james otis the pre-revolutionist-第23章

按键盘上方向键 ← 或 → 可快速上下翻页，按键盘上的 Enter 键可回到本书目录页，按键盘上方向键 ↑ 可回到本页顶部！
————未阅读完？加入书签已便下次继续阅读！


he　had　a　fair　scholastic　career　and　graduated　at　the　age　of　nineteen　in　1743。　　While　popular　after　a　fashion　at　college；　he　was　a　bit　of　a　recluse　and　a　diligent　student　of　literature；　with　a　predilection；　it　is　said；　for　music；　playing　well　on　the　violin。　　After　graduating；　he　wisely　spent　two　years　in　general　reading　before　entering　upon　the　study　of　the　law；　which　he　did　in　1745　under　James　Gridley；　a　prominent　jurist　of　Massachusetts　and　sometime　Crown　Attorney…General。　　Three　years　later；　he　was　admitted　to　the　bar；　and　in　1748　began　to　practice　his　profession　at　Plymouth；　Mass。　　In　1750；　he　removed　to　Boston；　and　there　became　known　as　an　advocate　of　note　and　high　promise；　actuated　by　nice　professional　instincts；　with　a　fine　sense　of　honor；　and　keenly　appreciating；　it　is　recorded；　his　responsibilities　in　his　relations　with　his　clients；　which　led　him　to　accept　only　such　cases　as　he　could　conscientiously　defend　and　take　retainers　from。

This　characteristic　scruple　in　the　lawyer　gave　him　a　high　standing　in　his　profession；　and　naturally　led　to　success　at　the　bar；　besides　winning　for　him　the　respect　and　admiration　of　troops　of　warm　and　attached　friends。

About　this　time　he　appears　to　have　developed　uncommon　gifts　as　an　orator；　and　his　rather　irascible　nature　gave　scope　to　his　keen　wit　and　powers　of　sarcasm。　　His　extensive　reading　and　ultimate　study　of　good　literary　models　naturally　bore　fruit　in　the　practice　of　the　forensic　art　and　gave　him　prestige　at　the　bar；　as　well　as；　later　on；　in　taking　to　public　life　and　to　the　advocacy　of　the　rights　of　the　Colonists　in　the　controversy　with　the　Crown。

In　1755；　when　he　had　attained　his　thirtieth　year；　Otis　married　Ruth　Cunningham；　the　daughter　of　an　influential　Boston　merchant。　　The　lady；　from　all　accounts；　was　undemonstrative　and　devoid　of　her　husband's　patriotic　ardor；　traits　that　did　not　tend　to　domestic　felicity　or　lead；　on　the　wife's　part；　to　a　commanding　influence　over　her　vehement　and　somewhat　eccentric　husband。　　The　fruit　of　the　union　was　one　son　and　two　daughters。　　The　son　entered　the　navy；　but　unhappily　died　in　his　eighteenth　year。　　One　of　the　daughters；　the　elder　of　the　two；　probably　under　the　mother's　influence；　angered　her　father　by　espousing　the　English　cause　and　marrying　a　Captain　Brown；　a　British　officer　on　duty　at　Boston。　　The　marriage　was　a　source　of　irritation　and　unhappiness　to　Otis；　who；　after　his　son…in…law　had　fought　and　been　wounded　at　Bunker　Hill；　withdrew　with　his　wife　to　England；　and　was　there　disowned　and　cut　off　by　the　irate　patriot；　whose　affection　was　also　dried　up　for　the　erring　daughter。　　The　younger　daughter；　on　the　other　hand；　was　a　devoted　and　patriotic　woman；　who　shared　her　father's　enthusiasm　for　the　popular　cause。　　She　married　Benjamin　Lincoln　of　Boston；　but　early　became　a　widow。

By　this　time；　Otis　had　become　not　only　a　man　eminent　in　his　profession　in　Boston；　but　a　powerful　factor　in　the　public　life　of　the　city。　　The　New　England　commonwealth　was　then　beginning　to　be　greatly　exercised　over　the　aggressions　of　the　Motherland；　and　this　was　keenly　watched　by　Otis；　who　took　a　lively　and　patriotic　interest　in　Colonial　affairs。　　Beyond　his　profession；　which　had　closely　engrossed　him；　he　had　heretofore　taken　little　part　in　public　life；　his　leisure；　indeed；　he　had　employed　more　as　a　student　of　books　rather　than　of　national　affairs；　as　his　work　on　the　〃Rudiments　of　Latin　Prosody；〃　published　in　1760；　bears　witness。　　As　the　era　of　a　conflict　with　England　neared；　he　however　altered　in　this　respect；　and　became　a　zealous　advocate　of　non…interference　on　the　part　of　the　Crown　in　the　affairs　of　the　Colonies　and　an　ardent　protester　against　English　oppression　and　injustice。　　Soon　grievances　arose　in　the　relations　between　the　Colonies　and　England　which　gave　Otis　the　right　to　denounce　the　Motherland　and　excite　dissaffection　among　the　people　of　the　New　World。　　These　grievances　arose　out　of　the　strained　commercial　relations　between　the　two　countries　and　the　attempt　of　England　to　devise　and　enforce　irritating　schemes　of　Colonial　control。　　Of　these　causes　of　outcry　in　the　New　World　the　two　chief　were　the　revival　and　rigid　execution　of　the　English　Navigation　Acts；　designed　to　limit　the　freedom　of　the　American　Colonies　in　trading　with　West　Indian　ports　in　American　built　vessels；　and　the　insistence；　on　the　part　of　the　Crown　and　the　British　government；　that　the　Colonies　should　be　taxed　for　the　partial　support　of　English　garrisons　in　the　country。　　In　the　development　of　trade　in　the　New　World；　the　Colonies　reasonably　felt　that　they　should　not　be　harassed　by　the　mother　country；　and　so　they　permitted　commerce　to　expand　as　it　would；　and　when　this　was　enjoined　by　England　they　naturally　resented　interference　by　her　and　began　to　evade　the　laws　which　she　imposed　upon　the　young　country　and　bid　defiance　to　the　Crown　customs　officers　in　the　measures　resorted　to　in　the　way　of　restriction　and　imposed　penalty。　　This　attitude　of　the　Colonists　in　ignoring　or　defying　English　laws　was　soon　now　specially　emphasized　when　the　Crown　resorted　to　more　stringent　measures　to　curb　Colonial　trade　and　impose　heavy　customs　duties　on　articles　entering　New　World　ports。　　Flagrant　acts　of　evasion　followed；　and　defiant　smuggling　at　length　brought　its　legal　consequencesin　the　issue　by　the　English　Court　of　Exchequer　of　search　warrants；　or　Writs　of　Assistance；　as　they　were　called；　by　which　it　was　sought　to　put　a　stop　to　smuggling；　by　resorting　to　humiliating　arbitrary　measures　sure　to　be　resented　by　the　Colonies。　　These　Writs　of　Assistance　empowered　the　King's　officers；　or　others　delegated　by　them；　to　board　vessels　in　port　and　enter　and　search　warehouses；　and　even　the　private　homes　of　the　Colonists；　for　contraband　goods　and　all　importations　that　had　not　paid　toll　to　His　Majesty's　customs。　　This　attempted　rigid　execution　of　the　Acts　of　Trade；　together　with　other　arbitrary　measures　on　the　part　of　the　Crown　which　followed；　such　as　the　imposition　of　the　Stamp　Act；　and　the　coercive　levy　of　taxes　to　pay　part　of　the　cost　of　maintaining　English　troops　in　the　Colonies；　was　soon　to　cost　England　dear　and　end　in　the　loss　of　her　possessions　in　America　and　the　rise　of　the　New　World　Republic。

One　of　the　most　active　men　in　the　Colonies　to　oppose　this　Colonial　policy　of　England　was；　as　we　know；　the　patriot　James　Otis；　at　the　time　Advocate…General　of　the　Crown；　who　took　strong　ground　against　the　Writs　of　Assistance；　arguing　that　they　were　not　only　arbitrary　and　despotic　in　their　operation；　but　unconstitutional　in　their　imposition　on　the　Colony；　since　they　were　irreconcilable　with　the　Colonial　charters　and　a　violation　of　the　rights　and　prerogatives　of　the　people。　　Rather　than　uphold　them　as　a　Crown　officer；　Otis　resigned　his　post　of　Advocate…General；　and　became　a　fervent　pleader　of　the　popular　cause　and　denouncer　of　the　legal　processes　by　which　the　Crown　sought　to　impose；　with　its　authority；　its　obnoxious　trammellings　and　restrictions　without　the　consent　of　and　in　defiance　of　the　inalienable　rights　of　the　American　people。　　Otis　not　only　resisted　the　enforcement　by　the　King's　officers　of　the　odious　warrants　and　denounced　their　arbitrary　character；　but　inveighed　hotly　against　English　oppression　and　all　attempts　of　the　Crown　and　its　deputy　in　the　province；　the　Lieutenant…Governor　of　Massachusetts；　to　restrict　the　liberties　of　the　people　and　impose　unconstitutional　laws　upon　the　Colony。　　The　Writs　of　Assistance　were；　of　course；　defended　by　the　representatives　of　the　Crown　in　the　Colony；　and　on　the　plea　that　without　some　such　legal　process　the　laws　could　not　be　executed；　and　that　similar　writs　were　in　existence　in　England　and　made　use　of　there　on　the　authority　of　English　statutes。　　The　pleas　against　them　advanced　by　Otis　took　cognizance　of　the　fact　that　the　Writs　were　irreconcilable　with　the　charter　of　the　Massachusetts　Colony；　that　English　precedent　for　their　enforcement　had　no　application　in　America；　and　that　taxation　by　the　Motherland　and　compulsory　acts　of　the　nature　of　the　Writs　did　open　violence　to　the　rights　and　liberties　of　the　people　and　were　inherently　arbitrary　and　despotic；　being　imposed　without　the　consent　of　the　Colonies　and　to　their　grave　hurt　and　detriment。　　In　pleading　the　Colonial　cause　against　the　Writs；　Otis　struck