贝壳电子书 > 英文原著电子书 > crime and punishment(罪与罚) >

第86章

crime and punishment(罪与罚)-第86章

小说: crime and punishment(罪与罚) 字数: 每页4000字

按键盘上方向键 ← 或 → 可快速上下翻页,按键盘上的 Enter 键可回到本书目录页,按键盘上方向键 ↑ 可回到本页顶部!
————未阅读完?加入书签已便下次继续阅读!



fact; I doubt whether such an argument could be published。 I simply         
hinted that an 'extraordinary' man has the right。。。 that is not an          
official right; but an inner right to decide in his own conscience          
to overstep。。。 certain obstacles; and only in case it is essential for      
the practical fulfilment of his idea (sometimes; perhaps; of benefit        
to the whole of humanity)。 You say that my article isn't definite; I        
am ready to make it as clear as I can。 Perhaps I am right in                
thinking you want me to; very well。 I maintain that if the discoveries      
of Kepler and Newton could not have been made known except by               
sacrificing the lives of one; a dozen; a hundred; or more men;              
Newton would have had the right; would indeed have been in duty             
bound。。。 to eliminate the dozen or the hundred men for the sake of          
making his discoveries known to the whole of humanity。 But it does not      
follow from that that Newton had a right to murder people right and         
left and to steal every day in the market。 Then; I remember; I              
maintain in my article that all。。。 well; legislators and leaders of         
men; such as Lycurgus; Solon; Mahomet; Napoleon; and so on; were all        
without exception criminals; from the very fact that; making a new          
law; they transgressed the ancient one; handed down from their              
ancestors and held sacred by the people; and they did not stop short        
at bloodshed either; if that bloodshed… often of innocent persons           
fighting bravely in defence of ancient law… were of use to their            
cause。 It's remarkable; in fact; that the majority; indeed; of these        
benefactors and leaders of humanity were guilty of terrible carnage。        
In short; I maintain that all great men or even men a little out of         
the common; that is to say capable of giving some new word; must            
from their very nature be criminals… more or less; of course。               
Otherwise it's hard for them to get out of the common rut; and to           
remain in the common rut is what they can't submit to; from their very      
nature again; and to my mind they ought not; indeed; to submit to           
it。 You see that there is nothing particularly new in all that。 The         
same thing has been printed and read a thousand times before。 As for        
my division of people into ordinary and extraordinary; I acknowledge        
that it's somewhat arbitrary; but I don't insist upon exact numbers。 I      
only believe in my leading idea that men are in general divided by a        
law of nature into two categories; inferior (ordinary); that is; so to      
say; material that serves only to reproduce its kind; and men who have      
the gift or the talent to utter a new word。 There are; of course;           
innumerable sub…divisions; but the distinguishing features of both          
categories are fairly well marked。 The first category; generally            
speaking; are men conservative in temperament and law…abiding; they         
live under control and love to be controlled。 To my thinking it is          
their duty to be controlled; because that's their vocation; and             
there is nothing humiliating in it for them。 The second category all        
transgress the law; they are destroyers or disposed to destruction          
according to their capacities。 The crimes of these men are of course        
relative and varied; for the most part they seek in very varied ways        
the destruction of the present for the sake of the better。 But if such      
a one is forced for the sake of his idea to step over a corpse or wade      
through blood; he can; I maintain; find within himself; in his              
conscience; a sanction for wading through blood… that depends on the        
idea and its dimensions; note that。 It's only in that sense I speak of      
their right to crime in my article (you remember it began with the          
legal question)。 There's no need for such anxiety; however; the masses      
will scarcely ever admit this right; they punish them or hang them          
(more or less); and in doing so fulfil quite justly their conservative      
vocation。 But the same masses set these criminals on a pedestal in the      
next generation and worship them (more or less)。 The first category is      
always the man of the present; the second the man of the future。 The        
first preserve the world and people it; the second move the world           
and lead it to its goal。 Each class has an equal right to exist。 In         
fact; all have equal rights with me… and vive la guerre eternelle…          
till the New Jerusalem; of course!〃                                         
  〃Then you believe in the New Jerusalem; do you?〃                          
  〃I do;〃 Raskolnikov answered firmly; as he said these words and           
during the whole preceding tirade he kept his eyes on one spot on           
the carpet。                                                                 
  〃And。。。 and do you believe in God? Excuse my curiosity。〃                  
  〃I do;〃 repeated Raskolnikov; raising his eyes to Porfiry。                
  〃And。。。 do you believe in Lazarus' rising from the dead?〃                 
  〃I。。。 I do。 Why do you ask all this?〃                                     
  〃You believe it literally?〃                                               
  〃Literally。〃                                                              
  〃You don't say so。。。。 I asked from curiosity。 Excuse me。 But let          
us go back to the question; they are not always executed。 Some; on the      
contrary。。。〃                                                                
  〃Triumph in their lifetime? Oh; yes; some attain their ends in            
this life; and then。。。〃                                                     
  〃They begin executing other people?〃                                      
  〃If it's necessary; indeed; for the most part they do。 Your remark        
is very witty。〃                                                             
  〃Thank you。 But tell me this: how do you distinguish those                
extraordinary people from the ordinary ones? Are there signs at             
their birth? I feel there ought to be more exactitude; more external        
definition。 Excuse the natural anxiety of a practical law…abiding           
citizen; but couldn't they adopt a special uniform; for instance;           
couldn't they wear something; be branded in some way? For you know          
if confusion arises and a member of one category imagines that he           
belongs to the other; begins to 'eliminate obstacles;' as you so            
happily expressed it; then。。。〃                                              
  〃Oh; that very often happens! That remark is wittier than the             
other。〃                                                                     
  〃Thank you。〃                                                              
  〃No reason to; but take note that the mistake can only arise in           
the first category; that is among the ordinary people (as I perhaps         
unfortunately called them)。 In spite of their predisposition to             
obedience very many of them; through a playfulness of nature;               
sometimes vouchsafed even to the cow; like to imagine themselves            
advanced people; 'destroyers;' and to push themselves into the 'new         
movement;' and this quite sincerely。 Meanwhile the really new people        
are very often unobserved by them; or even despised as reactionaries        
of grovelling tendencies。 But I don't think there is any                    
considerable danger here; and you really need not be uneasy for they        
never go very far。 Of course; they might have a thrashing sometimes         
for letting their fancy run away with them and to teach them their          
place; but no more; in fact; even this isn't necessary as they              
castigate themselves; fo

返回目录 上一页 下一页 回到顶部 0 1

你可能喜欢的