study of the king james bible(钦印〈圣经〉研究)-第21章
按键盘上方向键 ← 或 → 可快速上下翻页，按键盘上的 Enter 键可回到本书目录页，按键盘上方向键 ↑ 可回到本页顶部！
————未阅读完？加入书签已便下次继续阅读！
Then； Secondly； the words are short； and in general short words are the
strong ones。 The average word in the whole Bible； including the long
proper names； is barely over four letters； and if all the proper names are
excluded the average word is just a little under four letters。 Of course；
another way of saying that is that the words are generally Anglo…Saxon；
and； while in the original spelling they were much longer； yet in their
sound they were as brief as they are in our present spelling。 There is no
merit in Anglo… Saxon words except in the fact that they are concrete；
definite； non…abstract words。 They are words that mean the same to
everybody； they are part of common experience。 We shall see the power of
such words by comparing a simple statement in Saxon words from the
English Bible with a comment of a learned theologian of our own time on
them。 The phrase is a simple one in the Communion service： 〃This is my
body which is given for you。〃 That is all Saxon。 When our theologian
comes to comment on it he says we are to understand that 〃the validity of
the service does not lie in the quality of external signs and sacramental
representation； but in its essential property and substantial reality。〃 Now
there are nine words abstract in their meaning； Latin in their form。 It is in
that kind of words that the Bible could have been translated； and in our
own day might even be translated。 Addison speaks of that： 〃If any one
would judge of the beauties of poetry that are to be met with in the divine
writings； and examine how kindly the Hebrew manners of speech mix and
incorporate with the English language； after having perused the Book of
Psalms； let him read a literal translation of Horace or Pindar。 He will find
in these two last such an absurdity and confusion of style with such a
comparative poverty of imagination； as will make him very sensible of
what I have been here advancing。〃＇1＇
＇1＇ The Spectator； No。 405。
The fact that the words are short can be quickly illustrated by taking
some familiar sections。 In the Ten Commandments there are three hundred
and nineteen words in all； two hundred and fifty…nine of them are words of
one syllable； and only sixty are of two syllables and over。 There are fifty
words of two syllables； six of three syllables； of which four are such
composite words that they really amount to two words of one and two
59
… Page 60…
Study of the King James Bible
syllables each； with four words of four syllables； and none over that。 Make
a comparison just here。 There is a paragraph in Professor March's lectures
on the English language where he is urging that its strongest words are
purely English； not derived from Greek or Latin。 He uses the King James
version as illustration。 If； now； we take three hundred and nineteen words
at the beginning of that paragraph to compare with the three hundred and
nineteen in the Ten Commandments； the result will be interesting。 Where
the Ten Commandments have two hundred and fifty…nine words of one
syllable； Professor March has only one hundred and ninety…four； over
against the fifty two…syllable words in the Ten Commandments； Professor
March has sixty…five； over against their six words of three syllables； he has
thirty…five； over against their four words of four syllables； he uses eighteen；
and while the Ten Commandments have no word longer than four
syllables； Professor March needs five words of five syllables and two
words of six syllables to express his ideas。＇1＇
＇1＇ This table will show the comparison at a glance：
Syllables 1 2 3 4 5 6 The
Commandments 259 50 6 4 0 0 319 Professor
March 194 65 35 18 5 2 319
The same thing appears in the familiar 23d Psalm； where there are
one hundred and nineteen words in all； of which ninety…five are words of
one syllable； and only three of three syllables； with none longer。 In the
Sermon on the Mount eighty two per cent。 of the words in our English
version are words of one syllable。
The only point urged now is that this kind of thing makes for strength
in literature。 Short words are strong words。 They have a snap and a grip to
them that long words have not。 Very few men would grow angry over
having a statement called a 〃prevarication〃 or 〃a disingenuous
entanglement of ideas；〃 but there is something about the word 〃lie〃 that
snaps in a man's face。 〃Unjustifiable hypothecation〃 may be the same as
stealing； but it would never excite one to be called 〃an unjustifiable
hypothecator〃 as it does to be called a thief。 At the very foundation of the
strength of the literature of the English Bible there lies this tendency to
short； clear…cut words。
60
… Page 61…
Study of the King James Bible
Rising now from this basal element in the literature of the version； we
come to the place where its style and its ideas blend in what we may call
its earnestness。 That is itself a literary characteristic。 There is not a line of
trifling in the book。 No man would ever learn trifling from it。 It takes itself
with tremendous seriousness。 Here are earnest men at work； to them life is
joyous； but it is no joke。 That is why the element of humor in it is such a
small one。 It is there； to be sure。 Many of its similes are intended to be
humorous。 A few of its incidents are humorous； but it has little of that
element in it； as indeed little of our literature has that element markedly in
it。 We have a few exceptions。 But what George Eliot says in Adam Bede is
true； that wit is of a temporary nature； and does not deal with the deep and
more lasting elements in life。 The Bible is not a sad book。 There are
children at play in it； there are feasts and buoyant gatherings fully
recounted。 But it never trifles nor jests。
So it has given us a language of great dignity。 Let Addison speak again：
〃How cold and dead does a prayer appear that is composed in the most
elegant and polite forms of speech； which are natural to our tongue； when
it is not heightened by that solemnity of phrase which may be drawn from
the sacred writings。 It has been said by some of the ancients that if the
gods were to talk with men； they would certainly speak in Plato's style； but
I think we may say； with justice； that when mortals converse with their
Creator they cannot do it in so proper a style as in that of the Holy
Scriptures。〃
As that earnestness of the literature of the original precluded any great
amount of humor in the wide range of its literary forms； so in the King
James version it precluded any trifling expressions； any plays on words；
even the duplication of such plays as can be found in the Hebrew or the
Greek。 You seldom find any turn of a word in the King James versi
