institution which in the beginning had been a great
step forwards from barbarism。 If the modern writers who have
spoken harshly of these pecuniary compositions had come upon a
set