character-第67章
按键盘上方向键 ← 或 → 可快速上下翻页,按键盘上的 Enter 键可回到本书目录页,按键盘上方向键 ↑ 可回到本页顶部!
————未阅读完?加入书签已便下次继续阅读!
their regrets; their complacencies; and their self…
justifications?〃 (8)
When Mason was reproached for publishing the private letters of
Gray; he answered; 〃Would you always have my friends appear in
full…dress?〃 Johnson was of opinion that to write a man's life
truly; it is necessary that the biographer should have personally
known him。 But this condition has been wanting in some of the
best writers of biographies extant。 (9) In the case of Lord
Campbell; his personal intimacy with Lords Lyndhurst and Brougham
seems to have been a positive disadvantage; leading him to dwarf
the excellences and to magnify the blots in their characters。
Again; Johnson says: 〃If a man profess to write a life; he must
write it really as it was。 A man's peculiarities; and even his
vices; should be mentioned; because they mark his character。〃 But
there is always this difficulty;that while minute details of
conduct; favourable or otherwise; can best be given from personal
knowledge; they cannot always be published; out of regard for the
living; and when the time arrives when they may at length be told;
they are then no longer remembered。 Johnson himself expressed
this reluctance to tell all he knew of those poets who had been
his contemporaries; saying that he felt as if 〃walking upon ashes
under which the fire was not extinguished。〃
For this reason; amongst others; we rarely obtain an unvarnished
picture of character from the near relatives of distinguished men;
and; interesting though all autobiography is; still less can we
expect it from the men themselves。 In writing his own memoirs; a
man will not tell all that he knows about himself。 Augustine was
a rare exception; but few there are who will; as he did in his
'Confessions;' lay bare their innate viciousness; deceitfulness;
and selfishness。 There is a Highland proverb which says; that if
the best man's faults were written on his forehead he would pull
his bonnet over his brow。 〃There is no man;〃 said Voltaire; 〃who
has not something hateful in himno man who has not some of the
wild beast in him。 But there are few who will honestly tell us
how they manage their wild beast。〃 Rousseau pretended to unbosom
himself in his 'Confessions;' but it is manifest that he held back
far more than he revealed。 Even Chamfort; one of the last men to
fear what his contemporaries might think or say of him; once
observed:… 〃It seems to me impossible; in the actual state of
society; for any man to exhibit his secret heart; the details of
his character as known to himself; and; above all; his weaknesses
and his vices; to even his best friend。〃
An autobiography may be true so far as it goes; but in
communicating only part of the truth; it may convey an impression
that is really false。 It may be a disguisesometimes it is an
apologyexhibiting not so much what a man really was; as what he
would have liked to be。 A portrait in profile may be correct; but
who knows whether some scar on the off…cheek; or some squint in
the eye that is not seen; might not have entirely altered the
expression of the face if brought into sight? Scott; Moore;
Southey; all began autobiographies; but the task of continuing
them was doubtless felt to be too difficult as well as delicate;
and they were abandoned。
French literature is especially rich in a class of biographic
memoirs; of which we have few counterparts in English。 We refer
to their MEMOIRES POUR SERVIR; such as those of Sully; De Comines;
Lauzun; De Retz; De Thou; Rochefoucalt; &c。; in which we have
recorded an immense mass of minute and circumstantial information
relative to many great personages of history。 They are full of
anecdotes illustrative of life and character; and of details which
might be called frivolous; but that they throw a flood of light on
the social habits and general civilisation of the periods to which
they relate。 The MEMOIRES of Saint…Simon are something more: they
are marvellous dissections of character; and constitute the most
extraordinary collection of anatomical biography that has ever
been brought together。
Saint…Simon might almost be regarded in the light of a posthumous
court…spy of Louis the Fourteenth。 He was possessed by a passion
for reading character; and endeavouring to decipher motives and
intentions in the faces; expressions; conversation; and byplay of
those about him。 〃I examine all my personages closely;〃 said he
〃watch their mouth; eyes; and ears constantly。〃 And what he heard
and saw he noted down with extraordinary vividness and dash。
Acute; keen; and observant; he pierced the masks of the courtiers;
and detected their secrets。 The ardour with which he prosecuted
his favourite study of character seemed insatiable; and even
cruel。 〃The eager anatomist;〃 says Sainte…Beuve; 〃was not more
ready to plunge the scalpel into the still…palpitating bosom in
search of the disease that had baffled him。〃
La Bruyere possessed the same gift of accurate and penetrating
observation of character。 He watched and studied everybody about
him。 He sought to read their secrets; and; retiring to his
chamber; he deliberately painted their portraits; returning to
them from time to time to correct some prominent featurehanging
over them as fondly as an artist over some favourite study
adding trait to trait; and touch to touch; until at length the
picture was complete and the likeness perfect。
It may be said that much of the interest of biography; especially
of the more familiar sort; is of the nature of gossip; as that of
the MEMOIRES POUR SERVIR is of the nature of scandal; which is no
doubt true。 But both gossip and scandal illustrate the strength
of the interest which men and women take in each other's
personality; and which; exhibited in the form of biography; is
capable of communicating the highest pleasure; and yielding the
best instruction。 Indeed biography; because it is instinct of
humanity; is the branch of literature whichwhether in the form
of fiction; of anecdotal recollection; or of personal narrative
is the one that invariably commends itself to by far the largest
class of readers。
There is no room for doubt that the surpassing interest which
fiction; whether in poetry or prose; possesses for most minds;
arises mainly from the biographic element which it contains。
Homer's 'Iliad' owes its marvellous popularity to the genius which
its author displayed in the portrayal of heroic character。 Yet he
does not so much describe his personages in detail as make them
develope themselves by their actions。 〃There are in Homer;〃 said
Dr。 Johnson; 〃such characters of heroes and combination of
qualities of heroes; that the united powers of mankind ever since
have not produced any but what are to be found there。〃
The genius of Shakspeare also was displayed in the powerful
delineation of character; and the dramatic evolution of human
passions。 His personages seem to be realliving and breathing
before us。 So too with Cervantes; whose Sancho Panza; though
homely and vulgar; is intensely human。 The characters in Le
Sage's 'Gil Blas;' in Goldsmith's 'Vicar of Wakefield;' and in
Scott's marvellous muster…roll; seem to us almost as real as
persons whom we have actually known; and De Foe's greatest works
are but so many biographies; painted in minute detail; with
reality so apparently stamped upon every page; that it is
difficult to believe his Robinson Crusoe and Colonel Jack to have
been fictitious instead of real persons。
Though the richest romance lies enclosed in actual human life; and
though biography; because it describes beings who have actually
felt the joys and sorrows; and experienced the difficulties and
triumphs; of real life; is capable of being made more attractive;
than the most perfect fictions ever woven; it is remarkable that
so few men of genius have been attracted to the composition of
works of this kind。 Great work