贝壳电子书 > 英文原著电子书 > part13 >

第3章

part13-第3章

小说: part13 字数: 每页4000字

按键盘上方向键 ← 或 → 可快速上下翻页,按键盘上的 Enter 键可回到本书目录页,按键盘上方向键 ↑ 可回到本页顶部!
————未阅读完?加入书签已便下次继续阅读!




Constitution; by more strongly marking out its lines。




        We have nothing later from Europe than the public papers give。

I hope yourself and all the Western members will make a sacred point

of being at the first day of the meeting of Congress; for _vestra res

agitur。_




        Accept my affectionate salutations & assurances of esteem &

respect。







        A CONSTITUTIONAL AMENDMENT




        _To Wilson Cary Nicholas_

        _Monticello; Sep。 7; 1803_




        DEAR SIR;  Your favor of the 3d was delivered me at court;

but we were much disappointed at not seeing you here; Mr。 Madison &

the Gov。 being here at the time。  I enclose you a letter from Monroe

on the subject of the late treaty。  You will observe a hint in it; to

do without delay what we are bound to do。  There is reason; in the

opinion of our ministers; to believe; that if the thing were to do

over again; it could not be obtained; & that if we give the least

opening; they will declare the treaty void。  A warning amounting to

that has been given to them; & an unusual kind of letter written by

their minister to our Secretary of State; direct。  Whatever Congress

shall think it necessary to do; should be done with as little debate

as possible; & particularly so far as respects the constitutional

difficulty。  I am aware of the force of the observations you make on

the power given by the Constn to Congress; to admit new States into

the Union; without restraining the subject to the territory then

constituting the U S。  But when I consider that the limits of the U S

are precisely fixed by the treaty of 1783; that the Constitution

expressly declares itself to be made for the U S; I cannot help

believing the intention was to permit Congress to admit into the

Union new States; which should be formed out of the territory for

which; & under whose authority alone; they were then acting。  I do

not believe it was meant that they might receive England; Ireland;

Holland; &c。 into it; which would be the case on your construction。

When an instrument admits two constructions; the one safe; the other

dangerous; the one precise; the other indefinite; I prefer that which

is safe & precise。  I had rather ask an enlargement of power from the

nation; where it is found necessary; than to assume it by a

construction which would make our powers boundless。  Our peculiar

security is in possession of a written Constitution。  Let us not make

it a blank paper by construction。  I say the same as to the opinion

of those who consider the grant of the treaty making power as

boundless。  If it is; then we have no Constitution。  If it has

bounds; they can be no others than the definitions of the powers

which that instrument gives。  It specifies & delineates the

operations permitted to the federal government; and gives all the

powers necessary to carry these into execution。  Whatever of these

enumerated objects is proper for a law; Congress may make the law;

whatever is proper to be executed by way of a treaty; the President &

Senate may enter into the treaty; whatever is to be done by a

judicial sentence; the judges may pass the sentence。  Nothing is more

likely than that their enumeration of powers is defective。  This is

the ordinary case of all human works。  Let us go on then perfecting

it; by adding; by way of amendment to the Constitution; those powers

which time & trial show are still wanting。  But it has been taken too

much for granted; that by this rigorous construction the treaty power

would be reduced to nothing。  I had occasion once to examine its

effect on the French treaty; made by the old Congress; & found that

out of thirty odd articles which that contained; there were one; two;

or three only which could not now be stipulated under our present

Constitution。  I confess; then; I think it important; in the present

case; to set an example against broad construction; by appealing for

new power to the people。  If; however; our friends shall think

differently; certainly I shall acquiesce with satisfaction;

confiding; that the good sense of our country will correct the evil

of construction when it shall produce ill effects。




        No apologies for writing or speaking to me freely are

necessary。  On the contrary; nothing my friends can do is so dear to

me; & proves to me their friendship so clearly; as the information

they give me of their sentiments & those of others on interesting

points where I am to act; and where information & warning is so

essential to excite in me that due reflection which ought to precede

action。  I leave this about the 21st; and shall hope the District

Court will give me an opportunity of seeing you。




        Accept my affectionate salutations; & assurances of cordial

esteem & respect。







        JESUS; LOUISIANA; AND MALTHUS




        _To Dr。 Joseph Priestley_

        _Washington; Jan。 29; 1804_




        DEAR SIR;  Your favor of December 12 came duly to hand; as

did the 2'd。 letter to Doctor Linn; and the treatise of Phlogiston;

for which I pray you to accept my thanks。  The copy for Mr。

Livingston has been delivered; together with your letter to him; to

Mr。 Harvie; my secretary; who departs in a day or two for Paris; &

will deliver them himself to Mr。 Livingston; whose attention to your

matter cannot be doubted。  I have also to add my thanks to Mr。

Priestley; your son; for the copy of your Harmony; which I have gone

through with great satisfaction。  It is the first I have been able to

meet with; which is clear of those long repetitions of the same

transaction; as if it were a different one because related with some

different circumstances。




        I rejoice that you have undertaken the task of comparing the

moral doctrines of Jesus with those of the ancient Philosophers。  You

are so much in possession of the whole subject; that you will do it

easier & better than any other person living。  I think you cannot

avoid giving; as preliminary to the comparison; a digest of his moral

doctrines; extracted in his own words from the Evangelists; and

leaving out everything relative to his personal history and

character。  It would be short and precious。  With a view to do this

for my own satisfaction; I had sent to Philadelphia to get two

testaments Greek of the same edition; & two English; with a design to

cut out the morsels of morality; and paste them on the leaves of a

book; in the manner you describe as having been pursued in forming

your Harmony。  But I shall now get the thing done by better hands。




        I very early saw that Louisiana was indeed a speck in our

horizon which was to burst in a tornado; and the public are

unapprized how near this catastrophe was。  Nothing but a frank &

friendly development of causes & effects on our part; and good sense

enough in Bonaparte to see that the train was unavoidable; and would

change the face of the world; saved us from that storm。  I did not

expect he would yield till a war took place between France and

England; and my hope was to palliate and endure; if Messrs。 Ross;

Morris; &c。 did not force a premature rupture; until that event。  I

believed the event not very distant; but acknolege it came on sooner

than I had expected。  Whether; however; the good sense of Bonaparte

might not see the course predicted to be necessary & unavoidable;

even before a war should be imminent; was a chance which we thought

it our duty to try; but the immediate prospect of rupture brought the

case to immediate decision。  The _denoument_ has been happy; and I

confess I look to this duplication of area for the extending a

government so free and economical as ours; as a great achievement to

the mass of happiness which is to ensue。  Whether we remain in one

confederacy; or form into Atlantic and Mississippi confederacies; I

believe not very important to the happiness of either part。  Those of

the western confederacy will be as much our 

返回目录 上一页 下一页 回到顶部 0 0

你可能喜欢的