beacon lights of history-iii-2-第66章
按键盘上方向键 ← 或 → 可快速上下翻页,按键盘上的 Enter 键可回到本书目录页,按键盘上方向键 ↑ 可回到本页顶部!
————未阅读完?加入书签已便下次继续阅读!
and telephones and Thames tunnels and Crystal Palaces and Niagara
bridges and railways over the Rocky Mountains! The day of our
deliverance is come; the nations are saved; the Brunels and the
Fieldses are our victors and leaders! Crown them with Olympic
leaves; as the heroes of our great games of life。 And thou; O
England! exalted art thou among the nations;not for thy Oxfords
and Westminsters; not for thy divines and saints and martyrs and
poets; not for thy Hookers and Leightons and Cranmers and Miltons
and Burkes and Lockes; not for thy Reformation; not for thy
struggles for liberty;but for thy Manchesters and Birminghams;
thy Portsmouth shipyards; thy London docks; thy Liverpool
warehouses; thy mines of coal and iron; thy countless mechanisms by
which thou bringest the wealth of nations into thy banks; and art
enabled to buy the toil of foreigners and to raise thy standards on
the farthest battlements of India and China。 These conquests and
acquisitions are real; are practical; machinery over life; the
triumph of physical forces; dominion over waves and winds;these
are the great victories which consummate the happiness of man; and
these are they which flow from the philosophy which Bacon taught。
Now Macaulay does not directly say all these things; but these are
the spirit and gist of the interpretation which he puts upon
Bacon's writings。 The philosophy of Bacon leads directly to these
blessings; and these constitute its great peculiarity。 And it
cannot be denied that the new era which Bacon heralded was fruitful
in these very things;that his philosophy encouraged this new
development of material forces; but it may be questioned whether he
had not something else in view than mere utility and physical
progress; and whether his method could not equally be applied to
metaphysical subjects; whether it did not pertain to the whole
domain of truth; and take in the whole realm of human inquiry。 I
believe that Bacon was interested; not merely in the world of
matter; but in the world of mind; that he sought to establish
principles from which sound deductions might be made; as well as to
establish reliable inductions。 Lord Campbell thinks that a perfect
system of ethics could be made out of his writings; and that his
method is equally well adapted to examine and classify the
phenomena of the mind。 He separated the legitimate paths of human
inquiry; giving his attention to poetry and politics and
metaphysics; as well as to physics。 Bacon does not sneer as
Macaulay does at the ancient philosophers; he bears testimony to
their genius and their unrivalled dialectical powers; even if he
regards their speculations as frequently barren。 He does not
flippantly ridicule the homoousian and the homoiousian as mere
words; but the expression and exponent of profound theological
distinctions; as every theologian knows them to be。 He does not
throw dirt on metaphysical science if properly directed; still less
on noble inquiries after God and the mysteries of life。 He is
subjective as well as objective。 He treats of philosophy in its
broadest meaning; as it takes in the province of the understanding;
the memory; and the will; as well as of man in society。 He speaks
of the principles of government and of the fountains of law; of
universal justice; of eternal spiritual truth。 So that Playfair
judiciously observes (and he was a scientist) 〃that it was not by
sagacious anticipations of science; afterwards to be made in
physics; that his writings have had so powerful an influence; as in
his knowledge of the limits and resources of the human
understanding。 It would be difficult to find another writer; prior
to Locke; whose works are enriched with so many just observations
on mere intellectual phenomena。 What he says of the laws of
memory; or imagination; has never been surpassed in subtlety。 No
man ever more carefully studied the operation of his own mind and
the intellectual character of others。〃 Nor did Bacon despise
metaphysical science; only the frivolous questions that the old
scholastics associated with it; and the general barrenness of their
speculations。 He surely would not have disdained the subsequent
inquiries of Locke; or Berkeley; or Leibnitz; or Kant。 True; he
sought definite knowledge;something firm to stand upon; and which
could not be controverted。 No philosophy can be sound when the
principle from which deductions are made is not itself certain or
very highly probable; or when this principle; pushed to its utmost
logical sequence; would lead to absurdity; or even to a conflict
with human consciousness。 To Bacon the old methods were wrong; and
it was his primal aim to reform the scientific methods in order to
arrive at truth; not truth for utilitarian ends chiefly; but truth
for its own sake。 He loved truth as Palestrina loved music; or
Raphael loved painting; or Socrates loved virtue。
Now the method which was almost exclusively employed until Bacon's
time is commonly called the deductive method; that is; some
principle or premise was assumed to be true; and reasoning was made
from this assumption。 No especial fault was found with the
reasoning of the great masters of logic like Aristotle and Thomas
Aquinas; for it never has been surpassed in acuteness and severity。
If their premises were admitted; their conclusions would follow as
a certainty。 What was wanted was to establish the truth of
premises; or general propositions。 This Bacon affirmed could be
arrived at only by induction; that is; the ascending from
ascertained individual facts to general principles; by extending
what is true of particulars to the whole class in which they
belong。 Bacon has been called the father of inductive science;
since he would employ the inductive method。 Yet he is not truly
the father of induction; since it is as old as the beginnings of
science。 Hippocrates; when he ridiculed the quacks of his day; and
collected the facts and phenomena of disease; and inferred from
them the proper treatment of it; was as much the father of
induction as Bacon himself。 The error the ancients made was in not
collecting a sufficient number of facts to warrant a sound
induction。 And the ancients looked out for facts to support some
preconceived theory; from which they reasoned syllogistically。 The
theory could not be substantiated by any syllogistic reasonings;
since conclusions could never go beyond assumptions; if the
assumptions were wrong; no ingenious or elaborate reasoning would
avail anything towards the discovery of truth; but could only
uphold what was assumed。 This applied to theology as well as to
science。 In the Dark Ages it was well for the teachers of mankind
to uphold the dogmas of the Church; which they did with masterly
dialectical skill。 Those were ages of Faith; and not of Inquiry。
It was all…important to ground believers in a firm faith of the
dogmas which were deemed necessary to support the church and the
cause of religion。 They were regarded as absolute certainties。
There was no dispute about the premises of the scholastic's
arguments; and hence his dialectics strengthened the mind by the
exercise of logical sports; and at the same time confirmed the
faith。
The world never saw a more complete system of dogmatic theology
than that elaborated by Thomas Aquinas。 When the knowledge of the
Greek and Hebrew was rare and imperfect; and it was impossible to
throw light by means of learning and science on the texts of
Scripture; it was well to follow the interpretation of such a great
light as Augustine; and assume his dogmas as certainties; since
they could not then be controverted; and thus from them construct a
system of belief which would confirm the faith。 But Aquinas; with
his Aristotelian method of syllogism and definitions; could not go
beyond Augustine。 Augustine was the fountain; and the water that
flowed from it in ten thousand channels could