second treatise of government-第11章
按键盘上方向键 ← 或 → 可快速上下翻页，按键盘上的 Enter 键可回到本书目录页，按键盘上方向键 ↑ 可回到本页顶部！
————未阅读完？加入书签已便下次继续阅读！
e allowing him the privilege of his nature to be free； but to thrust him out amongst brutes； and abandon him to a state as wretched； and as much beneath that of a man； as their's。 This is that which puts the authority into the parents hands to govern the minority of their children。 God hath made it their business to employ this care on their offspring； and hath placed in them suitable inclinations of tenderness and concern to temper this power； to apply it； as his wisdom designed it； to the children's good； as long as they should need to be under it。 Sec。 64。 But what reason can hence advance this care of the parents due to their off…spring into an absolute arbitrary dominion of the father； whose power reaches no farther； than by such a discipline； as he finds most effectual； to give such strength and health to their bodies； such vigour and rectitude to their minds； as may best fit his children to be most useful to themselves and others； and； if it be necessary to his condition； to make them work； when they are able； for their own subsistence。 But in this power the mother too has her share with the father。 Sec。 65。 Nay； this power so little belongs to the father by any peculiar right of nature； but only as he is guardian of his children； that when he quits his care of them； he loses his power over them； which goes along with their nourishment and education； to which it is inseparably annexed； and it belongs as much to the foster…father of an exposed child； as to the natural father of another。 So little power does the bare act of begetting give a man over his issue； if all his care ends there； and this be all the title he hath to the name and authority of a father。 And what will become of this paternal power in that part of the world； where one woman hath more than one husband at a time？ or in those parts of America； where； when the husband and wife part； which happens frequently； the children are all left to the mother； follow her； and are wholly under her care and provision？ If the father die whilst the children are young； do they not naturally every where owe the same obedience to their mother； during their minority； as to their father were he alive？ and will any one say； that the mother hath a legislative power over her children？ that she can make standing rules； which shall be of perpetual obligation； by which they ought to regulate all the concerns of their property； and bound their liberty all the course of their lives？ or can she inforce the observation of them with capital punishments？ for this is the proper power of the magistrate； of which the father hath not so much as the shadow。 His command over his children is but temporary； and reaches not their life or property： it is but a help to the weakness and imperfection of their nonage； a discipline necessary to their education： and though a father may dispose of his own possessions as he pleases； when his children are out of danger of perishing for want； yet his power extends not to the lives or goods； which either their own industry； or another's bounty has made their's； nor to their liberty neither； when they are once arrived to the infranchisement of the years of discretion。 The father's empire then ceases； and he can from thence forwards no more dispose of the liberty of his son； than that of any other man： and it must be far from an absolute or perpetual jurisdiction； from which a man may withdraw himself； having license from divine
authority to leave father and mother； and cleave to his wife。 Sec。 66。 But though there be a time when a child comes to be as free from subjection to the will and command of his father； as the father himself is free from subjection to the will of any body else； and they are each under no other restraint； but that which is common to them both； whether it be the law of nature； or municipal law of their country； yet this freedom exempts not a son from that honour which he ought； by the law of God and nature； to pay his parents。 God having made the parents instruments in his great design of continuing the race of mankind； and the occasions of life to their children； as he hath laid on them an obligation to nourish； preserve； and bring up their offspring； so he has laid on the children a perpetual obligation of honouring their parents； which containing in it an inward esteem and reverence to be shewn by all outward expressions； ties up the child from any thing that may ever injure or affront； disturb or endanger； the happiness or life of those from whom he received his； and engages him in all actions of defence； relief； assistance and comfort of those； by whose means he entered into being； and has been made capable of any enjoyments of life： from this obligation no state； no freedom can absolve children。 But this is very far from giving parents a power of command over their children； or an authority to make laws and dispose as they please of their lives or liberties。 It is one thing to owe honour； respect； gratitude and assistance； another to require an absolute obedience and submission。 The honour due to parents； a monarch in his throne owes his mother； and yet this lessens not his authority； nor subjects him to her government。 Sec。 67。 The subjection of a minor places in the father a temporary government； which terminates with the minority of the child： and the honour due from a child； places in the parents a perpetual right to respect； reverence； support and compliance too； more or less； as the father's care； cost； and kindness in his education； has been more or less。 This ends not with minority； but holds in all parts and conditions of a man's life。 The want of distinguishing these two powers； viz。 that which the father hath in the right of tuition； during minority； and the right of honour all his life； may perhaps have caused a great part of the mistakes about this matter： for to speak properly of them； the first of these is rather the privilege of children； and duty of parents； than any prerogative of paternal power。 The nourishment and education of their children is a charge so incumbent on parents for their children's good； that nothing can absolve them from taking care of it： and though the power of commanding and chastising them go along with it； yet God hath woven into the principles of human nature such a tenderness for their off…spring； that there is little fear that parents should use their power with too much rigour； the excess is seldom on the severe side； the strong byass of nature drawing the other way。 And therefore God almighty when he would express his gentle dealing with the Israelites； he tells them； that though he chastened them； he chastened them as a man chastens his son； Deut。 viii。 5。 i。e。 with tenderness and affection； and kept them under no severer discipline than what was absolutely best for them； and had been less kindness to have slackened。 This is that power to which children are commanded obedience； that the pains and care of their parents may not be increased； or ill rewarded。 Sec。 68。 On the other side； honour and support； all that which gratitude requires to return for the benefits received by and from them； is the indispensable duty of the child； and the proper privilege of the parents。 This is intended for the parents advantage； as the other is for the child's； though education； the parents duty； seems to have most power； because the ignorance and infirmities of childhood stand in need of
restraint and correction； which is a visible exercise of rule； and a kind of dominion。 And that duty which is comprehended in the word honour； requires less obedience； though the obligation be stronger on grown； than younger children： for who can think the command； Children obey your parents； requires in a man； that has children of his own； the same submission to his father； as it does in his yet young children to him； and that by this precept he were bound to obey all his father's commands； if； out of a conceit of authority； he should have the indiscretion to treat him still as a boy？ Sec。 69。 The first part then of paternal power； or rat
