the writings-2-第10章
按键盘上方向键 ← 或 → 可快速上下翻页,按键盘上的 Enter 键可回到本书目录页,按键盘上方向键 ↑ 可回到本页顶部!
————未阅读完?加入书签已便下次继续阅读!
say so。 Colonel Doniphan; too; the favorite Whig of Missouri;
and who overran all Northern Mexico; on his return home in a
public speech at St。 Louis condemned the administration in
relation to the war。 If I remember; G。 T。 M。 Davis; who has
been through almost the whole war; declares in favor of Mr。 Clay;
from which I infer that he adopts the sentiments of Mr。 Clay;
generally at least。 On the other hand; I have heard of but one
Whig who has been to the war attempting to justify the
President's conduct。 That one was Captain Bishop; editor of the
Charleston Courier; and a very clever fellow。 I do not mean this
letter for the public; but for you。 Before it reaches you; you
will have seen and read my pamphlet speech; and perhaps been
scared anew by it。 After you get over your scare; read it over
again; sentence by sentence; and tell me honestly what you think
of it。 I condensed all I could for fear of being cut off by the
hour rule; and when I got through I had spoken but forty…five
minutes。
Yours forever;
A。 LINCOLN。
TO WILLIAM H。 HERNDON。
WASHINGTON; February 2; 1848
DEAR WILLIAM:I just take my pen to say that Mr。 Stephens; of
Georgia; a little; slim; pale…faced; consumptive man; with a
voice like Logan's; has just concluded the very best speech of an
hour's length I ever heard。 My old withered dry eyes are full of
tears yet。
If he writes it out anything like he delivered it; our people
shall see a good many copies of it。
Yours truly;
A。 LINCOLN。
ON THE MEXICAN WAR
TO WILLIAM H。 HERNDON。
WASHINGTON; February 15; 1848。
DEAR WILLIAM:Your letter of the 29th January was received last
night。 Being exclusively a constitutional argument; I wish to
submit some reflections upon it in the same spirit of kindness
that I know actuates you。 Let me first state what I understand
to be your position。 It is that if it shall become necessary to
repel invasion; the President may; without violation of the
Constitution; cross the line and invade the territory of another
country; and that whether such necessity exists in any given case
the President is the sole judge。
Before going further consider well whether this is or is not your
position。 If it is; it is a position that neither the President
himself; nor any friend of his; so far as I know; has ever taken。
Their only positions arefirst; that the soil was ours when the
hostilities commenced; and second; that whether it was rightfully
ours or not; Congress had annexed it; and the President for that
reason was bound to defend it; both of which are as clearly
proved to be false in fact as you can prove that your house is
mine。 The soil was not ours; and Congress did not annex or
attempt to annex it。 But to return to your position。 Allow the
President to invade a neighboring nation whenever he shall deem
it necessary to repel an invasion; and you allow him to do so
whenever he may choose to say he deems it necessary for such
purpose; and you allow him to make war at pleasure。 Study to see
if you can fix any limit to his power in this respect; after
having given him so much as you propose。 If to…day he should
choose to say he thinks it necessary to invade Canada to prevent
the British from invading us; how could you stop him? You may
say to him;I see no probability of the British invading us〃;
but he will say to you; 〃Be silent: I see it; if you don't。〃
The provision of the Constitution giving the war making power to
Congress was dictated; as I understand it; by the following
reasons: kings had always been involving and impoverishing their
people in wars; pretending generally; if not always; that the
good of the people was the object。 This our convention
understood to be the most oppressive of all kingly oppressions;
and they resolved to so frame the Constitution that no one man
should hold the power of bringing this oppression upon us。 But
your view destroys the whole matter; and places our President
where kings have always stood。 Write soon again。
Yours truly;
A。 LINCOLN。
REPORT IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES;
MARCH 9; 1848。
Mr。 Lincoln; from the Committee on the Postoffice and Post Roads;
made the following report:
The Committee on the Post…office and Post Roads; to whom was
referred the resolution of the House of Representatives entitled
〃An Act authorizing postmasters at county seats of justice to
receive subscriptions for newspapers and periodicals; to be paid
through the agency of the Post…office Department; and for other
purposes;〃 beg leave to submit the following report
The committee have reason to believe that a general wish pervades
the community at large that some such facility as the proposed
measure should be granted by express law; for subscribing;
through the agency of the Post…office Department; to newspapers
and periodicals which diffuse daily; weekly; or monthly
intelligence of passing events。 Compliance with this general
wish is deemed to be in accordance with our republican
institutions; which can be best sustained by the diffusion of
knowledge and the due encouragement of a universal; national
spirit of inquiry and discussion of public events through the
medium of the public press。 The committee; however; has not been
insensible to its duty of guarding the Post…office Department
against injurious sacrifices for the accomplishment of this
object; whereby its ordinary efficacy might be impaired or
embarrassed。 It has therefore been a subject of much
consideration; but it is now confidently hoped that the bill
herewith submitted effectually obviates all objections which
might exist with regard to a less matured proposition。
The committee learned; upon inquiry; that the Post…office
Department; in view of meeting the general wish on this subject;
made the experiment through one if its own internal regulations;
when the new postage system went into operation on the first of
July; 1845; and that it was continued until the thirtieth of
September; 1847。 But this experiment; for reasons hereafter
stated; proved unsatisfactory; and it was discontinued by order
of the Postmaster…General。 As far as the committee can at
present ascertain; the following seem to have been the principal
grounds of dissatisfaction in this experiment:
(1) The legal responsibility of postmasters receiving newspaper
subscriptions; or of their sureties; was not defined。
(2) The authority was open to all postmasters instead of being
limited to those of specific offices。
(3) The consequence of this extension of authority was that; in
innumerable instances; the money; without the previous knowledge
or control of the officers of the department who are responsible
for the good management of its finances; was deposited in offices
where it was improper such funds should be placed; and the
repayment was ordered; not by the financial officers; but by the
postmasters; at points where it was inconvenient to the
department so to disburse its funds。
(4) The inconvenience of accumulating uncertain and fluctuating
sums at small offices was felt seriously in consequent
overpayments to contractors on their quarterly collecting orders;
and; in case of private mail routes; in litigation concerning the
misapplication of such funds to the special service of supplying
mails。
(5) The accumulation of such funds on draft offices could not be
known to the financial clerks of the department in time to
control it; and too often this rendered uncertain all their
calculations of funds in hand。
(6) The orders of payment were for the most part issued upon the
principal offices; such as New York; Philadelphia; Boston;
Baltimore; etc。; where the large offices of publishers are
located; causing an illimitable and uncontrollable drain of the
department funds from those points