the psychology of revolution-第32章
按键盘上方向键 ← 或 → 可快速上下翻页,按键盘上的 Enter 键可回到本书目录页,按键盘上方向键 ↑ 可回到本页顶部!
————未阅读完?加入书签已便下次继续阅读!
thinkers like Kant imagined that they saw in it the triumph of
reason。 Foreigners like Humboldt came to France ‘‘to breathe the
air of liberty and to assist at the obsequies of despotism。''
These intellectual illusions did not last long。 The evolution of
the drama soon revealed the true foundations of the dream。
2。 Dissolution of the Ancien Regime。 The assembling of the
States General。
Before they are realised in action; revolutions are sketched out
in men's thoughts。 Prepared by the causes already studied; the
French Revolution commenced in reality with the reign of Louis
XVI。 More discontented and censorious every day; the middle
classes added claim to claim。 Everybody was calling for reform。
Louis XVI。 thoroughly understood the utility of reform; but he
was too weak to impose it on the clergy and the nobility。 He
could not even retain his reforming ministers; Malesherbes and
Turgot。 What with famines and increased taxation; the poverty of
all classes increased; and the huge pensions drawn by the Court
formed a shocking contrast to the general distress。
The notables convoked to attempt to remedy the financial
situation refused a system of equal taxation; and granted only
insignificant reforms which the Parliament did not even consent
to register。 It had to be dissolved。 The provincial Parliaments
made common cause with that of Paris; and were also dissolved。
But they led opinion; and in all parts of France promoted
the demand for a meeting of the States General; which had not
been convoked for nearly two hundred years。
The decision was taken: 5;000;000 Frenchmen; of whom 100;000
were ecclesiastics and 150;000 nobles; sent their
representatives。 There were in all 1;200 deputies; of whom 578
were of the Third Estate; consisting chiefly of magistrates;
advocates; and physicians。 Of the 300 deputies of the clergy;
200; of plebeian origin; threw in their lot with the Third Estate
against the nobility and clergy。
From the first sessions a psychological conflict broke out
between the deputies of different social conditions and
(therefore) different mentalities。 The magnificent costumes of
the privileged deputies contrasted in a humiliating fashion with
the sombre fashions of the Third Estate。
At the first session the members of the nobility and the clergy
were covered; according to the prerogatives of their class;
before the king。 Those of the Third Estate wished to imitate
them; but the privileged members protested。 On the following day
more protests of wounded self…love were heard。 The deputies of
the Third Estate invited those of the nobility and the clergy who
were sitting in separate halls to join them for the verification
of their powers。 The nobles refused。 The negotiations lasted
more than a month。 Finally; the deputies of the Third Estate; on
the proposition of the Abbe Sieyes; considering that
they represented 95 per cent。 of the nation; declared themselves
constituted as a National Assembly。 From that moment the
Revolution pursued its course。
3。 The Constituent Assembly。
The power of a political assembly resides; above all; in the
weakness of its adversaries。 Astonished by the slight resistance
encountered; and carried away by the ascendancy of a handful of
orators; the Constituent Assembly; from its earliest sessions;
spoke and acted as a sovereign body。 Notably it arrogated to
itself the power of decreeing imposts; a serious encroachment
upon the prerogatives of the royal power。
The resistance of Louis XVI。 was feeble enough。 He simply had
the hall in which the States assembled closed。 The deputies then
met in the hall of the tennis…court; and took the oath that they
would not separate until the Constitution of the kingdom was an
established fact。
The majority of the deputies of the clergy went with them。 The
king revoked the decision of the Assembly; and ordered the
deputies to retire。 The Marquis de Dreux…Breze; the Grand
Master of Ceremonies; having invited them to obey the order of
the sovereign; the President of the Assembly declared ‘‘that the
nation assembled cannot receive orders;'' and Mirabeau replied to
the envoy of the sovereign that; being united by the will of the
people; the Assembly would only withdraw at the point of the
bayonet。 Again the king gave way。
On the 9th of June the meeting of deputies took the title of the
Constituent Assembly。 For the first time in centuries the king
was forced to recognise the existence of a new power; formerly
ignoredthat of the people; represented by its elected
representatives。 The absolute monarchy was no more。
Feeling himself more and more seriously threatened; Louis XVI。
summoned to Versailles a number of regiments composed of foreign
mercenaries。 The Assembly demanded the withdrawal of the troops。
The king refused; and dismissed Necker; replacing him by the
Marshal de Broglie; reputed to be an extremely authoritative
person。
But the Assembly had able supporters。 Camille Desmoulins and
others harangued the crowd in all directions; calling it to the
defence of liberty。 They sounded the tocsin; organised a militia
of 12;000 men; took muskets and cannon from the Invalides; and on
the 14th of July the armed bands marched upon the Bastille。 The
fortress; barely defended; capitulated in a few hours。 Seven
prisoners were found within it; of whom one was an idiot and four
were accused of forgery。
The Bastille; the prison of many victims of arbitrary power;
symbolised the royal power to many minds; but the people who
demolished it had not suffered by it。 Scarcely any but members
of the nobility were imprisoned there。
The influence exercised by the taking of this fortress has
continued to our days。 Serious historians like M。 Rambaud assure
us that ‘‘the taking of the Bastille is a culminating fact in the
history; not of France only but of all Europe; and inaugurates a
new epoch in the history of the world。''
Such credulity is a little excessive。 The importance of the
event lay simply in the psychological fact that for the first
time the people received an obvious proof of the weakness of an
authority which had lately been formidable。
When the principle of authority is injured in the public mind it
dissolves very rapidly。 What might not one demand of a king who
could not defend his principal fortress against popular attacks?
The master regarded as all…powerful had ceased to be so。
The taking of the Bastille was the beginning of one of those
phenomena of mental contagion which abound in the history of the
Revolution。 The foreign mercenary troops; although they could
scarcely be interested in the movement; began to show symptoms of
mutiny。 Louis XVI。 was reduced to accepting their disbandment。
He recalled Necker; went to the Hotel de Ville; sanctioned by
his presence the accomplished facts; and accepted from La
Fayette; commandant of the National Guard; the new cockade of
red; white; and blue which allied the colours of Paris to those
of the king。
Although the riot which ended in the taking of the Bastille can
by no means be regarded as ‘‘a culminating fact in history;'' it
does mark the precise moment of the commencement of popular
government。 The armed people thenceforth intervened daily in the
deliberations of the revolutionary Assemblies; and seriously
influenced their conduct。
This intervention of the people in conformity with the dogma of
its sovereignty has provoked the respectful admiration of many
historians of the Revolution。 Even a superficial study of the
psychology of crowds would speedily have shown them that the
mystic entity which they call the people was merely translating
the will of a few leaders。 It is not correct to say that the
people took the Bastille; attacked the Tuileries; invaded the
Convention; &c。; but that certa