±´¿Çµç×ÓÊé > Ó¢ÎÄÔ­Öøµç×ÓÊé > the canadian dominion >

µÚ21ÕÂ

the canadian dominion-µÚ21ÕÂ

С˵£º the canadian dominion ×ÖÊý£º ÿҳ4000×Ö

°´¼üÅÌÉÏ·½Ïò¼ü ¡û »ò ¡ú ¿É¿ìËÙÉÏÏ·­Ò³£¬°´¼üÅÌÉ쵀 Enter ¼ü¿É»Øµ½±¾ÊéĿ¼ҳ£¬°´¼üÅÌÉÏ·½Ïò¼ü ¡ü ¿É»Øµ½±¾Ò³¶¥²¿£¡
¡ª¡ª¡ª¡ªÎ´ÔĶÁÍꣿ¼ÓÈëÊéÇ©ÒѱãÏ´μÌÐøÔĶÁ£¡




But¡¡these¡¡leaders¡¡in¡¡turn¡¡soon¡¡gave¡¡way¡¡to¡¡new¡¡men£»¡¡and¡¡the¡¡political¡¡parties¡¡gradually¡¡fell¡¡into¡¡a¡¡state¡¡of¡¡flux¡£¡¡In¡¡Canada¡¡West¡¡there¡¡were¡¡still¡¡a¡¡few¡¡Tories£»¡¡survivors¡¡of¡¡the¡¡Family¡¡Compact¡¡and¡¡last¡­ditch¡¡defenders¡¡of¡¡privilege¡¡in¡¡Church¡¡and¡¡State£»¡¡a¡¡growing¡¡number¡¡of¡¡moderate¡¡Conservatives£»¡¡a¡¡larger¡¡group¡¡of¡¡moderate¡¡Liberals£»¡¡and¡¡a¡¡small¡¡but¡¡aggressive¡¡extreme¡¡left¡¡wing¡¡of¡¡¡¨Clear¡¡Grits£»¡¨¡¡mainly¡¡Scotch¡¡Presbyterians£»¡¡foes¡¡of¡¡any¡¡claim¡¡to¡¡undue¡¡power¡¡on¡¡the¡¡part¡¡of¡¡class¡¡or¡¡clergy¡£¡¡In¡¡Canada¡¡East¡¡the¡¡English¡¡members¡¡from¡¡the¡¡Townships£»¡¡under¡¡A¡£¡¡T¡£¡¡Galt£»¡¡were¡¡ceasing¡¡to¡¡vote¡¡as¡¡a¡¡unit£»¡¡and¡¡the¡¡main¡¡body¡¡of¡¡French¡­Canadian¡¡members¡¡were¡¡breaking¡¡up¡¡into¡¡a¡¡moderate¡¡Liberal¡¡party£»¡¡and¡¡a¡¡smaller¡¡group¡¡of¡¡Rouges£»¡¡fiery¡¡young¡¡men¡¡under¡¡the¡¡leadership¡¡of¡¡Papineau£»¡¡now¡¡returned¡¡from¡¡exile£»¡¡were¡¡crusading¡¡against¡¡clerical¡¡pretensions¡¡and¡¡all¡¡the¡¡established¡¡order¡£

The¡¡situation¡¡was¡¡one¡¡made¡¡to¡¡the¡¡hand¡¡of¡¡a¡¡master¡¡tactician¡£¡¡The¡¡time¡¡brought¡¡forth¡¡the¡¡man¡£¡¡John¡¡A¡£¡¡Macdonald£»¡¡a¡¡young¡¡Kingston¡¡lawyer¡¡of¡¡Tory¡¡upbringing£»¡¡or¡¡¡¨John¡¡A¡£¡¨£»¡¡as¡¡generation¡¡after¡¡generation¡¡affectionately¡¡called¡¡him£»¡¡was¡¡to¡¡prove¡¡the¡¡greatest¡¡leader¡¡of¡¡men¡¡in¡¡Canada's¡¡annals¡£¡¡Shrewd£»¡¡tactful£»¡¡and¡¡genial£»¡¡never¡¡forgetting¡¡a¡¡face¡¡or¡¡a¡¡favor£»¡¡as¡¡popular¡¡for¡¡his¡¡human¡¡frailties¡¡as¡¡for¡¡his¡¡strength£»¡¡Macdonald¡¡saw¡¡that¡¡the¡¡old¡¡party¡¡lines¡¡drawn¡¡in¡¡the¡¡days¡¡of¡¡the¡¡struggle¡¡for¡¡responsible¡¡government¡¡were¡¡breaking¡¡down¡¡and¡¡that¡¡the¡¡future¡¡lay¡¡with¡¡a¡¡union¡¡of¡¡the¡¡moderate¡¡elements¡¡in¡¡both¡¡parties¡¡and¡¡both¡¡sections¡£¡¡He¡¡succeeded¡¡in¡¡1854¡¡in¡¡bringing¡¡together¡¡in¡¡Canada¡¡West¡¡a¡¡strong¡¡Liberal¡­Conservative¡¡group¡¡and¡¡in¡¡effecting¡¡a¡¡permanent¡¡alliance¡¡with¡¡the¡¡main¡¡body¡¡of¡¡French¡­Canadian¡¡Liberals£»¡¡now¡¡under¡¡the¡¡leadership¡¡of¡¡Cartier£»¡¡a¡¡vigorous¡¡fighter¡¡and¡¡an¡¡easy¡­going¡¡opportunist¡£¡¡With¡¡the¡¡addition¡¡of¡¡Galt¡¡as¡¡the¡¡financial¡¡expert£»¡¡these¡¡allies¡¡held¡¡power¡¡throughout¡¡the¡¡greater¡¡part¡¡of¡¡the¡¡next¡¡dozen¡¡years¡£¡¡Their¡¡position¡¡was¡¡not¡¡unchallenged¡£¡¡The¡¡Clear¡¡Grits¡¡had¡¡found¡¡a¡¡leader¡¡after¡¡their¡¡own¡¡heart¡¡in¡¡George¡¡Brown£»¡¡a¡¡Scotchman¡¡of¡¡great¡¡ability£»¡¡a¡¡hard¡¡hitter¡¡and¡¡a¡¡good¡¡hater¡¡especially¡¡of¡¡slavery£»¡¡the¡¡Roman¡¡Catholic¡¡hierarchy£»¡¡and¡¡¡¨John¡¡A¡£¡¨¡¡Through¡¡his¡¡newspaper£»¡¡the¡¡Toronto¡¡¡¨Globe¡¨£»¡¡he¡¡wielded¡¡a¡¡power¡¡unique¡¡in¡¡Canadian¡¡journalism¡£¡¡The¡¡Rouges£»¡¡now¡¡led¡¡by¡¡A¡£¡¡A¡£¡¡Dorion£»¡¡a¡¡man¡¡of¡¡stainless¡¡honor¡¡and¡¡essentially¡¡moderate¡¡temper£»¡¡withdrew¡¡from¡£¡¡their¡¡extreme¡¡anticlerical¡¡position¡¡but¡¡could¡¡not¡¡live¡¡down¡¡their¡¡youth¡¡or¡¡make¡¡head¡¡against¡¡the¡¡forces¡¡of¡¡conservatism¡¡in¡¡their¡¡province¡£¡¡They¡¡did¡¡not¡¡command¡¡many¡¡votes¡¡in¡¡the¡¡House£»¡¡but¡¡every¡¡man¡¡of¡¡them¡¡was¡¡an¡¡orator£»¡¡and¡¡they¡¡remained¡¡through¡¡all¡¡vicissitudes¡¡a¡¡power¡¡to¡¡reckon¡¡with¡£

Step¡¡by¡¡step£»¡¡under¡¡Liberal¡¡and¡¡under¡¡Liberal¡¡Conservative¡¡Governments£»¡¡the¡¡programme¡¡of¡¡Canadian¡¡Liberalism¡¡was¡¡carried¡¡into¡¡effect¡£¡¡Self¡­government£»¡¡at¡¡least¡¡in¡¡domestic¡¡affairs£»¡¡had¡¡been¡¡attained¡£¡¡An¡¡effective¡¡system¡¡of¡¡municipal¡¡government¡¡and¡¡a¡¡good¡¡beginning¡¡in¡¡popular¡¡education¡¡followed¡£¡¡The¡¡last¡¡link¡¡between¡¡Church¡¡and¡¡State¡¡was¡¡severed¡¡in¡¡1854¡¡when¡¡the¡¡Clergy¡¡Reserves¡¡were¡¡turned¡¡over¡¡to¡¡the¡¡municipalities¡¡for¡¡secular¡¡purposes£»¡¡with¡¡life¡¡annuities¡¡for¡¡clergymen¡¡who¡¡had¡¡been¡¡receiving¡¡stipends¡¡from¡¡the¡¡Reserves¡£¡¡In¡¡Lower¡¡Canada¡¡the¡¡remnants¡¡of¡¡the¡¡old¡¡feudal¡¡system£»¡¡the¡¡rights¡¡of¡¡the¡¡seigneurs£»¡¡were¡¡abolished¡¡in¡¡the¡¡same¡¡year¡¡with¡¡full¡¡compensation¡¡from¡¡the¡¡state¡£¡¡An¡¡elective¡¡upper¡¡Chamber¡¡took¡¡the¡¡place¡¡of¡¡the¡¡appointed¡¡Legislative¡¡Council¡¡a¡¡year¡¡later¡£¡¡The¡¡Reformers£»¡¡as¡¡the¡¡Clear¡¡Grits¡¡preferred¡¡to¡¡call¡¡themselves¡¡officially£»¡¡should¡¡perhaps¡¡have¡¡been¡¡content¡¡with¡¡so¡¡much¡¡progress¡£¡¡They¡¡insisted£»¡¡however£»¡¡that¡¡a¡¡new¡¡and¡¡more¡¡intolerable¡¡privilege¡¡had¡¡arisenthe¡¡privilege¡¡which¡¡Canada¡¡East¡¡held¡¡of¡¡equal¡¡representation¡¡in¡¡the¡¡Legislative¡¡Assembly¡¡long¡¡after¡¡its¡¡population¡¡had¡¡fallen¡¡behind¡¡that¡¡of¡¡Canada¡¡West¡£

The¡¡political¡¡union¡¡of¡¡the¡¡two¡¡Canadas¡¡in¡¡fact¡¡had¡¡never¡¡been¡¡complete¡£¡¡Throughout¡¡the¡¡Union¡¡period¡¡there¡¡were¡¡two¡¡leaders¡¡in¡¡each¡¡Cabinet£»¡¡two¡¡Attorney¡¡Generals£»¡¡and¡¡two¡¡distinct¡¡judicial¡¡systems¡£¡¡Every¡¡session¡¡laws¡¡were¡¡passed¡¡applying¡¡to¡¡one¡¡section¡¡alone¡£¡¡This¡¡continued¡¡separation¡¡had¡¡its¡¡beginning¡¡in¡¡a¡¡clause¡¡of¡¡the¡¡Union¡¡Act¡¡itself£»¡¡which¡¡provided¡¡that¡¡each¡¡section¡¡should¡¡have¡¡equal¡¡representation¡¡in¡¡the¡¡Assembly£»¡¡even¡¡though¡¡Lower¡¡Canada¡¡then¡¡had¡¡a¡¡much¡¡larger¡¡population¡¡than¡¡Upper¡¡Canada¡£¡¡When¡¡the¡¡tide¡¡of¡¡overseas¡¡immigration¡¡put¡¡Canada¡¡West¡¡well¡¡in¡¡the¡¡lead£»¡¡it¡¡in¡¡its¡¡turn¡¡was¡¡denied¡¡the¡¡full¡¡representation¡¡its¡¡greater¡¡population¡¡warranted¡£¡¡First¡¡the¡¡Conservatives£»¡¡and¡¡later¡¡the¡¡Clear¡¡Grits£»¡¡took¡¡up¡¡the¡¡cry¡¡of¡¡¡¨Representation¡¡by¡¡Population¡£¡¨¡¡It¡¡was¡¡not¡¡difficult¡¡to¡¡convince¡¡the¡¡average¡¡Canada¡¡West¡¡elector¡¡that¡¡it¡¡was¡¡an¡¡outrage¡¡that¡¡three¡¡French¡­Canadian¡¡voters¡¡should¡¡count¡¡as¡¡much¡¡as¡¡four¡¡English¡­speaking¡¡voters¡£¡¡Macdonald£»¡¡relying¡¡for¡¡power¡¡on¡¡his¡¡alliance¡¡with¡¡Cartier£»¡¡could¡¡not¡¡accept¡¡the¡¡demand£»¡¡and¡¡saw¡¡seat¡¡after¡¡seat¡¡in¡¡Canada¡¡West¡¡fall¡¡to¡¡Brown¡¡and¡¡his¡¡¡¨Rep¡£¡¡by¡¡Pop¡£¡¨¡¡crusaders¡£¡¡Brown's¡¡success¡¡only¡¡solidified¡¡Canada¡¡East¡¡against¡¡him£»¡¡until£»¡¡in¡¡the¡¡early¡¡sixties£»¡¡party¡¡lines¡¡coincided¡¡almost¡¡with¡¡sectional¡¡lines¡£¡¡Parties¡¡were¡¡so¡¡closely¡¡matched¡¡that¡¡the¡¡life¡¡of¡¡a¡¡Ministry¡¡was¡¡short¡£¡¡In¡¡the¡¡three¡¡years¡¡ending¡¡in¡¡1864¡¡there¡¡were¡¡two¡¡general¡¡elections¡¡and¡¡four¡¡Ministries¡£¡¡Political¡¡controversy¡¡became¡¡bitterly¡¡personal£»¡¡and¡¡corruption¡¡was¡¡spreading¡¡fast¡£

Constant¡¡efforts¡¡were¡¡made¡¡to¡¡avert¡¡the¡¡threatened¡¡deadlock¡£¡¡Macdonald£»¡¡who¡¡always¡¡trusted¡¡more¡¡to¡¡personal¡¡management¡¡than¡¡to¡¡constitutional¡¡expedients£»¡¡won¡¡over¡¡one¡¡after¡¡another¡¡of¡¡the¡¡opponents¡¡who¡¡troubled¡¡him£»¡¡and¡¡thus¡¡postponed¡¡the¡¡day¡¡of¡¡reckoning¡£¡¡Rival¡¡plans¡¡of¡¡constitutional¡¡reform¡¡were¡¡brought¡¡forward¡£¡¡The¡¡simplest¡¡remedy¡¡was¡¡the¡¡repeal¡¡of¡¡the¡¡union£»¡¡leaving¡¡each¡¡province¡¡to¡¡go¡¡its¡¡own¡¡way¡£¡¡But¡¡this¡¡solution¡¡was¡¡felt¡¡to¡¡be¡¡a¡¡backward¡¡step¡¡and¡¡one¡¡which¡¡would¡¡create¡¡more¡¡problems¡¡than¡¡it¡¡would¡¡solve¡£¡¡More¡¡support¡¡was¡¡given¡¡the¡¡double¡¡majority¡¡principle£»¡¡a¡¡provision¡¡that¡¡no¡¡measure¡¡affecting¡¡one¡¡section¡¡should¡¡be¡¡passed¡¡unless¡¡a¡¡majority¡¡from¡¡that¡¡section¡¡favored¡¡it£»¡¡but¡¡this¡¡method¡¡broke¡¡down¡¡when¡¡put¡¡to¡¡a¡¡practical¡¡test¡£¡¡The¡¡Rouges£»¡¡and¡¡later¡¡Brown£»¡¡put¡¡forward¡¡a¡¡plan¡¡for¡¡the¡¡abolition¡¡of¡¡legislative¡¡union¡¡in¡¡favor¡¡of¡¡a¡¡federal¡¡union¡¡of¡¡the¡¡two¡¡Canadas¡£¡¡This¡¡lacked¡¡the¡¡wide¡¡vision¡¡of¡¡the¡¡fourth¡¡suggestion£»¡¡which¡¡was¡¡destined¡¡to¡¡be¡¡adopted¡¡as¡¡the¡¡solution£»¡¡namely£»¡¡the¡¡federation¡¡of¡¡all¡¡British¡¡North¡¡America¡£

Federal¡¡union£»¡¡it¡¡was¡¡urged£»¡¡would¡¡solve¡¡party¡¡and¡¡sectional¡¡deadlock¡¡by¡¡removing¡¡to¡¡local¡¡legislatures¡¡the¡¡questions¡¡which¡¡created¡¡the¡¡greatest¡¡divergence¡¡of¡¡opinion¡£¡¡The¡¡federal¡¡union¡¡of¡¡the¡¡Canadas¡¡alone¡¡or¡¡the¡¡federal¡¡union¡¡of¡¡all¡¡British¡¡North¡¡America¡¡would¡¡either¡¡achieve¡¡this¡¡end¡£¡¡But¡¡there¡¡were¡¡other¡¡ends¡¡in¡¡view¡¡which¡¡only¡¡the¡¡wider¡¡plan¡¡could¡¡serve¡£¡¡The¡¡needs¡¡of¡¡defense¡¡demanded¡¡a¡¡single¡¡control¡¡for¡¡all¡¡the¡¡colonies¡£¡¡The¡¡probable¡¡loss¡¡of¡¡the¡¡open¡¡market¡¡of¡¡the¡¡United¡¡States¡¡made¡¡it¡¡imperative¡¡to¡¡unite¡¡all¡¡the¡¡provinces¡¡in¡¡a¡¡single¡¡free¡¡trade¡¡area¡£¡¡The¡¡first¡¡faint¡¡stirrings¡¡of¡¡national¡¡ambition£»¡¡prompting¡¡the¡¡younger¡¡men¡¡to¡¡throw¡¡off¡¡the¡¡leading¡¡strings¡¡of¡¡colonial¡¡dependence£»¡¡were¡¡stimulated¡¡by¡¡the¡¡vision¡¡of¡¡a¡¡country¡¡which¡¡would¡¡stretch¡¡from¡¡sea¡¡to¡¡sea¡£¡¡The¡¡westward¡¡growth¡¡of¡¡the¡¡United¡¡States¡¡and¡¡the¡¡reports¡¡of¡¡travelers¡¡were¡¡opening¡¡men's¡¡eyes¡¡to¡¡the¡¡possibilities¡¡of¡¡the¡¡vast¡¡lands¡¡under¡¡the¡¡control¡¡of¡¡the¡¡Hudson's¡¡Bay¡¡Company¡¡and¡¡the¡¡need¡¡of¡¡asserting¡¡authority¡¡over¡¡these¡¡northern¡¡regions¡¡if¡¡they¡¡were¡¡to¡¡be¡¡held¡¡for¡¡the¡¡Crown¡£¡¡Eastward£»¡¡also£»¡¡men¡¡were¡¡awaking¡¡to¡¡their¡¡isolation¡£¡¡There¡¡was¡¡not£»¡¡in¡¡the¡¡Maritime¡¡Provinces£»¡¡any¡¡popular¡¡desire¡¡for¡¡union¡¡with¡¡the¡¡Canadas¡¡or¡¡any¡¡political¡¡crisis¡¡compelling¡¡drastic¡¡remedy£»¡¡but¡¡the¡¡need¡¡of¡¡union¡¡for¡¡defense¡¡was¡¡felt¡¡in¡¡some¡¡quarters£»¡¡and¡¡ambitious¡¡politicians¡¡who¡¡had¡¡mastered¡¡their¡¡local¡¡fields¡¡were¡¡beginning¡¡to¡¡sigh¡¡for¡¡larger¡¡worlds¡¡to¡¡conquer¡£

It¡¡took¡¡the¡¡patient¡¡and¡¡courageous¡¡striving¡¡of¡¡many¡¡men¡¡to¡¡make¡¡this¡¡vision¡¡of¡¡a¡¡united¡¡country¡¡a¡¡reality¡£¡¡The¡¡roll¡¡of¡¡the¡¡Fathers¡¡of¡¡Confederation¡¡is¡¡a¡¡long¡¡and¡¡honored¡¡one¡£¡¡Yet¡¡on¡¡that¡¡roll¡¡there¡¡are¡¡some¡¡outstanding¡¡names£»¡¡the¡¡names¡¡of¡¡men¡¡whose¡¡services¡¡were¡¡not¡¡merely¡¡devoted¡¡but¡¡indispensable¡£¡¡The¡¡first¡¡to¡¡bring¡¡the¡¡question¡¡within¡¡the¡¡field¡¡of¡¡practical¡¡politics¡¡was¡¡A¡£¡¡T¡£¡¡Galt£»¡¡but¡¡when¡¡attempt¡¡after¡¡attempt¡¡in¡¡1864¡¡to¡¡organize¡¡a¡¡Ministry¡¡with¡¡a¡¡safe¡¡working¡¡majority¡¡had¡¡failed£»¡¡it¡¡was¡¡George¡¡Brown¡¡who¡¡proposed¡¡that¡¡the¡¡party¡¡leaders¡¡should¡¡join¡¡hands¡¡in

·µ»ØĿ¼ ÉÏÒ»Ò³ ÏÂÒ»Ò³ »Øµ½¶¥²¿ ÔÞ£¨0£© ²È£¨0£©

Äã¿ÉÄÜϲ»¶µÄ