on the gait of animals-第4章
按键盘上方向键 ← 或 → 可快速上下翻页,按键盘上的 Enter 键可回到本书目录页,按键盘上方向键 ↑ 可回到本页顶部!
————未阅读完?加入书签已便下次继续阅读!
animals could not move themselves; when the flexure is extended they
would not have moved forward at all if the flexure or arc were equal
to the chord subtended; as it is; it reaches further when it is
straightened out; and then this part stays still and it draws up
what is left behind。
In all the changes described that which moves now extends itself
in a straight line to progress; and now is hooped; it straightens
itself in its leading part; and is hooped in what follows behind。 Even
jumping animals all make a flexion in the part of the body which is
underneath; and after this fashion make their leaps。 So too flying and
swimming things progress; the one straightening and bending their
wings to fly; the other their fins to swim。 Of the latter some have
four fins; others which are rather long; for example eels; have only
two。 These swim by substituting a flexion of the rest of their body
for the (missing) pair of fins to complete the movement; as we have
said before。 Flat fish use two fins; and the flat of their body as a
substitute for the absent pair of fins。 Quite flat fish; like the Ray;
produce their swimming movement with the actual fins and with the
two extremes or semicircles of their body; bending and straightening
themselves alternately。
10
A difficulty might perhaps be raised about birds。 How; it may be
said; can they; either when they fly or when they walk; be said to
move at four points? Now we did not say that all Sanguinea move at
four points; but merely at not more than four。 Moreover; they cannot
as a fact fly if their legs be removed; nor walk without their
wings。 Even a man does not walk without moving his shoulders。
Everything indeed; as we have said; makes a change of place by flexion
and straightening; for all things progress by pressing upon what being
beneath them up to a point gives way as it were gradually;
accordingly; even if there be no flexion in another member; there must
be at least in the point whence motion begins; is in feathered
(flying) insects at the base of the 'scale…wing'; in birds at the base
of the wing; in others at the base of the corresponding member; the
fins; for instance; in fish。 In others; for example snakes; the
flexion begins in the joints of the body。
In winged creatures the tail serves; like a ship's rudder; to keep
the flying thing in its course。 The tail then must like other limbs be
able to bend at the point of attachment。 And so flying insects; and
birds (Schizoptera) whose tails are ill…adapted for the use in
question; for example peacocks; and domestic cocks; and generally
birds that hardly fly; cannot steer a straight course。 Flying
insects have absolutely no tail; and so drift along like a
rudderless vessel; and beat against anything they happen upon; and
this applies equally to sharded insects; like the scarab…beetle and
the chafer; and to unsharded; like bees and wasps。 Further; birds that
are not made for flight have a tail that is of no use; for instance
the purple coot and the heron and all water…fowl。 These fly stretching
out their feet as a substitute for a tail; and use their legs
instead of a tail to direct their flight。 The flight of insects is
slow and frail because the character of their feathery wings is not
proportionate to the bulk of their body; this is heavy; their wings
small and frail; and so the flight they use is like a cargo boat
attempting to make its voyage with oars; now the frailty both of the
actual wings and of the outgrowths upon them contributes in a
measure to the flight described。 Among birds; the peacock's tail is at
one time useless because of its size; at another because it is shed。
But birds are in general at the opposite pole to flying insects as
regards their feathers; but especially the swiftest flyers among them。
(These are the birds with curved talons; for swiftness of wing is
useful to their mode of life。) The rest of their bodily structure is
in harmony with their peculiar movement; the small head; the slight
neck; the strong and acute breastbone (acute like the prow of a
clipper…built vessel; so as to be well…girt; and strong by dint of its
mass of flesh); in order to be able to push away the air that beats
against it; and that easily and without exhaustion。 The hind…quarters;
too; are light and taper again; in order to conform to the movement of
the front and not by their breadth to suck the air。
11
So much then for these questions。 But why an animal that is to stand
erect must necessarily be not only a biped; but must also have the
superior parts of the body lighter; and those that lie under these
heavier; is plain。 Only if situated like this could it possibly
carry itself easily。 And so man; the only erect animal; has legs
longer and stouter relatively to the upper parts of his body than
any other animal with legs。 What we observe in children also is
evidence of this。 Children cannot walk erect because they are always
dwarf…like; the upper parts of their bodies being longer and stouter
than the lower。 With advancing years the lower increase
disproportionately; until the children get their appropriate size; and
then and not till then they succeed in walking erect。 Birds are
hunchbacked yet stand on two legs because their weight is set back;
after the principle of horses fashioned in bronze with their
forelegs prancing。 But their being bipeds and able to stand is above
all due to their having the hip…bone shaped like a thigh; and so large
that it looks as if they had two thighs; one in the leg before the
knee…joint; the other joining his part to the fundament。 Really this
is not a thigh but a hip; and if it were not so large the bird could
not be a biped。 As in a man or a quadruped; the thigh and the rest
of the leg would be attached immediately to quite a small hip;
consequently the whole body would be tilted forward。 As it is;
however; the hip is long and extends right along to the middle of
the belly; so that the legs are attached at that point and carry as
supports the whole frame。 It is also evident from these considerations
that a bird cannot possibly be erect in the sense in which man is。 For
as it holds its body now the wings are naturally useful to it; but
if it were erect they would be as useless as the wings of Cupids we
see in pictures。 It must have been clear as soon as we spoke that
the form of no human nor any similar being permits of wings; not
only because it would; though Sanguineous; be moved at more than
four points; but also because to have wings would be useless to it
when moving naturally。 And Nature makes nothing contrary to her own
nature。
12
We have stated above that without flexion in the legs or shoulders
and hips no Sanguineous animal with feet could progress; and that
flexion is impossible except some point be at rest; and that men and
birds; both bipeds; bend their legs in opposite directions; and
further that quadrupeds bend their in opposite directions; and each
pair in the opposite way to a man's limbs。 For men bend their arms
backwards; their legs forwards; quadrupeds their forelegs forwards;
their back legs backwards; and in like manner also birds bend
theirs。 The reason is that Nature's workmanship is never
purposeless; as we said above; but everything for the best possible in
the circumstances。 Inasmuch; therefore; as all creatures which
naturally have the power of changing position by the use of limbs;
must have one leg stationary with the weight of the body on it; and
when they move forward the leg which has the leading position must
be unencumbered; and the progression continuing the we