±´¿Çµç×ÓÊé > Ó¢ÎÄÔ­Öøµç×ÓÊé > the anti-slavery crusade >

µÚ28ÕÂ

the anti-slavery crusade-µÚ28ÕÂ

С˵£º the anti-slavery crusade ×ÖÊý£º ÿҳ4000×Ö

°´¼üÅÌÉÏ·½Ïò¼ü ¡û »ò ¡ú ¿É¿ìËÙÉÏÏ·­Ò³£¬°´¼üÅÌÉ쵀 Enter ¼ü¿É»Øµ½±¾ÊéĿ¼ҳ£¬°´¼üÅÌÉÏ·½Ïò¼ü ¡ü ¿É»Øµ½±¾Ò³¶¥²¿£¡
¡ª¡ª¡ª¡ªÎ´ÔĶÁÍꣿ¼ÓÈëÊéÇ©ÒѱãÏ´μÌÐøÔĶÁ£¡



¡¡that¡¡State¡¡in¡¡order¡¡to¡¡enjoy¡¡the¡¡liberty¡¡of¡¡governing¡¡ourselves¡¡in¡¡Kansas£»¡¡then¡¡let¡¡that¡¡be¡¡the¡¡issue¡£¡¡If¡¡Kansas¡¡and¡¡the¡¡whole¡¡North¡¡must¡¡be¡¡enslaved£»¡¡or¡¡Missouri¡¡become¡¡free£»¡¡then¡¡let¡¡her¡¡be¡¡made¡¡free¡£¡¡Aye£¡¡¡and¡¡if¡¡to¡¡be¡¡free¡¡ourselves£»¡¡slavery¡¡must¡¡be¡¡abolished¡¡in¡¡the¡¡whole¡¡country£»¡¡then¡¡let¡¡us¡¡accept¡¡that¡¡due¡£¡¡If¡¡black¡¡slavery¡¡in¡¡a¡¡part¡¡of¡¡the¡¡States¡¡is¡¡incompatible¡¡with¡¡white¡¡freedom¡¡in¡¡any¡¡State£»¡¡then¡¡let¡¡black¡¡slavery¡¡be¡¡abolished¡¡from¡¡all¡£¡¡As¡¡men¡¡espousing¡¡the¡¡principles¡¡of¡¡the¡¡Declaration¡¡of¡¡the¡¡Fathers£»¡¡we¡¡can¡¡do¡¡nothing¡¡else¡¡than¡¡accept¡¡these¡¡issues¡£¡¨¡¡The¡¡men¡¡who¡¡saved¡¡Kansas¡¡to¡¡freedom¡¡were¡¡not¡¡abolitionists¡¡in¡¡the¡¡restricted¡¡sense¡£¡¡Governor¡¡Walker¡¡found¡¡in¡¡1857¡¡that¡¡a¡¡considerable¡¡majority¡¡of¡¡the¡¡free¡­state¡¡men¡¡were¡¡Democrats¡¡and¡¡that¡¡some¡¡were¡¡from¡¡the¡¡South¡£¡¡Nearly¡¡all¡¡actual¡¡settlers£»¡¡from¡¡whatever¡¡source¡¡they¡¡came£»¡¡were¡¡free¡­state¡¡men¡¡who¡¡felt¡¡that¡¡a¡¡slave¡¡was¡¡a¡¡burden¡¡in¡¡such¡¡a¡¡country¡¡as¡¡Kansas¡£¡¡For¡¡example£»¡¡during¡¡the¡¡first¡¡winter¡¡of¡¡the¡¡occupation¡¡of¡¡Kansas£»¡¡an¡¡owner¡¡of¡¡nineteen¡¡slaves¡¡was¡¡himself¡¡forced¡¡to¡¡work¡¡like¡¡a¡¡trooper¡¡to¡¡keep¡¡them¡¡from¡¡freezing£»¡¡and£»¡¡indeed£»¡¡one¡¡of¡¡them¡¡did¡¡freeze¡¡to¡¡death¡¡and¡¡another¡¡was¡¡seriously¡¡injured¡£¡¡In¡¡spite¡¡of¡¡all¡¡the¡¡advertising¡¡of¡¡opportunity¡¡and¡¡all¡¡the¡¡pressure¡¡brought¡¡to¡¡bear¡¡upon¡¡Southerners¡¡to¡¡settle¡¡in¡¡Kansas£»¡¡at¡¡no¡¡time¡¡did¡¡the¡¡number¡¡of¡¡slaves¡¡in¡¡the¡¡Territory¡¡reach¡¡three¡¡hundred¡£¡¡The¡¡climate¡¡and¡¡the¡¡soil¡¡made¡¡for¡¡freedom£»¡¡and¡¡the¡¡Governors¡¡were¡¡not¡¡the¡¡only¡¡persons¡¡who¡¡were¡¡converted¡¡to¡¡free¡­state¡¡principles¡¡by¡¡residence¡¡in¡¡the¡¡Territory¡£

CHAPTER¡¡XIII¡£¡¡THE¡¡SUPREME¡¡COURT¡¡IN¡¡POLITICS¡¡The¡¡decision¡¡and¡¡arguments¡¡of¡¡the¡¡Supreme¡¡Court¡¡upon¡¡the¡¡Dred¡¡Scott¡¡case¡¡were¡¡published¡¡on¡¡March¡¡6£»¡¡1857£»¡¡two¡¡days¡¡after¡¡the¡¡inauguration¡¡of¡¡President¡¡Buchanan¡£¡¡The¡¡decision¡¡had¡¡been¡¡agreed¡¡upon¡¡many¡¡months¡¡before£»¡¡and¡¡the¡¡appeal¡¡of¡¡the¡¡negro£»¡¡Dred¡¡Scott£»¡¡had¡¡been¡¡decided¡¡by¡¡rulings¡¡which¡¡in¡¡no¡¡way¡¡involved¡¡the¡¡validity¡¡of¡¡the¡¡Missouri¡¡Compromise¡£¡¡Nevertheless£»¡¡a¡¡majority¡¡of¡¡the¡¡judges¡¡determined¡¡to¡¡give¡¡to¡¡the¡¡newly¡¡developed¡¡theory¡¡of¡¡John¡¡C¡£¡¡Calhoun¡¡the¡¡appearance¡¡of¡¡the¡¡sanctity¡¡of¡¡law¡£¡¡According¡¡to¡¡Chief¡¡Justice¡¡Taney's¡¡dictum£»¡¡those¡¡who¡¡made¡¡the¡¡Constitution¡¡gave¡¡to¡¡those¡¡clauses¡¡defining¡¡the¡¡power¡¡of¡¡Congress¡¡over¡¡the¡¡Territories¡¡an¡¡erroneous¡¡meaning¡£¡¡On¡¡numerous¡¡occasions¡¡Congress¡¡had¡¡by¡¡statute¡¡excluded¡¡slavery¡¡from¡¡the¡¡public¡¡domain¡£¡¡This£»¡¡in¡¡the¡¡judgment¡¡of¡¡the¡¡Chief¡¡Justice£»¡¡they¡¡had¡¡no¡¡right¡¡to¡¡do£»¡¡and¡¡such¡¡legislation¡¡was¡¡unconstitutional¡¡and¡¡void¡£¡¡Specifically¡¡the¡¡Missouri¡¡Compromise¡¡had¡¡never¡¡had¡¡any¡¡binding¡¡force¡¡as¡¡law¡£¡¡Property¡¡in¡¡slaves¡¡was¡¡as¡¡sacred¡¡as¡¡property¡¡in¡¡any¡¡other¡¡form£»¡¡and¡¡slave¡­owners¡¡had¡¡equal¡¡claim¡¡with¡¡other¡¡property¡¡owners¡¡to¡¡protection¡¡in¡¡all¡¡the¡¡Territories¡¡of¡¡the¡¡United¡¡States¡£¡¡Neither¡¡Congress¡¡nor¡¡a¡¡territorial¡¡Legislature¡¡could¡¡infringe¡¡such¡¡equal¡¡rights¡£¡¡According¡¡to¡¡popular¡¡understanding£»¡¡the¡¡Supreme¡¡Court¡¡declared¡¡¡¨that¡¡the¡¡negro¡¡has¡¡no¡¡rights¡¡which¡¡the¡¡white¡¡man¡¡is¡¡bound¡¡to¡¡respect¡£¡¨¡¡But¡¡Chief¡¡Justice¡¡Taney¡¡did¡¡not¡¡use¡¡these¡¡words¡¡merely¡¡as¡¡an¡¡expression¡¡of¡¡his¡¡own¡¡or¡¡of¡¡the¡¡Court's¡¡opinion¡£¡¡He¡¡used¡¡them¡¡in¡¡a¡¡way¡¡much¡¡more¡¡contemptible¡¡and¡¡inexcusable¡¡to¡¡the¡¡minds¡¡of¡¡men¡¡of¡¡strong¡¡anti¡­slavery¡¡convictions¡£¡¡He¡¡put¡¡them¡¡into¡¡the¡¡mouths¡¡of¡¡the¡¡fathers¡¡of¡¡the¡¡Republic£»¡¡who¡¡wrote¡¡the¡¡Declaration¡¡of¡¡Independence£»¡¡framed¡¡the¡¡Constitution£»¡¡organized¡¡state¡¡Governments£»¡¡and¡¡gave¡¡to¡¡negroes¡¡full¡¡rights¡¡of¡¡citizenship£»¡¡including¡¡the¡¡right¡¡to¡¡vote¡£¡¡But¡¡how¡¡explain¡¡this¡¡strange¡¡inconsistency£¿¡¡The¡¡Chief¡¡Justice¡¡was¡¡equal¡¡to¡¡the¡¡occasion¡£¡¡He¡¡insisted¡¡that¡¡in¡¡recent¡¡years¡¡there¡¡had¡¡come¡¡about¡¡a¡¡better¡¡understanding¡¡of¡¡the¡¡phraseology¡¡of¡¡the¡¡Declaration¡¡of¡¡Independence¡£¡¡The¡¡words£»¡¡¡¨All¡¡men¡¡are¡¡created¡¡equal£»¡¨¡¡he¡¡admitted£»¡¡¡¨would¡¡seem¡¡to¡¡embrace¡¡the¡¡whole¡¡human¡¡family£»¡¡and¡¡if¡¡they¡¡were¡¡used¡¡in¡¡a¡¡similar¡¡instrument¡¡at¡¡this¡¡day¡¡they¡¡would¡¡be¡¡so¡¡understood¡£¡¨¡¡But¡¡the¡¡writers¡¡of¡¡that¡¡instrument¡¡had¡¡not£»¡¡he¡¡said£»¡¡intended¡¡to¡¡include¡¡men¡¡of¡¡the¡¡African¡¡race£»¡¡who¡¡were¡¡at¡¡that¡¡time¡¡regarded¡¡as¡¡not¡¡forming¡¡any¡¡part¡¡of¡¡the¡¡people¡£¡¡Thereforestrange¡¡logic£¡these¡¡men¡¡of¡¡the¡¡revolutionary¡¡era¡¡who¡¡treated¡¡negroes¡¡actually¡¡as¡¡citizens¡¡having¡¡full¡¡equal¡¡rights¡¡did¡¡not¡¡understand¡¡the¡¡meaning¡¡of¡¡their¡¡own¡¡words£»¡¡which¡¡could¡¡be¡¡comprehended¡¡only¡¡after¡¡three¡­quarters¡¡of¡¡a¡¡century¡¡when£»¡¡forsooth£»¡¡equal¡¡rights¡¡had¡¡been¡¡denied¡¡to¡¡all¡¡persons¡¡of¡¡African¡¡descent¡£¡¡The¡¡ruling¡¡of¡¡the¡¡Court¡¡in¡¡the¡¡Dred¡¡Scott¡¡case¡¡came¡¡at¡¡a¡¡time¡¡when¡¡Northern¡¡people¡¡had¡¡a¡¡better¡¡idea¡¡of¡¡the¡¡spirit¡¡and¡¡teachings¡¡of¡¡the¡¡founders¡¡of¡¡the¡¡Republic¡¡regarding¡¡the¡¡slavery¡¡question¡¡than¡¡any¡¡generation¡¡before¡¡or¡¡since¡¡has¡¡had¡£¡¡The¡¡campaign¡¡that¡¡had¡¡just¡¡closed¡¡had¡¡been¡¡characterized¡¡by¡¡a¡¡high¡¡order¡¡of¡¡discussion£»¡¡and¡¡it¡¡was¡¡also¡¡emphatically¡¡a¡¡reading¡¡campaign¡£¡¡The¡¡new¡¡Republican¡¡party¡¡planted¡¡itself¡¡squarely¡¡on¡¡the¡¡principles¡¡enunciated¡¡by¡¡Thomas¡¡Jefferson£»¡¡the¡¡reputed¡¡founder¡¡of¡¡the¡¡old¡¡Republican¡¡party¡£¡¡They¡¡went¡¡back¡¡to¡¡the¡¡policy¡¡of¡¡the¡¡fathers£»¡¡whose¡¡words¡¡on¡¡the¡¡subject¡¡of¡¡slavery¡¡they¡¡eagerly¡¡read¡£¡¡¡·From¡¡this¡¡source¡¡also¡¡came¡¡the¡¡chief¡¡material¡¡for¡¡their¡¡public¡¡addresses¡£¡¡To¡¡the¡¡common¡¡man¡¡who¡¡was¡¡thus¡¡indoctrinated£»¡¡the¡¡Chief¡¡Justice£»¡¡in¡¡describing¡¡the¡¡sentiments¡¡of¡¡the¡¡fathers¡¡respecting¡¡slavery£»¡¡appeared¡¡to¡¡be¡¡doing¡¡what¡¡Horace¡¡Greeley¡¡was¡¡wont¡¡to¡¡describe¡¡as¡¡¡¨saying¡¡a¡¡thing¡¡and¡¡being¡¡conscious¡¡while¡¡saying¡¡it¡¡that¡¡the¡¡thing¡¡is¡¡not¡¡true¡£¡¨¡¡The¡¡Dred¡¡Scott¡¡decision¡¡laid¡¡the¡¡Republicans¡¡open¡¡to¡¡the¡¡charge¡¡of¡¡seeking¡¡by¡¡unlawful¡¡means¡¡to¡¡deprive¡¡slaveowners¡¡of¡¡their¡¡rights£»¡¡and¡¡it¡¡was¡¡to¡¡the¡¡partizan¡¡interest¡¡of¡¡the¡¡Democrats¡¡to¡¡stand¡¡by¡¡the¡¡Court¡¡and¡¡thus¡¡discredit¡¡their¡¡opponents¡£¡¡This¡¡action¡¡tended¡¡to¡¡carry¡¡the¡¡entire¡¡Democratic¡¡party¡¡to¡¡the¡¡support¡¡of¡¡Calhoun's¡¡extreme¡¡position¡¡on¡¡the¡¡slavery¡¡question¡£¡¡Republicans¡¡had¡¡proclaimed¡¡that¡¡liberty¡¡was¡¡national¡¡and¡¡slavery¡¡municipal£»¡¡that¡¡slavery¡¡had¡¡no¡¡warrant¡¡for¡¡existence¡¡except¡¡by¡¡state¡¡enactment£»¡¡that¡¡under¡¡the¡¡Constitution¡¡Congress¡¡had¡¡no¡¡more¡¡right¡¡to¡¡make¡¡a¡¡slave¡¡than¡¡it¡¡had¡¡to¡¡make¡¡a¡¡king£»¡¡that¡¡Congress¡¡had¡¡no¡¡power¡¡to¡¡establish¡¡or¡¡permit¡¡slavery¡¡in¡¡the¡¡Territories£»¡¡that¡¡it¡¡was£»¡¡on¡¡the¡¡contrary£»¡¡the¡¡duty¡¡of¡¡Congress¡¡to¡¡exclude¡¡slavery¡£¡¡On¡¡these¡¡points¡¡the¡¡Supreme¡¡Court¡¡and¡¡the¡¡Republican¡¡party¡¡held¡¡directly¡¡contradictory¡¡opinions¡£¡¡The¡¡Democratic¡¡platform¡¡of¡¡1856¡¡endorsed¡¡the¡¡doctrine¡¡of¡¡popular¡¡sovereignty¡¡as¡¡embodied¡¡in¡¡the¡¡Kansas¡­Nebraska¡¡legislation£»¡¡which¡¡implied¡¡that¡¡Congress¡¡should¡¡neither¡¡prohibit¡¡nor¡¡introduce¡¡slavery¡¡into¡¡the¡¡Territories£»¡¡but¡¡should¡¡leave¡¡the¡¡inhabitants¡¡free¡¡to¡¡decide¡¡that¡¡question¡¡for¡¡themselves£»¡¡the¡¡public¡¡domains¡¡being¡¡open¡¡to¡¡slaveowners¡¡on¡¡equal¡¡terms¡¡with¡¡others¡£¡¡But¡¡once¡¡they¡¡had¡¡an¡¡organized¡¡territorial¡¡Government¡¡and¡¡a¡¡duly¡¡elected¡¡territorial¡¡Legislature£»¡¡the¡¡residents¡¡of¡¡a¡¡Territory¡¡were¡¡empowered¡¡to¡¡choose¡¡either¡¡slave¡¡labor¡¡or¡¡exclusively¡¡free¡¡labor¡£¡¡This¡¡at¡¡least¡¡was¡¡the¡¡view¡¡expounded¡¡by¡¡Stephen¡¡A¡£¡¡Douglas£»¡¡though¡¡the¡¡theory¡¡was¡¡apparently¡¡rendered¡¡untenable¡¡by¡¡the¡¡ruling¡¡of¡¡the¡¡Court¡¡which¡¡extended¡¡protection¡¡to¡¡slave¡­owners¡¡in¡¡all¡¡the¡¡Territories¡¡remaining¡¡under¡¡the¡¡control¡¡of¡¡the¡¡general¡¡Government¡£¡¡It¡¡followed¡¡that¡¡if¡¡Congress¡¡had¡¡no¡¡power¡¡to¡¡interfere¡¡with¡¡that¡¡right£»¡¡much¡¡less¡¡had¡¡a¡¡local¡¡territorial¡¡Government£»¡¡which¡¡is¡¡itself¡¡a¡¡creature¡¡of¡¡Congress¡£¡¡A¡¡state¡¡Government¡¡alone¡¡might¡¡control¡¡the¡¡status¡¡of¡¡slave¡¡property¡£¡¡A¡¡Territory¡¡when¡¡adopting¡¡a¡¡constitution¡¡preparatory¡¡to¡¡becoming¡¡a¡¡State¡¡would¡¡find¡¡it¡¡then¡¡in¡¡order¡¡to¡¡decide¡¡whether¡¡the¡¡proposed¡¡State¡¡should¡¡be¡¡free¡¡or¡¡slave¡£¡¡This¡¡was¡¡the¡¡view¡¡held¡¡by¡¡Jefferson¡¡Davis¡¡and¡¡the¡¡extreme¡¡pro¡­slavery¡¡leaders¡£¡¡Aided¡¡by¡¡the¡¡authority¡¡of¡¡the¡¡Supreme¡¡Court£»¡¡they¡¡were¡¡prepared¡¡to¡¡insist¡¡upon¡¡a¡¡new¡¡plank¡¡in¡¡future¡¡Democratic¡¡platforms¡¡which¡¡should¡¡guarantee¡¡to¡¡all¡¡slave¡­owners¡¡equal¡¡rights¡¡in¡¡all¡¡Territories¡¡until¡¡they¡¡ceased¡¡to¡¡be¡¡Territories¡£¡¡Over¡¡this¡¡issue¡¡the¡¡party¡¡again¡¡divided¡¡in¡¡1860¡£¡¡Republicans¡¡naturally¡¡imagined¡¡that¡¡there¡¡had¡¡been¡¡collusion¡¡between¡¡Democratic¡¡politicians¡¡and¡¡members¡¡of¡¡the¡¡Supreme¡¡Court¡£¡¡Mr¡£¡¡Seward¡¡made¡¡an¡¡explicit¡¡statement¡¡to¡¡that¡¡effect£»¡¡and¡¡affirmed¡¡that¡¡President¡¡Buchanan¡¡was¡¡admitted¡¡into¡¡the¡¡secret£»¡¡alleging¡¡as¡¡proof¡¡a¡¡few¡¡words¡¡in¡¡his¡¡inaugural¡¡address¡¡referring¡¡to¡¡the¡¡decision¡¡soon¡¡to¡¡be¡¡delivered¡£¡¡Nothing¡¡of¡¡the¡¡sort£»¡¡however£»¡¡was¡¡ever¡¡proven¡£¡¡The¡¡historian¡¡Von¡¡Holst¡¡presents¡¡the¡¡view¡¡that¡¡there¡¡had¡¡been¡¡a¡¡most¡¡elaborate¡¡and¡¡comprehensive¡¡program¡¡on¡¡the¡¡part¡¡of¡¡the¡¡slavocracy¡¡to¡¡control¡¡the¡¡judiciary¡¡of¡¡the¡¡federal¡¡Government¡£¡¡The¡¡ac

·µ»ØĿ¼ ÉÏÒ»Ò³ ÏÂÒ»Ò³ »Øµ½¶¥²¿ ÔÞ£¨0£© ²È£¨0£©

Äã¿ÉÄÜϲ»¶µÄ