second treatise of government-第5章
按键盘上方向键 ← 或 → 可快速上下翻页，按键盘上的 Enter 键可回到本书目录页，按键盘上方向键 ↑ 可回到本页顶部！
————未阅读完？加入书签已便下次继续阅读！
w of nature for his rule。 The liberty of man； in society； is to be under no other legislative power； but that established； by consent； in the commonwealth； nor under the dominion of any will； or restraint of any law； but what that legislative shall enact； according to the trust put in it。 Freedom then is not what Sir Robert Filmer tells us； Observations； A。 55。 a liberty for every one to do what he lists； to live as he pleases； and not to be tied by any laws： but freedom of men under government is； to have a standing rule to live by； common to every one of that society； and made by the legislative power erected in it； a liberty to follow my own will in all things； where the rule prescribes not； and not to be subject to the inconstant； uncertain； unknown； arbitrary will of another man： as freedom of nature is； to be under no other restraint but the law of nature。 Sec。 23。 This freedom from absolute； arbitrary power； is so necessary to； and closely joined with a man's preservation； that he cannot part with it； but by what forfeits his preservation and life together： for a man； not having the power of his own life； cannot； by compact； or his own consent； enslave himself to any one； nor put himself under the absolute； arbitrary power of another； to take away his life； when he pleases。 No body can give more power than he has himself； and he that cannot take away his own life； cannot give another power over it。 Indeed； having by his fault forfeited his own life； by some act that deserves death； he； to whom he has forfeited it； may （when he has him in his power） delay to take it； and make use of him to his own service； and he does him no injury by it： for； whenever he finds the hardship of his slavery outweigh the value of his life； it is in his power； by resisting the will of his master； to draw on himself the death he desires。 Sec。 24。 This is the perfect condition of slavery； which is nothing else； but the state of war continued； between a lawful conqueror and a captive： for； if once compact enter between them； and make an agreement for a limited power on the one side； and obedience on the other； the state of war and slavery ceases； as long as the compact endures： for； as has been said； no man can； by agreement； pass over to another that which he hath not in himself； a power over his own life。 I confess； we find among the Jews； as well as other nations； that men did sell themselves； but； it is plain； this was only to drudgery； not to slavery： for； it is evident； the person sold was not under an absolute； arbitrary； despotical power： for the master could not have power to kill him； at any time； whom； at a certain time； he was obliged to let go free out of his service； and the master of such a servant was so far from having an arbitrary power over his life； that he could not； at pleasure； so much as maim him； but the loss of an eye； or tooth； set him free； Exod。 xxi。
CHAP。 V。
Of PROPERTY。
Sec。 25。 Whether we consider natural reason； which tells us； that men； being once born； have a right to their preservation； and consequently to meat and drink； and such other things as nature affords for their subsistence： or revelation； which gives us an account of those grants God made of the world to Adam； and to Noah； and his sons； it is very clear； that God； as king David says； Psal。 cxv。 16。 has given the earth to the children of men； given it to mankind in common。 But this being supposed； it seems to some a very great difficulty； how any one should ever come to have a property in any thing： I will not content myself to answer； that if it be difficult to make out property； upon a supposition that God gave the world to Adam； and his posterity in common； it is impossible that any man； but one universal monarch； should have any property upon a supposition； that God gave the world to Adam； and his heirs in succession； exclusive of all the rest of his posterity。 But I shall endeavour to shew； how men might come to have a property in several parts of that which God gave to mankind in common； and that without any express compact of all the commoners。 Sec。 26。 God； who hath given the world to men in common； hath also given them reason to make use of it to the best advantage of life； and convenience。 The earth； and all that is therein； is given to men for the support and comfort of their being。 And tho' all the fruits it naturally produces； and beasts it feeds； belong to mankind in common； as they are produced by the spontaneous hand of nature； and no body has originally a private dominion； exclusive of the rest of mankind； in any of them； as they are thus in their natural state： yet being given for the use of men； there must of necessity be a means to appropriate them some way or other； before they can be of any use； or at all beneficial to any particular man。 The fruit； or venison； which nourishes the wild Indian； who knows no enclosure； and is still a tenant in common； must be his； and so his； i。e。 a part of him； that another can no longer have any right to it； before it can do him any good for the support of his life。 Sec。 27。 Though the earth； and all inferior creatures； be common to all men； yet every man has a property in his own person： this no body has any right to but himself。 The labour of his body； and the work of his hands； we may say； are properly his。 Whatsoever then he removes out of the state that nature hath provided； and left it in； he hath mixed his labour with； and joined to it something that is his own； and thereby makes it his property。 It being by him removed from the common state nature hath placed it in； it hath by this labour something annexed to it； that excludes the common right of other men： for this labour being the unquestionable property of the labourer； no man but he can have a right to what that is once joined to； at least where there is enough； and as good； left in common for others。 Sec。 28。 He that is nourished by the acorns he picked up under an oak； or the apples he gathered from the trees in the wood； has certainly appropriated them to himself。 No body can deny but the nourishment is his。 I ask then； when did they begin to be his？ when he digested？ or when he eat？ or when he boiled？ or when he brought them home？ or when he picked them up？ and it is plain； if the first gathering made them not his； nothing else could。 That labour put a distinction between them and common： that added something to them more than nature； the common mother of all； had done； and so they became his private right。 And will any one say； he had no right to those acorns or apples； he thus appropriated； because he had not the consent of all mankind to make them his？ Was it a robbery thus to assume to himself what belonged to all in common？ If such a consent as that was necessary； man had starved； notwithstanding the plenty God had given him。 We see in commons； which remain so by compact； that it is the taking any part of what is common； and removing it out of the state nature leaves it in； which begins the property； without which the common is of no use。 And the taking of this or that part； does not depend on the express consent of all the commoners。 Thus the grass my horse has bit； the turfs my servant has cut； and the ore I have digged in any place； where I have a right to them in common with others； become my property； without the assignation or consent of any body。 The labour that was mine； removing them out of that common state they were in； hath fixed my property in them。 Sec。 29。 By making an explicit consent of every commoner； necessary to any one's appropriating to himself any part of what is given in common； children or servants could not cut the meat； which their father or master had provided for them in common；
without assigning to every one his peculiar part。 Though the water running in the fountain be every one's； yet who can doubt； but that in the pitcher is his only who drew it out？ His labour hath taken it out of the hands of nature； where it was common； and belonged equally to a
