±´¿Çµç×ÓÊé > Ó¢ÎÄÔ­Öøµç×ÓÊé > the anti-slavery crusade >

µÚ3ÕÂ

the anti-slavery crusade-µÚ3ÕÂ

С˵£º the anti-slavery crusade ×ÖÊý£º ÿҳ4000×Ö

°´¼üÅÌÉÏ·½Ïò¼ü ¡û »ò ¡ú ¿É¿ìËÙÉÏÏ·­Ò³£¬°´¼üÅÌÉ쵀 Enter ¼ü¿É»Øµ½±¾ÊéĿ¼ҳ£¬°´¼üÅÌÉÏ·½Ïò¼ü ¡ü ¿É»Øµ½±¾Ò³¶¥²¿£¡
¡ª¡ª¡ª¡ªÎ´ÔĶÁÍꣿ¼ÓÈëÊéÇ©ÒѱãÏ´μÌÐøÔĶÁ£¡



ion¡¡of¡¡Louisiana¡¡as¡¡a¡¡slave¡¡State¡£¡¡The¡¡admission¡¡of¡¡Indiana¡¡in¡¡1816¡¡on¡¡the¡¡one¡¡side¡¡and¡¡of¡¡Mississippi¡¡in¡¡1817¡¡on¡¡the¡¡other¡¡still¡¡maintained¡¡the¡¡balance£º¡¡ten¡¡free¡¡States¡¡stood¡¡against¡¡ten¡¡slave¡¡States¡£¡¡During¡¡the¡¡next¡¡two¡¡years¡¡Illinois¡¡and¡¡Alabama¡¡were¡¡admitted£»¡¡making¡¡twenty¡­two¡¡States¡¡in¡¡all£»¡¡still¡¡evenly¡¡divided¡£¡¡The¡¡ordinance¡¡for¡¡the¡¡government¡¡of¡¡the¡¡territory¡¡north¡¡of¡¡the¡¡Ohio¡¡River£»¡¡passed¡¡in¡¡1787¡¡and¡¡reenacted¡¡by¡¡Congress¡¡after¡¡the¡¡adoption¡¡of¡¡the¡¡Constitution£»¡¡proved¡¡to¡¡be¡¡an¡¡act¡¡of¡¡great¡¡significance¡¡in¡¡its¡¡relation¡¡to¡¡the¡¡limitation¡¡of¡¡slavery¡£¡¡By¡¡this¡¡ordinance¡¡slavery¡¡was¡¡forever¡¡prohibited¡¡in¡¡the¡¡Northwest¡¡Territory¡£¡¡In¡¡the¡¡territory¡¡south¡¡of¡¡the¡¡Ohio¡¡River¡¡slavery¡¡became¡¡permanently¡¡established¡£¡¡The¡¡river£»¡¡therefore£»¡¡became¡¡an¡¡extension¡¡of¡¡the¡¡original¡¡Mason¡¡and¡¡Dixon's¡¡Line¡¡with¡¡the¡¡new¡¡meaning¡¡attached£º¡¡it¡¡became¡¡a¡¡division¡¡between¡¡free¡¡and¡¡slave¡¡territory¡£¡¡It¡¡was¡¡apparently¡¡at¡¡first¡¡a¡¡mere¡¡matter¡¡of¡¡chance¡¡that¡¡a¡¡balance¡¡was¡¡struck¡¡between¡¡the¡¡two¡¡losses¡¡of¡¡States¡£¡¡While¡¡Virginia¡¡remained¡¡a¡¡slave¡¡State£»¡¡it¡¡was¡¡natural¡¡that¡¡slavery¡¡should¡¡extend¡¡into¡¡Kentucky£»¡¡which¡¡had¡¡been¡¡a¡¡part¡¡of¡¡Virginia¡£¡¡Likewise¡¡Tennessee£»¡¡being¡¡a¡¡part¡¡of¡¡North¡¡Carolina£»¡¡became¡¡slave¡¡territory¡£¡¡When¡¡these¡¡two¡¡Territories¡¡became¡¡slave¡¡States£»¡¡the¡¡equal¡¡division¡¡began¡£¡¡There¡¡was¡¡yet¡¡an¡¡abundance¡¡of¡¡territory¡¡both¡¡north¡¡and¡¡south¡¡to¡¡be¡¡taken¡¡into¡¡the¡¡Union¡¡and£»¡¡without¡¡any¡¡special¡¡plan¡¡or¡¡agitation£»¡¡States¡¡were¡¡admitted¡¡in¡¡pairs£»¡¡one¡¡free¡¡and¡¡the¡¡other¡¡slave¡£¡¡In¡¡the¡¡meantime¡¡there¡¡was¡¡distinctly¡¡developed¡¡the¡¡idea¡¡of¡¡the¡¡possible¡¡or¡¡probable¡¡permanence¡¡of¡¡slavery¡¡in¡¡the¡¡South¡¡and¡¡of¡¡a¡¡rivalry¡¡or¡¡even¡¡a¡¡future¡¡conflict¡¡between¡¡the¡¡two¡¡sections¡£¡¡When¡¡in¡¡1819¡¡Missouri¡¡applied¡¡for¡¡admission¡¡to¡¡the¡¡Union¡¡with¡¡a¡¡state¡¡constitution¡¡permitting¡¡slavery£»¡¡there¡¡was¡¡a¡¡prolonged¡¡debate¡¡over¡¡the¡¡whole¡¡question£»¡¡not¡¡only¡¡in¡¡Congress¡¡but¡¡throughout¡¡the¡¡entire¡¡country¡£¡¡North¡¡and¡¡South¡¡were¡¡distinctly¡¡pitted¡¡against¡¡each¡¡other¡¡with¡¡rival¡¡systems¡¡of¡¡labor¡£¡¡The¡¡following¡¡year¡¡Congress¡¡passed¡¡a¡¡law¡¡providing¡¡for¡¡the¡¡admission¡¡of¡¡Missouri£»¡¡but£»¡¡to¡¡restore¡¡the¡¡balance£»¡¡Maine¡¡was¡¡separated¡¡from¡¡Massachusetts¡¡and¡¡was¡¡admitted¡¡to¡¡the¡¡Union¡¡as¡¡a¡¡State¡£¡¡It¡¡was¡¡further¡¡enacted¡¡that¡¡slavery¡¡should¡¡be¡¡forever¡¡prohibited¡¡from¡¡all¡¡territory¡¡of¡¡the¡¡United¡¡States¡¡north¡¡of¡¡the¡¡parallel¡¡36¡¡degrees¡¡30'£»¡¡that¡¡is£»¡¡north¡¡of¡¡the¡¡southern¡¡boundary¡¡of¡¡Missouri¡£¡¡It¡¡is¡¡this¡¡part¡¡of¡¡the¡¡act¡¡which¡¡is¡¡known¡¡as¡¡the¡¡Missouri¡¡Compromise¡£¡¡It¡¡was¡¡accepted¡¡as¡¡a¡¡permanent¡¡limitation¡¡of¡¡the¡¡institution¡¡of¡¡slavery¡£¡¡By¡¡this¡¡act¡¡Mason¡¡and¡¡Dixon's¡¡Line¡¡was¡¡extended¡¡through¡¡the¡¡Louisiana¡¡Purchase¡£¡¡As¡¡the¡¡western¡¡boundary¡¡was¡¡then¡¡defined£»¡¡slavery¡¡could¡¡still¡¡be¡¡extended¡¡into¡¡Arkansas¡¡and¡¡into¡¡a¡¡part¡¡of¡¡what¡¡is¡¡now¡¡Oklahoma£»¡¡while¡¡a¡¡great¡¡empire¡¡to¡¡the¡¡northwest¡¡was¡¡reserved¡¡for¡¡the¡¡formation¡¡of¡¡free¡¡States¡£¡¡Arkansas¡¡became¡¡a¡¡slave¡¡State¡¡in¡¡1836¡¡and¡¡Michigan¡¡was¡¡admitted¡¡as¡¡a¡¡free¡¡State¡¡in¡¡the¡¡following¡¡year¡£¡¡With¡¡the¡¡admission¡¡of¡¡Arkansas¡¡and¡¡Michigan£»¡¡thirteen¡¡slave¡¡States¡¡were¡¡balanced¡¡by¡¡a¡¡like¡¡number¡¡of¡¡free¡¡States¡£¡¡The¡¡South¡¡still¡¡had¡¡Florida£»¡¡which¡¡would¡¡in¡¡time¡¡become¡¡a¡¡slave¡¡State¡£¡¡Against¡¡this¡¡single¡¡Territory¡¡there¡¡was¡¡an¡¡immense¡¡region¡¡to¡¡the¡¡northwest£»¡¡equal¡¡in¡¡area¡¡to¡¡all¡¡the¡¡slave¡¡States¡¡combined£»¡¡which£»¡¡according¡¡to¡¡the¡¡Ordinance¡¡of¡¡1787¡¡and¡¡the¡¡Missouri¡¡Compromise£»¡¡had¡¡been¡¡consecrated¡¡to¡¡freedom¡£¡¡Foreseeing¡¡this¡¡condition£»¡¡a¡¡few¡¡Southern¡¡planters¡¡began¡¡a¡¡movement¡¡for¡¡the¡¡extension¡¡of¡¡territory¡¡to¡¡the¡¡south¡¡and¡¡west¡¡immediately¡¡after¡¡the¡¡adoption¡¡of¡¡the¡¡Missouri¡¡Compromise¡£¡¡When¡¡Arkansas¡¡was¡¡admitted¡¡in¡¡1836£»¡¡there¡¡was¡¡a¡¡prospect¡¡of¡¡the¡¡immediate¡¡annexation¡¡of¡¡Texas¡¡as¡¡a¡¡slave¡¡State¡£¡¡This¡¡did¡¡not¡¡take¡¡place¡¡until¡¡nine¡¡years¡¡later£»¡¡but¡¡the¡¡propaganda£»¡¡the¡¡object¡¡of¡¡which¡¡was¡¡the¡¡extension¡¡of¡¡slave¡¡territory£»¡¡could¡¡not¡¡be¡¡maintained¡¡by¡¡those¡¡Who¡¡contended¡¡that¡¡slavery¡¡was¡¡a¡¡curse¡¡to¡¡the¡¡country¡£¡¡Virginia£»¡¡therefore£»¡¡and¡¡other¡¡border¡¡slave¡¡States£»¡¡as¡¡they¡¡became¡¡committed¡¡to¡¡the¡¡policy¡¡of¡¡expansion£»¡¡ceased¡¡to¡¡tolerate¡¡official¡¡public¡¡utterances¡¡against¡¡slavery¡£¡¡Three¡¡more¡¡or¡¡less¡¡clearly¡¡defined¡¡sections¡¡appear¡¡in¡¡the¡¡later¡¡development¡¡of¡¡the¡¡crusade¡£¡¡These¡¡are¡¡the¡¡New¡¡England¡¡States£»¡¡the¡¡Middle¡¡States£»¡¡and¡¡the¡¡States¡¡south¡¡of¡¡North¡¡Carolina¡¡and¡¡Tennessee¡£¡¡In¡¡New¡¡England£»¡¡few¡¡negroes¡¡were¡¡ever¡¡held¡¡as¡¡slaves£»¡¡and¡¡the¡¡institution¡¡disappeared¡¡during¡¡the¡¡first¡¡years¡¡of¡¡the¡¡Republic¡£¡¡The¡¡inhabitants¡¡had¡¡little¡¡experience¡¡arising¡¡from¡¡actual¡¡contact¡¡with¡¡slavery¡£¡¡When¡¡slavery¡¡disappeared¡¡from¡¡New¡¡England¡¡and¡¡before¡¡there¡¡had¡¡been¡¡developed¡¡in¡¡the¡¡country¡¡at¡¡large¡¡a¡¡national¡¡feeling¡¡of¡¡responsibility¡¡for¡¡its¡¡continued¡¡existence£»¡¡interest¡¡in¡¡the¡¡subject¡¡declined¡£¡¡For¡¡twenty¡¡years¡¡previous¡¡to¡¡the¡¡founding¡¡of¡¡Garrison's¡¡Liberator¡¡in¡¡1831£»¡¡organized¡¡abolition¡¡movements¡¡had¡¡been¡¡almost¡¡unknown¡¡in¡¡New¡¡England¡£¡¡In¡¡various¡¡ways¡¡the¡¡people¡¡were¡¡isolated£»¡¡separated¡¡from¡¡contact¡¡with¡¡slavery¡£¡¡Their¡¡knowledge¡¡of¡¡this¡¡subject¡¡of¡¡discussion¡¡was¡¡academic£»¡¡theoretical£»¡¡acquired¡¡at¡¡second¡­hand¡£¡¡In¡¡New¡¡York¡¡and¡¡New¡¡Jersey¡¡slaves¡¡were¡¡much¡¡more¡¡numerous¡¡than¡¡in¡¡New¡¡England¡£¡¡There¡¡were¡¡still¡¡slaves¡¡in¡¡considerable¡¡numbers¡¡until¡¡about¡¡1825¡£¡¡The¡¡people¡¡had¡¡a¡¡knowledge¡¡of¡¡the¡¡institution¡¡from¡¡experience¡¡and¡¡observation£»¡¡and¡¡there¡¡was¡¡no¡¡break¡¡in¡¡the¡¡continuity¡¡of¡¡their¡¡organized¡¡abolition¡¡societies¡£¡¡Chief¡¡among¡¡the¡¡objects¡¡of¡¡these¡¡societies¡¡was¡¡the¡¡effort¡¡to¡¡prevent¡¡kidnapping¡¡and¡¡to¡¡guard¡¡the¡¡rights¡¡of¡¡free¡¡negroes¡£¡¡For¡¡both¡¡of¡¡these¡¡purposes¡¡there¡¡was¡¡a¡¡continuous¡¡call¡¡for¡¡activity¡£¡¡Pennsylvania¡¡also¡¡had¡¡freedmen¡¡of¡¡her¡¡own¡¡whose¡¡rights¡¡called¡¡for¡¡guardianship£»¡¡as¡¡well¡¡as¡¡many¡¡freedmen¡¡from¡¡farther¡¡south¡¡who¡¡had¡¡come¡¡into¡¡the¡¡State¡£¡¡The¡¡movement¡¡of¡¡protest¡¡and¡¡protection¡¡did¡¡not¡¡stop¡¡at¡¡Mason¡¡and¡¡Dixon's¡¡Line£»¡¡but¡¡extended¡¡far¡¡into¡¡the¡¡South¡£¡¡In¡¡both¡¡North¡¡Carolina¡¡and¡¡Tennessee¡¡an¡¡active¡¡protest¡¡against¡¡slavery¡¡was¡¡at¡¡all¡¡times¡¡maintained¡£¡¡In¡¡this¡¡great¡¡middle¡¡section¡¡of¡¡the¡¡country£»¡¡between¡¡New¡¡England¡¡and¡¡South¡¡Carolina£»¡¡there¡¡was¡¡no¡¡cessation¡¡in¡¡the¡¡conflict¡¡between¡¡free¡¡and¡¡slave¡¡labor¡£¡¡Some¡¡of¡¡these¡¡States¡¡became¡¡free¡¡while¡¡others¡¡remained¡¡slave£»¡¡but¡¡between¡¡the¡¡people¡¡of¡¡the¡¡two¡¡sections¡¡there¡¡was¡¡continuous¡¡communication¡£¡¡Slaveholders¡¡came¡¡into¡¡free¡¡States¡¡to¡¡liberate¡¡their¡¡slaves¡£¡¡Non¡­slaveholders¡¡came¡¡to¡¡get¡¡rid¡¡of¡¡the¡¡competition¡¡of¡¡slave¡¡labor£»¡¡and¡¡free¡¡negroes¡¡came¡¡to¡¡avoid¡¡reenslavement¡£¡¡Slaves¡¡fled¡¡thither¡¡on¡¡their¡¡way¡¡to¡¡liberty¡£¡¡It¡¡was¡¡not¡¡a¡¡matter¡¡of¡¡choice£»¡¡it¡¡was¡¡an¡¡unavoidable¡¡condition¡¡which¡¡compelled¡¡the¡¡people¡¡of¡¡the¡¡border¡¡States¡¡to¡¡give¡¡continuous¡¡attention¡¡to¡¡the¡¡institution¡¡of¡¡slavery¡£¡¡The¡¡modern¡¡anti¡­slavery¡¡movement¡¡had¡¡its¡¡origin¡¡in¡¡this¡¡great¡¡middle¡¡section£»¡¡and¡¡from¡¡the¡¡same¡¡source¡¡it¡¡derived¡¡its¡¡chief¡¡support¡£¡¡The¡¡great¡¡body¡¡of¡¡active¡¡abolitionists¡¡were¡¡from¡¡the¡¡slave¡¡States¡¡or¡¡else¡¡derived¡¡their¡¡inspiration¡¡from¡¡personal¡¡contact¡¡with¡¡slavery¡£¡¡As¡¡compared¡¡with¡¡New¡¡England¡¡abolitionists£»¡¡the¡¡middlestate¡¡folk¡¡were¡¡less¡¡extreme¡¡in¡¡their¡¡views¡£¡¡They¡¡had¡¡a¡¡keener¡¡appreciation¡¡of¡¡the¡¡difficulties¡¡involved¡¡in¡¡emancipation¡£¡¡They¡¡were¡¡more¡¡tolerant¡¡towards¡¡the¡¡idea¡¡of¡¡letting¡¡the¡¡country¡¡at¡¡large¡¡share¡¡the¡¡burdens¡¡involved¡¡in¡¡the¡¡liberation¡¡of¡¡the¡¡slaves¡£¡¡Border¡­state¡¡abolitionists¡¡naturally¡¡favored¡¡the¡¡policy¡¡of¡¡gradual¡¡emancipation¡¡which¡¡had¡¡been¡¡followed¡¡in¡¡New¡¡York£»¡¡New¡¡Jersey£»¡¡and¡¡Pennsylvania¡£¡¡Abolitionists¡¡who¡¡continued¡¡to¡¡reside¡¡in¡¡the¡¡slave¡¡States¡¡were¡¡forced¡¡to¡¡recognize¡¡the¡¡fact¡¡that¡¡emancipation¡¡involved¡¡serious¡¡questions¡¡of¡¡race¡¡adjustment¡£¡¡From¡¡the¡¡border¡¡States¡¡came¡¡the¡¡colonization¡¡society£»¡¡a¡¡characteristic¡¡institution£»¡¡as¡¡well¡¡as¡¡compromise¡¡of¡¡every¡¡variety¡£¡¡The¡¡southernmost¡¡section£»¡¡including¡¡South¡¡Carolina£»¡¡Georgia£»¡¡and¡¡the¡¡Gulf¡¡States£»¡¡was¡¡even¡¡more¡¡sharply¡¡defined¡¡in¡¡the¡¡attitude¡¡it¡¡assumed¡¡toward¡¡the¡¡anti¡­slavery¡¡movement¡£¡¡At¡¡no¡¡time¡¡did¡¡the¡¡cause¡¡of¡¡emancipation¡¡become¡¡formidable¡¡in¡¡this¡¡section¡£¡¡In¡¡all¡¡these¡¡States¡¡there¡¡was£»¡¡of¡¡course£»¡¡a¡¡large¡¡class¡¡of¡¡non¡­slaveholding¡¡whites£»¡¡who¡¡were¡¡opposed¡¡to¡¡slavery¡¡and¡¡who¡¡realized¡¡that¡¡they¡¡were¡¡victims¡¡of¡¡an¡¡injurious¡¡system£»¡¡but¡¡they¡¡had¡¡no¡¡effective¡¡organ¡¡for¡¡expression¡£¡¡The¡¡ruling¡¡minority¡¡gained¡¡an¡¡early¡¡and¡¡an¡¡easy¡¡victory¡¡and¡¡to¡¡the¡¡end¡¡held¡¡a¡¡firm¡¡hand¡£¡¡To¡¡the¡¡inhabitants¡¡of¡¡this¡¡section¡¡it¡¡appeared¡¡to¡¡be¡¡a¡¡self¡­evident¡¡truth¡¡that¡¡the¡¡white¡¡race¡¡was¡¡born¡¡to¡¡rule¡¡and¡¡the¡¡black¡¡race¡¡was¡¡born¡¡to¡¡serve¡£¡¡Where¡¡negroes¡¡outnumbered¡¡the¡¡whites¡¡fourfold£»¡¡the¡¡mere¡¡suggestion¡¡of¡¡emancipation¡¡raised¡¡a¡¡race¡¡question¡¡which¡¡seemed¡¡appal

·µ»ØĿ¼ ÉÏÒ»Ò³ ÏÂÒ»Ò³ »Øµ½¶¥²¿ ÔÞ£¨0£© ²È£¨0£©

Äã¿ÉÄÜϲ»¶µÄ