贝壳电子书 > 英文原著电子书 > robert louis stevenson >

第19章

robert louis stevenson-第19章

小说: robert louis stevenson 字数: 每页4000字

按键盘上方向键 ← 或 → 可快速上下翻页,按键盘上的 Enter 键可回到本书目录页,按键盘上方向键 ↑ 可回到本页顶部!
————未阅读完?加入书签已便下次继续阅读!



 old devil of the mediaeval drama; who  was made only to be laughed at and taken lightly; a buffoon and a  laughing…stock indeed。  And while he could unveil villainy; as is  the case pre…eminently in Huish in the EBB…TIDE; he shrank from  inflicting the punishments for which untutored human nature looks;  and thus he lost one great aid to crude dramatic effect。  As to his  poems; they are intimately personal in his happiest moments:  he  deals with separate moods and sentiments; and scarcely ever touches  those of a type alien to his own。  The defect of his child poems is  distinctly that he is everywhere strictly recalling and reproducing  his own quaint and wholly exceptional childhood; and children;  ordinary; normal; healthy children; will not take to these poems  (though grown…ups largely do so); as they would to; say; the  LILLIPUT LEVEE of my old friend; W。 B。 Rands。  Rands showed a great  deal of true dramatic play there within his own very narrow limits;  as; at all events; adults must conceive them。

Even in his greatest works; in THE MASTER OF BALLANTRAE and WEIR OF  HERMISTON; the special power in Stevenson really lies in subduing  his characters at the most critical point for action; to make them  prove or sustain his thesis; and in this way the rare effect that  he might have secured DRAMATICALLY is largely lost and make…believe  substituted; as in the Treasure Search in the end of THE MASTER OF  BALLANTRAE。  The powerful dramatic effect he might have had in his  DENOUEMENT is thus completely sacrificed。  The essence of the drama  for the stage is that the work is for this and this alone …  dialogue and everything being only worked rightly when it bears on;  aids; and finally secures this in happy completeness。

In a word; you always; in view of true dramatic effect; see  Stevenson himself too clearly behind his characters。  The 〃fine  speeches〃 Mr Pinero referred to trace to the intrusion behind the  glass of a part…quicksilvered portion; which cunningly shows; when  the glass is moved about; Stevenson himself behind the character;  as we have said already。  For long he shied dealing with women; as  though by a true instinct。  Unfortunately for him his image was as  clear behind CATRIONA; with the discerning; as anywhere else; and  this; alas! too far undid her as an independent; individual  character; though traits like those in her author were attractive。   The constant effort to relieve the sense of this affords him the  most admirable openings for the display of his exquisite style; of  which he seldom or never fails to make the very most in this  regard; but the necessity laid upon him to aim at securing a sense  of relief by this is precisely the same as led him to write the  overfine speeches in the plays; as Mr Pinero found and pointed out  at Edinburgh:  both defeat the true end; but in the written book  mere art of style and a naivete and a certain sweetness of temper  conceal the lack of nature and creative spontaneity; while on the  stage the descriptions; saving reflections and fine asides; are  ruthlessly cut away under sheer stage necessities; or; if left; but  hinder the action; and art of this kind does not there suffice to  conceal the lack of nature。

More clearly to bring out my meaning here and draw aid from  comparative illustration; let me take my old friend of many years;  Charles Gibbon。  Gibbon was poor; very poor; in intellectual  subtlety compared with Stevenson; he had none of his sweet; quaint;  original fancy; he was no casuist; he was utterly void of power in  the subdued humorous twinkle or genial by…play in which Stevenson  excelled。  But he has more of dramatic power; pure and simple; than  Stevenson had … his novels … the best of them … would far more  easily yield themselves to the ordinary purposes of the ordinary  playwright。  Along with conscientiousness; perception; penetration;  with the dramatist must go a certain indescribable common…sense  commonplaceness … if I may name it so … protection against vagary  and that over…refined egotism and self…confession which is inimical  to the drama and in which the Stevensonian type all too largely  abounds for successful dramatic production。  Mr Henley perhaps put  it too strongly when he said that what was supremely of interest to  R。 L。 Stevenson was Stevenson himself; but he indicates the  tendency; and that tendency is inimical to strong; broad; effective  and varied dramatic presentation。  Water cannot rise above its own  level; nor can minds of this type go freely out of themselves in a  grandly healthy; unconscious; and unaffected way; and this is the  secret of the dramatic spirit; if it be not; as Shelley said; the  secret of morals; which Stevenson; when he passed away; was but on  the way to attain。  As we shall see; he had risen so far above it;  subdued it; triumphed over it; that we really cannot guess what he  might have attained had but more years been given him。  For the  last attainment of the loftiest and truest genius is precisely this  … to gain such insight of the real that all else becomes  subsidiary。  True simplicity and the abiding relief and enduring  power of true art with all classes lies here and not elsewhere。   Cleverness; refinement; fancy; and invention; even sublety of  intellect; are practically nowhere in this sphere without this。



CHAPTER XIV … STEVENSON AS DRAMATIST



IN opposition to Mr Pinero; therefore; I assert that Stevenson's  defect in spontaneous dramatic presentation is seen clearly in his  novels as well as in his plays proper。

In writing to my good friend; Mr Thomas M'Kie; Advocate; Edinburgh;  telling him of my work on R。 L。 Stevenson and the results; I thus  gathered up in little the broad reflections on this point; and I  may perhaps be excused quoting the following passages; as they  reinforce by a new reference or illustration or two what has just  been said:


〃Considering his great keenness and force on some sides; I find R。  L。 Stevenson markedly deficient in grip on other sides … common  sides; after all; of human nature。  This was so far largely due to  a dreamy; mystical; so far perverted and; so to say; often even  inverted casuistical; fatalistic morality; which would not allow  him scope in what Carlyle would have called a healthy hatred of  fools and scoundrels; with both of which classes … vagabonds in  strictness … he had rather too much of a sneaking sympathy。  Mr  Pinero was wrong … totally and incomprehensibly wrong … when he  told the good folks of Edinburgh at the Philosophical Institution;  and afterwards at the London Birkbeck Institution; that it was lack  of concentration and care that made R。 L。 Stevenson a failure as a  dramatist。  No:  it was here and not elsewhere that the failure  lay。  R。 L。 Stevenson was himself an unconscious paradox … and  sometimes he realised it … his great weakness from this point of  view being that he wished to show strong and original by making the  villain the hero of the piece as well。  Now; THAT; if it may; by  clever manipulation and dexterity; be made to do in a novel; most  certainly it will not do on the stage … more especially if it is  done consciously and; as it were; of MALICE PREPENSE; because; for  one thing; there is in the theatre a very varied yet united  audience which has to give a simultaneous and immediate verdict …  an audience not inclined to some kinds of overwrought subtleties  and casuistries; however clever the technique。  If THE MASTER OF  BALLANTRAE (which has some highly dramatic scenes and situations;  if it is not in itself substantially a drama) were to be put on the  stage; the playwright; if wisely determined for success; would  really have … not in details; but in essential conception … to kick  R。 L。 Stevenson in his most personal aim out of it; and take and  present a more definite moral view of the two villain…heroes  (brothers; too); improve and elevate the one a bit if he lowered  the other; and not wobble in sympathy and try to make the audience  wobble in sympathy also; as R。 L。 Stevenson certainly does。  As for  BEAU AUSTIN; it most emphatically; in view of this; should be re… writ … re…writ especially towards the ending … and the scandalous  Beau tarred and feathere

返回目录 上一页 下一页 回到顶部 0 0

你可能喜欢的