the writings-2-µÚ12ÕÂ
°´¼üÅÌÉÏ·½Ïò¼ü ¡û »ò ¡ú ¿É¿ìËÙÉÏÏ·ҳ£¬°´¼üÅÌÉ쵀 Enter ¼ü¿É»Øµ½±¾ÊéĿ¼ҳ£¬°´¼üÅÌÉÏ·½Ïò¼ü ¡ü ¿É»Øµ½±¾Ò³¶¥²¿£¡
¡ª¡ª¡ª¡ªÎ´ÔĶÁÍꣿ¼ÓÈëÊéÇ©ÒѱãÏ´μÌÐøÔĶÁ£¡
The¡¡Speaker¡¡replied¡¡in¡¡the¡¡negative¡£
TO¡¡ARCHIBALD¡¡WILLIAMS¡£
WASHINGTON£»¡¡April¡¡30£»¡¡1848¡£
DEAR¡¡WILLIAMS£ºI¡¡have¡¡not¡¡seen¡¡in¡¡the¡¡papers¡¡any¡¡evidence¡¡of¡¡a
movement¡¡to¡¡send¡¡a¡¡delegate¡¡from¡¡your¡¡circuit¡¡to¡¡the¡¡June
convention¡£¡¡¡¡I¡¡wish¡¡to¡¡say¡¡that¡¡I¡¡think¡¡it¡¡all¡important¡¡that¡¡a
delegate¡¡should¡¡be¡¡sent¡£¡¡¡¡Mr¡£¡¡Clay's¡¡chance¡¡for¡¡an¡¡election¡¡is
just¡¡no¡¡chance¡¡at¡¡all¡£¡¡¡¡He¡¡might¡¡get¡¡New¡¡York£»¡¡and¡¡that¡¡would
have¡¡elected¡¡in¡¡1844£»¡¡but¡¡it¡¡will¡¡not¡¡now£»¡¡because¡¡he¡¡must¡¡now£»
at¡¡the¡¡least£»¡¡lose¡¡Tennessee£»¡¡which¡¡he¡¡had¡¡then£»¡¡and¡¡in¡¡addition
the¡¡fifteen¡¡new¡¡votes¡¡of¡¡Florida£»¡¡Texas£»¡¡Iowa£»¡¡and¡¡Wisconsin¡£¡¡¡¡I
know¡¡our¡¡good¡¡friend¡¡Browning¡¡is¡¡a¡¡great¡¡admirer¡¡of¡¡Mr¡£¡¡Clay£»¡¡and
I¡¡therefore¡¡fear¡¡he¡¡is¡¡favoring¡¡his¡¡nomination¡£¡¡¡¡If¡¡he¡¡is£»¡¡ask
him¡¡to¡¡discard¡¡feeling£»¡¡and¡¡try¡¡if¡¡he¡¡can¡¡possibly£»¡¡as¡¡a¡¡matter
of¡¡judgment£»¡¡count¡¡the¡¡votes¡¡necessary¡¡to¡¡elect¡¡him¡£
In¡¡my¡¡judgment¡¡we¡¡can¡¡elect¡¡nobody¡¡but¡¡General¡¡Taylor£»¡¡and¡¡we
cannot¡¡elect¡¡him¡¡without¡¡a¡¡nomination¡£¡¡¡¡Therefore¡¡don't¡¡fail¡¡to
send¡¡a¡¡delegate¡£¡¡¡¡Your¡¡friend¡¡as¡¡ever£»
A¡£¡¡LINCOLN¡£
REMARKS¡¡IN¡¡THE¡¡HOUSE¡¡OF¡¡REPRESENTATIVES£»
MAY¡¡11£»¡¡1848¡£
A¡¡bill¡¡for¡¡the¡¡admission¡¡of¡¡Wisconsin¡¡into¡¡the¡¡Union¡¡had¡¡been
passed¡£
Mr¡£¡¡Lincoln¡¡moved¡¡to¡¡reconsider¡¡the¡¡vote¡¡by¡¡which¡¡the¡¡bill¡¡was
passed¡£¡¡¡¡He¡¡stated¡¡to¡¡the¡¡House¡¡that¡¡he¡¡had¡¡made¡¡this¡¡motion¡¡for
the¡¡purpose¡¡of¡¡obtaining¡¡an¡¡opportunity¡¡to¡¡say¡¡a¡¡few¡¡words¡¡in
relation¡¡to¡¡a¡¡point¡¡raised¡¡in¡¡the¡¡course¡¡of¡¡the¡¡debate¡¡on¡¡this
bill£»¡¡which¡¡he¡¡would¡¡now¡¡proceed¡¡to¡¡make¡¡if¡¡in¡¡order¡£¡¡¡¡The¡¡point
in¡¡the¡¡case¡¡to¡¡which¡¡he¡¡referred¡¡arose¡¡on¡¡the¡¡amendment¡¡that¡¡was
submitted¡¡by¡¡the¡¡gentleman¡¡from¡¡Vermont¡¡£§Mr¡£¡¡Collamer£§¡¡in
Committee¡¡of¡¡the¡¡Whole¡¡on¡¡the¡¡State¡¡of¡¡the¡¡Union£»¡¡and¡¡which¡¡was
afterward¡¡renewed¡¡in¡¡the¡¡House£»¡¡in¡¡relation¡¡to¡¡the¡¡question
whether¡¡the¡¡reserved¡¡sections£»¡¡which£»¡¡by¡¡some¡¡bills¡¡heretofore
passed£»¡¡by¡¡which¡¡an¡¡appropriation¡¡of¡¡land¡¡had¡¡been¡¡made¡¡to
Wisconsin£»¡¡had¡¡been¡¡enhanced¡¡in¡¡value£»¡¡should¡¡be¡¡reduced¡¡to¡¡the
minimum¡¡price¡¡of¡¡the¡¡public¡¡lands¡£¡¡¡¡The¡¡question¡¡of¡¡the¡¡reduction
in¡¡value¡¡of¡¡those¡¡sections¡¡was¡¡to¡¡him¡¡at¡¡this¡¡time¡¡a¡¡matter¡¡very
nearly¡¡of¡¡indifference¡£¡¡¡¡He¡¡was¡¡inclined¡¡to¡¡desire¡¡that¡¡Wisconsin
should¡¡be¡¡obliged¡¡by¡¡having¡¡it¡¡reduced¡£¡¡¡¡But¡¡the¡¡gentleman¡¡from
Indiana¡¡£§Mr¡£¡¡C¡£¡¡B¡£¡¡Smith£§£»¡¡the¡¡chairman¡¡of¡¡the¡¡Committee¡¡on
Territories£»¡¡yesterday¡¡associated¡¡that¡¡question¡¡with¡¡the¡¡general
question£»¡¡which¡¡is¡¡now¡¡to¡¡some¡¡extent¡¡agitated¡¡in¡¡Congress£»¡¡of
making¡¡appropriations¡¡of¡¡alternate¡¡sections¡¡of¡¡land¡¡to¡¡aid¡¡the
States¡¡in¡¡making¡¡internal¡¡improvements£»¡¡and¡¡enhancing¡¡the¡¡price
of¡¡the¡¡sections¡¡reserved£»¡¡and¡¡the¡¡gentleman¡¡from¡¡Indiana¡¡took
ground¡¡against¡¡that¡¡policy¡£¡¡¡¡He¡¡did¡¡not¡¡make¡¡any¡¡special¡¡argument
in¡¡favor¡¡of¡¡Wisconsin£»¡¡but¡¡he¡¡took¡¡ground¡¡generally¡¡against¡¡the
policy¡¡of¡¡giving¡¡alternate¡¡sections¡¡of¡¡land£»¡¡and¡¡enhancing¡¡the
price¡¡of¡¡the¡¡reserved¡¡sections¡£¡¡¡¡Now¡¡he¡¡£§Mr¡£¡¡Lincoln£§¡¡did¡¡not¡¡at
this¡¡time¡¡take¡¡the¡¡floor¡¡for¡¡the¡¡purpose¡¡of¡¡attempting¡¡to¡¡make¡¡an
argument¡¡on¡¡the¡¡general¡¡subject¡£¡¡¡¡He¡¡rose¡¡simply¡¡to¡¡protest
against¡¡the¡¡doctrine¡¡which¡¡the¡¡gentleman¡¡from¡¡Indiana¡¡had¡¡avowed
in¡¡the¡¡course¡¡of¡¡what¡¡he¡¡£§Mr¡£¡¡Lincoln£§¡¡could¡¡not¡¡but¡¡consider¡¡an
unsound¡¡argument¡£
It¡¡might£»¡¡however£»¡¡be¡¡true£»¡¡for¡¡anything¡¡he¡¡knew£»¡¡that¡¡the
gentleman¡¡from¡¡Indiana¡¡might¡¡convince¡¡him¡¡that¡¡his¡¡argument¡¡was
sound£»¡¡but¡¡he¡¡£§Mr¡£¡¡Lincoln£§¡¡feared¡¡that¡¡gentleman¡¡would¡¡not¡¡be
able¡¡to¡¡convince¡¡a¡¡majority¡¡in¡¡Congress¡¡that¡¡it¡¡was¡¡sound¡£¡¡¡¡It
was¡¡true¡¡the¡¡question¡¡appeared¡¡in¡¡a¡¡different¡¡aspect¡¡to¡¡persons
in¡¡consequence¡¡of¡¡a¡¡difference¡¡in¡¡the¡¡point¡¡from¡¡which¡¡they
looked¡¡at¡¡it¡£¡¡¡¡It¡¡did¡¡not¡¡look¡¡to¡¡persons¡¡residing¡¡east¡¡of¡¡the
mountains¡¡as¡¡it¡¡did¡¡to¡¡those¡¡who¡¡lived¡¡among¡¡the¡¡public¡¡lands¡£
But£»¡¡for¡¡his¡¡part£»¡¡he¡¡would¡¡state¡¡that¡¡if¡¡Congress¡¡would¡¡make¡¡a
donation¡¡of¡¡alternate¡¡sections¡¡of¡¡public¡¡land¡¡for¡¡the¡¡purpose¡¡of
internal¡¡improvements¡¡in¡¡his¡¡State£»¡¡and¡¡forbid¡¡the¡¡reserved
sections¡¡being¡¡sold¡¡at¡¡1¡£25£»¡¡he¡¡should¡¡be¡¡glad¡¡to¡¡see¡¡the
appropriation¡¡made£»¡¡though¡¡he¡¡should¡¡prefer¡¡it¡¡if¡¡the¡¡reserved
sections¡¡were¡¡not¡¡enhanced¡¡in¡¡price¡£¡¡¡¡He¡¡repeated£»¡¡he¡¡should¡¡be
glad¡¡to¡¡have¡¡such¡¡appropriations¡¡made£»¡¡even¡¡though¡¡the¡¡reserved
sections¡¡should¡¡be¡¡enhanced¡¡in¡¡price¡£¡¡¡¡He¡¡did¡¡not¡¡wish¡¡to¡¡be
understood¡¡as¡¡concurring¡¡in¡¡any¡¡intimation¡¡that¡¡they¡¡would¡¡refuse
to¡¡receive¡¡such¡¡an¡¡appropriation¡¡of¡¡alternate¡¡sections¡¡of¡¡land
because¡¡a¡¡condition¡¡enhancing¡¡the¡¡price¡¡of¡¡the¡¡reserved¡¡sections
should¡¡be¡¡attached¡¡thereto¡£¡¡¡¡He¡¡believed¡¡his¡¡position¡¡would¡¡now
be¡¡understood£º¡¡if¡¡not£»¡¡he¡¡feared¡¡he¡¡should¡¡not¡¡be¡¡able¡¡to¡¡make
himself¡¡understood¡£
But£»¡¡before¡¡he¡¡took¡¡his¡¡seat£»¡¡he¡¡would¡¡remark¡¡that¡¡the¡¡Senate
during¡¡the¡¡present¡¡session¡¡had¡¡passed¡¡a¡¡bill¡¡making
appropriations¡¡of¡¡land¡¡on¡¡that¡¡principle¡¡for¡¡the¡¡benefit¡¡of¡¡the
State¡¡in¡¡which¡¡he¡¡resided¡¡the¡¡State¡¡of¡¡Illinois¡£¡¡¡¡The¡¡alternate
sections¡¡were¡¡to¡¡be¡¡given¡¡for¡¡the¡¡purpose¡¡of¡¡constructing¡¡roads£»
and¡¡the¡¡reserved¡¡sections¡¡were¡¡to¡¡be¡¡enhanced¡¡in¡¡value¡¡in
consequence¡£¡¡¡¡When¡¡that¡¡bill¡¡came¡¡here¡¡for¡¡the¡¡action¡¡of¡¡this
Houseit¡¡had¡¡been¡¡received£»¡¡and¡¡was¡¡now¡¡before¡¡the¡¡Committee¡¡on
Public¡¡Landshe¡¡desired¡¡much¡¡to¡¡see¡¡it¡¡passed¡¡as¡¡it¡¡was£»¡¡if¡¡it
could¡¡be¡¡put¡¡in¡¡no¡¡more¡¡favorable¡¡form¡¡for¡¡the¡¡State¡¡of¡¡Illinois¡£
When¡¡it¡¡should¡¡be¡¡before¡¡this¡¡House£»¡¡if¡¡any¡¡member¡¡from¡¡a¡¡section
of¡¡the¡¡Union¡¡in¡¡which¡¡these¡¡lands¡¡did¡¡not¡¡lie£»¡¡whose¡¡interest
might¡¡be¡¡less¡¡than¡¡that¡¡which¡¡he¡¡felt£»¡¡should¡¡propose¡¡a¡¡reduction
of¡¡the¡¡price¡¡of¡¡the¡¡reserved¡¡sections¡¡to¡¡1¡£25£»¡¡he¡¡should¡¡be¡¡much
obliged£»¡¡but¡¡he¡¡did¡¡not¡¡think¡¡it¡¡would¡¡be¡¡well¡¡for¡¡those¡¡who¡¡came
from¡¡the¡¡section¡¡of¡¡the¡¡Union¡¡in¡¡which¡¡the¡¡lands¡¡lay¡¡to¡¡do¡¡so¡£
He¡¡wished¡¡it£»¡¡then£»¡¡to¡¡be¡¡understood¡¡that¡¡he¡¡did¡¡not¡¡join¡¡in
the¡¡warfare¡¡against¡¡the¡¡principle¡¡which¡¡had¡¡engaged¡¡the¡¡minds¡¡of
some¡¡members¡¡of¡¡Congress¡¡who¡¡were¡¡favorable¡¡to¡¡the¡¡improvements
in¡¡the¡¡western¡¡country¡£¡¡There¡¡was¡¡a¡¡good¡¡deal¡¡of¡¡force£»¡¡he
admitted£»¡¡in¡¡what¡¡fell¡¡from¡¡the¡¡chairman¡¡of¡¡the¡¡Committee¡¡on
Territories¡£¡¡¡¡It¡¡might¡¡be¡¡that¡¡there¡¡was¡¡no¡¡precise¡¡justice¡¡in
raising¡¡the¡¡price¡¡of¡¡the¡¡reserved¡¡sections¡¡to¡¡2¡£50¡¡per¡¡acre¡£¡¡¡¡It
might¡¡be¡¡proper¡¡that¡¡the¡¡price¡¡should¡¡be¡¡enhanced¡¡to¡¡some¡¡extent£»
though¡¡not¡¡to¡¡double¡¡the¡¡usual¡¡price£»¡¡but¡¡he¡¡should¡¡be¡¡glad¡¡to
have¡¡such¡¡an¡¡appropriation¡¡with¡¡the¡¡reserved¡¡sections¡¡at¡¡2¡£50£»
he¡¡should¡¡be¡¡better¡¡pleased¡¡to¡¡have¡¡the¡¡price¡¡of¡¡those¡¡sections
at¡¡something¡¡less£»¡¡and¡¡he¡¡should¡¡be¡¡still¡¡better¡¡pleased¡¡to¡¡have
them¡¡without¡¡any¡¡enhancement¡¡at¡¡all¡£
There¡¡was¡¡one¡¡portion¡¡of¡¡the¡¡argument¡¡of¡¡the¡¡gentleman¡¡from
Indiana£»¡¡the¡¡chairman¡¡of¡¡the¡¡Committee¡¡on¡¡Territories¡¡£§Mr¡£
Smith£§£»¡¡which¡¡he¡¡wished¡¡to¡¡take¡¡occasion¡¡to¡¡say¡¡that¡¡he¡¡did¡¡not
view¡¡as¡¡unsound¡£¡¡¡¡He¡¡alluded¡¡to¡¡the¡¡statement¡¡that¡¡the¡¡General
Government¡¡was¡¡interested¡¡in¡¡these¡¡internal¡¡improvements¡¡being
made£»¡¡inasmuch¡¡as¡¡they¡¡increased¡¡the¡¡value¡¡of¡¡the¡¡lands¡¡that¡¡were
unsold£»¡¡and¡¡they¡¡enabled¡¡the¡¡government¡¡to¡¡sell¡¡the¡¡lands¡¡which
could¡¡not¡¡be¡¡sold¡¡without¡¡them¡£¡¡¡¡Thus£»¡¡then£»¡¡the¡¡government
gained¡¡by¡¡internal¡¡improvements¡¡as¡¡well¡¡as¡¡by¡¡the¡¡general¡¡good
which¡¡the¡¡people¡¡derived¡¡from¡¡them£»¡¡and¡¡it¡¡might¡¡be£»¡¡therefore£»
that¡¡the¡¡lands¡¡should¡¡not¡¡be¡¡sold¡¡for¡¡more¡¡than¡¡1¡£50¡¡instead¡¡of
the¡¡price¡¡being¡¡doubled¡£¡¡¡¡He£»¡¡however£»¡¡merely¡¡mentioned¡¡this¡¡in
passing£»¡¡for¡¡he¡¡only¡¡rose¡¡to¡¡state£»¡¡as¡¡the¡¡principle¡¡of¡¡giving
these¡¡lands¡¡for¡¡the¡¡purposes¡¡which¡¡he¡¡had¡¡mentioned¡¡had¡¡been¡¡laid
hold¡¡of¡¡and¡¡considered¡¡favorably£»¡¡and¡¡as¡¡there¡¡were¡¡some
gentlemen¡¡who¡¡had¡¡constitutional¡¡scruples¡¡about¡¡giving¡¡money¡¡for
these¡¡purchases¡¡who¡¡would¡¡not¡¡hesitate¡¡to¡¡give¡¡land£»¡¡that¡¡he¡¡was
not¡¡willing¡¡to¡¡have¡¡it¡¡understood¡¡that¡¡he¡¡was¡¡one¡¡of¡¡those¡¡who
made¡¡war¡¡against¡¡that¡¡principle¡£¡¡¡¡This¡¡was¡¡all¡¡he¡¡desired¡¡to¡¡say£»
and¡¡having¡¡accomplished¡¡the¡¡object¡¡with¡¡which¡¡he¡¡rose£»¡¡he
withdrew¡¡his¡¡motion¡¡to¡¡reconsider¡£
ON¡¡TAYLOR'S¡¡NOMINATION
TO¡¡E¡£¡¡B¡£¡¡WASHBURNE¡£
WASHINGTON£»¡¡April¡¡30£»1848¡£
DEAR¡¡WASHBURNE£º
I¡¡have¡¡this¡¡moment¡¡received¡¡your¡¡very¡¡short¡¡note¡¡asking¡¡me¡¡if¡¡old
Taylor¡¡is¡¡to¡¡be¡¡used¡¡up£»¡¡and¡¡who¡¡will¡¡be¡¡the¡¡nominee¡£¡¡¡¡My¡¡hope¡¡of
Taylor's¡¡nomination¡¡is¡¡as¡¡higha¡¡little¡¡higher¡¡than¡¡it¡¡was¡¡when
yo