representative government-第2章
按键盘上方向键 ← 或 → 可快速上下翻页,按键盘上的 Enter 键可回到本书目录页,按键盘上方向键 ↑ 可回到本页顶部!
————未阅读完?加入书签已便下次继续阅读!
ts establishment。 They must be willing and able to do what is necessary to keep it standing。 And they must be willing and able to do what it requires of them to enable it to fulfil its purposes。 The word 〃do〃 is to be understood as including forbearances as well as acts。 They must be capable of fulfilling the conditions of action; and the conditions of self…restraint; which are necessary either for keeping the established polity in existence; or for enabling it to achieve the ends; its conduciveness to which forms its recommendation。 The failure of any of these conditions renders a form of government; whatever favourable promise it may otherwise hold out; unsuitable to the particular case。 The first obstacle; the repugnance of the people to the particular form of government; needs little illustration; because it never can in theory have been overlooked。 The case is of perpetual occurrence。 Nothing but foreign force would induce a tribe of North American Indians to submit to the restraints of a regular and civilised government。 The same might have been said; though somewhat less absolutely; of the barbarians who overran the Roman Empire。 It required centuries of time; and an entire change of circumstances; to discipline them into regular obedience even to their own leaders; when not actually serving under their banner。 There are nations who will not voluntarily submit to any government but that of certain families; which have from time immemorial had the privilege of supplying them with chiefs。 Some nations could not; except by foreign conquest; be made to endure a monarchy; others are equally averse to a republic。 The hindrance often amounts; for the time being; to impracticability。 But there are also cases in which; though not averse to a form of government… possibly even desiring it… a people may be unwilling or unable to fulfil its conditions。 They may be incapable of fulfilling such of them as are necessary to keep the government even in nominal existence。 Thus a people may prefer a free government; but if; from indolence; or carelessness; or cowardice; or want of public spirit; they are unequal to the exertions necessary for preserving it; if they will not fight for it when it is directly attacked; if they can be deluded by the artifices used to cheat them out of it; if by momentary discouragement; or temporary panic; or a fit of enthusiasm for an individual; they can be induced to lay their liberties at the feet even of a great man; or trust him with powers which enable him to subvert their institutions; in all these cases they are more or less unfit for liberty: and though it may be for their good to have had it even for a short time; they are unlikely long to enjoy it。 Again; a people may be unwilling or unable to fulfil the duties which a particular form of government requires of them。 A rude people; though in some degree alive to the benefits of civilised society; may be unable to practise the forbearance which it demands: their passions may be too violent; or their personal pride too exacting; to forego private conflict; and leave to the laws the avenging of their real or supposed wrongs。 In such a case; a civilised government; to be really advantageous to them; will require to be in a considerable degree despotic: to be one over which they do not themselves exercise control; and which imposes a great amount of forcible restraint upon their actions。 Again; a people must be considered unfit for more than a limited and qualified freedom; who will not co…operate actively with the law and the public authorities in the repression of evil…doers。 A people who are more disposed to shelter a criminal than to apprehend him; who; like the Hindoos; will perjure themselves to screen the man who has robbed them; rather than take trouble or expose themselves to vindictiveness by giving evidence against him; who; like some nations of Europe down to a recent date; if a man poniards another in the public street; pass by on the other side; because it is the business of the police to look to the matter; and it is safer not to interfere in what does not concern them; a people who are revolted by an execution; but not shocked at an assassination… require that the public authorities should be armed with much sterner powers of repression than elsewhere; since the first indispensable requisites of civilised life have nothing else to rest on。 These deplorable states of feeling; in any people who have emerged from savage life; are; no doubt; usually the consequence of previous bad government; which has taught them to regard the law as made for other ends than their good; and its administrators as worse enemies than those who openly violate it。 But however little blame may be due to those in whom these mental habits have grown up; and however the habits may be ultimately conquerable by better government; yet while they exist a people so disposed cannot be governed with as little power exercised over them as a people whose sympathies are on the side of the law; and who are willing to give active assistance in its enforcement。 Again; representative institutions are of little value; and may be a mere instrument of tyranny or intrigue; when the generality of electors are not sufficiently interested in their own government to give their vote; or; if they vote at all; do not bestow their suffrages on public grounds; but sell them for money; or vote at the beck of some one who has control over them; or whom for private reasons they desire to propitiate。 Popular election thus practised; instead of a security against misgovernment; is but an additional wheel in its machinery。 Besides these moral hindrances; mechanical difficulties are often an insuperable impediment to forms of government。 In the ancient world; though there might be; and often was; great individual or local independence; there could be nothing like a regulated popular government beyond the bounds of a single city…community; because there did not exist the physical conditions for the formation and propagation of a public opinion; except among those who could be brought together to discuss public matters in the same agora。 This obstacle is generally thought to have ceased by the adoption of the representative system。 But to surmount it completely; required the press; and even the newspaper press; the real equivalent; though not in all respects an adequate one; of the Pnyx and the Forum。 There have been states of society in which even a monarchy of any great territorial extent could not subsist; but unavoidably broke up into petty principalities; either mutually independent; or held together by a loose tie like the feudal: because the machinery of authority was not perfect enough to carry orders into effect at a great distance from the person of the ruler。 He depended mainly upon voluntary fidelity for the obedience even of his army; nor did there exist the means of making the people pay an amount of taxes sufficient for keeping up the force necessary to compel obedience throughout a large territory。 In these and all similar cases; it must be understood that the amount of the hindrance may be either greater or less。 It may be so great as to make the form of government work very ill; without absolutely precluding its existence; or hindering it from being practically preferable to any other which can be had。 This last question mainly depends upon a consideration which we have not yet arrived at… the tendencies of different forms of government to promote Progress。 We have now examined the three fundamental conditions of the adaptation of forms of government to the people who are to be governed by them。 If the supporters of what may be termed the naturalistic theory of politics; mean but to insist on the necessity of these three conditions; if they only mean that no government can permanently exist which does not fulfil the first and second conditions; and; in some considerable measure; the third; their doctrine; thus limited; is incontestable。 Whatever they mean more than this appears to me untenable。 All that we are told about the necessity of an historical basis for institutions; of their being in harmony with the national usages and character; and the like; means either this; or nothi