the writings-2-第18章
按键盘上方向键 ← 或 → 可快速上下翻页,按键盘上的 Enter 键可回到本书目录页,按键盘上方向键 ↑ 可回到本页顶部!
————未阅读完?加入书签已便下次继续阅读!
that nothing could afford me more satisfaction than to learn that
you and others of my young friends at home were doing battle in
the contest and endearing themselves to the people and taking a
stand far above any I have ever been able to reach in their
admiration。 I cannot conceive that other men feel differently。
Of course I cannot demonstrate what I say; but I was young once;
and I am sure I was never ungenerously thrust back。 I hardly
know what to say。 The way for a young man to rise is to improve
himself every way he can; never suspecting that anybody wishes to
hinder him。 Allow me to assure you that suspicion and jealousy
never did help any man in any situation。 There may sometimes be
ungenerous attempts to keep a young man down; and they will
succeed; too; if he allows his mind to be diverted from its true
channel to brood over the attempted injury。 Cast about and see
if this feeling has not injured every person you have ever known
to fall into it。
Now; in what I have said I am sure you will suspect nothing but
sincere friendship。 I would save you from a fatal error。 You
have been a studious young man。 You are far better informed on
almost all subjects than I ever have been。 You cannot fail in
any laudable object unless you allow your mind to be improperly
directed。 I have some the advantage of you in the world's
experience; merely by being older; and it is this that induces me
to advise。 You still seem to be a little mistaken about the
Congressional Globe and Appendix。 They contain all of the
speeches that are published in any way。 My speech and Dayton's
speech which you say you got in pamphlet form are both word for
word in the Appendix。 I repeat again; all are there。
Your friend; as ever;
A。 LINCOLN。
GENERAL TAYLOR AND THE VETO
SPEECH IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES;
JULY 27; 1848。
Mr。 SPEAKER; our Democratic friends seem to be in a great
distress because they think our candidate for the Presidency
don't suit us。 Most of them cannot find out that General Taylor
has any principles at all; some; however; have discovered that he
has one; but that one is entirely wrong。 This one principle is
his position on the veto power。 The gentleman from Tennessee
'Mr。 Stanton' who has just taken his seat; indeed; has said there
is very little; if any; difference on this question between
General Taylor and all the Presidents; and he seems to think it
sufficient detraction from General Taylor's position on it that
it has nothing new in it。 But all others whom I have heard speak
assail it furiously。 A new member from Kentucky 'Mr。 Clark'; of
very considerable ability; was in particular concerned about it。
He thought it altogether novel and unprecedented for a President
or a Presidential candidate to think of approving bills whose
constitutionality may not be entirely clear to his own mind。 He
thinks the ark of our safety is gone unless Presidents shall
always veto such bills as in their judgment may be of doubtful
constitutionality。 However clear Congress may be on their
authority to pass any particular act; the gentleman from Kentucky
thinks the President must veto it if he has doubts about it。 Now
I have neither time nor inclination to argue with the gentleman
on the veto power as an original question; but I wish to show
that General Taylor; and not he; agrees with the earlier
statesmen on this question。 When the bill chartering the first
Bank of the United States passed Congress; its constitutionality
was questioned。 Mr。 Madison; then in the House of
Representatives; as well as others; had opposed it on that
ground。 General Washington; as President; was called on to
approve or reject it。 He sought and obtained on the
constitutionality question the separate written opinions of
Jefferson; Hamilton; and Edmund Randolph;they then being
respectively Secretary of State; Secretary of the Treasury; and
Attorney general。 Hamilton's opinion was for the power; while
Randolph's and Jefferson's were both against it。 Mr。 Jefferson;
after giving his opinion deciding only against the
constitutionality of the bill; closes his letter with the
paragraph which I now read:
〃It must be admitted; however; that unless the President's mind;
on a view of everything which is urged for and against this bill;
is tolerably clear that it is unauthorized by the Constitution;
if the pro and con hang so even as to balance his judgment; a
just respect for the wisdom of the legislature would naturally
decide the balance in favor of their opinion。 It is chiefly for
cases where they are clearly misled by error; ambition; or
interest; that the Constitution has placed a check in the
negative of the President。
〃THOMAS JEFFERSON。
〃February 15; 1791。〃
General Taylor's opinion; as expressed in his Allison letter; is
as I now read:
〃The power given by the veto is a high conservative power; but;
in my opinion; should never be exercised except in cases of clear
violation of the Constitution; or manifest haste and want of
consideration by Congress。〃
It is here seen that; in Mr。 Jefferson's opinion; if on the
constitutionality of any given bill the President doubts; he is
not to veto it; as the gentleman from Kentucky would have him do;
but is to defer to Congress and approve it。 And if we compare
the opinion of Jefferson and Taylor; as expressed in these
paragraphs; we shall find them more exactly alike than we can
often find any two expressions having any literal difference。
None but interested faultfinders; I think; can discover any
substantial variation。
But gentlemen on the other side are unanimously agreed that
General Taylor has no other principles。 They are in utter
darkness as to his opinions on any of the questions of policy
which occupy the public attention。 But is there any doubt as to
what he will do on the prominent questions if elected? Not the
least。 It is not possible to know what he will or would do in
every imaginable case; because many questions have passed away;
and others doubtless will arise which none of us have yet thought
of; but on the prominent questions of currency; tariff; internal
improvements; and Wilmot Proviso; General Taylor's course is at
least as well defined as is General Cass's。 Why; in their
eagerness to get at General Taylor; several Democratic members
here have desired to know whether; in case of his election; a
bankrupt law is to be established。 Can they tell us General
Cass's opinion on this question?
'Some member answered; 〃He is against it。〃'
Aye; how do you know he is? There is nothing about it in the
platform; nor elsewhere; that I have seen。 If the gentleman
knows of anything which I do not know he can show it。 But to
return。 General Taylor; in his Allison letter; says:
〃Upon the subject of the tariff; the currency; the improvement of
our great highways; rivers; lakes; and harbors; the will of the
people; as expressed through their representatives in Congress;
ought to be respected and carried out by the executive。〃
Now this is the whole matter。 In substance; it is this: The
people say to General Taylor; 〃If you are elected; shall we have
a national bank?〃 He answers; '' Your will; gentlemen; not mine。
'' What about the tariff?〃 〃Say yourselves。〃 〃Shall our rivers
and harbors be improved?〃 〃Just as you please。 If you desire a
bank; an alteration of the tariff; internal improvements; any or
all; I will not hinder you。 If you do not desire them; I will
not attempt to force them on you。 Send up your members of
Congress from the various districts; with opinions according to
your own; and if they are for these measures; or any of them; I
shall have nothing to oppose; if they are not for them; I shall
not; by any appliances whatever; attempt to dragoon them into
their adoption。〃
Now can there be any difficulty in understandi