the soul of the far east(远东的灵魂)-第16章
按键盘上方向键 ← 或 → 可快速上下翻页，按键盘上的 Enter 键可回到本书目录页，按键盘上方向键 ↑ 可回到本页顶部！
————未阅读完？加入书签已便下次继续阅读！
as much importance as his social standing； I being beneath contempt； and
you above criticism。
Honorifics are used not only on all possible occasions for courtesy； but
at times； it would seem； upon impossible ones； for in some instances the
43
… Page 44…
The Soul of the Far East
most subtle diagnosis fails to reveal in them a relevancy to anybody。
That the commonest objects should bear titles because of their connection
with some particular person is comprehensible； but what excuse can be
made for a phrase like the following； 〃It respectfully does that the august
seat exists；〃 all of which simply means 〃is；〃 and may be applied to
anything； being the common wordin Japanese it is all one word nowfor
that apparently simple idea。 It would seem a sad waste of valuable
material。 The real reason why so much distinguished consideration is
shown the article in question lies in the fact that it is treated as existing
with reference to the person addressed； and therefore becomes ipso facto
august。
Here is a still subtler example。 You are； we will suppose； at a tea…
house； and you wish for sugar。 The following almost stereotyped
conversation is pretty sure to take place。 I translate it literally； simply
prefacing that every tea…house girl； usually in the first blush of youth； is
generically addressed as 〃elder sister；〃 another honorific； at least so
considered in Japan。
You clap your hands。 （Enter tea…house maiden。）
You。 Hai； elder sister； augustly exists there sugar？
The T。 H。 M。 The honorable sugar； augustly is it？
You。 So； augustly。
The T。 H。 M。 He （indescribable expression of assent）。 （Exit tea…
house maiden to fetch the sugar。）
Now； the 〃augustlies〃 go almost without saying； but why is the sugar
honorable？ Simply because it is eventually going to be offered to you。
But she would have spoken of it by precisely the same respectful title； if
she had been obliged to inform you that there was none； in which case it
never could have become yours。 Such is politeness。 We may note； in
passing； that all her remarks and all yours； barring your initial question；
meant absolutely nothing。 She understood you perfectly from the first； and
you knew she did； but then； if all of us were to say only what were
necessary； the delightful art of conversation would soon be nothing but a
science。
The average Far Oriental； indeed； talks as much to no purpose as his
44
… Page 45…
The Soul of the Far East
Western cousin； only in his chit…chat politeness replaces personalities。
With him； self is suppressed； and an ever…present regard for others is
substituted in its stead。
A lack of personality is； as we have seen； the occasion of this courtesy；
it is also its cause。
That politeness should be one of the most marked results of
impersonality may appear surprising； yet a slight examination will show it
to be a fact。 Looked at a posteriori； we find that where the one trait exists
the other is most developed； while an absence of the second seems to
prevent the full growth of the first。 This is true both in general and in
detail。 Courtesy increases； as we travel eastward round the world；
coincidently with a decrease in the sense of self。 Asia is more courteous
than Europe； Europe than America。 Particular races show the same
concomitance of characteristics。 France； the most impersonal nation of
Europe； is at the same time the most polite。
Considered a priori； the connection between the two is not far to seek。
Impersonality； by lessening the interest in one's self； induces one to take an
interest in others。 Introspection tends to make of man a solitary animal；
the absence of it a social one。 The more impersonal the people； the more
will the community supplant the individual in the popular estimation。
The type becomes the interesting thing to man； as it always is to nature。
Then； as the social desires develop； politeness； being the means to their
enjoyment； develops also。
A second omission in Japanese etymology is that of gender。 That
words should be credited with sex is a verbal anthropomorphism that
would seem to a Japanese exquisitely grotesque； if so be that it did not
strike him as actually immodest。 For the absence of gender is simply
symptomatic of a much more vital failing； a disregard of sex。 Originally；
as their language bears witness； the Japanese showed a childish reluctance
to recognizing sex at all。 Usually a single sexless term was held
sufficient for a given species； and did duty collectively for both sexes。
Only where a consideration of sex thrust itself upon them； beyond the
possibility of evasion； did they employ for the male and the female
distinctive expressions。 The more intimate the relation of the object to
45
… Page 46…
The Soul of the Far East
man； the more imperative the discriminating name。 Hence human beings
possessed a fair number of such special appellatives； for a man is a
palpably different sort of person from his grandmother； and a mother…in…
law from a wife。 But it is noteworthy that the artificial affinities of
society were as carefully differentiated as the distinctions due to sex； while
ancestral relationships were deemed more important than either。
Animals； though treated individually most humanely； are vouchsafed
but scant recognition on the score of sex。 With them； both sexes share
one common name； and commonly； indeed； this answers quite well
enough。 In those few instances where sex enters into the question in a
manner not to be ignored； particles denoting 〃male〃 or 〃female〃 are
prefixed to the general term。 How comparatively rare is the need of such
specification can be seen from the way in which； with us； in many species；
the name of one sex alone does duty indifferently for both。 That of the
male is the one usually selected； as in the case of the dog or horse。 If；
however； it be the female with which man has most to do； she is allowed
to bestow her name upon her male partner。 Examples of the latter
description occur in the use of 〃cows〃 for 〃cattle；〃 and 〃hens〃 for 〃fowls。〃
A Japanese can say only 〃fowl；〃 defined； if absolutely necessary； as 〃he…
fowl〃 or 〃she…fowl。〃
Now such a slighting of one of the most potent springs of human
action； sex； with all that the idea involves； is not due to a pronounced
misogynism on the part of these people； but to a much more effective
neglect； a great
