the canadian dominion-µÚ20ÕÂ
°´¼üÅÌÉÏ·½Ïò¼ü ¡û »ò ¡ú ¿É¿ìËÙÉÏÏ·ҳ£¬°´¼üÅÌÉ쵀 Enter ¼ü¿É»Øµ½±¾ÊéĿ¼ҳ£¬°´¼üÅÌÉÏ·½Ïò¼ü ¡ü ¿É»Øµ½±¾Ò³¶¥²¿£¡
¡ª¡ª¡ª¡ªÎ´ÔĶÁÍꣿ¼ÓÈëÊéÇ©ÒѱãÏ´μÌÐøÔĶÁ£¡
ts¡¡campaign¡¡of¡¡bluster¡¡and¡¡after¡¡Lincoln's¡¡proclamation¡¡had¡¡brought¡¡the¡¡moral¡¡issue¡¡again¡¡to¡¡the¡¡fore¡£¡¡The¡¡fact¡¡that¡¡a¡¡large¡¡number¡¡of¡¡Canadians£»¡¡popularly¡¡set¡¡at¡¡forty¡¡thousand£»¡¡enlisted¡¡in¡¡the¡¡Northern¡¡armies£»¡¡is¡¡to¡¡be¡¡explained¡¡in¡¡part¡¡by¡¡the¡¡call¡¡of¡¡adventure¡¡and¡¡the¡¡lure¡¡of¡¡high¡¡bounties£»¡¡but¡¡it¡¡must¡¡also¡¡be¡¡taken¡¡to¡¡reflect¡¡the¡¡sympathy¡¡of¡¡the¡¡mass¡¡of¡¡the¡¡people¡£
*¡¡See¡¡¡¨Abraham¡¡Lincoln¡¡and¡¡the¡¡Union¡¨£»¡¡by¡¡Nathaniel¡¡W¡£¡¡Stephenson¡¡£¨in¡¡¡¨The¡¡Chronicles¡¡of¡¡America¡¨£©¡£
In¡¡the¡¡United¡¡States¡¡resentment¡¡was¡¡slower¡¡in¡¡passing¡£¡¡While¡¡the¡¡war¡¡was¡¡on£»¡¡prudence¡¡forbade¡¡any¡¡overt¡¡act¡£¡¡When¡¡it¡¡was¡¡over£»¡¡the¡¡bill¡¡for¡¡the¡¡Alabama¡¡raids¡¡and¡¡the¡¡taunts¡¡of¡¡the¡¡¡¨Times¡¨¡¡came¡¡in¡£¡¡Great¡¡Britain¡¡paid¡¡in¡¡the¡¡settlement¡¡of¡¡the¡¡Alabama¡¡claims¡£*¡¡Canada¡¡suffered¡¡by¡¡the¡¡abrogation¡¡of¡¡the¡¡Reciprocity¡¡Treaty¡¡at¡¡the¡¡first¡¡possible¡¡date£»¡¡and¡¡by¡¡the¡¡connivance¡¡of¡¡the¡¡American¡¡authorities¡¡in¡¡the¡¡Fenian¡¡raids¡¡of¡¡1866¡¡and¡¡1870¡£¡¡Yet¡¡for¡¡Canada¡¡the¡¡outcome¡¡was¡¡by¡¡no¡¡means¡¡ill¡£¡¡If¡¡the¡¡Civil¡¡War¡¡did¡¡not¡¡bring¡¡forth¡¡a¡¡new¡¡nation¡¡in¡¡the¡¡South£»¡¡it¡¡helped¡¡to¡¡make¡¡one¡¡in¡¡the¡¡far¡¡North¡£¡¡A¡¡common¡¡danger¡¡drew¡¡the¡¡scattered¡¡British¡¡Provinces¡¡together¡¡and¡¡made¡¡ready¡¡the¡¡way¡¡for¡¡the¡¡coming¡¡Dominion¡¡of¡¡Canada¡£
*See¡¡¡¨The¡¡Day¡¡of¡¡the¡¡Confederacy¡¨£»¡¡by¡¡Nathaniel¡¡W¡£¡¡Stephenson£»¡¡and¡¡¡¨The¡¡Path¡¡of¡¡Empire¡¨¡¡£¨in¡¡¡¨The¡¡Chronicles¡¡of¡¡America¡¨£©¡£
It¡¡was¡¡not¡¡from¡¡the¡¡United¡¡States¡¡alone¡¡that¡¡an¡¡impetus¡¡came¡¡for¡¡the¡¡closer¡¡union¡¡of¡¡the¡¡British¡¡Provinces¡£¡¡The¡¡same¡¡period¡¡and¡¡the¡¡same¡¡events¡¡ripened¡¡opinion¡¡in¡¡the¡¡United¡¡Kingdom¡¡in¡¡favor¡¡of¡¡some¡¡practical¡¡means¡¡of¡¡altering¡¡a¡¡colonial¡¡relationship¡¡which¡¡bad¡¡ceased¡¡to¡¡bring¡¡profit¡¡but¡¡which¡¡had¡¡not¡¡ceased¡¡to¡¡be¡¡a¡¡burden¡¡of¡¡responsibility¡¡and¡¡risk¡£
The¡¡British¡¡Empire¡¡had¡¡its¡¡beginning¡¡in¡¡the¡¡initiative¡¡of¡¡private¡¡business¡¡men£»¡¡not¡¡in¡¡any¡¡conscious¡¡policy¡¡of¡¡state¡£¡¡Yet¡¡as¡¡the¡¡Empire¡¡grew¡¡the¡¡teaching¡¡of¡¡doctrinaires¡¡and¡¡the¡¡example¡¡of¡¡other¡¡colonial¡¡powers¡¡had¡¡developed¡¡a¡¡definite¡¡policy¡¡whereby¡¡the¡¡plantations¡¡overseas¡¡were¡¡to¡¡be¡¡made¡¡to¡¡serve¡¡the¡¡needs¡¡of¡¡the¡¡nation¡¡at¡¡home¡£¡¡The¡¡end¡¡of¡¡empire¡¡was¡¡commercial¡¡profit£»¡¡the¡¡means£»¡¡the¡¡political¡¡subordination¡¡of¡¡the¡¡colonies£»¡¡the¡¡debit¡¡entry£»¡¡the¡¡cost¡¡of¡¡the¡¡military¡¡and¡¡naval¡¡and¡¡diplomatic¡¡services¡¡borne¡¡by¡¡the¡¡mother¡¡country¡£¡¡But¡¡the¡¡course¡¡of¡¡events¡¡had¡¡now¡¡broken¡¡down¡¡this¡¡theory¡£¡¡Britain£»¡¡for¡¡her¡¡own¡¡good£»¡¡had¡¡abandoned¡¡protection£»¡¡and¡¡with¡¡it¡¡fell¡¡the¡¡system¡¡of¡¡preference¡¡and¡¡monopoly¡¡in¡¡colonial¡¡markets¡£¡¡Not¡¡only¡¡preference¡¡had¡¡gone¡¡but¡¡even¡¡equality¡£¡¡The¡¡colonies£»¡¡notably¡¡Canada£»¡¡which¡¡was¡¡most¡¡influenced¡¡by¡¡the¡¡United¡¡States£»¡¡were¡¡perversely¡¡using¡¡their¡¡new¡¡found¡¡freedom¡¡to¡¡protect¡¡their¡¡own¡¡manufacturers¡¡against¡¡all¡¡outsiders£»¡¡Britain¡¡included¡£¡¡When¡¡Sheffield¡¡cutlers£»¡¡hard¡¡hit¡¡by¡¡Canada's¡¡tariff£»¡¡protested¡¡to¡¡the¡¡Colonial¡¡Secretary¡¡and¡¡he¡¡echoed¡¡their¡¡remonstrance£»¡¡the¡¡Canadian¡¡Minister¡¡of¡¡Finance£»¡¡A¡£¡¡T¡£¡¡Galt£»¡¡stoutly¡¡refused¡¡to¡¡heed¡£¡¡¡¨Self¡government¡¡would¡¡be¡¡utterly¡¡annihilated£»¡¨¡¡Galt¡¡replied¡¡in¡¡1860£»¡¡¡¨if¡¡the¡¡views¡¡of¡¡the¡¡Imperial¡¡Government¡¡were¡¡to¡¡be¡¡preferred¡¡to¡¡those¡¡of¡¡the¡¡people¡¡of¡¡Canada¡£¡¡It¡¡is¡¡therefore¡¡the¡¡duty¡¡of¡¡the¡¡present¡¡government¡¡distinctly¡¡to¡¡affirm¡¡the¡¡right¡¡of¡¡the¡¡Canadian¡¡legislature¡¡to¡¡adjust¡¡the¡¡taxation¡¡of¡¡the¡¡people¡¡in¡¡the¡¡way¡¡they¡¡deem¡¡best¡¡¡¡¡even¡¡if¡¡it¡¡should¡¡unfortunately¡¡happen¡¡to¡¡meet¡¡the¡¡disapproval¡¡of¡¡the¡¡Imperial¡¡Ministry¡£¡¨¡¡Clearly£»¡¡if¡¡trade¡¡advantage¡¡were¡¡the¡¡chief¡¡purpose¡¡of¡¡empire£»¡¡the¡¡Empire¡¡had¡¡lost¡¡its¡¡reason¡¡for¡¡being¡£
With¡¡the¡¡credit¡¡entry¡¡fading£»¡¡the¡¡debit¡¡entry¡¡loomed¡¡up¡¡bigger¡£¡¡Hardly¡¡had¡¡the¡¡Corn¡¡Laws¡¡been¡¡abolished¡¡when¡¡Radical¡¡critics¡¡called¡¡on¡¡the¡¡British¡¡Government¡¡to¡¡withdraw¡¡the¡¡redcoat¡¡garrisons¡¡from¡¡the¡¡colonies£º¡¡no¡¡profit£»¡¡no¡¡defense¡£¡¡Slowly¡¡but¡¡steadily¡¡this¡¡reduction¡¡was¡¡effected¡£¡¡To¡¡fill¡¡the¡¡gaps£»¡¡the¡¡colonies¡¡began¡¡to¡¡strengthen¡¡their¡¡militia¡¡forces¡£¡¡In¡¡Canada¡¡only¡¡a¡¡beginning¡¡had¡¡been¡¡made¡¡in¡¡the¡¡way¡¡of¡¡defense¡¡when¡¡the¡¡Trent¡¡episode¡¡brought¡¡matters¡¡to¡¡a¡¡crisis¡£¡¡If¡¡war¡¡broke¡¡out¡¡between¡¡the¡¡United¡¡States¡¡and¡¡Great¡¡Britain£»¡¡Canada¡¡would¡¡be¡¡the¡¡battlefield¡£¡¡Every¡¡Canadian¡¡knew¡¡it£»¡¡nothing¡¡could¡¡be¡¡clearer¡£¡¡When¡¡the¡¡danger¡¡of¡¡immediate¡¡war¡¡had¡¡passed£»¡¡the¡¡Parliament¡¡of¡¡Canada¡¡turned¡¡to¡¡the¡¡provision¡¡of¡¡more¡¡adequate¡¡defense¡£¡¡A¡¡bill¡¡providing¡¡for¡¡a¡¡compulsory¡¡levy¡¡was¡¡defeated¡¡in¡¡1862£»¡¡more¡¡on¡¡personal¡¡and¡¡party¡¡grounds¡¡than¡¡on¡¡its¡¡own¡¡merits£»¡¡and¡¡the¡¡Ministry¡¡next¡¡in¡¡office¡¡took¡¡the¡¡other¡¡course¡¡of¡¡increasing¡¡the¡¡volunteer¡¡force¡¡and¡¡of¡¡providing¡¡for¡¡officers'¡¡training¡£¡¡Compared¡¡with¡¡any¡¡earlier¡¡arrangements¡¡for¡¡defense£»¡¡the¡¡new¡¡plans¡¡marked¡¡a¡¡great¡¡advance£»¡¡but¡¡when¡¡judged¡¡in¡¡the¡¡light¡¡of¡¡the¡¡possible¡¡necessity¡¡of¡¡repelling¡¡American¡¡invasion£»¡¡they¡¡were¡¡plainly¡¡inadequate¡£¡¡A¡¡burst¡¡of¡¡criticism¡¡followed¡¡from¡¡England£»¡¡press¡¡and¡¡politicians¡¡joined¡¡in¡¡denouncing¡¡the¡¡blind¡¡and¡¡supine¡¡colonials¡£¡¡Did¡¡they¡¡not¡¡know¡¡that¡¡invasion¡¡by¡¡the¡¡United¡¡States¡¡was¡¡inevitable£¿¡¡¡¨If¡¡the¡¡people¡¡of¡¡the¡¡North¡¡fail£»¡¨¡¡declared¡¡a¡¡noble¡¡lord£»¡¡¡¨they¡¡will¡¡attack¡¡Canada¡¡as¡¡a¡¡compensation¡¡for¡¡their¡¡losses£»¡¡if¡¡they¡¡succeed£»¡¡they¡¡will¡¡attack¡¡Canada¡¡in¡¡the¡¡drunkenness¡¡of¡¡victory¡£¡¨¡¡If¡¡such¡¡an¡¡invasion¡¡came£»¡¡Britain¡¡had¡¡neither¡¡the¡¡power¡¡nor¡¡the¡¡will£»¡¡the¡¡¡¨Times¡¨¡¡declared£»¡¡to¡¡protect¡¡Canada¡¡without¡¡any¡¡aid¡¡on¡¡her¡¡part£»¡¡not¡¡the¡¡power£»¡¡for¡¡¡¨our¡¡empire¡¡is¡¡too¡¡vast£»¡¡our¡¡population¡¡too¡¡small£»¡¡our¡¡antagonist¡¡too¡¡powerful¡¨£»¡¡not¡¡the¡¡will£»¡¡for¡¡¡¨we¡¡no¡¡longer¡¡monopolize¡¡the¡¡trade¡¡of¡¡the¡¡colonies£»¡¡we¡¡no¡¡longer¡¡job¡¡their¡¡patronage¡£¡¨¡¡To¡¡these¡¡amazing¡¡attacks¡¡Canadians¡¡replied¡¡that¡¡they¡¡knew¡¡the¡¡United¡¡States¡¡better¡¡than¡¡Englishmen¡¡did¡£¡¡They¡¡were¡¡prepared¡¡to¡¡take¡¡their¡¡share¡¡in¡¡defense£»¡¡but¡¡they¡¡could¡¡not¡¡forget¡¡that¡¡if¡¡war¡¡came¡¡it¡¡would¡¡not¡¡be¡¡by¡¡any¡¡act¡¡of¡¡Canada¡£¡¡It¡¡was¡¡soon¡¡noted¡¡that¡¡those¡¡who¡¡most¡¡loudly¡¡denounced¡¡Canada¡¡for¡¡not¡¡arming¡¡to¡¡the¡¡teeth¡¡were¡¡the¡¡Southern¡¡sympathizers¡£¡¡¡¨The¡¡'Times'¡¡has¡¡done¡¡more¡¡than¡¡its¡¡share¡¡in¡¡creating¡¡bad¡¡feeling¡¡between¡¡England¡¡and¡¡the¡¡United¡¡States£»¡¨¡¡declared¡¡a¡¡Toronto¡¡newspaper£»¡¡¡¨and¡¡would¡¡have¡¡liked¡¡to¡¡see¡¡the¡¡Canadians¡¡take¡¡up¡¡the¡¡quarrel¡¡which¡¡it¡¡has¡¡raised¡¡¡£¡¡¡£¡¡¡£¡¡¡£¡¡We¡¡have¡¡no¡¡idea¡¡of¡¡Canada¡¡being¡¡made¡¡a¡¡victim¡¡of¡¡the¡¡Jefferson¡¡Bricks¡¡on¡¡either¡¡side¡¡of¡¡the¡¡Atlantic¡£¡¨
The¡¡question¡¡of¡¡defense¡¡fell¡¡into¡¡the¡¡background¡¡when¡¡the¡¡war¡¡ended¡¡and¡¡the¡¡armies¡¡of¡¡the¡¡Union¡¡went¡¡back¡¡to¡¡their¡¡farms¡¡and¡¡shops¡£¡¡But¡¡the¡¡discussion¡¡left¡¡in¡¡the¡¡minds¡¡of¡¡most¡¡Englishmen¡¡the¡¡belief¡¡that¡¡the¡¡possession¡¡of¡¡such¡¡colonies¡¡was¡¡a¡¡doubtful¡¡blessing¡£¡¡Manchester¡¡men¡¡like¡¡Bright£»¡¡Liberals¡¡like¡¡Gladstone¡¡and¡¡Cornewall¡¡Lewis£»¡¡Conservatives¡¡like¡¡Lowe¡¡and¡¡Disraeli£»¡¡all¡¡came¡¡to¡¡believe¡¡that¡¡separation¡¡was¡¡only¡¡a¡¡question¡¡of¡¡time¡£¡¡Yet¡¡honor¡¡made¡¡them¡¡hesitate¡¡to¡¡set¡¡the¡¡defenseless¡¡colonies¡¡adrift¡¡to¡¡be¡¡seized¡¡by¡¡the¡¡first¡¡hungry¡¡neighbor¡£
At¡¡this¡¡juncture¡¡the¡¡plans¡¡for¡¡uniting¡¡all¡¡the¡¡colonies¡¡in¡¡one¡¡great¡¡federation¡¡seemed¡¡to¡¡open¡¡a¡¡way¡¡out£»¡¡united£»¡¡the¡¡colonies¡¡could¡¡stand¡¡alone¡£¡¡Thus¡¡Confederation¡¡found¡¡support¡¡in¡¡Britain¡¡as¡¡well¡¡as¡¡a¡¡stimulus¡¡from¡¡the¡¡United¡¡States¡£¡¡This£»¡¡however£»¡¡was¡¡not¡¡enough¡£¡¡Confederation¡¡would¡¡not¡¡have¡¡come¡¡when¡¡it¡¡didand¡¡that¡¡might¡¡have¡¡meant¡¡it¡¡would¡¡never¡¡have¡¡come¡¡at¡¡allhad¡¡not¡¡party¡¡and¡¡sectional¡¡deadlock¡¡forced¡¡Canadian¡¡politicians¡¡to¡¡seek¡¡a¡¡remedy¡¡in¡¡a¡¡wider¡¡union¡£
At¡¡first¡¡all¡¡had¡¡gone¡¡well¡¡with¡¡the¡¡Union¡¡of¡¡1841¡£¡¡It¡¡did¡¡not¡¡take¡¡the¡¡politicians¡¡long¡¡to¡¡learn¡¡how¡¡to¡¡use¡¡the¡¡power¡¡that¡¡responsible¡¡government¡¡put¡¡into¡¡their¡¡hands¡£¡¡After¡¡Elgin's¡¡day¡¡the¡¡Governor¡¡General¡¡fell¡¡back¡¡into¡¡the¡¡role¡¡of¡¡constitutional¡¡monarch¡¡which¡¡cabinet¡¡control¡¡made¡¡easy¡¡for¡¡him¡£¡¡In¡¡the¡¡forties£»¡¡men¡¡had¡¡spoken¡¡of¡¡Sydenham¡¡and¡¡Bagot£»¡¡Metcalfe¡¡and¡¡Elgin£»¡¡in¡¡the¡¡fifties£»¡¡they¡¡spoke¡¡of¡¡Baldwin¡¡and¡¡La¡¡Fontaine£»¡¡Hincks¡¡and¡¡Macdonald¡¡and¡¡Cartier¡¡and¡¡Brown£»¡¡and¡¡less¡¡and¡¡less¡¡of¡¡the¡¡Governors¡¡in¡¡whose¡¡name¡¡these¡¡men¡¡ruled¡£¡¡Politics¡¡then¡¡attracted¡¡more¡¡of¡¡the¡¡country's¡¡ablest¡¡men¡¡than¡¡it¡¡does¡¡now£»¡¡and¡¡the¡¡party¡¡leaders¡¡included¡¡many¡¡who¡¡would¡¡have¡¡made¡¡their¡¡mark¡¡in¡¡any¡¡parliament¡¡in¡¡the¡¡world¡£¡¡Baldwin¡¡and¡¡La¡¡Fontaine£»¡¡united¡¡to¡¡the¡¡end£»¡¡resigned¡¡office¡¡in¡¡1851£»¡¡believing¡¡that¡¡they¡¡had¡¡played¡¡their¡¡part¡¡in¡¡establishing¡¡responsible¡¡government¡¡and¡¡feeling¡¡out¡¡of¡¡touch¡¡with¡¡the¡¡radical¡¡elements¡¡of¡¡their¡¡following¡¡who¡¡were¡¡demanding¡¡further¡¡change¡£¡¡Their¡¡place¡¡was¡¡taken¡¡in¡¡Canada¡¡West¡¡by¡¡Hincks£»¡¡an¡¡adroit¡¡tactician¡¡and¡¡a¡¡skilled¡¡financier£»¡¡intent¡¡on¡¡railway¡¡building¡¡and¡¡trade¡¡development£»¡¡and¡¡in¡¡Canada¡¡East¡¡by¡¡Morin£»¡¡a¡¡somewhat¡¡colorless¡¡lieutenant¡¡of¡¡La¡¡Fontaine¡£
But¡¡these¡¡leaders¡¡in¡¡turn¡¡soon¡¡gave¡¡way¡¡to¡¡new¡¡men£»¡¡and¡¡the¡¡political¡¡parties¡¡gradually¡¡fell¡¡into¡¡a