贝壳电子书 > 英文原著电子书 > the vested interests and the common man >

第13章

the vested interests and the common man-第13章

小说: the vested interests and the common man 字数: 每页4000字

按键盘上方向键 ← 或 → 可快速上下翻页,按键盘上的 Enter 键可回到本书目录页,按键盘上方向键 ↑ 可回到本页顶部!
————未阅读完?加入书签已便下次继续阅读!



indispensable material means of industry。 Though not hitherto by 
formal specification and legal provision; their assets include; 
in effect; the state of the industrial arts as well as the 
mechanical appliances and the materials without which these 
industrial arts are of no effect。 It is true; a little something; 
and indeed more than a little; has been done toward the due legal 
recognition of the investor's usufruct of the community's 
technological efficiency; in the recognition of vested interests 
and intangible assets as articles of private property defensible 
at law。 But on the whole; and until a relatively recent date; the 
investors' tenure of this usufruct has been allowed to rest 
informally on their control of the community's material assets。 
Still; the outlook now appears to be that something further may 
presently be done toward a more secure and unambiguous tenure of 
this usufruct; by suitable legal decisions bearing on the 
inviolability of vested interests and intangible assets。 The 
outcome is; in effect; that these owners have equitably become 
the sole legitimate beneficiaries of the possible margin of 
product above cost。 
    These are also simple facts and patent; and should seem 
sufficiently obvious without argument。 They have also been 
explained at some length elsewhere。 But this recital of what 
should already be commonplace information seems necessary here 
for the sake of a more perspicuous continuity in the present 
argument。 To many persons; perhaps to the greater proportion of 
those unpropertied persons that are often spoken of collectively 
as 〃the common man;〃 the state of things which has just been 
outlined may seem untoward。 And further reflection on the 
character and prospective consequences of this arrangement is 
likely to add something more to the common man's apprehension of 
hardship and insecurity to come。 Therefore it may be well to 
recall that this state of things has been brought to pass not by 
the failure of those principles of equity and self…help that lie 
at the root of it all; but rather by the eminently unyielding 
stability and sufficiency of these principles under new 
conditions。 It is not due to any inherent weakness or shiftiness 
in these principles of law and custom; which have faithfully 
remained the same as ever; and which all men admit were good and 
sound at the period of their installation。 But it is beginning to 
appear now; after the event; that the inclusion of unrestricted 
ownership among those rights and perquisites which were allowed 
to stand over when the transition was made to the modern point of 
view is likely to prove inexpedient in the further course of 
growth and change。 
    Unrestricted ownership of property; with inheritance; free 
contract; and self…help; is believed to have been highly 
expedient as well as eminently equitable under the circumstances 
which conditioned civilised life at the period when the civilised 
world made up its mind to that effect。 And the discrepancy which 
has come in evidence in this later time is traceable to the fact 
that other things have not remained the same。 The odious outcome 
has been made by disturbing causes; not by these enlightened 
principles of honest living。 Security and unlimited discretion in 
the rights of ownership were once rightly made much of as a 
simple and obvious safeguard of self…direction and self…help for 
the common man; whereas; in the event; under a new order of 
circumstances; it all promises to be nothing better than a means 
of assured defeat and vexation for the common man。 
 
Chapter 4 
 
Free Income 
 
    Industry of the modern sort  mechanical; specialised; 
standardised; drawn on a large scale  is highly productive。 
When this industrial system of the new order is not hindered by 
outside control it will yield a very large net return of output 
over cost;  counting cost in terms of man power and necessary 
consumption; so large; indeed; that the cost of what is 
necessarily consumed in productive work; in the way of materials; 
mechanical appliances; and subsistence of the workmen; is 
inconsiderable by comparison。 The same thing may be described by 
saying that the necessary consumption of subsistence and 
industrial plant amounts to but an inconsiderable deduction from 
the gross output of industry at any time。 So inordinately 
productive is this familiar new order of industry that in 
ordinary times it is forever in danger of running into excesses 
and turning out an output in excess of what the market  that is 
to say the business situation  will tolerate。 There is constant 
danger of 〃overproduction;〃 So that there is commonly a large 
volume of man power unemployed and an appreciable proportion of 
the industrial plant lying idle or half idle。 It is quite 
unusual; perhaps altogether out of the question; to let all or 
nearly all the available plant and man power run at full capacity 
even for a limited time。 
    It is; of course; impossible to say how large the net 
aggregate product over cost would be  counting the product in 
percentages of the necessary cost  in case this industrial 
system were allowed to work at full capacity and with free use of 
all the available technological knowledge。 There is no safe 
ground for an estimate; for such a thing has never been tried; 
and no near approach to such a state of things is to be looked 
for under the existing circumstances of ownership and control。 
Even under the most favorable conditions of brisk times the 
business situation will not permit it。 There will at least always 
be an indefinitely large allowance to be reckoned for work and 
substance expended on salesmanship; advertising; and competitive 
management designed to increase sales。 This line of expenditures 
is a necessary part of businesslike management; although it 
contributes nothing to the output of goods; and in that sense it 
is to be counted as a necessary deduction from the net productive 
capacity of the industrial system as it runs。 It would also be 
extremely difficult to make allowance for this deduction; since 
much of it is not recognised as such by the men in charge and 
does not appear on their books under any special descriptive 
heading。 In one way and another; and for divers and various 
reasons; the net production of goods serviceable for human use 
falls considerably short of the gross output; and the gross 
output is always short of the productive capacity of the 
available plant and man power。 
    Still; taken as it goes; with whatever handicap of these 
various kinds is to be allowed for; it remains patently true that 
the net product greatly exceeds the cost。 So much so that 
whatever is required for the replacement of the material 
equipment consumed in production; plus 〃reasonable returns〃 on 
this equipment; commonly amounts to no more than a fraction of 
the total output。 The resulting margin of excess product over 
cost plus reasonable returns on the material equipment is due to 
the high productive efficiency of the current state of the 
industrial arts and is the source of that free income which gives 
rise to intangible assets。 The distinction between tangible 
assets and intangible is not a hard and fast one; of course; but 
the difference is sufficiently broad and sufficiently well 
understood for use in the present connection; so long as no pains 
is taken to confuse these terms with needless technical verbiage。 
    To avoid debate and digression; it may be remarked that 
〃reasonable returns〃 is also here used in the ordinary sense of 
the expression; without further definition; as being sufficiently 
understood and precise enough for the argument。 The play of 
motives and transactions by which a rough common measure of 
reasonable returns has been arrived at is taken for granted。 A 
detailed examination of all that matter would involve an extended 
digression; and nothing would be gained for the argument。 
According to the traditional view; which was handed on from the 
period before the coming of corporation finance; and which still 
stands over as an article of common belief in t

返回目录 上一页 下一页 回到顶部 0 0

你可能喜欢的