the psychology of revolution-第7章
按键盘上方向键 ← 或 → 可快速上下翻页,按键盘上的 Enter 键可回到本书目录页,按键盘上方向键 ↑ 可回到本页顶部!
————未阅读完?加入书签已便下次继续阅读!
adopted; sanctified; and kept by His power through faith unto
salvation。 Neither are any other redeemed by Christ; effectually
called; justified; adopted; sanctified; and saved; but the elect
only。''
The psychology of Calvin is not without affinity with that of
Robespierre。 Like the latter; the master of the pure truth; he
sent to death those who would not accept his doctrines。 God; he
stated; wishes ‘‘that one should put aside all humanity when it
is a question of striving for his glory。''
The case of Calvin and his disciples shows that matters which
rationally are the most contradictory become perfectly reconciled
in minds which are hypnotised by a belief。 In the eyes of
rational logic; it seems impossible to base a morality upon the
theory of predestination; since whatever they do men are sure of
being either saved or damned。 However; Calvin had no difficulty
in erecting a most severe morality upon this totally illogical
basis。 Considering themselves the elect of God; his disciples
were so swollen by pride and the sense of their own dignity that
they felt obliged to serve as models in their conduct。
4。 Propagation of the Reformation。
The new faith was propagated not by speech; still less by process
of reasoning; but by the mechanism described in our preceding
work: that is; by the influence of affirmation; repetition;
mental contagion; and prestige。 At a much later date
revolutionary ideas were spread over France in the same fashion。
Persecution; as we have already remarked; only favoured this
propagation。 Each execution led to fresh conversions; as was
seen in the early years of the Christian Church。 Anne Dubourg;
Parliamentary councillor; condemned to be burned alive; marched
to the stake exhorting the crowd to be converted。 ‘‘His
constancy;'' says a witness; ‘‘made more Protestants among the
young men of the colleges than the books of Calvin。''
To prevent the condemned from speaking to the people their
tongues were cut out before they were burned。 The horror of
their sufferings was increased by attaching the victims to an
iron chain; which enabled the executioners to plunge them into
the fire and withdraw them several times in succession。
But nothing induced the Protestants to retract; even the offer of
an amnesty after they had felt the fire。
In 1535 Francis I。; forsaking his previous tolerance; ordered six
fires to be lighted simultaneously in Paris。 The Convention; as
we know; limited itself to a single guillotine in the same city。
It is probable that the sufferings of the victims were not very
excruciating; the insensibility of the Christian martyrs had
already been remarked。 Believers are hypnotised by their faith;
and we know to…day that certain forms of hypnotism engender
complete insensibility。
The new faith progressed rapidly。 In 1560 there were two
thousand reformed churches in France; and many great lords; at
first indifferent enough; adhered to the new doctrine。
5。 Conflict between different religious beliefsImpossibility
of Tolerance。
I have already stated that intolerance is always an accompaniment
of powerful religious beliefs。 Political and religious
revolutions furnish us with numerous proofs of this fact; and
show us also that the mutual intolerance of sectaries of the same
religion is always much greater than that of the defenders
of remote and alien faiths; such as Islamism and Christianity。
In fact; if we consider the faiths for whose sake France was so
long rent asunder; we shall find that they did not differ on any
but accessory points。 Catholics and Protestants adored exactly
the same God; and only differed in their manner of adoring Him。
If reason had played the smallest part in the elaboration of
their belief; it could easily have proved to them that it must be
quite indifferent to God whether He sees men adore Him in this
fashion or in that。
Reason being powerless to affect the brain of the convinced;
Protestants and Catholics continued their ferocious conflicts。
All the efforts of their sovereigns to reconcile them were in
vain。 Catherine de Medicis; seeing the party of the Reformed
Church increasing day by day in spite of persecution; and
attracting a considerable number of nobles and magistrates;
thought to disarm them by convoking at Poissy; in 1561; an
assembly of bishops and pastors with the object of fusing the two
doctrines。 Such an enterprise indicated that the queen; despite
her subtlety; knew nothing of the laws of mystic logic。 Not in
all history can one cite an example of a belief destroyed or
reduced by means of refutation。 Catherine did not even know that
although toleration is with difficulty possible between
individuals; it is impossible between collectivities。 Her
attempt failed completely。 The assembled theologians hurled
texts and insults at one another's heads; but no one was moved。
Catherine thought to succeed better in 1562 by promulgating an
edict according Protestants the right to unite in the public
celebration of their cult。
This tolerance; very admirable from a philosophical point of
view; but not at all wise from the political standpoint; had no
other result beyond exasperating both parties。 In the Midi;
where the Protestants were strongest; they persecuted the
Catholics; sought to convert them by violence; cut their throats
if they did not succeed; and sacked their cathedrals。 In the
regions where the Catholics were more numerous the Reformers
suffered like persecutions。
Such hostilities as these inevitably engendered civil war。 Thus
arose the so…called religious wars; which so long spilled the
blood of France。 The cities were ravaged; the inhabitants
massacred; and the struggle rapidly assumed that special quality
of ferocity peculiar to religious or political conflicts; which;
at a later date; was to reappear in the wars of La Vendee。
Old men; women; and children; all were exterminated。 A certain
Baron d'Oppede; first president of the Parliament of Aix; had
already set an example by killing 3;000 persons in the space of
ten days; with refinements of cruelty; and destroying three
cities and twenty…two villages。 Montluc; a worthy forerunner of
Carrier; had the Calvinists thrown living into the wells until
these were full。 The Protestants were no more humane。 They did
not spare even the Catholic churches; and treated the tombs and
statues just as the delegates of the Convention were to treat the
royal tombs of Saint Denis。
Under the influence of these conflicts France was progressively
disintegrated; and at the end of the reign of Henri III。 was
parcelled out into veritable little confederated municipal
republics; forming so many sovereign states。 The royal power was
vanishing。 The States of Blois claimed to dictate their wishes
to Henri III。; who had fled from his capital。 In 1577 the
traveller Lippomano; who traversed France; saw important cities
Orleans; Tours; Blois; Poitiersentirely devastated; the
cathedrals and churches in ruins; and the tombs shattered。 This
was almost the state of France at the end of the Directory。
Among the events of this epoch; that which has left the darkest
memory; although it was not perhaps the most murderous; was the
massacre of St。 Bartholomew in 1572; ordered; according to the
historians; by Catherine de Medicis and Charles IX。
One does not require a very profound knowledge of psychology to
realise that no sovereign could have ordered such an event。 St。
Bartholomew's Day was not a royal but a popular crime。 Catherine
de Medicis; believing her existence and that of the king
threatened by a plot directed by four or five Protestant leaders
then in Paris; sent men to kill them in their houses; according
to the summary fashion of the time。 The massacre which followed
is very well explained by M。 Battifol in the following