±´¿Çµç×ÓÊé > Ó¢ÎÄÔ­Öøµç×ÓÊé > the anti-slavery crusade >

µÚ22ÕÂ

the anti-slavery crusade-µÚ22ÕÂ

С˵£º the anti-slavery crusade ×ÖÊý£º ÿҳ4000×Ö

°´¼üÅÌÉÏ·½Ïò¼ü ¡û »ò ¡ú ¿É¿ìËÙÉÏÏ·­Ò³£¬°´¼üÅÌÉ쵀 Enter ¼ü¿É»Øµ½±¾ÊéĿ¼ҳ£¬°´¼üÅÌÉÏ·½Ïò¼ü ¡ü ¿É»Øµ½±¾Ò³¶¥²¿£¡
¡ª¡ª¡ª¡ªÎ´ÔĶÁÍꣿ¼ÓÈëÊéÇ©ÒѱãÏ´μÌÐøÔĶÁ£¡



849¡¡to¡¡provide¡¡for¡¡gradual¡¡emancipation¡¡in¡¡Kentucky¡¡was¡¡bitterly¡¡resented¡£¡¡It¡¡had¡¡long¡¡been¡¡an¡¡axiom¡¡with¡¡the¡¡slavocracy¡¡that¡¡the¡¡institution¡¡would¡¡perish¡¡unless¡¡it¡¡had¡¡the¡¡opportunity¡¡to¡¡expand¡£¡¡Out¡¡of¡¡this¡¡conviction¡¡arose¡¡Calhoun's¡¡famous¡¡theory¡¡that¡¡slaveowners¡¡had¡¡under¡¡the¡¡Constitution¡¡an¡¡equal¡¡right¡¡with¡¡the¡¡owners¡¡of¡¡all¡¡other¡¡forms¡¡of¡¡property¡¡in¡¡all¡¡the¡¡Territories¡£¡¡The¡¡theory¡¡itself¡¡assumed¡¡that¡¡the¡¡act¡¡prohibiting¡¡slavery¡¡in¡¡the¡¡territory¡¡north¡¡of¡¡the¡¡southern¡¡boundary¡¡of¡¡Missouri¡¡was¡¡unconstitutional¡¡and¡¡void¡£¡¡But¡¡this¡¡theory¡¡had¡¡not¡¡yet¡¡received¡¡judicial¡¡sanction£»¡¡and¡¡the¡¡time¡¡was¡¡at¡¡hand¡¡when¡¡the¡¡question¡¡of¡¡freedom¡¡or¡¡slavery¡¡in¡¡the¡¡western¡¡territory¡¡was¡¡to¡¡be¡¡determined¡£¡¡Between¡¡March¡¡and¡¡December£»¡¡1853£»¡¡the¡¡discovery¡¡was¡¡made¡¡that¡¡the¡¡Act¡¡of¡¡1850¡¡organizing¡¡the¡¡Territories¡¡of¡¡New¡¡Mexico¡¡and¡¡Utah¡¡had¡¡superseded¡¡the¡¡Compromise¡¡of¡¡1820£»¡¡that¡¡a¡¡principle¡¡had¡¡been¡¡recognized¡¡applicable¡¡to¡¡all¡¡the¡¡Territories£»¡¡that¡¡all¡¡were¡¡open¡¡to¡¡settlement¡¡on¡¡equal¡¡terms¡¡to¡¡slaveholders¡¡and¡¡non¡­slaveholders£»¡¡that¡¡the¡¡subject¡¡of¡¡slavery¡¡should¡¡be¡¡removed¡¡from¡¡Congress¡¡to¡¡the¡¡people¡¡of¡¡the¡¡Territories£»¡¡and¡¡that¡¡they¡¡should¡¡decide£»¡¡either¡¡when¡¡a¡¡territorial¡¡legislature¡¡was¡¡organized¡¡or¡¡at¡¡the¡¡time¡¡of¡¡the¡¡adoption¡¡of¡¡a¡¡constitution¡¡preparatory¡¡to¡¡statehood£»¡¡whether¡¡or¡¡not¡¡slavery¡¡should¡¡be¡¡authorized¡£¡¡These¡¡ideas¡¡found¡¡expression¡¡in¡¡various¡¡newspapers¡¡during¡¡the¡¡month¡¡of¡¡December£»¡¡1853¡£¡¡Though¡¡the¡¡authorship¡¡of¡¡the¡¡new¡¡theory¡¡is¡¡still¡¡a¡¡matter¡¡of¡¡dispute£»¡¡it¡¡is¡¡well¡¡known¡¡that¡¡Stephen¡¡A¡£¡¡Douglas¡¡became¡¡its¡¡chief¡¡sponsor¡¡and¡¡champion¡£¡¡The¡¡real¡¡motives¡¡and¡¡intentions¡¡of¡¡Douglas¡¡himself¡¡and¡¡of¡¡many¡¡of¡¡his¡¡supporters¡¡will¡¡always¡¡remain¡¡obscure¡¡and¡¡uncertain¡£¡¡But¡¡no¡¡uncertainty¡¡attaches¡¡to¡¡the¡¡motives¡¡of¡¡Senator¡¡Atchison¡¡and¡¡the¡¡leaders¡¡of¡¡the¡¡Calhoun¡¡section¡¡of¡¡the¡¡Democratic¡¡party¡£¡¡For¡¡ten¡¡years¡¡at¡¡least¡¡they¡¡had¡¡been¡¡laboring¡¡to¡¡get¡¡rid¡¡of¡¡the¡¡Missouri¡¡Compromise¡£¡¡Their¡¡motive¡¡was¡¡to¡¡defend¡¡slavery¡¡and¡¡especially¡¡to¡¡forestall¡¡a¡¡successful¡¡movement¡¡for¡¡emancipation¡¡in¡¡the¡¡State¡¡of¡¡Missouri¡£¡¡From¡¡early¡¡in¡¡January£»¡¡1854£»¡¡until¡¡late¡¡in¡¡May£»¡¡Douglas's¡¡Nebraska¡¡bill¡¡held¡¡the¡¡attention¡¡of¡¡Congress¡¡and¡¡of¡¡the¡¡entire¡¡country¡£¡¡At¡¡first¡¡the¡¡measure¡¡simply¡¡assumed¡¡that¡¡the¡¡Missouri¡¡Compromise¡¡had¡¡been¡¡superseded¡¡by¡¡the¡¡Act¡¡of¡¡1850¡£¡¡Later¡¡the¡¡bill¡¡was¡¡amended¡¡in¡¡such¡¡a¡¡way¡¡as¡¡to¡¡repeal¡¡distinctly¡¡that¡¡time¡­honored¡¡act¡£¡¡At¡¡first¡¡the¡¡plan¡¡was¡¡to¡¡organize¡¡Nebraska¡¡as¡¡a¡¡single¡¡Territory¡¡extending¡¡from¡¡Texas¡¡to¡¡Canada¡£¡¡Later¡¡it¡¡was¡¡proposed¡¡to¡¡organize¡¡separate¡¡Territories£»¡¡one¡¡west¡¡of¡¡Missouri¡¡under¡¡the¡¡name¡¡of¡¡Kansas£»¡¡the¡¡other¡¡west¡¡of¡¡Iowa¡¡under¡¡the¡¡name¡¡of¡¡Nebraska¡£¡¡Opposition¡¡came¡¡from¡¡Free¡­soilers£»¡¡from¡¡Northern¡¡Whigs¡¡and¡¡a¡¡few¡¡Whigs¡¡from¡¡the¡¡South£»¡¡and¡¡from¡¡a¡¡large¡¡proportion¡¡of¡¡Northern¡¡Democrats¡£¡¡The¡¡repeal¡¡of¡¡the¡¡Missouri¡¡Compromise¡¡came¡¡like¡¡a¡¡thunderbolt¡¡out¡¡of¡¡a¡¡clear¡¡sky¡¡to¡¡the¡¡people¡¡of¡¡the¡¡North¡£¡¡For¡¡a¡¡time¡¡Douglas¡¡was¡¡the¡¡most¡¡unpopular¡¡of¡¡political¡¡leaders¡¡and¡¡was¡¡apparently¡¡repudiated¡¡by¡¡his¡¡party¡£¡¡The¡¡first¡¡name¡¡designating¡¡the¡¡opponents¡¡of¡¡the¡¡Douglas¡¡bill¡¡was¡¡¡¨Anti¡¡Nebraska¡¡men£»¡¨¡¡for¡¡which¡¡the¡¡name¡¡Republican¡¡was¡¡gradually¡¡substituted¡¡and¡¡in¡¡1858¡¡became¡¡the¡¡accepted¡¡title¡¡of¡¡the¡¡party¡£¡¡The¡¡provision¡¡for¡¡two¡¡territorial¡¡governments¡¡instead¡¡of¡¡one¡¡carried¡¡with¡¡it¡¡the¡¡idea¡¡of¡¡a¡¡continued¡¡balance¡¡between¡¡slave¡¡and¡¡free¡¡States£»¡¡Kansas£»¡¡being¡¡on¡¡a¡¡geographical¡¡parallel¡¡with¡¡the¡¡slave¡¡States£»¡¡would¡¡probably¡¡permit¡¡slavery£»¡¡while¡¡Nebraska¡¡would¡¡be¡¡occupied¡¡by¡¡free¡­state¡¡immigrants¡£¡¡Though¡¡this¡¡was¡¡a¡¡commonly¡¡accepted¡¡view£»¡¡Eli¡¡Thayer¡¡of¡¡Worcester£»¡¡Massachusetts£»¡¡and¡¡a¡¡few¡¡others¡¡took¡¡a¡¡different¡¡view¡£¡¡They¡¡proposed¡¡to¡¡make¡¡an¡¡end¡¡of¡¡the¡¡discussion¡¡of¡¡the¡¡extension¡¡of¡¡slavery¡¡by¡¡sending¡¡free¡¡men¡¡who¡¡were¡¡opposed¡¡to¡¡slavery¡¡to¡¡occupy¡¡the¡¡territory¡¡open¡¡for¡¡settlement¡£¡¡To¡¡attain¡¡this¡¡object¡¡they¡¡organized¡¡an¡¡Emigrant¡¡Aid¡¡Company¡¡incorporated¡¡under¡¡the¡¡laws¡¡of¡¡the¡¡State¡£¡¡Even¡¡before¡¡the¡¡bill¡¡was¡¡passed£»¡¡the¡¡corporation¡¡was¡¡in¡¡full¡¡working¡¡order¡£¡¡Thayer¡¡himself¡¡traveled¡¡extensively¡¡throughout¡¡the¡¡Northern¡¡States¡¡stimulating¡¡interest¡¡in¡¡western¡¡emigration£»¡¡with¡¡the¡¡conviction¡¡that¡¡the¡¡disturbing¡¡question¡¡could¡¡be¡¡peacefully¡¡settled¡¡in¡¡this¡¡way¡£¡¡California¡¡had¡¡thus¡¡been¡¡saved¡¡to¡¡freedom£»¡¡why¡¡not¡¡all¡¡other¡¡Territories£¿¡¡The¡¡new¡¡company¡¡had¡¡as¡¡adviser¡¡and¡¡co¡­laborer¡¡Dr¡£¡¡Charles¡¡Robinson£»¡¡who¡¡had¡¡crossed¡¡the¡¡Kansas¡¡Territory¡¡on¡¡his¡¡way¡¡to¡¡California¡¡and¡¡had¡¡acquired¡¡valuable¡¡experience¡¡in¡¡the¡¡art¡¡of¡¡state¡­building¡¡under¡¡peculiar¡¡conditions¡£¡¡The¡¡first¡¡party¡¡sent¡¡out¡¡by¡¡the¡¡Emigrant¡¡Aid¡¡Company¡¡arrived¡¡in¡¡Kansas¡¡early¡¡in¡¡August£»¡¡1854£»¡¡and¡¡selected¡¡the¡¡site¡¡for¡¡the¡¡town¡¡of¡¡Lawrence¡£¡¡During¡¡the¡¡later¡¡months¡¡of¡¡the¡¡year£»¡¡four¡¡other¡¡parties¡¡were¡¡sent¡¡out£»¡¡in¡¡all¡¡numbering¡¡nearly¡¡seven¡¡hundred¡£¡¡Through¡¡extensive¡¡advertisement¡¡by¡¡the¡¡company£»¡¡through¡¡the¡¡general¡¡interest¡¡in¡¡the¡¡subject¡¡and¡¡the¡¡natural¡¡flow¡¡of¡¡emigration¡¡to¡¡the¡¡West£»¡¡Kansas¡¡was¡¡receiving¡¡large¡¡accessions¡¡of¡¡free¡­state¡¡settlers¡£¡¡Meanwhile¡¡the¡¡men¡¡of¡¡Missouri£»¡¡some¡¡of¡¡whom¡¡had¡¡striven¡¡for¡¡a¡¡decade¡¡to¡¡secure¡¡the¡¡privilege¡¡of¡¡extending¡¡slavery¡¡into¡¡the¡¡new¡¡Territory£»¡¡were¡¡not¡¡idle¡£¡¡Instantly¡¡upon¡¡the¡¡removal¡¡of¡¡legal¡¡barriers£»¡¡they¡¡occupied¡¡adjacent¡¡lands£»¡¡founded¡¡towns£»¡¡staked¡¡out¡¡claims£»¡¡formed¡¡plans¡¡for¡¡preempting¡¡the¡¡entire¡¡region¡¡and¡¡for¡¡forestalling¡¡or¡¡driving¡¡out¡¡all¡¡intruders¡£¡¡They¡¡had¡¡at¡¡first¡¡the¡¡advantage¡¡of¡¡position£»¡¡for¡¡they¡¡did¡¡not¡¡find¡¡it¡¡difficult¡¡to¡¡maintain¡¡two¡¡homes£»¡¡one¡¡in¡¡Kansas¡¡for¡¡purposes¡¡of¡¡voting¡¡and¡¡fighting¡¡and¡¡another¡¡in¡¡Missouri¡¡for¡¡actual¡¡residence¡£¡¡Andrew¡¡H¡£¡¡Reeder£»¡¡a¡¡Pennsylvania¡¡Democrat¡¡of¡¡strong¡¡pro¡­slavery¡¡prejudices£»¡¡was¡¡appointed¡¡first¡¡Governor¡¡of¡¡the¡¡Territory¡£¡¡When¡¡he¡¡arrived¡¡in¡¡Kansas¡¡in¡¡October£»¡¡1854£»¡¡there¡¡were¡¡already¡¡several¡¡thousand¡¡settlers¡¡on¡¡the¡¡ground¡¡and¡¡others¡¡were¡¡continually¡¡arriving¡£¡¡He¡¡appointed¡¡the¡¡29th¡¡of¡¡November¡¡for¡¡the¡¡election¡¡of¡¡a¡¡delegate¡¡to¡¡Congress¡£¡¡On¡¡that¡¡day¡¡several¡¡hundred¡¡Missourians¡¡came¡¡into¡¡the¡¡Territory¡¡and¡¡voted¡£¡¡There¡¡was¡¡no¡¡violence¡¡and¡¡no¡¡contest£»¡¡the¡¡free¡­state¡¡men¡¡had¡¡no¡¡separate¡¡candidate¡£¡¡Notwithstanding¡¡the¡¡violence¡¡of¡¡language¡¡used¡¡by¡¡opposing¡¡factions£»¡¡notwithstanding¡¡the¡¡organization¡¡of¡¡secret¡¡societies¡¡pledged¡¡to¡¡drive¡¡out¡¡all¡¡Northern¡¡intruders£»¡¡there¡¡was¡¡no¡¡serious¡¡disturbance¡¡until¡¡March¡¡30£»¡¡1855£»¡¡the¡¡day¡¡appointed¡¡for¡¡the¡¡election¡¡of¡¡members¡¡of¡¡the¡¡territorial¡¡Legislature¡£¡¡On¡¡that¡¡day¡¡the¡¡Missourians¡¡came¡¡full¡¡five¡¡thousand¡¡strong£»¡¡armed¡¡with¡¡guns£»¡¡bowie¡­knives£»¡¡and¡¡revolvers¡£¡¡They¡¡met¡¡with¡¡no¡¡resistance¡¡from¡¡the¡¡residents£»¡¡who¡¡were¡¡unarmed¡£¡¡They¡¡took¡¡charge¡¡of¡¡the¡¡precincts¡¡and¡¡chose¡¡pro¡­slavery¡¡delegates¡¡with¡¡one¡¡exception¡£¡¡Governor¡¡Reeder¡¡protested¡¡and¡¡recommended¡¡to¡¡the¡¡precincts¡¡the¡¡filing¡¡of¡¡protests¡£¡¡Only¡¡seven¡¡responded£»¡¡however£»¡¡and¡¡in¡¡these¡¡cases¡¡new¡¡elections¡¡were¡¡held¡¡and¡¡contesting¡¡delegates¡¡elected¡£¡¡The¡¡Governor¡¡issued¡¡certificates¡¡to¡¡these¡¡and¡¡to¡¡all¡¡those¡¡who¡¡in¡¡other¡¡precincts¡¡had¡¡been¡¡chosen¡¡by¡¡the¡¡horde¡¡from¡¡Missouri¡£¡¡When¡¡the¡¡Legislature¡¡met¡¡in¡¡July£»¡¡the¡¡seven¡¡contests¡¡were¡¡decided¡¡in¡¡favor¡¡of¡¡the¡¡pro¡­slavery¡¡party£»¡¡the¡¡single¡¡freestate¡¡member¡¡resigned£»¡¡and¡¡the¡¡assembly¡¡was¡¡unanimous¡£¡¡Governor¡¡Reeder¡¡fully¡¡expected¡¡that¡¡President¡¡Pierce¡¡would¡¡nullify¡¡the¡¡election£»¡¡and¡¡to¡¡this¡¡end¡¡he¡¡made¡¡a¡¡journey¡¡to¡¡Washington¡¡in¡¡April¡£¡¡On¡¡the¡¡way¡¡he¡¡delivered¡¡a¡¡public¡¡address¡¡at¡¡Easton£»¡¡Pennsylvania£»¡¡describing¡¡in¡¡lurid¡¡colors¡¡the¡¡outrage¡¡which¡¡had¡¡been¡¡perpetrated¡¡upon¡¡the¡¡people¡¡of¡¡Kansas¡¡by¡¡the¡¡¡¨border¡¡ruffians¡¨¡¡from¡¡Missouri£»¡¡and¡¡asserting¡¡that¡¡the¡¡accounts¡¡in¡¡the¡¡Northern¡¡press¡¡had¡¡not¡¡been¡¡exaggerated¡£¡¡While¡¡Governor¡¡Reeder¡¡in¡¡contact¡¡with¡¡the¡¡actual¡¡events¡¡in¡¡Kansas¡¡was¡¡becoming¡¡an¡¡active¡¡Free¡­Boiler£»¡¡President¡¡Pierce¡¡in¡¡association¡¡with¡¡Jefferson¡¡Davis¡¡and¡¡others¡¡of¡¡his¡¡party¡¡was¡¡developing¡¡active¡¡sympathies¡¡with¡¡the¡¡people¡¡of¡¡western¡¡Missouri¡£¡¡To¡¡the¡¡President¡¡this¡¡invasion¡¡of¡¡territory¡¡west¡¡of¡¡the¡¡slave¡¡State¡¡by¡¡Northern¡¡men¡¡aided¡¡by¡¡Northern¡¡corporations¡¡seemed¡¡a¡¡violation¡¡of¡¡the¡¡Kansas¡­Nebraska¡¡Act£»¡¡and¡¡he¡¡sought¡¡to¡¡induce¡¡Reeder¡¡to¡¡resign¡£¡¡This£»¡¡however£»¡¡the¡¡Governor¡¡positively¡¡refused¡¡to¡¡do¡¡unless¡¡the¡¡President¡¡would¡¡formally¡¡approve¡¡his¡¡conduct¡¡in¡¡Kansasan¡¡endorsement¡¡which¡¡required¡¡more¡¡fortitude¡¡than¡¡President¡¡Pierce¡¡possessed¡£¡¡On¡¡his¡¡return¡¡to¡¡Kansas£»¡¡determined¡¡to¡¡do¡¡what¡¡he¡¡could¡¡to¡¡protect¡¡the¡¡Kansas¡¡people¡¡from¡¡injustice£»¡¡he¡¡called¡¡the¡¡Legislature¡¡to¡¡meet¡¡at¡¡Pawnee£»¡¡a¡¡point¡¡far¡¡removed¡¡from¡¡the¡¡Missouri¡¡border¡£¡¡Immediately¡¡upon¡¡their¡¡organization¡¡at¡¡that¡¡place¡¡the¡¡members¡¡of¡¡the¡¡Legisl

·µ»ØĿ¼ ÉÏÒ»Ò³ ÏÂÒ»Ò³ »Øµ½¶¥²¿ ÔÞ£¨0£© ²È£¨0£©

Äã¿ÉÄÜϲ»¶µÄ