representative government-第3章
按键盘上方向键 ← 或 → 可快速上下翻页，按键盘上的 Enter 键可回到本书目录页，按键盘上方向键 ↑ 可回到本页顶部！
————未阅读完？加入书签已便下次继续阅读！
r being in harmony with the national usages and character； and the like； means either this； or nothing to the purpose。 There is a great quantity of mere sentimentality connected with these and similar phrases； over and above the amount of rational meaning contained in them。 But； considered practically； these alleged requisites of political institutions are merely so many facilities for realising the three conditions。 When an institution； or a set of institutions； has the way prepared for it by the opinions； tastes； and habits of the people； they are not only more easily induced to accept it； but will more easily learn； and will be； from the beginning； better disposed； to do what is required of them both for the preservation of the institutions； and for bringing them into such action as enables them to produce their best results。 It would be a great mistake in any legislator not to shape his measures so as to take advantage of such pre…existing habits and feelings when available。 On the other hand； it is an exaggeration to elevate these mere aids and facilities into necessary conditions。 People are more easily induced to do； and do more easily； what they are already used to； but people also learn to do things new to them。 Familiarity is a great help； but much dwelling on an idea will make it familiar； even when strange at first。 There are abundant instances in which a whole people have been eager for untried things。 The amount of capacity which a people possess for doing new things； and adapting themselves to new circumstances； is itself one of the elements of the question。 It is a quality in which different nations； and different stages of civilisation； differ much from one another。 The capability of any given people for fulfilling the conditions of a given form of government cannot be pronounced on by any sweeping rule。 Knowledge of the particular people； and general practical judgment and sagacity； must be the guides。 There is also another consideration not to be lost sight of。 A people may be unprepared for good institutions； but to kindle a desire for them is a necessary part of the preparation。 To recommend and advocate a particular institution or form of government； and set its advantages in the strongest light； is one of the modes； often the only mode within reach； of educating the mind of the nation not only for accepting or claiming； but also for working； the institution。 What means had Italian patriots； during the last and present generation； of preparing the Italian people for freedom in unity； but by inciting them to demand it？ Those； however； who undertake such a task； need to be duly impressed； not solely with the benefits of the institution or polity which they recommend； but also with the capacities； moral； intellectual； and active； required for working it； that they may avoid； if possible； stirring up a desire too much in advance of the capacity。 The result of what has been said is； that； within the limits set by the three conditions so often adverted to； institutions and forms of government are a matter of choice。 To inquire into the best form of government in the abstract （as it is called） is not a chimerical； but a highly practical employment of scientific intellect； and to introduce into any country the best institutions which； in the existing state of that country； are capable of； in any tolerable degree； fulfilling the conditions； is one of the most rational objects to which practical effort can address itself。 Everything which can be said by way of disparaging the efficacy of human will and purpose in matters of government might be said of it in every other of its applications。 In all things there are very strict limits to human power。 It can only act by wielding some one or more of the forces of nature。 Forces； therefore； that can be applied to the desired use must exist； and will only act according to their own laws。 We cannot make the river run backwards； but we do not therefore say that watermills 〃are not made； but grow。〃 In politics； as in mechanics； the power which is to keep the engine going must be sought for outside the machinery； and if it is not forthcoming； or is insufficient to surmount the obstacles which may reasonably be expected； the contrivance will fail。 This is no peculiarity of the political art； and amounts only to saying that it is subject to the same limitations and conditions as all other arts。 At this point we are met by another objection； or the same objection in a different form。 The forces； it is contended； on which the greater political phenomena depend； are not amenable to the direction of politicians or philosophers。 The government of a country； it is affirmed； is； in all substantial respects； fixed and determined beforehand by the state of the country in regard to the distribution of the elements of social power。 Whatever is the strongest power in society will obtain the governing authority； and a change in the political constitution cannot be durable unless preceded or accompanied by an altered distribution of power in society itself。 A nation； therefore； cannot choose its form of government。 The mere details； and practical organisation； it may choose； but the essence of the whole； the seat of the supreme power； is determined for it by social circumstances。 That there is a portion of truth in this doctrine I at once admit； but to make it of any use； it must be reduced to a distinct expression and proper limits。 When it is said that the strongest power in society will make itself strongest in the government； what is meant by power？ Not thews and sinews； otherwise pure democracy would be the only form of polity that could exist。 To mere muscular strength； add two other elements； property and intelligence； and we are nearer the truth； but far from having yet reached it。 Not only is a greater number often kept down by a less； but the greater number may have a preponderance in property； and individually in intelligence； and may yet be held in subjection； forcibly or otherwise； by a minority in both respects inferior to it。 To make these various elements of power politically influential they must be organised； and the advantage in organisation is necessarily with those who are in possession of the government。 A much weaker party in all other elements of power may greatly preponderate when the powers of government are thrown into the scale； and may long retain its predominance through this alone： though； no doubt； a government so situated is in the condition called in mechanics unstable equilibrium； like a thing balanced on its smaller end； which； if once disturbed； tends more and more to depart from； instead of reverting to； its previous state。 But there are still stronger objections to this theory of government in the terms in which it is usually stated。 The power in society which has any tendency to convert itself into political power is not power quiescent； power merely passive； but active power； in other words； power actually exerted； that is to say； a very small portion of all the power in existence。 Politically speaking； a great part of all power consists in will。 How is it possible； then； to compute the elements of political power； while we omit from the computation anything which acts on the will？ To think that because those who wield the power in society wield in the end that of government； therefore it is of no use to attempt to influence the constitution of the government by acting on opinion； is to forget that opinion is itself one of the greatest active social forces。 One person with a belief is a social power equal to ninety…nine who have only interests。 They who can succeed in creating a general persuasion that a certain form of government； or social fact of any kind； deserves to be preferred； have made nearly the most important step which can possibly be taken towards ranging the powers of society on its side。 On the day when the proto…martyr was stoned to death at Jerusalem； while he who was to be the Apostle of the Gentiles stood by 〃consenting unto his death；〃 would any one have supposed that the party of that stoned man were then and there the strongest power in society？ And has not the event proved that they were so？ Because theirs was the most powerfu
