±´¿Çµç×ÓÊé > Ó¢ÎÄÔ­Öøµç×ÓÊé > the anti-slavery crusade >

µÚ21ÕÂ

the anti-slavery crusade-µÚ21ÕÂ

С˵£º the anti-slavery crusade ×ÖÊý£º ÿҳ4000×Ö

°´¼üÅÌÉÏ·½Ïò¼ü ¡û »ò ¡ú ¿É¿ìËÙÉÏÏ·­Ò³£¬°´¼üÅÌÉ쵀 Enter ¼ü¿É»Øµ½±¾ÊéĿ¼ҳ£¬°´¼üÅÌÉÏ·½Ïò¼ü ¡ü ¿É»Øµ½±¾Ò³¶¥²¿£¡
¡ª¡ª¡ª¡ªÎ´ÔĶÁÍꣿ¼ÓÈëÊéÇ©ÒѱãÏ´μÌÐøÔĶÁ£¡



ds¡¡to¡¡inflict¡¡the¡¡crime¡¡of¡¡slavery¡¡upon¡¡an¡¡overwhelming¡¡majority¡¡of¡¡their¡¡white¡¡fellow¡­citizens¡£¡¡The¡¡publication¡¡of¡¡¡¨The¡¡Impending¡¡Crisis¡¨¡¡created¡¡a¡¡profound¡¡sensation¡¡among¡¡Southern¡¡leaders¡£¡¡So¡¡long¡¡as¡¡the¡¡attack¡¡upon¡¡the¡¡peculiar¡¡institution¡¡emanated¡¡from¡¡the¡¡North£»¡¡the¡¡defenders¡¡had¡¡the¡¡full¡¡benefit¡¡of¡¡local¡¡prejudice¡¡and¡¡resentment¡¡against¡¡outside¡¡intrusion¡£¡¡Helper¡¡was¡¡himself¡¡a¡¡thorough¡­going¡¡believer¡¡in¡¡state¡¡rights¡£¡¡Slavery¡¡was¡¡to¡¡be¡¡abolished£»¡¡as¡¡he¡¡thought£»¡¡by¡¡the¡¡action¡¡of¡¡the¡¡separate¡¡States¡£¡¡Here¡¡he¡¡was¡¡in¡¡accord¡¡with¡¡Northern¡¡abolitionists¡£¡¡If¡¡such¡¡literature¡¡as¡¡Helper's¡¡volume¡¡should¡¡find¡¡its¡¡way¡¡into¡¡the¡¡South£»¡¡it¡¡would¡¡be¡¡no¡¡longer¡¡possible¡¡to¡¡palm¡¡off¡¡upon¡¡the¡¡unthinking¡¡public¡¡the¡¡patent¡¡falsehood¡¡that¡¡abolitionists¡¡of¡¡the¡¡North¡¡were¡¡attempting¡¡to¡¡impose¡¡by¡¡force¡¡a¡¡change¡¡in¡¡Southern¡¡institutions¡£¡¡All¡¡that¡¡Southern¡¡abolitionists¡¡ever¡¡asked¡¡was¡¡the¡¡privilege¡¡of¡¡remaining¡¡at¡¡home¡¡in¡¡their¡¡own¡¡South¡¡in¡¡the¡¡full¡¡exercise¡¡of¡¡their¡¡constitutional¡¡rights¡£¡¡Southern¡¡leaders¡¡were¡¡undoubtedly¡¡aware¡¡of¡¡the¡¡concurrent¡¡publications¡¡of¡¡travelers¡¡and¡¡newspaper¡¡reporters£»¡¡of¡¡which¡¡Olmsted's¡¡books¡¡were¡¡conspicuous¡¡examples¡£¡¡Olmsted¡¡and¡¡Helper¡¡were¡¡both¡¡sources¡¡of¡¡proof¡¡that¡¡slavery¡¡was¡¡bringing¡¡the¡¡South¡¡to¡¡financial¡¡ruin¡£¡¡The¡¡facts¡¡were¡¡getting¡¡hold¡¡of¡¡the¡¡minds¡¡of¡¡the¡¡Southern¡¡people¡£¡¡The¡¡debate¡¡which¡¡had¡¡been¡¡adjourned¡¡was¡¡on¡¡the¡¡eve¡¡of¡¡being¡¡resumed¡£¡¡Complete¡¡suppression¡¡of¡¡the¡¡new¡¡scientific¡¡industrial¡¡argument¡¡against¡¡slavery¡¡seemed¡¡to¡¡slave¡­owners¡¡to¡¡furnish¡¡their¡¡only¡¡defense¡£¡¡The¡¡Appalachian¡¡ranges¡¡of¡¡mountains¡¡drove¡¡a¡¡wedge¡¡of¡¡liberty¡¡and¡¡freedom¡¡from¡¡Pennsylvania¡¡almost¡¡to¡¡the¡¡Gulf¡£¡¡In¡¡the¡¡upland¡¡regions¡¡slavery¡¡could¡¡not¡¡flourish¡£¡¡There¡¡was¡¡always¡¡enmity¡¡between¡¡the¡¡planters¡¡of¡¡the¡¡coast¡¡and¡¡the¡¡dwellers¡¡on¡¡the¡¡upland¡£¡¡The¡¡slaveholding¡¡oligarchy¡¡had¡¡always¡¡ruled£»¡¡but¡¡the¡¡day¡¡of¡¡the¡¡uplanders¡¡was¡¡at¡¡hand¡£¡¡This¡¡is¡¡the¡¡explanation¡¡of¡¡the¡¡veritable¡¡panic¡¡which¡¡Helper's¡¡publication¡¡created¡£¡¡A¡¡debate¡¡which¡¡should¡¡follow¡¡the¡¡line¡¡of¡¡this¡¡old¡¡division¡¡between¡¡the¡¡peoples¡¡of¡¡the¡¡Atlantic¡¡slave¡¡States¡¡would£»¡¡under¡¡existing¡¡conditions£»¡¡be¡¡fatal¡¡to¡¡the¡¡institution¡¡of¡¡slavery¡£¡¡West¡¡Virginia¡¡did¡¡become¡¡a¡¡free¡¡State¡¡at¡¡the¡¡first¡¡opportunity¡£¡¡Counties¡¡in¡¡western¡¡North¡¡Carolina¡¡claim¡¡to¡¡have¡¡furnished¡¡a¡¡larger¡¡proportion¡¡of¡¡their¡¡men¡¡to¡¡the¡¡Union¡¡army¡¡than¡¡any¡¡other¡¡counties¡¡in¡¡the¡¡country¡£¡¡Had¡¡the¡¡plan¡¡for¡¡peaceable¡¡emancipation¡¡projected¡¡by¡¡abolitionists¡¡been¡¡permitted¡¡to¡¡take¡¡its¡¡course£»¡¡the¡¡uplands¡¡of¡¡South¡¡Carolina¡¡would¡¡have¡¡been¡¡pitted¡¡against¡¡the¡¡lowlands£»¡¡and¡¡Senator¡¡Tillman¡¡would¡¡have¡¡appeared¡¡as¡¡a¡¡rampant¡¡abolitionist¡£¡¡There¡¡might¡¡have¡¡been¡¡violence£»¡¡but¡¡it¡¡would¡¡have¡¡been¡¡confined¡¡to¡¡limited¡¡areas¡¡in¡¡the¡¡separate¡¡States¡£¡¡Had¡¡the¡¡crisis¡¡been¡¡postponed£»¡¡there¡¡surely¡¡would¡¡have¡¡been¡¡a¡¡revival¡¡of¡¡abolitionism¡¡within¡¡the¡¡Southern¡¡States¡£¡¡Slavery¡¡in¡¡Missouri¡¡was¡¡already¡¡approaching¡¡a¡¡crisis¡£¡¡Southern¡¡leaders¡¡had¡¡long¡¡foreseen¡¡that¡¡the¡¡State¡¡would¡¡abolish¡¡slavery¡¡if¡¡a¡¡free¡¡State¡¡should¡¡be¡¡established¡¡on¡¡the¡¡western¡¡boundary¡£¡¡This¡¡was¡¡actually¡¡taking¡¡place¡£¡¡Kansas¡¡was¡¡filling¡¡up¡¡with¡¡free¡­state¡¡settlers¡¡and£»¡¡by¡¡the¡¡act¡¡of¡¡its¡¡own¡¡citizens£»¡¡a¡¡few¡¡years¡¡later¡¡did¡¡abolish¡¡slavery¡£¡¡Republicans¡¡naturally¡¡made¡¡use¡¡of¡¡Helper's¡¡book¡¡for¡¡party¡¡purposes¡£¡¡A¡¡cheap¡¡abridged¡¡edition¡¡was¡¡brought¡¡out¡£¡¡Several¡¡Republican¡¡leaders¡¡were¡¡induced¡¡to¡¡sign¡¡their¡¡names¡¡to¡¡a¡¡paper¡¡commending¡¡the¡¡publication¡£¡¡Among¡¡these¡¡was¡¡John¡¡Sherman¡¡of¡¡Ohio£»¡¡who¡¡in¡¡the¡¡organization¡¡of¡¡the¡¡newly¡¡elected¡¡House¡¡of¡¡Representatives¡¡in¡¡1859¡¡was¡¡the¡¡leading¡¡candidate¡¡of¡¡the¡¡Republicans¡¡for¡¡the¡¡speakership¡£¡¡During¡¡the¡¡contest¡¡the¡¡fact¡¡that¡¡his¡¡name¡¡was¡¡on¡¡this¡¡paper¡¡was¡¡made¡¡public£»¡¡and¡¡Southern¡¡leaders¡¡were¡¡furious¡£¡¡Extracts¡¡were¡¡read¡¡to¡¡prove¡¡that¡¡the¡¡book¡¡was¡¡incendiary¡£¡¡Millson¡¡of¡¡Virginia¡¡said¡¡that¡¡¡¨one¡¡who¡¡consciously£»¡¡deliberately£»¡¡and¡¡of¡¡purpose¡¡lends¡¡his¡¡name¡¡and¡¡influence¡¡to¡¡the¡¡propagation¡¡of¡¡such¡¡writings¡¡is¡¡not¡¡only¡¡not¡¡fit¡¡to¡¡be¡¡speaker£»¡¡but¡¡he¡¡is¡¡not¡­fit¡¡to¡¡live¡£¡¨¡¡It¡¡is¡¡one¡¡of¡¡the¡¡ironies¡¡of¡¡the¡¡situation¡¡that¡¡the¡¡passage¡¡selected¡¡to¡¡prove¡¡the¡¡incendiary¡¡character¡¡of¡¡the¡¡book¡¡is¡¡almost¡¡a¡¡literal¡¡quotation¡¡from¡¡the¡¡debate¡¡in¡¡the¡¡Virginia¡¡Legislature¡¡of¡¡1832¡£

CHAPTER¡¡X¡£¡¡¡¨BLEEDING¡¡KANSAS¡¨¡¡Both¡¡the¡¡leading¡¡political¡¡parties¡¡were£»¡¡in¡¡the¡¡campaign¡¡of¡¡1852£»¡¡fully¡¡committed¡¡to¡¡the¡¡acceptance¡¡of¡¡the¡¡so¡­called¡¡Compromise¡¡of¡¡1850¡¡as¡¡a¡¡final¡¡settlement¡¡of¡¡the¡¡slavery¡¡question£»¡¡both¡¡were¡¡committed¡¡to¡¡the¡¡support¡¡of¡¡the¡¡Fugitive¡¡Slave¡¡Act¡£¡¡The¡¡Free¡­soil¡¡party£»¡¡with¡¡John¡¡P¡£¡¡Hale¡¡as¡¡its¡¡candidate£»¡¡did¡¡make¡¡a¡¡vigorous¡¡attack¡¡upon¡¡the¡¡Fugitive¡¡Slave¡¡Act£»¡¡and¡¡opposed¡¡all¡¡compromises¡¡respecting¡¡slavery£»¡¡but¡¡Free¡­Boilers¡¡had¡¡been¡¡to¡¡a¡¡large¡¡extent¡¡reabsorbed¡¡into¡¡the¡¡Democratic¡¡party£»¡¡their¡¡vote¡¡of¡¡1852¡¡being¡¡only¡¡about¡¡half¡¡that¡¡of¡¡1848¡£¡¡Though¡¡the¡¡Whig¡¡vote¡¡was¡¡large¡¡and¡¡only¡¡about¡¡two¡¡hundred¡¡thousand¡¡less¡¡than¡¡that¡¡of¡¡the¡¡Democrats£»¡¡yet¡¡it¡¡was¡¡so¡¡distributed¡¡that¡¡the¡¡Whigs¡¡carried¡¡only¡¡four¡¡States£»¡¡Massachusetts£»¡¡Vermont£»¡¡Kentucky£»¡¡and¡¡Tennessee¡£¡¡The¡¡other¡¡States¡¡gave¡¡a¡¡Democratic¡¡plurality¡£¡¡Had¡¡there¡¡been¡¡time¡¡for¡¡readjustment£»¡¡the¡¡Whig¡¡party¡¡might¡¡have¡¡recovered¡¡lost¡¡ground£»¡¡but¡¡no¡¡time¡¡was¡¡permitted¡£¡¡There¡¡was¡¡in¡¡progress¡¡in¡¡Missouri¡¡a¡¡political¡¡conflict¡¡which¡¡was¡¡already¡¡commanding¡¡national¡¡attention¡£¡¡Thomas¡¡H¡£¡¡Benton£»¡¡for¡¡thirty¡¡years¡¡a¡¡Senator¡¡from¡¡Missouri£»¡¡and¡¡a¡¡national¡¡figure£»¡¡was¡¡the¡¡storm¡­center¡£¡¡His¡¡enemies¡¡accused¡¡him¡¡of¡¡being¡¡a¡¡Free¡­Boiler£»¡¡an¡¡abolitionist¡¡in¡¡disguise¡£¡¡He¡¡was¡¡professedly¡¡a¡¡stanch¡¡and¡¡uncompromising¡¡unionist£»¡¡a¡¡personal¡¡and¡¡political¡¡opponent¡¡of¡¡John¡¡C¡£¡¡Calhoun¡£¡¡According¡¡to¡¡his¡¡own¡¡statement¡¡he¡¡had¡¡been¡¡opposed¡¡to¡¡the¡¡extension¡¡of¡¡slavery¡¡since¡¡1804£»¡¡although¡¡he¡¡had¡¡advocated¡¡the¡¡admission¡¡of¡¡Missouri¡¡with¡¡a¡¡pro¡­slavery¡¡constitution¡¡in¡¡180¡£¡¡He¡¡was£»¡¡from¡¡the¡¡first£»¡¡senior¡¡Senator¡¡from¡¡the¡¡State£»¡¡and¡¡by¡¡a¡¡peculiar¡¡combination¡¡of¡¡influences¡¡incurred¡¡his¡¡first¡¡defeat¡¡for¡¡reelection¡¡in¡¡1851¡£¡¡Benton's¡¡defeat¡¡in¡¡the¡¡Missouri¡¡Legislature¡¡was¡¡largely¡¡the¡¡result¡¡of¡¡national¡¡pro¡­slavery¡¡influences¡£¡¡In¡¡a¡¡former¡¡chapter£»¡¡reference¡¡was¡¡made¡¡to¡¡the¡¡Ohio¡¡River¡¡as¡¡furnishing¡¡a¡¡¡¨providential¡¡argument¡¡against¡¡slavery¡£¡¨¡¡The¡¡Mississippi¡¡River¡¡as¡¡the¡¡eastern¡¡boundary¡¡of¡¡Missouri¡¡furnished¡¡a¡¡like¡¡argument£»¡¡but¡¡on¡¡the¡¡north¡¡not¡¡even¡¡a¡¡prairie¡¡brook¡¡separated¡¡free¡¡labor¡¡in¡¡Iowa¡¡from¡¡slave¡¡labor¡¡in¡¡Missouri¡£¡¡The¡¡inhabitants¡¡of¡¡western¡¡Missouri£»¡¡realizing¡¡that¡¡the¡¡tenure¡¡of¡¡their¡¡peculiar¡¡institution¡¡was¡¡becoming¡¡weaker¡¡in¡¡the¡¡east¡¡and¡¡north£»¡¡early¡¡became¡¡convinced¡¡that¡¡the¡¡organization¡¡of¡¡a¡¡free¡¡State¡¡along¡¡their¡¡western¡¡boundary¡¡would¡¡be¡¡followed¡¡by¡¡the¡¡abolition¡¡of¡¡slavery¡¡in¡¡their¡¡own¡¡State¡£¡¡This¡¡condition¡¡attracted¡¡the¡¡attention¡¡of¡¡the¡¡national¡¡guardians¡¡of¡¡pro¡­slavery¡¡interests¡£¡¡Calhoun£»¡¡Davis£»¡¡Breckinridge£»¡¡Toombs£»¡¡and¡¡others¡¡were¡¡in¡¡constant¡¡communication¡¡with¡¡local¡¡leaders¡£¡¡A¡¡certain¡¡Judge¡¡W¡£¡¡C¡£¡¡Price£»¡¡a¡¡religious¡¡fanatic£»¡¡and¡¡a¡¡pro¡­slavery¡¡devotee£»¡¡was¡¡induced¡¡to¡¡visit¡¡every¡¡part¡¡of¡¡the¡¡State¡¡in¡¡1844£»¡¡calling¡¡the¡¡attention¡¡of¡¡all¡¡slaveholders¡¡to¡¡the¡¡perils¡¡of¡¡the¡¡situation¡¡and¡¡preparing¡¡the¡¡way¡¡for¡¡the¡¡repeal¡¡of¡¡the¡¡Missouri¡¡Compromise¡£¡¡Senator¡¡Benton£»¡¡who¡¡was¡¡approached¡¡on¡¡the¡¡subject£»¡¡replied¡¡in¡¡such¡¡a¡¡way¡¡that¡¡all¡¡radical¡¡defenders¡¡of¡¡slavery£»¡¡both¡¡national¡¡leaders¡¡and¡¡local¡¡politicians£»¡¡were¡¡moved¡¡to¡¡unite¡¡for¡¡his¡¡political¡¡defeat¡£¡¡David¡¡R¡£¡¡Atchison£»¡¡junior¡¡Senator¡¡from¡¡Missouri£»¡¡had¡¡been¡¡made¡¡the¡¡leader¡¡of¡¡the¡¡pro¡­slavery¡¡forces¡£¡¡The¡¡defeat¡¡of¡¡Benton¡¡in¡¡the¡¡Missouri¡¡Legislature¡¡did¡¡not¡¡end¡¡the¡¡strife¡£¡¡He¡¡at¡¡once¡¡became¡¡a¡¡candidate¡¡for¡¡Atchison's¡¡place¡¡in¡¡the¡¡election¡¡which¡¡was¡¡to¡¡occur¡¡in¡¡1855£»¡¡and¡¡he¡¡was¡¡in¡¡the¡¡meantime¡¡elected¡¡to¡¡the¡¡House¡¡of¡¡Representatives¡¡in¡¡1852¡£¡¡The¡¡most¡¡telling¡¡consideration¡¡in¡¡Benton's¡¡favor¡¡was¡¡the¡¡general¡¡demand£»¡¡in¡¡which¡¡he¡¡himself¡¡joined£»¡¡for¡¡the¡¡immediate¡¡organization¡¡of¡¡the¡¡western¡¡territory¡¡in¡¡order¡¡to¡¡facilitate¡¡the¡¡building¡¡of¡¡a¡¡system¡¡of¡¡railways¡¡reaching¡¡the¡¡Pacific£»¡¡with¡¡St¡£¡¡Louis¡¡as¡¡the¡¡point¡¡of¡¡departure¡£¡¡For¡¡a¡¡time£»¡¡in¡¡1859£»¡¡and¡¡1853£»¡¡Benton¡¡was¡¡apparently¡¡triumphant£»¡¡and¡¡Atchison¡¡was¡¡himself¡¡willing¡¡to¡¡consent¡¡to¡¡the¡¡organization¡¡of¡¡the¡¡new¡¡territory¡¡with¡¡slavery¡¡excluded¡£¡¡The¡¡national¡¡leaders£»¡¡however£»¡¡were¡¡not¡¡of¡¡the¡¡same¡¡mind¡£¡¡The¡¡real¡¡issue¡¡was¡¡the¡¡continuance¡¡of¡¡slavery¡¡in¡¡the¡¡State£»¡¡the¡¡one¡¡thing¡¡which¡¡must¡¡not¡¡be¡¡permitted¡¡was¡¡the¡¡transfer¡¡of¡¡anti¡­slavery¡¡agitation¡¡to¡¡the¡¡separate¡¡States¡£¡¡Henry¡¡Clay's¡¡proposal¡¡of¡¡1849¡¡to¡¡provide¡¡for¡¡gradual¡¡emancipation¡¡in¡¡Kentucky¡¡was¡¡bitterly¡¡resented¡£¡¡It¡¡had¡¡long¡¡been¡¡an¡¡axiom

·µ»ØĿ¼ ÉÏÒ»Ò³ ÏÂÒ»Ò³ »Øµ½¶¥²¿ ÔÞ£¨0£© ²È£¨0£©

Äã¿ÉÄÜϲ»¶µÄ