mr. gladstone and genesis-第7章
按键盘上方向键 ← 或 → 可快速上下翻页,按键盘上的 Enter 键可回到本书目录页,按键盘上方向键 ↑ 可回到本页顶部!
————未阅读完?加入书签已便下次继续阅读!
unit of time。
The next step was; necessarily; the formation of that
〃firmament;〃 or dome over the earth…disk; which was supposed to
support the celestial waters; and in which sun; moon; and stars
were conceived to be set; as in a sort of orrery。 The earth was
still surrounded and covered by the lower waters; but the upper
were separated from it by the 〃firmament;〃 beneath which what we
call the air lay。 A second alternation of darkness and light
marks the lapse of time。
After this; the waters which covered the earth…disk; under the
firmament; were drawn away into certain regions; which became
seas; while the part laid bare became dry land。 In accordance
with the notion; universally accepted in antiquity; that moist
earth possesses the potentiality of giving rise to living
beings; the land; at the command of Elohim; 〃put forth〃 all
sorts of plants。 They are made to appear thus early; not; I
apprehend; from any notion that plants are lower in the scale of
being than animals (which would seem to be inconsistent with the
prevalence of tree worship among ancient people); but rather
because animals obviously depend on plants; and because; without
crops and harvests; there seemed to be no particular need of
heavenly signs for the seasons。
These were provided by the fourth day's work。 Light existed
already; but now vehicles for the distribution of light; in a
special manner and with varying degrees of intensity; were
provided。 I conceive that the previous alternations of light and
darkness were supposed to go on; but that the 〃light〃 was
strengthened during the daytime by the sun; which; as a source
of heat as well as of light; glided up the firmament from the
east; and slid down in the west; each day。 Very probably each
day's sun was supposed to be a new one。 And as the light of the
day was strengthened by the sun; so the darkness of the night
was weakened by the moon; which regularly waxed and waned every
month。 The stars are; as it were; thrown in。 And nothing can
more sharply mark the doctrinal purpose of the author; than the
manner in which he deals with the heavenly bodies; which the
Gentiles identified so closely with their gods; as if they were
mere accessories to the almanac。
Animals come next in order of creation; and the general notion
of the writer seems to be that they were produced by the medium
in which they live; that is to say; the aquatic animals by the
waters; and the terrestrial animals by the land。 But there was a
difficulty about flying things; such as bats; birds; and
insects。 The cosmogonist seems to have had no conception of
〃air〃 as an elemental body。 His 〃elements〃 are earth and water;
and he ignores air as much as he does fire。 Birds 〃fly above the
earth in the open firmament〃 or 〃on the face of the expanse〃 of
heaven。 They are not said to fly through the air。 The choice of
a generative medium for flying things; therefore; seemed to lie
between water and earth; and; if we take into account the
conspicuousness of the great flocks of water…birds and the
swarms of winged insects; which appear to arise from water; I
think the preference of water becomes intelligible。 However; I
do not put this forward as more than a probable hypothesis。
As to the creation of aquatic animals on the fifth; that of land
animals on the sixth day; and that of man last of all; I presume
the order was determined by the fact that man could hardly
receive dominion over the living world before it existed;
and that the 〃cattle〃 were not wanted until he was about to make
his appearance。 The other terrestrial animals would naturally be
associated with the cattle。
The absurdity of imagining that any conception; analogous to
that of a zoological classification; was in the mind of the
writer will be apparent; when we consider that the fifth day's
work must include the zoologist's Cetacea; Sirenia; and
seals; all of which are Mammalia; all birds; turtles;
sea…snakes and; presumably; the fresh water Reptilia and
Amphibia; with the great majority of Invertebrata。
The creation of man is announced as a separate act; resulting
from a particular resolution of Elohim to 〃make man in our
image; after our likeness。〃 To learn what this remarkable phrase
means we must turn to the fifth chapter of Genesis; the work of
the same writer。 〃In the day that Elohim created man; in the
likeness of Elohim made he him; male and female created he them;
and blessed them and called their name Adam in the day when they
were created。 And Adam lived an hundred and thirty years and
begat a son in his own likeness; after his image;
and called his name Seth。〃 I find it impossible to read this
passage without being convinced that; when the writer says Adam
was made in the likeness of Elohim; he means the same sort of
likeness as when he says that Seth was begotten in the likeness
of Adam。 Whence it follows that his conception of Elohim was
completely anthropomorphic。
In all this narrative I can discover nothing which
differentiates it; in principle; from other ancient cosmogonies;
except the rejection of all gods; save the vague; yet
anthropomorphic; Elohim; and the assigning to them anteriority
and superiority to the world。 It is as utterly irreconcilable
with the assured truths of modern science; as it is with the
account of the origin of man; plants; and animals given by the
writer of the second chief constituent of the Hexateuch in the
second chapter of Genesis。 This extraordinary story starts with
the assumption of the existence of a rainless earth; devoid of
plants and herbs of the field。 The creation of living beings
begins with that of a solitary man; the next thing that happens
is the laying out of the Garden of Eden; and the causing the
growth from its soil of every tree 〃that is pleasant to the
sight and good for food〃; the third act is the formation out of
the ground of 〃every beast of the field; and every fowl of the
air〃; the fourth and last; the manufacture of the first woman
from a rib; extracted from Adam; while in a state
of anaesthesia。
Yet there are people who not only profess to take this monstrous
legend seriously; but who declare it to be reconcilable with the
Elohistic account of the creation!
FOOTNOTES
(1) The Nineteenth Century; 1886。
(2) Both dolphins and dugongs occur in the Red Sea; porpoises
and dolphins in the Mediterranean; so that the 〃Mosaic writer〃
may have been acquainted with them。
(3) I said nothing about 〃the greater number of schools of Greek
philosophy;〃 as Mr。 Gladstone implies that I did; but expressly
spoke of the 〃founders of Greek philosophy。〃
(4) See Heinze; Die Lehre vom Logos; p。 9 et seq。
(5) Reprinted in Lay Sermons; Addresses; and Reviews;
1870。
(6) 〃Ancient;〃 doubtless; but his antiquity must not be
exaggerated。 For example; there is no proof that the 〃Mosaic〃
cosmogony was known to the Israelites of Solomon's time。
(7) When Jeremiah (iv。 23) says; 〃I beheld the earth; and; lo;
it was waste and void;〃 he certainly does not mean to imply that
the form of the earth was less definite; or its substance less
solid; than before。
(8) In looking through the delightful volume recently published
by the Astronomer…Royal for Ireland; a day or two ago; I find
the following remarks on the nebular hypothesis; which I should
have been glad to quote in my text if I had known them sooner:
〃Nor can it be ever more than a speculation; it cannot be
established by observation; nor can it be proved by calculation。
It is merely a conjecture; more or less plausible; but perhaps
in some degree; necessarily true; if our present laws of heat;
as we understand them; admit of the extreme application here
required; and if the present order of things has reigned for
sufficient time without the interventi