贝壳电子书 > 英文原著电子书 > second treatise of government >

第37章

second treatise of government-第37章

小说: second treatise of government 字数: 每页4000字

按键盘上方向键 ← 或 → 可快速上下翻页,按键盘上的 Enter 键可回到本书目录页,按键盘上方向键 ↑ 可回到本页顶部!
————未阅读完?加入书签已便下次继续阅读!



 body else can set up; and  introducing a power which the people hath not authorized; they  actually introduce a state of war; which is that of force without 

authority: and thus; by removing the legislative established by  the society; (in whose decisions the people acquiesced and  united; as to that of their own will) they untie the knot; and  expose the people a…new to the state of war; And if those; who by  force take away the legislative; are rebels; the legislators  themselves; as has been shewn; can be no less esteemed so; when  they; who were set up for the protection; and preservation of the  people; their liberties and properties; shall by force invade and  endeavour to take them away; and so they putting themselves into  a state of war with those who made them the protectors and  guardians of their peace; are properly; and with the greatest  aggravation; rebellantes; rebels。      Sec。 228。  But if they; who say it lays a foundation for  rebellion; mean that it may occasion civil wars; or intestine  broils; to tell the people they are absolved from obedience when  illegal attempts are made upon their liberties or properties; and  may oppose the unlawful violence of those who were their  magistrates; when they invade their properties contrary to the  trust put in them; and that therefore this doctrine is not to be  allowed; being so destructive to the peace of the world: they may  as well say; upon the same ground; that honest men may not oppose  robbers or pirates; because this may occasion disorder or  bloodshed。  If any mischief come in such cases; it is not to be  charged upon him who defends his own right; but on him that  invades his neighbours。  If the innocent honest man must quietly  quit all he has; for peace sake; to him who will lay violent  hands upon it; I desire it may be considered; what a kind of  peace there will be in the world; which consists only in violence  and rapine; and which is to be maintained only for the benefit of  robbers and oppressors。  VVho would not think it an admirable  peace betwix the mighty and the mean; when the lamb; without  resistance; yielded his throat to be torn by the imperious wolf?   Polyphemus's den gives us a perfect pattern of such a peace; and  such a government; wherein Ulysses and his companions had nothing  to do; but quietly to suffer themselves to be devoured。  And no  doubt Ulysses; who was a prudent man; preached up passive  obedience; and exhorted them to a quiet submission; by  representing to them of what concernment peace was to mankind;  and by shewing the inconveniences might happen; if they should  offer to resist Polyphemus; who had now the power over them。      Sec。 229。  The end of government is the good of mankind; and  which is best for mankind; that the people should be always  exposed to the boundless will of tyranny; or that the rulers  should be sometimes liable to be opposed; when they grow  exorbitant in the use of their power; and employ it for the  destruction; and not the preservation of the properties of their  people?      Sec。 230。  Nor let any one say; that mischief can arise from  hence; as often as it shall please a busy head; or turbulent  spirit; to desire the alteration of the government。  It is true;  such men may stir; whenever they please; but it will be only to  their own just ruin and perdition: for till the mischief be grown  general; and the ill designs of the rulers become visible; or  their attempts sensible to the greater part; the people; who are  more disposed to suffer than right themselves by resistance; are  not apt to stir。  The examples of particular injustice; or  oppression of here and there an unfortunate man; moves them not。   But if they universally have a persuation; grounded upon manifest  evidence; that designs are carrying on against their liberties;  and the general course and tendency of things cannot but give  them strong suspicions of the evil intention of their governors;  who is to be blamed for it?  Who can help it; if they; who might  avoid it; bring themselves into this suspicion?  Are the people  to be blamed; if they have the sense of rational creatures; and  can think of things no otherwise than as they find and feel them?   And is it not rather their fault; who put things into such a 

posture; that they would not have them thought to be as they are?   I grant; that the pride; ambition; and turbulency of private men  have sometimes caused great disorders in commonwealths; and  factions have been fatal to states and kingdoms。  But whether the  mischief hath oftener begun in the peoples wantonness; and a  desire to cast off the lawful authority of their rulers; or in  the rulers insolence; and endeavours to get and exercise an  arbitrary power over their people; whether oppression; or  disobedience; gave the first rise to the disorder; I leave it to  impartial history to determine。  This I am sure; whoever; either  ruler or subject; by force goes about to invade the rights of  either prince or people; and lays the foundation for overturning  the constitution and frame of any just government; is highly  guilty of the greatest crime; I think; a man is capable of; being  to answer for all those mischiefs of blood; rapine; and  desolation; which the breaking to pieces of governments bring on  a country。  And he who does it; is justly to be esteemed the  common enemy and pest of mankind; and is to be treated  accordingly。          Sec。 231。  That subjects or foreigners; attempting by  force on the properties of any people; may be resisted with  force; is agreed on all hands。  But that magistrates; doing the  same thing; may be resisted; hath of late been denied: as if  those who had the greatest privileges and advantages by the law;  had thereby a power to break those laws; by which alone they were  set in a better place than their brethren: whereas their offence  is thereby the greater; both as being ungrateful for the greater  share they have by the law; and breaking also that trust; which  is put into their hands by their brethren。          Sec。 232。  Whosoever uses force without right; as every  one does in society; who does it without law; puts himself into a  state of war with those against whom he so uses it; and in that  state all former ties are cancelled; all other rights cease; and  every one has a right to defend himself; and to resist the  aggressor。  This is so evident; that Barclay himself; that great  assertor of the power and sacredness of kings; is forced to  confess; That it is lawful for the people; in some cases; to  resist their king; and that too in a chapter; wherein he pretends  to shew; that the divine law shuts up the people from all manner  of rebellion。  Whereby it is evident; even by his own doctrine;  that; since they may in some cases resist; all resisting of  princes is not rebellion。  His words are these。  Quod siquis  dicat; Ergone populus tyrannicae crudelitati & furori jugulum  semper praebebit?  Ergone multitude civitates suas fame; ferro; &  flamma vastari; seque; conjuges; & liberos fortunae ludibrio &  tyranni libidini exponi; inque omnia vitae pericula omnesque  miserias & molestias a rege deduci patientur?  Num illis quod  omni animantium generi est a natura tributum; denegari debet; ut  sc。 vim vi repellant; seseq; ab injuria; tueantur?  Huic breviter  responsum sit; Populo universo negari defensionem; quae juris  naturalis est; neque ultionem quae praeter naturam est adversus  regem concedi debere。   Quapropter si rex non in singulares  tantum personas aliquot privatum odium exerceat; sed corpus etiam  reipublicae; cujus ipse caput est; i。e。  totum populum; vel  insignem aliquam ejus partem immani & intoleranda saevitia seu  tyrannide divexet; populo; quidem hoc casu resistendi ac tuendi  se ab injuria potestas competit; sed tuendi se tantum; non enim  in principem invadendi: & restituendae injuriae illatae; non  recedendi a debita reverentia propter acceptam injuriam。   Praesentem denique impetum propulsandi non vim praeteritam  ulciscenti jus habet。  Horum enim alterum a natura est; ut vitam  scilicet corpusque tueamur。  Alterum vero contra naturam; ut  inferior de superiori supplicium sumat。  Quod itaque populus  malum; antequam factum sit; impedire po

返回目录 上一页 下一页 回到顶部 0 0

你可能喜欢的