second treatise of government-第13章
按键盘上方向键 ← 或 → 可快速上下翻页，按键盘上的 Enter 键可回到本书目录页，按键盘上方向键 ↑ 可回到本页顶部！
————未阅读完？加入书签已便下次继续阅读！
ty over one who was not his child； but by virtue of that executive power of the law of nature； which； as a man； he had a right to： and he alone could punish him in his family； where the respect of his children had laid by the exercise of such a power； to give way to the dignity and authority they were willing should remain in him； above the rest of his family。 （*It is no improbable opinion therefore； which the archphilosopher was of； that the chief person in every houshold was always； as it were； a king： so when numbers of housholds joined themselves in civil societies together； kings were the first kind of governors amongst them； which is also； as it seemeth； the reason why the name of fathers continued still in them； who； of fathers； were made rulers； as also the ancient custom of governors to do as Melchizedec； and being kings； to exercise the office of priests； which fathers did at the first； grew perhaps by the same occasion。 Howbeit； this is not the only kind of regiment that has been received in the world。 The inconveniences of one kind have caused sundry others to be devised； so that in a word； all public regiment； of what kind soever； seemeth evidently to have risen from the deliberate advice； consultation and composition between men； judging it convenient and behoveful； there being no impossibility in nature considered by itself； but that man might have lived without any public regiment； Hooker's Eccl。 Pol。 lib。 i。 sect。 10。） Sec。 75。 Thus it was easy； and almost natural for children； by a tacit； and scarce avoidable consent； to make way for the father's authority and government。 They had been accustomed in their childhood to follow his direction； and to refer their little differences to him； and when they were men； who fitter to rule them？ Their little properties； and less covetousness； seldom afforded greater controversies； and when any should arise； where could they have a fitter umpire than he； by whose care they had every one been sustained and brought up； and who had a tenderness for them aII？ It is no wonder that they made no distinction betwixt minority and full age； nor looked after one and twenty； or any other age that might make them the free disposers of themselves and fortunes； when they could have no desire to be out of their pupilage： the government they had been under； during it； continued still to be more their protection than restraint； and they could no where find a greater security to their peace； liberties； and fortunes； than in the rule of a father。 Sec。 76。 Thus the natural fathers of families； by an insensible change； became the politic monarchs of them too： and as they chanced to live long； and leave able and worthy heirs； for several successions； or otherwise； so they laid the foundations of hereditary； or elective kingdoms； under several constitutions and mannors； according as chance； contrivance； or occasions happened to mould them。 But if princes have their titles in their fathers right； and it be a sufficient proof of the natural right of fathers to political authority； because they commonly were those in whose hands we find； de facto； the exercise of government： I say； if this argument be good； it will as strongly prove； that all princes； nay princes only； ought to be priests； since it is as certain； that in the beginning； the father of the family was priest； as that he was ruler in his own houshold。
CHAP。 VII。
Of Political or Civil Society。
Sec。 77。 GOD having made man such a creature； that in his own judgment； it was not good for him to be alone； put him under strong obligations of necessity； convenience； and inclination to drive him into society； as well as fitted him with understanding and language to continue and enjoy it。 The first society was between man and wife； which gave beginning to that between parents and children； to which； in time； that between master and servant came to be added： and though all these might； and commonly did meet together； and make up but one family； wherein the master or mistress of it had some sort of rule proper to a family； each of these； or all together； came short of political society； as we shall see； if we consider the different ends； ties； and bounds of each of these。 Sec。 78。 Conjugal society is made by a voluntary compact between man and woman； and tho' it consist chiefly in such a communion and right in one another's bodies as is necessary to its chief end； procreation； yet it draws with it mutual support and assistance； and a communion of interests too； as necessary not only to unite their care and affection； but also necessary to their common off…spring； who have a right to be nourished； and maintained by them； till they are able to provide for themselves。 Sec。 79。 For the end of conjunction； between male and female； being not barely procreation； but the continuation of the species； this conjunction betwixt male and female ought to last； even after procreation； so long as is necessary to the nourishment and support of the young ones； who are to be sustained even after procreation； so long as is necessary to the nourishment and support of the young ones； who are to be sustained by those that got them； till they are able to shift and provide for themselves。 This rule； which the infinite wise maker hath set to the works of his hands； we find the inferior creatures steadily obey。 In those viviparous animals which feed on grass； the conjunction between male and female lasts no longer than the very act of copulation； because the teat of the dam being sufficient to nourish the young； till it be able to feed on grass； the male only begets； but concerns not himself for the female or young； to whose sustenance he can contribute nothing。 But in beasts of prey the conjunction lasts longer： because the dam not being able well to subsist herself； and nourish her numerous off…spring by her own prey alone； a more laborious； as well as more dangerous way of living； than by feeding on grass； the assistance of the male is necessary to the maintenance of their common family； which cannot subsist till they are able to prey for themselves； but by the joint care of male and female。 The same is to be observed in all birds； （except some domestic ones； where plenty of food excuses the cock from feeding； and taking care of the young brood） whose young needing food in the nest； the cock and hen continue mates； till the young are able to use their wing； and provide for themselves。 Sec。 80。 And herein I think lies the chief； if not the only reason； why the male and female in mankind are tied to a longer conjunction than other creatures； viz。 because the female is capable of conceiving； and de facto is commonly with child again； and brings forth too a new birth； long before the former is out of a dependency for support on his parents help； and able to shift for himself； and has all the assistance is due to him from his parents： whereby the father； who is bound to take care for those he hath begot； is under an obligation to continue in conjugal society with the same woman longer than other creatures；
whose young being able to subsist of themselves； before the time of procreation returns again； the conjugal bond dissolves of itself； and they are at liberty； till Hymen at his usual anniversary season summons them again to chuse new mates。 Wherein one cannot but admire the wisdom of the great Creator； who having given to man foresight； and an ability to lay up for the future； as well as to supply the present necessity； hath made it necessary； that society of man and wife should be more lasting； than of male and female amongst other creatures； that so their industry might be encouraged； and their interest better united； to make provision and lay up goods for their common issue； which uncertain mixture； or easy and frequent solutions of conjugal society would mightily disturb。 Sec。 81。 But tho'these are ties upon mankind； which make the conjugal bonds more firm and lasting in man； than the other species of animals； yet it would give one reaso
