贝壳电子书 > 英文原著电子书 > robert louis stevenson >

第42章

robert louis stevenson-第42章

小说: robert louis stevenson 字数: 每页4000字

按键盘上方向键 ← 或 → 可快速上下翻页,按键盘上的 Enter 键可回到本书目录页,按键盘上方向键 ↑ 可回到本页顶部!
————未阅读完?加入书签已便下次继续阅读!



f the opportunity  of obtaining the portrait of one of the most distinguished Scotsmen  of recent times。  It can hardly have been for want of money; for  though the funds at their disposal for the purchase of ordinary  works of art are but limited; no longer ago than last year they  were the recipients of a very handsome legacy from the late Mr J。  M。 Gray; the accomplished and much lamented Curator of the Scottish  National Portrait Gallery … a legacy left them for the express  purpose of acquiring portraits of distinguished Scotsmen; and the  income of which was amply sufficient to have enabled them to  purchase this portrait。  One is therefore almost shut up to the  conclusion that the Trustees were influenced in their decision by  one of the two following reasons:

〃1。 That they did not consider Stevenson worthy of a place in the  gallery。  This is a position so incomprehensible and so utterly  opposed to public sentiment that one can hardly credit it having  been the cause of this refusal。  Whatever may be the place which  Stevenson may ultimately take as an author; and however opinions  may differ as to the merits of his work; no one can deny that he  was one of the most popular writers of his day; and that as a mere  master of style; if for nothing else; his works will be read so  long as there are students of English Literature。  Surely the  portrait of one for whom such a claim may legitimately be made  cannot be considered altogether unworthy of a place in the National  Collection; as one of Scotland's most distinguished sons。

〃2。 The only other reason which can be suggested as having weighed  with the Trustees in their decision is one which in some cases  might be held to be worthy of consideration。  It is conceivable  that in the case of some men the Trustees might be of opinion that  there was plenty of time to consider the matter; and that in the  meantime there was always the chance of some generous donor  presenting them with a portrait。  But; as has been shown above; the  portraits of Stevenson are practically confined to two:  one of  these is in America; and there is not the least chance of its ever  coming here; and the other they have refused。  And; as it is  understood that the Trustees have a rule that they do not accept  any portrait which has not been painted from the life; they  preclude themselves from acquiring a copy of any existing picture  or even a portrait done from memory。

〃It is rumoured that the Nerli portrait may ultimately find a  resting…place in the National Collection of Portraits in London。   If this should prove to be the case; what a commentary on the old  saying:  'A prophet is not without honour save in his own  country。'〃



CHAPTER XXXIII … LAPSES AND ERRORS IN CRITICISM



NOTHING could perhaps be more wearisome than to travel o'er the  wide sandy area of Stevenson criticism and commentary; and expose  the many and sad and grotesque errors that meet one there。  Mr  Baildon's slip is innocent; compared with many when he says (p。  106) TREASURE ISLAND appeared in YOUNG FOLKS as THE SEA…COOK。  It  did nothing of the kind; it is on plain record in print; even in  the pages of the EDINBURGH EDITION; that Mr James Henderson would  not have the title THE SEA…COOK; as he did not like it; and  insisted on its being TREASURE ISLAND。  To him; therefore; the  vastly better title is due。  Mr Henley was in doubt if Mr Henderson  was still alive when he wrote the brilliant and elevated article on  〃Some Novels〃 in the NORTH AMERICAN; and as a certain dark bird  killed Cock Robin; so he killed off Dr Japp; and not to be outdone;  got in an ideal 〃Colonel〃 JACK; so Mr Baildon there follows Henley;  unaware that Mr Henderson did not like THE SEA…COOK; and was still  alive; and that a certain Jack in the fatal NORTH AMERICAN has  Japp's credit。

Mr Baildon's words are:


〃This was the famous book of adventure; TREASURE ISLAND; appearing  first as THE SEA…COOK in a boy's paper; where it made no great  stir。  But; on its publication in volume form; with the vastly  better title; the book at once 'boomed;' as the phrase goes; to an  extent then; in 1882; almost unprecedented。  The secret of its  immense success may almost be expressed in a phrase by saying that  it is a book like GULLIVER'S TRAVELS; THE PILGRIM'S PROGRESS; and  ROBINSON CRUSOE itself for all ages … boys; men; and women。〃


Which just shows how far lapse as to a fact may lead to critical  misreadings also。

Mr Hammerton sometimes lets good folks say in his pages; without  correction; what is certainly not correct。  Thus at one place we  are told that Stevenson was only known as Louis in print; whereas  that was the only name by which he was known in his own family。   Then Mr Gosse; at p。 34; is allowed to write:


〃Professor Blackie was among them on the steamer from the Hebrides;  a famous figure that calls for no description; and a voluble shaggy  man; clad in homespun; with spectacles forward upon his nose; who  it was whispered to us; was Mr Sam Bough; the Scottish Academician;  A WATER…COLOUR PAINTER OF SOME REPUTE; who was to die in 1878。〃


Mr Sam Bough WAS 〃a water…colour painter of some repute;〃 but a  painter in oils of yet greater repute … a man of rare strength;  resource; and facility … never; perhaps; wholly escaping from some  traces of his early experiences in scene…painting; but a true  genius in his art。  Ah; well I remember him; though an older man;  yet youthful in the band of young Scotch artists among whom as a  youngster I was privileged to move in Edinburgh … Pettie; Chalmers;  M'Whirter; Peter Graham; MacTaggart; MacDonald; John Burr; and  Bough。  Bough could be voluble on art; and many a talk I had with  him as with the others named; especially with John Burr。  Bough and  he both could talk as well as paint; and talk right well。  Bough  had a slight cast in the eye; when he got a WEE excited on his  subject he would come close to you with head shaking; and  spectacles displaced; and forelock wagging; and the cast would seem  to die away。  Was this a fact; or was it an illusion on my part?  I  have often asked myself that question; and now I ask it of others。   Can any of my good friends in Edinburgh say; can Mr Caw help me  here; either to confirm or to correct me?  I venture to insert here  an anecdote; with which my friend of old days; Mr Wm。 MacTaggart;  R。S。A。; in a letter kindly favours me:


〃Sam Bough was a very sociable man; and; when on a sketching tour;  liked to have a young artist or two with him。  Jack Nisbett played  the violin; and Sam the 'cello; etc。  Jack was fond of telling that  Sam used to let them all choose the best views; and then he would  take what was left; and Jack; with mild astonishment; would say;  that 'it generally turned out to be the best … on the canvas!'〃


In Mr Hammerton's copy of the verses in reply to Mr Crockett's  dedication of THE STICKIT MINISTER to Stevenson; in which occurred  the fine phrase 〃The grey Galloway lands; where about the graves of  the martyrs the whaups are crying; his heart remembers how〃:


〃Blows the wind to…day and the sun and the rain are flying: Blows the wind on the moors to…day and now; Where about the graves of the martyrs the whaups are crying; My heart remembers how。

〃Grey recumbent tombs of the dead in desert places; Standing stones on the vacant wine…red moor; Hills of sheep; and the HOMES of the silent vanished races; And winds austere and pure。

〃Be it granted me to behold you again in dying; Hills of home! and to hear again the call … Hear about the graves of the martyrs the pee…weet crying; And hear no more at all。〃


Mr Hammerton prints HOWES instead of HOMES; which I have italicised  above。  And I may note; though it does not affect the poetry; if it  does a little affect the natural history; that the PEE…WEETS and  the whaups are not the same … the one is the curlew; and the other  is the lapwing … the one most frequenting wild; heathery or peaty  moorland; and the other pasture or even ploughed land … so that it  is a great pity for unity and simplicity alike that Stevenson did  not repeat the 〃whaup;〃 but wrote rather as though pee…weet or pee… weets were the same as whaups … the common 

返回目录 上一页 下一页 回到顶部 0 0

你可能喜欢的