the origins of contemporary france-5-第44章
按键盘上方向键 ← 或 → 可快速上下翻页,按键盘上的 Enter 键可回到本书目录页,按键盘上方向键 ↑ 可回到本页顶部!
————未阅读完?加入书签已便下次继续阅读!
perverted now by the mob and again by the government; inert in the
country; oppressive in the towns; we have seen the state into which
they had fallen at the end of the Directory; how; instead of a refuge
for liberty; they had become haunts of tyranny or sinks of egoism;
why; in 1800; they were as much decried as their predecessors in 1788;
why their two successive props; the old one and the most recent;
historic custom and popular election; were now discredited and no
longer resorted to。 … After the disastrous experience of the monarchy
and the still worse experience of the republic; another prop had to be
sought for; but only one remained; that of the central power; the only
one visible and which seemed substantial; in default of others they
had recourse to this。'9' In any event; no protestation; even secret
and moral; any longer prevented the State from attaching other
corporate bodies to itself; in order to use them for its own purposes
as instruments or appendages。
II。 Doctrines of Government。
The theory。 … Agreement of speculative ideas with practical
necessities。 … Public rights under the Ancient Regime。 … The King's
three original rights。 … Labors of the jurists in extending royal
prerogatives。 … Historical impediments。 … The primitive or ulterior
limits of royal power。 … The philosophic and revolutionary principle
of popular sovereignty。 … Unlimited extension of State power。 …
Application to spontaneous bodies。 … Convergence of ancient and new
doctrines。 … Corporations considered as creations of the public power。
… Centralization through the universal intervention of the State。
The theory here agreed with the need; and not alone the recent theory;
but again the ancient theory。 Long before 1789; public right had
elevated the prerogative of centralized power into a dogma and
exaggerated it beyond measure。
There are three titles under which this power was conferred。 … Feudal
seignior; and suzerain; that is to say; commander…in…chief of the
great resident army whose willing forces had served to reconstruct
society in the ninth century; the King; through the remotest of his
origins … that is to say; through the immemorial confusion of
sovereignty with property … was the owner of France; the same as an
individual owns his private domain。'10' … Married; moreover; to the
Church since the first Capets; consecrated and crowned at Rheims;
anointed by God like a second David;'11' not only was he believed to
be authorized from on high; like other monarchs; but; from Louis le
Gros; and especially after the time of saint Louis; he appeared as the
delegate from on high; invested with a laic sacerdotalism; clothed
with moral power; minister of eternal justice; redresser of wrongs;
protector of the weak; benefactor of the humble … in short; 〃His Most
Christian Majesty。〃 … At length; after the thirteenth century; the
recent discovery and diligent study of the ancient codes of Justinian
had shown in his person the successor of the Caesars of Rome and of
the Emperors of Constantinople。 According to these codes the people in
a body had transferred its rights to the prince; now; in antique
cities; all rights were vested in the community; and the individual
had none;'12' accordingly; through this transfer; all rights; public
or private; passed into the hands of the prince; henceforth he could
exercise them as he pleased; under no restriction and no control。 He
was above the law; since he made it; his powers were illimitable and
his decision absolute。'13'
On this triple frame the jurists; like State spiders; had; from
Philippe le Bel down; spun their web; and the instinctive concordance
of their hereditary efforts had attached all its threads to the
omnipotence of the King。 … Being jurisconsults … that is to say;
logicians … they were obliged to deduce; and their minds naturally
recurred to the unique and rigid principle to which they might attach
their arguments。 … As advocates and councilors of the crown they
espoused the case of their client and; through professional zeal;
derived or forced precedents and texts to his advantage。 … By virtue
of being administrators and judges the grandeur of their master
constituted their grandeur; and personal interest counseled them to
expand a prerogative in which; through delegation; they took part。 …
Hence; during four centuries; they had spun the tissue of 〃regalian
rights;〃 the great net in the meshes of which; since Louis XIV。; all
lives found themselves caught。'14'
Nevertheless; however tightly spun was the web; there were openings in
it; or; at least; very weak spots。 … And first; of the consequences
flowing from these three principles in their hands; two of them had
hindered the third from unwinding its skein to the end: owing to the
fact that the King was formerly Count de Paris and Abbot of St。 Denis;
he could not become a veritable Augustus; an authentic Diocletian: his
two French titles limited his Roman title。 Without regard to the laws;
so…called fundamental; which imposed his heir on him beforehand; also
the entire line of his successive heirs; the tutor; male or female; of
his minor heir; and which; if he derogated from immemorial usage;
annulled his will like that of a private individual; his quality of
suzerain and that of Most Christian; were for him a double impediment。
As hereditary general of the feudal army he was bound to consider and
respect the hereditary officers of the same army; his old peers and
companions in arms … that is to say; the nobles。 As outside bishop; he
owed to the Church not alone his spiritual orthodoxy; but; again; his
temporal esteem; his active zeal; and the aid furnished him by his
secular arm。 Hence; in applied right; the numerous privileges of the
nobles and the Church; so many immunities and even liberties; so many
remains of antique local independence; and even of antique local
sovereignty;'15' so many prerogatives; honorific or serviceable;
maintained by the law and by the tribunals。 On this side; the meshes
of the monarchical netting had not been well knit or remained loose;
and the same elsewhere; with openings more or less wide; in the five
provincial governments (états); in the Pyrenees districts; in Alsace;
at Strasbourg; but especially in Languedoc and in Brittany; where the
pact of incorporation; through a sort of bilateral contract;
associated together on the same parchment and under the same seal the
franchises of the province and the sovereignty of the King。
Add to these original lacunae the hole made by the Prince himself in
his net already woven: he had with his own hand torn away its meshes;
and by thousands。 Extravagant to excess and always needy; he converted
everything into money; even his own rights; and; in the military
order; in the civil order; in commerce and in industry; in the
administration; in the judicature; and in the finances。 From one end
of the territory to the other; he had sold innumerable offices;
imposts; dignities; honors; monopolies; exemptions; survivorships;
expectancies … in brief; privileges which; once conferred for a money
consideration; became legal property;'16' often hereditary and
transmissible by the individual or the corporation which had paid for
them。 In this way the King alienated a portion of his royalty for the
benefit of the buyer。 Now; in 1789; he had alienated a great many of
these portions; accordingly; his present authority was everywhere
restricted by the use he had previously made of it。 … Sovereignty;
thus; in his hands had suffered from the double effect of its historic
origins and its historic exercise; the public power had not become; or
had ceased to be; omnipotence。 On the one hand it had not reached its
plenitude; and on the other hand it had deprived itself of a portion
of its own completeness。
The philosophers wished to find a solution for this double weakness;
innate and acquired They had therefore transpo