darwin and modern science-第101章
按键盘上方向键 ← 或 → 可快速上下翻页，按键盘上的 Enter 键可回到本书目录页，按键盘上方向键 ↑ 可回到本页顶部！
————未阅读完？加入书签已便下次继续阅读！
Bates read his paper before the Linnean Society； Nov。 21； 1861； and Darwin's impressions on hearing it were conveyed in a letter to the author dated Dec。 3： 〃Under a general point of view； I am quite convinced （Hooker and Huxley took the same view some months ago） that a philosophic view of nature can solely be driven into naturalists by treating special subjects as you have done。 Under a special point of view； I think you have solved one of the most perplexing problems which could be given to solve。〃 （〃Life and Letters〃； II。 page 378。） The memoir appeared in the following year； and after reading it Darwin wrote as follows； Nov。 20； 1862： 〃。。。In my opinion it is one of the most remarkable and admirable papers I ever read in my life。。。I am rejoiced that I passed over the whole subject in the 〃Origin〃； for I should have made a precious mess of it。 You have most clearly stated and solved a wonderful problem。。。Your paper is too good to be largely appreciated by the mob of naturalists without souls； but； rely on it； that it will have LASTING value； and I cordially congratulate you on your first great work。 You will find； I should think； that Wallace will fully appreciate it。〃 （〃Life and Letters〃； II。 pages 391…393。） Four days later； Nov。 24； Darwin wrote to Hooker on the same subject： 〃I have now finished his paper。。。' it seems to me admirable。 To my mind the act of segregation of varieties into species was never so plainly brought forward； and there are heaps of capital miscellaneous observations。〃 （〃More Letters〃； I。 page 214。）
Darwin was here referring to the tendency of similar varieties of the same species to pair together； and on Nov。 25 he wrote to Bates asking for fuller information on this subject。 （〃More Letters〃； I。 page 215。 See also parts of Darwin's letter to Bates in 〃Life and Letters〃； II。 page 392。） If Bates's opinion were well founded； sexual selection would bear a most important part in the establishment of such species。 （See Poulton； 〃Essays on Evolution〃； 1908； pages 65； 85…88。） It must be admitted； however； that the evidence is as yet quite insufficient to establish this conclusion。 It is interesting to observe how Darwin at once fixed on the part of Bates's memoir which seemed to bear upon sexual selection。 A review of Bates's theory of Mimicry was contributed by Darwin to the 〃Natural History Review〃 （New Ser。 Vol。 III。 1863； page 219。） and an account of it is to be found in the 〃Origin〃 （Edition 1872； pages 375…378。） and in 〃The Descent of Man〃。 （Edition 1874； pages 323…325。）
Darwin continually writes of the value of hypothesis as the inspiration of inquiry。 We find an example in his letter to Bates； Nov。 22； 1860： 〃I have an old belief that a good observer really means a good theorist； and I fully expect to find your observations most valuable。〃 （〃More Letters〃； I。 page 176。） Darwin's letter refers to many problems upon which Bates had theorised and observed； but as regards Mimicry itself the hypothesis was thought out after the return of the letter from the Amazons； when he no longer had the opportunity of testing it by the observation of living Nature。 It is by no means improbable that； had he been able to apply this test； Bates would have recognised that his division of butterfly resemblances into two classes；one due to the theory of mimicry； the other to the influence of local conditions；could not be sustained。
Fritz Muller's contributions to the problem of Mimicry were all made in S。E。 Brazil； and numbers of them were communicated； with other observations on natural history； to Darwin； and by him sent to Professor R。 Meldola who published many of the facts。 Darwin's letters to Meldola （Poulton； 〃Charles Darwin and the theory of Natural Selection〃； London； 1896； pages 199…218。） contain abundant proofs of his interest in Muller's work upon Mimicry。 One deeply interesting letter （Loc。 cit。 pages 201； 202。） dated Jan。 23； 1872； proves that Fritz Muller before he originated the theory of Common Warning Colours （Synaposematic Resemblance or Mullerian Mimicry）； which will ever be associated with his name； had conceived the idea of the production of mimetic likeness by sexual selection。
Darwin's letter to Meldola shows that he was by no means inclined to dismiss the suggestion as worthless； although he considered it daring。 〃You will also see in this letter a strange speculation； which I should not dare to publish； about the appreciation of certain colours being developed in those species which frequently behold other forms similarly ornamented。 I do not feel at all sure that this view is as incredible as it may at first appear。 Similar ideas have passed through my mind when considering the dull colours of all the organisms which inhabit dull…coloured regions； such as Patagonia and the Galapagos Is。〃 A little later； on April 5； he wrote to Professor August Weismann on the same subject： 〃It may be suspected that even the habit of viewing differently coloured surrounding objects would influence their taste； and Fritz Muller even goes so far as to believe that the sight of gaudy butterflies might influence the taste of distinct species。〃 （〃Life and Letters〃； III。 page 157。）
This remarkable suggestion affords interesting evidence that F。 Muller was not satisfied with the sufficiency of Bates's theory。 Nor is this surprising when we think of the numbers of abundant conspicuous butterflies which he saw exhibiting mimetic likenesses。 The common instances in his locality； and indeed everywhere in tropical America； were anything but the hard…pressed struggling forms assumed by the theory of Bates。 They belonged to the groups which were themselves mimicked by other butterflies。 Fritz Muller's suggestion also shows that he did not accept Bates's alternative explanation of a superficial likeness between models themselves； based on some unknown influence of local physico…chemical forces。 At the same time Muller's own suggestion was subject to this apparently fatal objection； that the sexual selection he invoked would tend to produce resemblances in the males rather than the females； while it is well known that when the sexes differ the females are almost invariably more perfectly mimetic than the males and in a high proportion of cases are mimetic while the males are non…mimetic。
The difficulty was met several years later by Fritz Muller's well…known theory； published in 1879 （〃Kosmos〃； May 1879； page 100。）； and immediately translated by Meldola and brought before the Entomological Society。 （〃Proc。 Ent。 Soc。 Lond。〃 1879； page xx。） Darwin's letter to Meldola dated June 6； 1879； shows 〃that the first introduction of this new and most suggestive hypothesis into this country was due to the direct influence of Darwin himself； who brought it before the notice of the one man who was likely to appreciate it at its true value and to find the means for its presentation to English naturalists。〃 （〃Charles Darwin and the Theory of Natural Selection〃； page 214。） Of the hypothesis itself Darwin wrote 〃F。 Muller's view of the mutual protection was quite new to me。〃 （Ibid。 page 213。） The hypothesis of Mullerian mimicry was at first strongly opposed。 Bates himself could never make up his mind to accept it。 As the Fellows were walking out of the meeting at which Professor Meldola explained the hypothesis； an eminent entomologist； now deceased； was heard to say to Bates： 〃It's a case of save me from my friends！〃 The new ideas encountered and still encounter to a great extent the difficulty that the theory of Bates had so completely penetrated the literature of natural history。 The present writer has observed that naturalists who have not thoroughly absorbed the older hypothesis are usually far more impressed by the newer one than are those whose allegiance has already been rendered。 The acceptance of Natural Selection itself was at first hindered by similar causes； as Darwin clearly recognised： 〃If you argue about the non… acceptance of Natural Selection； it seems to me a very striking fact that the Newtonian theory of gravitation； which seems to every one now so certain and plain； was rejected by a man so extraordinarily able as Leibnitz。 The truth will not penetrate a preoccupi
