female suffrage-第3章
按键盘上方向键 ← 或 → 可快速上下翻页,按键盘上的 Enter 键可回到本书目录页,按键盘上方向键 ↑ 可回到本页顶部!
————未阅读完?加入书签已便下次继续阅读!
point; and to do them full justice; would require volumes。 Such a
course is not necessary。 The question can be decided with truth and
justice on general principleson generally admitted facts。 We admit;
then; that in some Statesperhaps in allthere may be laws in
which the natural and acquired rights of woman have not been fairly
considered; that in some cases she has needed more legal protection
and more privileges than she has yet received。 But while this
admission is made; attention is at the same time demanded for a
fact inseparably connected with it; namely; the marked and generous
liberality which American men have thus far shown in the considerate
care and protection they have; as a general rule; given to the
interests of women。 In no country; whether of ancient or modern
times; have women had less to complain of in their treatment by
man than in America。 This is no rhetorical declamation; it is the
simple statement of an undeniable fact。 It is a matter of social
history。 Since the days of early colonial life to the present houror;
in other words; during the last two hundred and fifty yearssuch has
been the general course of things in this country。 The hardest tasks
have been taken by man; and a generous tenderness has been
shown to women in many of the details of social life; pervading all
classes of society; to a degree beyond what is customary even in the
most civilized countries of Europe。 Taking these two facts together
that certain abuses still exist; that certain laws and regulations need
changing and that; as a general rule; American women have thus far
been treated by their countrymen with especial consideration; in a
legal and in a social sensethe inference becomes perfectly plain。 A
formidable and very dangerous social revolution is not needed to
correct remaining abuses。 Any revolution aiming at upsetting the
existing relations of the sexesrelations going back to the earliest
records and traditions of the racecan not be called less than
formidable and dangerous。 Let women make full use of the
influences already at their command; and all really needed changes
may be effected by means both sure and safemeans already
thoroughly tried。 Let them use all the good sense; all the
information; all the eloquence; and; if they please; all the wit; at
their command when talking over these abuses in society。 Let them
state their views; their needs; their demands; in conscientiously
written papers。 Let them appeal for aid to the best; the wisest; the
most respected men of the country; and the result is certain。 Choose
any one real; existing abuse as a test of the honesty and the
liberality of American men toward the women of the country; and we
all know before…hand what shall be the result。*
{FOOTNOTE by SFC} * There is an injustice in the present law of
guardianship in the State of New York; which may be named as one
of those abuses which need reformation。 A woman can not now; in
the State of New York; appoint a guardian for her child; even though
its father be dead。 The authority for appointing a guardian otherwise
than by the courts is derived from the Revised statutes; p。 1; title 3;
chapter 8; part 2; and that passage gives the power to the father
only。 The mother is not named。 It has been decided in the courts
that a mother can not make this appointment12 Howard's Practical
Reports; 532。 This is certainly very unjust and very unwise。 But let
any dozen women of respectability take the matter in hand; and; by
the means already at their command; from their own chimney…
corners; they can readily procure the insertion of the needful clause。
And so with any other real abuse。 Men are now ready to listen; and
ready to act; when additional legislation is prudently and sensibly
asked for by their wives and mothers。 How they may act when
women stand before them; armed CAP…A…PIE; and prepared to
demand legislation at the point of the bayonet; can not yet be
known。 {END FOOTNOTE}
If husbands; fathers; brothers; are ready any day to shed their
heart's blood for our personal defense in
442
the hour of peril; we may feel perfectly assured that they will also
protect us; when appealed to; by legislation。 When they lay down
their arms and refuse to fight for us; it will then be time to ask them
to give up legislation also。 But until that evil hour arrives let men
make the laws; and let women be content to fill worthily; to the very
best of their abilities; the noble position which the Heavenly Father
has already marked out for them。 There is work to be done in that
position reaching much higher; going much farther; and penetrating
far deeper; than any mere temporary legislation can do。 Of that work
we shall speak more fully a moment later。
SECONDLY。 THE INALIENABLE NATURAL RIGHT OF WOMAN TO VOTE;
AND IMPERATIVELY SO IN A COUNTRY WHERE UNIVERSAL SUFFRAGE
IS A GREAT POLITICAL PRINCIPLE。
This second proposition of the advocates of female suffrage is of a
general character。 It does not point to particular abuses; it claims
the right of woman to vote as one which she should demand;
whether practically needed or not。 It is asserted that to disqualify
half the race from voting is an abuse entirely inconsistent with the
first principles of American politics。 The answer to this is plain。 The
elective franchise is not an end; it is only a means。 A good
government is indeed an inalienable right。 Just so far as the elective
franchise will conduce to this great end; to that point it becomes
also a right; but no farther。 A male suffrage wisely free; including all
capable of justly appreciating its importance; and honestly
discharging its responsibilities; becomes a great advantage to a
nation。 But universal suffrage; pushed to its extreme limits; including
all men; all women; all minors beyond the years of childhood; would
inevitably be fraught with evil。 There have been limits to the
suffrage of the freest nations。 Such limits have been found necessary
by all past political experience。 In this country; at the present hour;
there are restrictions upon the suffrage in every State。 Those
restrictions vary in character。 They are either national; relating to
color; political; mental; educational; connected with a property
qualification; connected with sex; connected with minority of years;
or they are moral in their nature。*
'FOOTNOTE by SFC} *In connection with this point of moral
qualification we venture to ask a question。 Why not enlarge the
criminal classes from whom the suffrage is now withheld? Why not
exclude every man convicted of any degrading legal crime; even petty
larceny? And why not exclude from the suffrage all habitual
drunkards judicially so declared? These are changes which would do
vastly more of good than admitting women to vote。 {END
FOOTNOTE}
This restriction connected with sex is; in fact; but one of many other
restrictions; considered more or less necessary even in a democracy。
Manhood suffrage is a very favorite term of the day。 But; taken in
the plain meaning of those words; such fullness of suffrage has at
the present hour no actual existence in any independent nation; or in
any extensive province。 It does not exist; as we have just seen;
even among the men of America。 And; owing to the conditions of
human life; we may well believe that unrestricted fullness of
manhood suffrage never can exist in any great nation for any length
of time。 In those States of the American Union which approach
nearest to a practical manhood suffrage; unnaturalized foreigners;
minors; and certain classes of criminals; are excluded from voting。
And why so? What is the cause of this exclusion? Here are men by
tens of thousandsmen of widely different classes and conditions
peremptorily deprived of a privilege asserted to be a positive
inalienable right universal in its application。 There is manifestly
some reason for this apparently contradictory state of things。 We
know that reason to be the good of society。 It is for the good of
society that the suffrage is withheld from those classes of men。 A
certain fitness for the right use of the suffrage is therefore deemed
necessary before granting it。 A criminal; an unnaturalize