the perpetuation of living beings-第3章
按键盘上方向键 ← 或 → 可快速上下翻页,按键盘上的 Enter 键可回到本书目录页,按键盘上方向键 ↑ 可回到本页顶部!
————未阅读完?加入书签已便下次继续阅读!
nourishment; and so on; you may by…and…by convert single flowers into
double flowers; and make thorns shoot out into branches。 You may
thicken or make various modifications in the shape of the fruit。 In
animals; too; you may produce analogous changes in this way; as in the
case of that deep bronze colour which persons rarely lose after having
passed any length of time in tropical countries。 You may also alter
the development of the muscles very much; by dint of training; all the
world knows that exercise has a great effect in this way; we always
expect to find the arm of a blacksmith hard and wiry; and possessing a
large development of the brachial muscles。 No doubt training; which is
one of the forms of external conditions; converts what are originally
only instructions; teachings; into habits; or; in other words; into
organizations; to a great extent; but this second cause of variation
cannot be considered to be by any means a large one。 The third cause
that I have to mention; however; is a very extensive one。 It is one
that; for want of a better name; has been called 〃spontaneous
variation;〃 which means that when we do not know anything about the
cause of phenomena; we call it spontaneous。 In the orderly chain of
causes and effects in this world; there are very few things of which it
can be said with truth that they are spontaneous。 Certainly not in
these physical matters;in these there is nothing of the
kind;everything depends on previous conditions。 But when we cannot
trace the cause of phenomena; we call them spontaneous。
Of these variations; multitudinous as they are; but little is known with
perfect accuracy。 I will mention to you some two or three cases;
because they are very remarkable in themselves; and also because I
shall want to use them afterwards。 Reaumur; a famous French naturalist;
a great many years ago; in an essay which he wrote upon the art of
hatching chickens;which was indeed a very curious essay;had
occasion to speak of variations and monstrosities。 One very remarkable
case had come under his notice of a variation in the form of a human
member; in the person of a Maltese; of the name of Gratio Kelleia; who
was born with six fingers upon each hand; and the like number of toes
to each of his feet。 That was a case of spontaneous variation。 Nobody
knows why he was born with that number of fingers and toes; and as we
don't know; we call it a case of 〃spontaneous〃 variation。 There is
another remarkable case also。 I select these; because they happen to
have been observed and noted very carefully at the time。 It frequently
happens that a variation occurs; but the persons who notice it do not
take any care in noting down the particulars; until at length; when
inquiries come to be made; the exact circumstances are forgotten; and
hence; multitudinous as may be such 〃spontaneous〃 variations; it is
exceedingly difficult to get at the origin of them。
The second case is one of which you may find the whole details in the
〃Philosophical Transactions〃 for the year 1813; in a paper communicated
by Colonel Humphrey to the President of the Royal Society;〃On a new
Variety in the Breed of Sheep;〃 giving an account of a very remarkable
breed of sheep; which at one time was well known in the northern states
of America; and which went by the name of the Ancon or the Otter breed
of sheep。 In the year 1791; there was a farmer of the name of Seth
Wright in Massachusetts; who had a flock of sheep; consisting of a ram
and; I think; of some twelve or thirteen ewes。 Of this flock of ewes;
one at the breeding…time bore a lamb which was very singularly formed;
it had a very long body; very short legs; and those legs were bowed! I
will tell you by…and…by how this singular variation in the breed of
sheep came to be noted; and to have the prominence that it now has。 For
the present; I mention only these two cases; but the extent of variation
in the breed of animals is perfectly obvious to any one who has studied
natural history with ordinary attention; or to any person who compares
animals with others of the same kind。 It is strictly true that there
are never any two specimens which are exactly alike; however similar;
they will always differ in some certain particular。
Now let us go back to Atavism;to the hereditary tendency I spoke of。
What will come of a variation when you breed from it; when Atavism
comes; if I may say so; to intersect variation? The two cases of which
I have mentioned the history; give a most excellent illustration of
what occurs。 Gratio Kelleia; the Maltese; married when he was
twenty…two years of age; and; as I suppose there were no six…fingered
ladies in Malta; he married an ordinary five…fingered person。 The
result of that marriage was four children; the first; who was christened
Salvator; had six fingers and six toes; like his father; the second was
George; who had five fingers and toes; but one of them was deformed;
showing a tendency to variation; the third was Andre; he had five
fingers and five toes; quite perfect; the fourth was a girl; Marie; she
had five fingers and five toes; but her thumbs were deformed; showing a
tendency toward the sixth。
These children grew up; and when they came to adult years; they all
married; and of course it happened that they all married five…fingered
and five…toed persons。 Now let us see what were the results。 Salvator
had four children; they were two boys; a girl; and another boy; the
first two boys and the girl were six…fingered and six…toed like their
grandfather; the fourth boy had only five fingers and five toes。 George
had only four children; there were two girls with six fingers and six
toes; there was one girl with six fingers and five toes on the right
side; and five fingers and five toes on the left side; so that she was
half and half。 The last; a boy; had five fingers and five toes。 The
third; Andre; you will recollect; was perfectly well…formed; and he had
many children whose hands and feet were all regularly developed。 Marie;
the last; who; of course; married a man who had only five fingers; had
four children; the first; a boy; was born with six toes; but the other
three were normal。
Now observe what very extraordinary phenomena are presented here。 You
have an accidental variation arising from what you may call a
monstrosity; you have that monstrosity tendency or variation diluted in
the first instance by an admixture with a female of normal construction;
and you would naturally expect that; in the results of such an union;
the monstrosity; if repeated; would be in equal proportion with the
normal type; that is to say; that the children would be half and half;
some taking the peculiarity of the father; and the others being of the
purely normal type of the mother; but you see we have a great
preponderance of the abnormal type。 Well; this comes to be mixed once
more with the pure; the normal type; and the abnormal is again produced
in large proportion; notwithstanding the second dilution。 Now what
would have happened if these abnormal types had intermarried with each
other; that is to say; suppose the two boys of Salvator had taken it
into their heads to marry their first cousins; the two first girls of
George; their uncle? You will remember that these are all of the
abnormal type of their grandfather。 The result would probably have
been; that their offspring would have been in every case a further
development of that abnormal type。 You see it is only in the fourth;
in the person of Marie; that the tendency; when it appears but slightly
in the second generation; is washed out in the third; while the progeny
of Andre; who escaped in the first instance; escape altogether。
We have in this case a good example of nature's tendency to the
perpetuation of a variation。 Here it is certainly a variation which
carried with it no use or benefit; and yet you see the tendency to
perpetuation may be so strong; that; notwithstanding a great admixture
of pure blood; the variety continues itself up to the third generation;
which is largely marked with it。 In this case; as I have said; there
was no means of the second generation inter