liberty-第7章
按键盘上方向键 ← 或 → 可快速上下翻页，按键盘上的 Enter 键可回到本书目录页，按键盘上方向键 ↑ 可回到本页顶部！
————未阅读完？加入书签已便下次继续阅读！
o be understood： What any man does in the bare state of Nature is injurious to no man； not that in such a State he cannot offend God； or break the Lawes of Nature； for Injustice against men presupposeth Humane Lawes； such； as in the State of Nature there are none： Now the truth of this proposition thus conceived is sufficiently demonstrated to the mindfull Reader in the Articles immediately foregoing； but because in certaine cases the difficulty of the conclusion makes us forget the premises； I will contract this Argument； and make it most evident to a single view； every man hath right to protect himself； as appears by the seventh Article。 The same man therefore hath a right to use all the means which necessarily conduce to this end by the eight Article： But those are the necessary means which he shall judge to be such by the ninth Article。 He therefore hath a right to make use； of and to doe all whatsoever he shall judge requisite for his preservation： wherefore by the judgement of him that doth it； the thing done is either right； or wrong； and therefore right。 True it is therefore in the bare State of Nature； &c but if any man pretend somewhat to tend necessarily to his preservation； which yet he himself doth not confidently believe so； he may offend against the Lawes of Nature； as in the third Chapter of this Book is more at large declar'd。 It hath been objected by some： If a Sonne kill his Father； doth he him no injury？ I have answered； That a Sonne cannot be understood to be at any time in the State of Nature； as being under the Power and command of them to whom he ownes his protection as soon as ever he is born； namely either his Fathers； or his Mothers； or his that nourisht him； as is demonstrated in the ninth Chapter。 XI。 But it was the least benefit for men thus to have a common Right to all things； for the effects of this Right are the same； almost； as if there had been no Right at all； for although any man might say of every thing； This is mine； yet could he not enjoy it； by reason of his Neighbour； who having equall Right； and equall power； would pretend the same thing to be his。 XII。 If now to this naturall proclivity of men； to hurt each other； which they derive from their Passions； but chiefly from a vain esteeme of themselves： You adde； the right of all to all； wherewith one by right invades； the other by right resists； and whence arise perpetuall jealousies and suspicions on all hands； and how hard a thing it is to provide against an enemy invading us； with an intention to oppresse； and ruine； though he come with a small Number； and no great Provision；。 it cannot be deny'd but that the naturall state of men； before they entr'd into Society； was a meer War； and that not simply； but a War of all men； against all men； for what is WAR； but that same time in which the will of contesting by force； is fully declar'd either by Words； or Deeds？ The time remaining； is termed PEACE。 XIII。 But it is easily judg'd how disagreeable a thing to the preservation either of Man…kind； or of each single Man； a perpetuall War is： But it is perpetuall in its own nature； because in regard of the equality of those that strive； it cannot be ended by Victory； for in this state the Conquerour is subject to so much danger； as it were to be accounted a Miracle； if any； even the most strong should close up his life with many years； and old age。 They of America are Examples hereof； even in this present Age： Other Nations have been in former Ages； which now indeed are become Civill； and Flourishing； but were then few； fierce； short…lived； poor； nasty； and destroy'd of all that Pleasure； and Beauty of life； which Peace and Society are wont to bring with them。 Whosoever therefore holds； that it had been best to have continued in that state in which all things were lawfull for all men； he contradicts himself； for every man； by naturall necessity desires that which is good for him： nor is there any that esteemes a war of all against all； which necessarily adheres to such a State； to be good for him。 And so it happens that through feare of each other we think it fit to rid our selves of this condition； and to get some fellowes； that if there needs must be war； it may not yet be against all men； nor without some helps。 XIV。 Fellowes are gotten either by constraint； or by consent； By Constraint； when after fight the Conqueror makes the conquered serve him either through feare of death； or by laying fetters on him： By consent； when men enter into society to helpe each other； both parties consenting without any constraint。 But the Conqueror may by right compell the Conquered； or the strongest the weaker； （as a man in health may one that is sick； or he that is of riper yeares a childe） unlesse he will choose to die； to give caution of his future obedience。 For since the right of protecting our selves according to our owne wills proceeded from our danger； and our danger from our equality； its more consonant to reason； and more certaine for our conservation； using the present advantage to secure our selves by taking caution； then； when they shall be full growne and strong； and got out of our power； to endeavour to recover that power againe by doubtfull fight。 And on the other side； nothing can be thought more absurd； then by discharging whom you already have weak in your power； to make him at once both an enemy； and a strong one。 From whence we may understand likewise as a Corollarie in the naturall state of men； That a sure and irresistible Power confers the right of Dominion； and ruling over those who cannot resist； insomuch； as the right of all things； that can be done； adheres essentially； and immediately unto this omnipotence hence arising。 XV。 Yet cannot men expect any lasting preservation continuing thus in the state of nature （i。e。） of War； by reason of that equality of power； and other humane faculties they are endued withall。 Wherefore to seek Peace； where there is any hopes of obtaining it； and where there is none； to enquire out for Auxiliaries of War； is the dictate of right Reason； that is； the Law of Nature； as shall be shewed in the next Chapter。
Chap。 II。
Of the Law of Nature concerning Contracts。
I。 All Authors agree not concerning the definition of the Naturall Law； who notwithstanding doe very often make use of this terme in their Writings。 The Method therefore； wherein we begin from definitions； and exclusion of all equivocation； is only proper to them who leave no place for contrary Disputes； for the rest； if any man say； that somwhat is done against the Law of Nature； one proves it hence； because it was done against the generall Agreement of all the most wise； and learned Nations： But this declares not who shall be the judg of the wisdome and learning of all Nations： Another hence； That it was done against the Generall consent of all Man…kind； which definition is by no means to be admitted； for then it were impossible for any but Children； and Fools； to offend against such a Law； for sure； under the notion of Man…kind； they comprehend all men actually endued with Reason。 These therefore either doe Naught against it； or if they doe Ought； it is without their joint accord； and therefore ought to be excus'd； but to receive the Lawes of Nature from the Consents of them； who oftner Break； then Observe them； is in truth unreasonable： besides； Men condemne the same things in others； which they approve in themselves； on the other side； they publickly commend what they privately condemne； and they deliver their Opinions more by Hear…say； then any Speculation of their own； and they accord more through hatred of some object； through fear； hope； love； or some other perturbation of mind； then true Reason。 And therefore it comes to passe； that whole Bodyes of people often doe those things by Generall accord； or Contention； which those Writers most willingly acknowledge to be against the Law of Nature。 But since all doe grant that is done by RIGHT； which is not done against Reason； we ought to judg those Actions onely wrong； which are repugnant to right Reason； （i。e。） which contradict some certaine Truth collected by right reasoning from true Principles； but that Wrong which is done； we say it is done against some Law： th
