±´¿Çµç×ÓÊé > Ó¢ÎÄÔ­Öøµç×ÓÊé > the anti-slavery crusade >

µÚ15ÕÂ

the anti-slavery crusade-µÚ15ÕÂ

С˵£º the anti-slavery crusade ×ÖÊý£º ÿҳ4000×Ö

°´¼üÅÌÉÏ·½Ïò¼ü ¡û »ò ¡ú ¿É¿ìËÙÉÏÏ·­Ò³£¬°´¼üÅÌÉ쵀 Enter ¼ü¿É»Øµ½±¾ÊéĿ¼ҳ£¬°´¼üÅÌÉÏ·½Ïò¼ü ¡ü ¿É»Øµ½±¾Ò³¶¥²¿£¡
¡ª¡ª¡ª¡ªÎ´ÔĶÁÍꣿ¼ÓÈëÊéÇ©ÒѱãÏ´μÌÐøÔĶÁ£¡



H¡£¡¡Seward¡¡of¡¡New¡¡York£»¡¡intimating¡¡that¡¡he¡¡expected¡¡him¡¡to¡¡do¡¡much¡¡to¡¡curb¡¡the¡¡threatening¡¡power¡¡of¡¡the¡¡slaveholding¡¡oligarchy£»¡¡while¡¡Andrew¡¡Jackson£»¡¡who¡¡died¡¡earlier£»¡¡had¡¡already¡¡conferred¡¡a¡¡like¡¡distinction¡¡upon¡¡young¡¡Stephen¡¡A¡£¡¡Douglas¡£¡¡There¡¡was¡¡no¡¡lack¡¡of¡¡aspirants¡¡for¡¡the¡¡fallen¡¡mantles¡£¡¡John¡¡C¡£¡¡Calhoun¡¡continued¡¡almost¡¡to¡¡the¡¡day¡¡of¡¡his¡¡death¡¡to¡¡modify¡¡his¡¡interpretation¡¡of¡¡the¡¡Constitution¡¡in¡¡the¡¡interest¡¡of¡¡his¡¡section¡£¡¡As¡¡a¡¡young¡¡man¡¡he¡¡avowed¡¡protectionist¡¡principles¡£¡¡Becoming¡¡convinced¡¡that¡¡slave¡¡labor¡¡was¡¡not¡¡suited¡¡to¡¡manufacture£»¡¡he¡¡urged¡¡South¡¡Carolina¡¡to¡¡declare¡¡the¡¡protective¡¡tariff¡¡laws¡¡null¡¡and¡¡void¡¡within¡¡her¡¡limits¡£¡¡When¡¡his¡¡section¡¡seemed¡¡endangered¡¡by¡¡the¡¡distribution¡¡of¡¡anti¡­slavery¡¡literature¡¡through¡¡the¡¡mail£»¡¡he¡¡extemporized¡¡a¡¡theory¡¡that¡¡each¡¡State¡¡had¡¡a¡¡right¡¡to¡¡pass¡¡statutes¡¡to¡¡protect¡¡itself¡¡in¡¡such¡¡an¡¡emergency£»¡¡in¡¡which¡¡case¡¡it¡¡became¡¡the¡¡duty¡¡of¡¡the¡¡general¡¡Government¡¡and¡¡of¡¡all¡¡other¡¡States¡¡to¡¡respect¡¡such¡¡laws¡£¡¡When¡¡it¡¡finally¡¡appeared¡¡that¡¡the¡¡territory¡¡acquired¡¡from¡¡Mexico¡¡was¡¡likely¡¡to¡¡remain¡¡free£»¡¡the¡¡same¡¡statesman¡¡made¡¡further¡¡discoveries¡£¡¡He¡¡found¡¡that¡¡Congress¡¡had¡¡no¡¡right¡¡to¡¡exclude¡¡slavery¡¡from¡¡any¡¡Territory¡¡belonging¡¡to¡¡the¡¡United¡¡States£»¡¡that¡¡the¡¡owners¡¡of¡¡slaves¡¡had¡¡equal¡¡rights¡¡with¡¡the¡¡owners¡¡of¡¡other¡¡property£»¡¡that¡¡neither¡¡Congress¡¡nor¡¡a¡¡territorial¡¡authority¡¡had¡¡any¡¡power¡¡to¡¡exclude¡¡slaves¡¡from¡¡a¡¡Territory¡£¡¡This¡¡doctrine¡¡was¡¡accepted¡¡by¡¡extremists¡¡in¡¡the¡¡South¡¡and¡¡was¡¡finally¡¡embodied¡¡in¡¡the¡¡Dred¡¡Scott¡¡decision¡¡of¡¡1857¡£¡¡Abolitionists¡¡had¡¡meantime¡¡evolved¡¡a¡¡precisely¡¡contradictory¡¡theory¡£¡¡They¡¡asserted¡¡that¡¡the¡¡Constitution¡¡gave¡¡no¡¡warrant¡¡for¡¡property¡¡in¡¡man£»¡¡except¡¡as¡¡held¡¡under¡¡state¡¡laws£»¡¡that¡¡with¡¡this¡¡exception¡¡freedom¡¡was¡¡guaranteed¡¡to¡¡all£»¡¡that¡¡Congress¡¡had¡¡no¡¡more¡¡right¡¡to¡¡make¡¡a¡¡slave¡¡than¡¡it¡¡had¡¡to¡¡make¡¡a¡¡king£»¡¡and¡¡that¡¡it¡¡was¡¡the¡¡duty¡¡of¡¡Congress¡¡to¡¡maintain¡¡freedom¡¡in¡¡all¡¡the¡¡Territories¡£¡¡Extremists¡¡expressed¡¡the¡¡view¡¡that¡¡all¡¡past¡¡acts¡¡whereby¡¡slavery¡¡had¡¡been¡¡extended¡¡were¡¡unconstitutional¡¡and¡¡therefore¡¡void¡£¡¡Between¡¡these¡¡extreme¡¡conflicting¡¡views¡¡was¡¡every¡¡imaginable¡¡grade¡¡of¡¡opinion¡£¡¡The¡¡prevailing¡¡view¡¡of¡¡opponents¡¡of¡¡slavery£»¡¡however£»¡¡was¡¡in¡¡harmony¡¡with¡¡their¡¡past¡¡conduct¡¡and¡¡maintained¡¡that¡¡Congress¡¡had¡¡complete¡¡control¡¡over¡¡slavery¡¡in¡¡the¡¡Territories¡£¡¡When¡¡the¡¡Mexican¡¡territory¡¡was¡¡acquired£»¡¡Stephen¡¡A¡£¡¡Douglas£»¡¡as¡¡the¡¡experienced¡¡chairman¡¡of¡¡the¡¡Committee¡¡on¡¡Territories¡¡in¡¡the¡¡Senate£»¡¡was¡¡already¡¡developing¡¡a¡¡theory¡¡respecting¡¡slavery¡¡in¡¡the¡¡Territories¡¡which¡¡was¡¡destined¡¡to¡¡play¡¡a¡¡leading¡¡part¡¡in¡¡the¡¡later¡¡crusade¡¡against¡¡slavery¡£¡¡Douglas¡¡was¡¡the¡¡most¡¡thoroughgoing¡¡of¡¡expansionists¡¡and¡¡would¡¡acknowledge¡¡no¡¡northern¡¡boundary¡¡on¡¡this¡¡side¡¡of¡¡the¡¡North¡¡Pole£»¡¡no¡¡southern¡¡boundary¡¡nearer¡¡than¡¡Panama¡£¡¡He¡¡regarded¡¡the¡¡United¡¡States£»¡¡with¡¡its¡¡great¡¡principle¡¡of¡¡local¡¡autonomy£»¡¡as¡¡fitted¡¡to¡¡become¡¡eventually¡¡the¡¡United¡¡States¡¡of¡¡the¡¡whole¡¡world£»¡¡while¡¡he¡¡held¡¡it¡¡to¡¡be¡¡an¡¡immediate¡¡duty¡¡to¡¡make¡¡it¡¡the¡¡United¡¡States¡¡of¡¡North¡¡America¡£¡¡As¡¡the¡¡son¡­¡¡in¡­law¡¡of¡¡a¡¡Southern¡¡planter¡¡in¡¡North¡¡Carolina£»¡¡and¡¡as¡¡the¡¡father¡¡of¡¡sons¡¡who¡¡inherited¡¡slave¡¡property£»¡¡Douglas£»¡¡although¡¡born¡¡in¡¡Vermont£»¡¡knew¡¡the¡¡South¡¡as¡¡did¡¡no¡¡other¡¡Northern¡¡statesman¡£¡¡He¡¡knew¡¡also¡¡the¡¡institution¡¡of¡¡slavery¡¡at¡¡first¡¡hand¡£¡¡As¡¡a¡¡pronounced¡¡expansionist¡¡and¡¡as¡¡the¡¡congressional¡¡leader¡¡in¡¡all¡¡matters¡¡pertaining¡¡to¡¡the¡¡Territories£»¡¡he¡¡acquired¡¡detailed¡¡information¡¡as¡¡to¡¡the¡¡qualities¡¡of¡¡these¡¡new¡¡possessions£»¡¡and¡¡he¡¡spoke£»¡¡therefore£»¡¡with¡¡a¡¡good¡¡degree¡¡of¡¡authority¡¡when¡¡he¡¡said£»¡¡¡¨If¡¡there¡¡was¡¡one¡¡inch¡¡of¡¡territory¡¡in¡¡the¡¡whole¡¡of¡¡our¡¡acquisitions¡¡from¡¡Mexico¡¡where¡¡slavery¡¡could¡¡exist£»¡¡it¡¡was¡¡in¡¡the¡¡valleys¡¡of¡¡the¡¡Sacramento¡¡and¡¡the¡¡San¡¡Joaquin¡£¡¨¡¡But¡¡this¡¡region¡¡was¡¡at¡¡once¡¡preempted¡¡for¡¡freedom¡¡upon¡¡the¡¡discovery¡¡of¡¡gold¡£¡¡Douglas¡¡did¡¡not¡¡admit¡¡that¡¡even¡¡the¡¡whole¡¡of¡¡Texas¡¡would¡¡remain¡¡dedicated¡¡to¡¡slavery¡£¡¡Some¡¡of¡¡the¡¡States¡¡to¡¡be¡¡formed¡¡from¡¡it¡¡would¡¡be¡¡free£»¡¡by¡¡the¡¡same¡¡laws¡¡of¡¡climate¡¡and¡¡resources¡¡which¡¡determined¡¡that¡¡the¡¡entire¡¡West¡¡would¡¡remain¡¡free¡£¡¡Before¡¡the¡¡Mexican¡¡War¡¡the¡¡Senator¡¡had¡¡become¡¡convinced¡¡that¡¡the¡¡extension¡¡of¡¡slavery¡¡had¡¡reached¡¡its¡¡limit£»¡¡that¡¡the¡¡Missouri¡¡Compromise¡¡was¡¡a¡¡dead¡¡letter¡¡except¡¡as¡¡a¡¡psychological¡¡palliative£»¡¡that¡¡Nature¡¡had¡¡already¡¡ordained¡¡that¡¡slave¡¡labor¡¡should¡¡be¡¡forever¡¡excluded¡¡from¡¡all¡¡Western¡¡territory¡¡both¡¡north¡¡and¡¡south¡¡of¡¡that¡¡line¡£¡¡His¡¡reply¡¡to¡¡Calhoun's¡¡contention¡¡that¡¡a¡¡balance¡¡must¡¡be¡¡maintained¡¡between¡¡slave¡¡and¡¡free¡¡States¡¡was¡¡that¡¡he¡¡had¡¡plans¡¡for¡¡forming¡¡seventeen¡¡new¡¡States¡¡out¡¡of¡¡the¡¡vast¡¡Western¡¡domains£»¡¡every¡¡one¡¡of¡¡which¡¡would¡¡be¡¡free¡£¡¡And¡¡besides£»¡¡said¡¡he£»¡¡¡¨we¡¡all¡¡look¡¡forward¡¡with¡¡confidence¡¡to¡¡the¡¡time¡¡when¡¡Delaware£»¡¡Maryland£»¡¡Virginia£»¡¡Kentucky£»¡¡and¡¡Missouri£»¡¡and¡¡probably¡¡North¡¡Carolina¡¡and¡¡Tennessee¡¡will¡¡adopt¡¡a¡¡gradual¡¡system¡¡of¡¡emancipation¡£¡¨¡¡Douglas¡¡was¡¡one¡¡of¡¡the¡¡first¡¡to¡¡favor¡¡the¡¡admission¡¡of¡¡California¡¡as¡¡a¡¡free¡¡State¡£¡¡According¡¡to¡¡the¡¡Missouri¡¡Compromise¡¡law¡¡and¡¡the¡¡laws¡¡of¡¡Mexico£»¡¡all¡¡Western¡¡territory¡¡was¡¡free£»¡¡and¡¡he¡¡was¡¡opposed¡¡to¡¡interference¡¡with¡¡existing¡¡conditions¡£¡¡The¡¡Missouri¡¡Compromise¡¡was¡¡still¡¡held¡¡sacred¡£¡¡Finally£»¡¡however£»¡¡it¡¡was¡¡with¡¡Douglas's¡¡assistance¡¡that¡¡the¡¡Compromise¡¡measures¡¡of¡¡1850¡¡were¡¡passed£»¡¡one¡¡of¡¡which¡¡provided¡¡for¡¡territorial¡¡Governments¡¡for¡¡Utah¡¡and¡¡New¡¡Mexico¡¡with¡¡the¡¡proviso¡¡that£»¡¡when¡¡admitted¡¡as¡¡States£»¡¡slavery¡¡should¡¡be¡¡permitted¡¡or¡¡prohibited¡¡as¡¡the¡¡citizens¡¡of¡¡those¡¡States¡¡should¡¡determine¡¡at¡¡the¡¡time¡£¡¡Congress¡¡refrained¡¡from¡¡any¡¡declaration¡¡as¡¡to¡¡slavery¡¡in¡¡the¡¡Territories¡£¡¡It¡¡was¡¡this¡¡policy¡¡of¡¡¡¨non¡­intervention¡¨¡¡which¡¡four¡¡years¡¡later¡¡furnished¡¡plausible¡¡excuse¡¡for¡¡the¡¡repeal¡¡of¡¡the¡¡Missouri¡¡Compromise¡£¡¡It¡¡was¡¡not¡¡strange¡¡that¡¡there¡¡was¡¡general¡¡ignorance¡¡in¡¡all¡¡parts¡¡of¡¡the¡¡country¡¡as¡¡to¡¡the¡¡resources¡¡of¡¡the¡¡newly¡¡acquired¡¡territory¡£¡¡The¡¡rush¡¡to¡¡the¡¡goldfields¡¡precipitated¡¡action¡¡in¡¡respect¡¡to¡¡California¡£¡¡Before¡¡General¡¡Taylor£»¡¡the¡¡newly¡¡elected¡¡President£»¡¡was¡¡inaugurated£»¡¡there¡¡was¡¡imminent¡¡need¡¡of¡¡an¡¡efficient¡¡government¡£¡¡An¡¡early¡¡act¡¡of¡¡the¡¡Administration¡¡was¡¡to¡¡send¡¡an¡¡agent¡¡to¡¡assist¡¡in¡¡the¡¡formation¡¡of¡¡a¡¡state¡¡Government£»¡¡and¡¡a¡¡convention¡¡was¡¡immediately¡¡called¡¡to¡¡frame¡¡a¡¡constitution¡£¡¡By¡¡unanimous¡¡vote¡¡of¡¡the¡¡convention£»¡¡slavery¡¡was¡¡excluded¡£¡¡The¡¡constitution¡¡was¡¡approved¡¡by¡¡popular¡¡vote¡¡and¡¡was¡¡presented¡¡to¡¡Congress¡¡for¡¡final¡¡acceptance¡¡in¡¡December£»¡¡1849¡£¡¡In¡¡the¡¡meantime¡¡a¡¡great¡¡commotion¡¡had¡¡arisen¡¡among¡¡the¡¡people¡£¡¡Southern¡¡state¡¡legislatures¡¡passed¡¡resolutions¡¡demanding¡¡that¡¡the¡¡rights¡¡of¡¡their¡¡peculiar¡¡institution¡¡should¡¡be¡¡recognized¡¡in¡¡the¡¡new¡¡Territory¡£¡¡Northern¡¡legislatures¡¡responded¡¡with¡¡resolutions¡¡favoring¡¡the¡¡admission¡¡of¡¡California¡¡as¡¡a¡¡State¡¡and¡¡the¡¡application¡¡of¡¡the¡¡Wilmot¡¡Proviso¡¡to¡¡the¡¡remaining¡¡territory¡£¡¡Northern¡¡Democrats¡¡had¡¡very¡¡generally¡¡denied¡¡that¡¡the¡¡affair¡¡with¡¡Mexico¡¡had¡¡as¡¡a¡¡chief¡¡purpose¡¡the¡¡extension¡¡of¡¡slavery¡£¡¡Democrats¡¡therefore¡¡united¡¡with¡¡Whigs¡¡in¡¡maintaining¡¡the¡¡principle¡¡of¡¡free¡¡soil¡£¡¡In¡¡the¡¡South¡¡there¡¡was¡¡a¡¡corresponding¡¡fusion¡¡of¡¡the¡¡two¡¡parties¡¡in¡¡support¡¡of¡¡the¡¡sectional¡¡issue¡£¡¡General¡¡concern¡¡prevailed¡¡as¡¡to¡¡the¡¡attitude¡¡of¡¡the¡¡Administration¡£¡¡Taylor's¡¡election¡¡had¡¡been¡¡effected¡¡by¡¡both¡¡a¡¡Southern¡¡and¡¡a¡¡Northern¡¡split¡¡in¡¡the¡¡Democratic¡¡party¡£¡¡Northern¡¡Democrats¡¡had¡¡voted¡¡for¡¡the¡¡Free¡­soil¡¡candidate¡¡because¡¡of¡¡the¡¡alleged¡¡pro¡­slavery¡¡tendencies¡¡of¡¡their¡¡own¡¡party¡£¡¡Southern¡¡Democrats¡¡voted¡¡for¡¡Taylor¡¡because¡¡of¡¡their¡¡distrust¡¡of¡¡Lewis¡¡Cass£»¡¡their¡¡own¡¡candidate¡£¡¡Some¡¡of¡¡these¡¡met¡¡in¡¡convention¡¡and¡¡formally¡¡nominated¡¡Taylor£»¡¡and¡¡Taylor¡¡accepted¡¡their¡¡nomination¡¡with¡¡thanks¡£¡¡Northern¡¡anti¡­slavery¡¡Whigs¡¡had¡¡a¡¡difficult¡¡task¡¡to¡¡keep¡¡their¡¡members¡¡in¡¡line¡£¡¡There¡¡is¡¡evidence¡¡that¡¡Taylor¡¡held¡¡the¡¡traditional¡¡Southern¡¡view¡¡that¡¡the¡¡anti¡­slavery¡¡North¡¡was¡¡disposed¡¡to¡¡encroach¡¡upon¡¡the¡¡rights¡¡of¡¡the¡¡South¡£¡¡Meeting¡¡fewer¡¡Northern¡¡Whig¡¡supporters£»¡¡he¡¡became¡¡convinced¡¡that¡¡the¡¡more¡¡active¡¡spirit¡¡of¡¡encroachment¡¡was¡¡in¡¡the¡¡pro¡­slavery¡¡South¡£¡¡California¡¡needed¡¡a¡¡state¡¡Government£»¡¡and¡¡the¡¡President¡¡took¡¡the¡¡most¡¡direct¡¡method¡¡to¡¡supply¡¡that¡¡need¡£¡¡As¡¡the¡¡inhabitants¡¡were¡¡unanimous¡¡in¡¡their¡¡desire¡¡to¡¡exclude¡¡slavery£»¡¡their¡¡wish¡¡should¡¡be¡¡respected¡£¡¡New¡¡Mexico¡¡was¡¡in¡¡a¡¡similar¡¡situation¡£¡¡As¡¡slavery¡¡was¡¡already¡¡excluded¡¡from¡¡the¡¡territory¡¡under¡¡Mexican¡¡law£»¡¡and¡¡as¡¡there¡¡was¡¡no¡¡wish¡¡on¡¡the¡¡part¡¡of¡¡the¡¡inhabitants¡¡to¡¡introduce¡¡slavery£»¡¡the¡¡President¡¡recognized¡¡existing¡¡facts¡¡and¡¡made¡¡no¡¡change¡£¡¡When¡¡Southern¡¡leaders¡¡projected¡¡a¡¡scheme¡¡to¡¡enlarge¡¡the¡¡boundaries¡¡of¡¡Texas

·µ»ØĿ¼ ÉÏÒ»Ò³ ÏÂÒ»Ò³ »Øµ½¶¥²¿ ÔÞ£¨0£© ²È£¨0£©

Äã¿ÉÄÜϲ»¶µÄ