r. f. murray-his poems with a memoir-第7章

按键盘上方向键 ← 或 → 可快速上下翻页，按键盘上的 Enter 键可回到本书目录页，按键盘上方向键 ↑ 可回到本页顶部！
————未阅读完？加入书签已便下次继续阅读！



‘Myth。'　　Had　one　been　fortunate　enough　to　interest　Murray；　it　must

have　led　to　some　discussion　of　his　literary　attempts。　　He　mentions

having　attended　a　lecture　given　by　myself　to　the　Literary　Society　on

‘Literature　as　a　Profession；'　and　he　found　the　lecturer　‘far　more　at

home　in　such　a　subject　than　in　the　Gifford　Lectures。'　　Possibly　the

hearer　was　‘more　at　home'　in　literature　than　in　discussions　as　to

the　origin　of　Huitzilopochtli。　　‘Literature；'　he　says；　‘never　was；

is　not；　and　never　will　be；　in　the　ordinary　sense　of　the　term；　a

profession。　　You　can't　teach　it　as　you　can　the　professions；　you

can't　succeed　in　it　as　you　can　in　the　professions；　by　dint　of　mere

diligence　and　without　special　aptitude　。　。　。　I　think　all　this

chatter　about　the　technical　and　pecuniary　sides　of　literature　is

extremely　foolish　and　worse　than　useless。　　It　only　serves　to　glut

the　idle　curiosity　of　the　general　public　about　matters　with　which

they　have　no　concern；　a　curiosity　which　（thanks　partly　to　American

methods　of　journalism）　has　become　simply　outrageous。'



Into　chatter　about　the　pecuniary　aspect　of　literature　the　Lecturer

need　hardly　say　that　he　did　not　meander。　　It　is　absolutely　true　that

literature　cannot　be　taught。　　Maupassant　could　have　dispensed　with

the　instructions　of　Flaubert。　　But　an　‘aptitude'　is　needed　in　all

professions；　and　in　such　arts　as　music；　and　painting；　and　sculpture；

teaching　is　necessary。　　In　literature；　teaching　can　only　come　from

general　education　in　letters；　from　experience；　from　friendly　private

criticism。　　But　if　you　cannot　succeed　in　literature　‘by　dint　of　mere

diligence；'　mere　diligence　is　absolutely　essential。　　Men　must　read；

must　observe；　must　practise。　　Diligence　is　as　necessary　to　the

author　as　to　the　grocer；　the　solicitor；　the　dentist；　the　barrister；

the　soldier。　　Nothing　but　nature　can　give　the　aptitude；　diligence

must　improve　it；　and　experience　may　direct　it。　　It　is　not　enough　to

wait　for　the　spark　from　heaven　to　fall；　the　spark　must　be　caught；

and　tended；　and　cherished。　　A　man　must　labour　till　he　finds　his

vein；　and　himself。　　Again；　if　literature　is　an　art；　it　is　also　a

profession。　　A　man's　very　first　duty　is　to　support　himself　and

those；　if　any；　who　are　dependent　on　him。　　If　he　cannot　do　it　by

epics；　tragedies；　lyrics；　he　must　do　it　by　articles；　essays；　tales；

or　how　he　honestly　can。　　He　must　win　his　leisure　by　his　labour；　and

give　his　leisure　to　his　art。　　Murray；　at　this　time；　was　diligent　in

helping　to　compile　and　correct　educational　works。　　He　might；　but　for

the　various　conditions　of　reserve；　hatred　of　towns；　and　the　rest；

have　been　earning　his　leisure　by　work　more　brilliant　and　more

congenial　to　most　men。　　But　his　theory　of　literature　was　so　lofty

that　he　probably　found　the　other；　the　harder；　the　less　remunerative；

the　less　attractive　work；　more　congenial　to　his　tastes。



He　describes；　to　Mrs。　Murray；　various　notable　visitors　to　St。

Andrews：　　Professor　Butcher；　who　lectured　on　Lucian；　and　is　‘very

handsome；'　Mr。　Arthur　Balfour；　the　Lord　Rector；　who　is　‘rather

handsome；'　and　delights　the　listener　by　his　eloquence；　Mr。

Chamberlain；　who　pleases　him　too；　though　he　finds　Mr。　Chamberlain

rather　acrimonious　in　his　political　reflections。　　About　Lucian；　the

subject　of　Mr。　Butcher's　lecture；　Murray　says　nothing。　　That

brilliant　man　of　letters　in　general；　the　Alcibiades　of　literature；

the　wittiest；　and；　rarely；　the　most　tender；　and；　always；　the　most

graceful；　was　a　model　who　does　not　seem　to　have　attracted　Murray。

Lucian　amused；　and　amuses；　and　lived　by　amusing：　　the　vein　of

romance　and　poetry　that　was　his　he　worked　but　rarely：　　perhaps　the

Samosatene　did　not　take　himself　too　seriously；　yet　he　lives　through

the　ages；　an　example；　in　many　ways　to　be　followed；　of　a　man　who

obviously　delighted　in　all　that　he　wrought。　　He　was　no　model　to

Murray；　who　only　delighted　in　his　moments　of　inspiration；　and　could

not　make　himself　happy　even　in　the　trifles　which　are　demanded　from

the　professional　pen。



He　did；　at　last；　endeavour　to　ply　that　servile　engine　of　which

Pendennis　conceived　so　exalted　an　opinion。　　Certainly　a　false　pride

did　not　stand　in　his　way　when；　on　May　5；　1889；　he　announced　that　he

was　about　to　leave　St。　Andrews；　and　attempt　to　get　work　at　proof…

correcting　and　in　the　humblest　sorts　of　journalism　in　Edinburgh。

The　chapter　is　honourable　to　his　resolution；　but　most　melancholy。

There　were　competence　and　ease　waiting　for　him；　probably；　in　London；

if　he　would　but　let　his　pen　have　its　way　in　bright　comment　and

occasional　verse。　　But　he　chose　the　other　course。　　With　letters　of

introduction　from　Mr。　Meiklejohn；　he　consulted　the　houses　of　Messrs。

Clark　and　Messrs。　Constable　in　Edinburgh。　　He　did　not　find　that　his

knowledge　of　Greek　was　adequate　to　the　higher　and　more　remunerative

branches　of　proof…reading；　that　weary　meticulous　toil；　so　fatiguing

to　the　eyesight。　　The　hours；　too；　were　very　long；　he　could　do　more

and　better　work　in　fewer　hours。　　No　time；　no　strength；　were　left　for

reading　and　writing。　　He　did；　while　in　Edinburgh；　send　a　few　things

to　magazines；　but　he　did　not　actually　‘bombard'　editors。　　He　is　‘to

live　in　one　room；　and　dine；　if　not　on　a　red　herring；　on　the　next

cheapest　article　of　diet。'　　These　months　of　privation；　at　which　he

laughed；　and　some　weeks　of　reading　proofs；　appear　to　have　quite

undermined　health　which　was　never　strong；　and　which　had　been　sorely

tried　by　‘the　wind　of　a　cursed　to…day；　the　curse　of　a　windy　to…

morrow；'　at　St。　Andrews。　　If　a　reader　observes　in　Murray　a　lack　of

strenuous　diligence；　he　must　attribute　it　less　to　lack　of

resolution；　than　to　defect　of　physical　force　and　energy。　　The　many

bad　colds　of　which　he　speaks　were　warnings　of　the　end；　which　came　in

the　form　of　consumption。　　This　lurking　malady　it　was　that　made　him

wait；　and　dally　with　his　talent。　　He　hit　on　the　idea　of　translating

some　of　Bossuet's　orations　for　a　Scotch　theological　publisher。

Alas！　the　publisher　did　not　anticipate　a　demand；　among　Scotch

ministers；　for　the　Eagle　of　Meaux。　　Murray；　in　his　innocence；　was

startled　by　the　caution　of　the　publisher；　who　certainly　would　have

been　a　heavy　loser。　　‘I　honestly　believe　that；　if　Charles　Dickens

were　now　alive　and　unknown；　and　were　to　offer　the　MS。　of　Pickwick　to

an　Edinburgh　publisher；　that　sagacious　old　individual　would　shake

his　prudent　old　head；　and　refuse　（with　the　utmost　politeness）　to

publish　it！'　　There　is　a　good　deal　of　difference　between　Pickwick

and　a　translation　of　old　French　sermons　about　Madame；　and　Conde；　and

people　of　whom　few　modern　readers　ever　heard。



Alone；　in　Edinburgh；　Murray　was　saddened　by　the　‘unregarding'

irresponsive　faces　of　the　people　as　they　passed。　　In　St。　Andrews　he

probably　knew　every　face；　even　in　Edinburgh　（a　visitor　from　London

thinks）　there　is　a　friendly　look　among　the　passers。　　Murray　did　not

find　it　so。　　He　approached　a　newspaper　office：　　‘he　＇the　Editor　whom

he　met＇　was　extremely　frank；　and　told　me　that　the　tone　of　my　article

onwas　underbred；　while　the　verses　I　had　sent　him　had　nothing　in

them。　　Very　pleasant　for　the　feelings　of　a　young　author；　was　it　not？

。　。　。　Unfavourable　criticism　is　an　excellent　tonic；　but　it　should　be

a　little　diluted　。　。　。　I　must；　however；　do　him　the　justice　to　say

that　he　did　me　a　good　turn　by　introducing　me　to　…；　。　。　。　who　was

kind　and　encouraging　in　the　extreme。'



Murray　now　called　on　the　Editor　of　the　Scottish　Leader；　the

Gladstonian　organ；　whom　he　found　very　courteous。　　He　was　asked　to

write　some　‘leader…notes'　as　they　are　called；　paragraphs　which

appear　in　the　same　columns　as　the　leading　articles。　　These　were

published；　to　his　astonishment；　and　he　was　‘to　be　taken　on　at　a

salary　ofa　week。'　　Let　us　avoid　pecuniary　chatter；　and　merely　say

that　the　sum；　while　he　was　on　trial；　was　not　likely　to　tempt　many

young　men　into　the　career　of　journalism。　　Yet　‘the　work　will　be　very

exacting；　and　almost　preclude　the　possibility　of　my　doing　anything

else。'　　Now；　as