north america-2-第54章
按键盘上方向键 ← 或 → 可快速上下翻页，按键盘上的 Enter 键可回到本书目录页，按键盘上方向键 ↑ 可回到本页顶部！
————未阅读完？加入书签已便下次继续阅读！
It therefore follows that members of the House of Representatives in Congress need by no means be all chosen on the same principle。 As a fact； universal suffrage* and vote by ballot； that is by open voting papers； prevail in the States； but they do not so prevail by virtue of any enactment of the Constitution。 The laws of the States； however； require that the voter shall have been a resident in the State for some period； and generally either deny the right of voting to negroes； or so hamper that privilege that practically it amounts to the same thing。
* Perhaps the better word would have been manhood suffrage； and even that word should be taken with certain restrictions。 Aliens； minors； convicts； and men who pay no taxes cannot vote。 In some States none can vote unless they can read and write。 In some there is a property qualification。 In all there are special restrictions against negroes。 There is in none an absolutely universal suffrage。 But I keep the name as it best expresses to us in England the system of franchise which has practically come to prevail in the United States。
The Senate of the United States is composed of two Senators from each State。 These Senators are chosen for six years； and are elected in a manner which shows the conservative tendency of the Constitution with more signification than perhaps any other rule which it contains。 This branch of Congress； which； as I shall presently endeavor to show； is by far the more influential of the two； is not in any way elected by the people。 〃The Senate of the United States shall be composed of two Senators from each State； CHOSEN BY THE LEGISLATURE THEREOF； for six years； and each senator shall have one voice。〃 The Senate sent to Congress is therefore elected by the State legislatures。 Each State legislature has two Houses and the Senators sent from that State to Congress are either chosen by vote of the two Houses voting togetherwhich is； I believe； the mode adopted in most States； or are voted for in the two Houses separatelyin which cases； when different candidates have been nominated； the two Houses confer by committees and settle the matter between them。 The conservative purpose of the Constitution is here sufficiently evident。 The intention has been to take the election of the Senators away from the people； and to confide it to that body in each State which may be regarded as containing its best trusted citizens。 It removes the Senators far away from the democratic element； and renders them liable to the necessity of no popular canvass。 Nor am I aware that the Constitution has failed in keeping the ground which it intended to hold in this matter。 On some points its selected rocks and chosen standing ground have slipped from beneath its feet； owing to the weakness of words in defining and making solid the intended prohibitions against democracy。 The wording of the Constitution has been regarded by the people as sacred； but the people has considered itself justified in opposing the spirit as long as it revered the letter of the Constitution。 And this was natural。 For the letter of the Constitution can be read by all men； but its spirit can be understood comparatively but by few。 As regards the election of the Senators； I believe that it has been fairly made by the legislatures of the different States。 I have not heard it alleged that members of the State legislatures have been frequently constrained by the outside popular voice to send this or that man as Senator to Washington。 It was clearly not the intention of those who wrote the Constitution that they should be so constrained。 But the Senators themselves in Washington have submitted to restraint。 On subjects in which the people are directly interested； they submit to instructions from the legislatures which have sent them as to the side on which they shall vote； and justify themselves in voting against their convictions by the fact that they have received such instructions。 Such a practice； even with the members of a House which has been directly returned by popular election； is； I think； false to the intention of the system。 It has clearly been intended that confidence should be put in the chosen candidate for the term of his duty； and that the electors are to be bound in the expression of their opinion by his sagacity and patriotism for that term。 A member of a representative House so chosen； who votes at the bidding of his constituency in opposition to his convictions； is manifestly false to his charge； and may be presumed to be thus false in deference to his own personal interests； and with a view to his own future standing with his constituents。 Pledges before election may be fair； because a pledge given is after all but the answer to a question asked。 A voter may reasonably desire to know a candidate's opinion on any matter of political interest before he votes for or against him。 The representative when returned should be free from the necessity of further pledges。 But if this be true with a House elected by popular suffrage； how much more than true must it be with a chamber collected together as the Senate of the United States is collected！ Nevertheless； it is the fact that many Senators； especially those who have been sent to the House as Democrats； do allow the State legislatures to dictate to them their votes； and that they do hold themselves absolved from the personal responsibility of their votes by such dictation。 This is one place in which the rock which was thought to have been firm has slipped away； and the sands of democracy have made their way through。 But with reference to this it is always in the power of the Senate to recover its own ground； and re…establish its own dignity； to the people in this matter the words of the Constitution give no authority； and all that is necessary for the recovery of the old practice is a more conservative tendency throughout the country generally。 That there is such a conservative tendency； no one can doubt； the fear is whether it may not work too quickly and go too far。 In speaking of these instructions given to Senators at Washington； I should explain that such instructions are not given by all States； nor are they obeyed by all Senators。 Occasionally they are made in the form of requests； the word 〃instruct〃 being purposely laid aside。 Requests of the same kind are also made to Representatives； who； as they are not returned by the State legislatures； are not considered to be subject to such instructions。 The form used is as follows： 〃we instruct our Senators and request our representatives；〃 etc。 etc。 The Senators are elected for six years； but the same Senate does not sit entire throughout that term。 The whole chamber is divided into three equal portions or classes； and a portion goes out at the end of every second year； so that a third of the Senate comes in afresh with every new House of Representatives。 The Vice…President of the United States； who is elected with the President； and who is not a Senator by election from any State； is the ex…officio President of the Senate。 Should the President of the United States vacate his seat by death or otherwise； the Vice…President becomes President of the United States； and in such case the Senate elects its own President pro tempore。 In speaking of the Senate； I must point out a matter to which the Constitution does not allude； but which is of the gravest moment in the political fabric of the nation。 Each State sends two Senators to Congress。 These two are sent altogether independently of the population which they represent； or of the number of members which the same State supplies to the Lower House。 When the Constitution was framed； Delaware was to send one member to the House of Representatives； and Pennsylvania eight； nevertheless； each of these States sent two Senators。 It would seem strange that a young people； commencing business as a nation on a basis intended to be democratic； should consent to a system so directly at variance with the theory of popular representation。 It reminds one of the old days when Yorkshire returned two members； and Rutlandshire two also。 And the discrepancy has greatly increased as young States have been added to the Union； while
