±´¿Çµç×ÓÊé > Ó¢ÎÄÔ­Öøµç×ÓÊé > abraham lincoln and the union >

µÚ1ÕÂ

abraham lincoln and the union-µÚ1ÕÂ

С˵£º abraham lincoln and the union ×ÖÊý£º ÿҳ4000×Ö

°´¼üÅÌÉÏ·½Ïò¼ü ¡û »ò ¡ú ¿É¿ìËÙÉÏÏ·­Ò³£¬°´¼üÅÌÉ쵀 Enter ¼ü¿É»Øµ½±¾ÊéĿ¼ҳ£¬°´¼üÅÌÉÏ·½Ïò¼ü ¡ü ¿É»Øµ½±¾Ò³¶¥²¿£¡
¡ª¡ª¡ª¡ªÎ´ÔĶÁÍꣿ¼ÓÈëÊéÇ©ÒѱãÏ´μÌÐøÔĶÁ£¡







Abraham¡¡Lincoln¡¡and¡¡the¡¡Union

A¡¡Chronicle¡¡of¡¡the¡¡Embattled¡¡North



by¡¡Nathaniel¡¡W¡£¡¡Stephenson







¡¡PREFACE

In¡¡spite¡¡of¡¡a¡¡lapse¡¡of¡¡sixty¡¡years£»¡¡the¡¡historian¡¡who¡¡attempts¡¡to¡¡portray¡¡the¡¡era¡¡of¡¡Lincoln¡¡is¡¡still¡¡faced¡¡with¡¡almost¡¡impossible¡¡demands¡¡and¡¡still¡¡confronted¡¡with¡¡arbitrary¡¡points¡¡of¡¡view¡£¡¡¡¡It¡¡is¡¡out¡¡of¡¡the¡¡question£»¡¡in¡¡a¡¡book¡¡so¡¡brief¡¡as¡¡this¡¡must¡¡necessarily¡¡be£»¡¡to¡¡meet¡¡all¡¡these¡¡demands¡¡or¡¡to¡¡alter¡¡these¡¡points¡¡of¡¡view¡£¡¡Interests¡¡that¡¡are¡¡purely¡¡local£»¡¡events¡¡that¡¡did¡¡not¡¡with¡¡certainty¡¡contribute¡¡to¡¡the¡¡final¡¡outcome£»¡¡gossip£»¡¡as¡¡well¡¡as¡¡the¡¡mere¡¡caprice¡¡of¡¡the¡¡scholarthese¡¡must¡¡obviously¡¡be¡¡set¡¡aside¡£

The¡¡task¡¡imposed¡¡upon¡¡the¡¡volume¡¡resolves¡¡itself£»¡¡at¡¡bottom£»¡¡into¡¡just¡¡two¡¡questions£º¡¡Why¡¡was¡¡there¡¡a¡¡war£¿¡¡Why¡¡was¡¡the¡¡Lincoln¡¡Government¡¡successful£¿¡¡With¡¡these¡¡two¡¡questions¡¡always¡¡in¡¡mind¡¡I¡¡have¡¡endeavored£»¡¡on¡¡the¡¡one¡¡hand£»¡¡to¡¡select¡¡and¡¡consolidate¡¡the¡¡pertinent¡¡facts£»¡¡on¡¡the¡¡other£»¡¡to¡¡make¡¡clear£»¡¡even¡¡at¡¡the¡¡cost¡¡of¡¡explanatory¡¡comment£»¡¡their¡¡relations¡¡in¡¡the¡¡historical¡¡sequence¡¡of¡¡cause¡¡and¡¡effect¡£¡¡¡¡This¡¡purpose¡¡has¡¡particularly¡¡governed¡¡the¡¡use¡¡of¡¡biographical¡¡matter£»¡¡in¡¡which¡¡the¡¡main¡¡illustration£»¡¡of¡¡course£»¡¡is¡¡the¡¡career¡¡of¡¡Lincoln¡£¡¡¡¡Prominent¡¡as¡¡it¡¡is¡¡here¡¡made£»¡¡the¡¡Lincoln¡¡matter¡¡all¡¡bears¡¡in¡¡the¡¡last¡¡analysis¡¡on¡¡one¡¡pointhis¡¡control¡¡of¡¡his¡¡support¡£¡¡¡¡On¡¡that¡¡the¡¡history¡¡of¡¡the¡¡North¡¡hinges¡£¡¡¡¡The¡¡personal¡¡and¡¡private¡¡Lincoln¡¡it¡¡is¡¡impossible¡¡to¡¡present¡¡within¡¡these¡¡pages¡£¡¡¡¡The¡¡public¡¡Lincoln£»¡¡including¡¡the¡¡character¡¡of¡¡his¡¡mind£»¡¡is¡¡here¡¡the¡¡essential¡¡matter¡£

The¡¡bibliography¡¡at¡¡the¡¡close¡¡of¡¡the¡¡volume¡¡indicates¡¡the¡¡more¡¡important¡¡books¡¡which¡¡are¡¡at¡¡the¡¡reader's¡¡disposal¡¡and¡¡which¡¡it¡¡is¡¡unfortunate¡¡not¡¡to¡¡know¡£

NATHANIEL¡¡W¡£¡¡STEPHENSON¡£¡¡Charleston£»¡¡S¡£¡¡C¡££»¡¡March£»¡¡1918¡£¡¡





I¡£¡¡THE¡¡TWO¡¡NATIONS¡¡OF¡¡THE¡¡REPUBLIC

II¡£¡¡THE¡¡PARTY¡¡OF¡¡POLITICAL¡¡EVASION

III¡£¡¡THE¡¡POLITICIANS¡¡AND¡¡THE¡¡NEW¡¡DAY

IV¡£¡¡THE¡¡CRISIS

V¡£¡¡SECESSION

VI¡£¡¡WAR

VII¡£¡¡LINCOLN

VIII¡£¡¡THE¡¡RULE¡¡OF¡¡LINCOLN

IX¡£¡¡THE¡¡CRUCIAL¡¡MATTER

X¡£¡¡THE¡¡SECRETARY¡¡OF¡¡THE¡¡TREASURY

XI¡£¡¡NORTHERN¡¡LIFE¡¡DURING¡¡THE¡¡WAR

XII¡£¡¡THE¡¡MEXICAN¡¡EPISODE

XIII¡£¡¡THE¡¡PLEBISCITE¡¡OF¡¡1864

XIV¡£¡¡LINCOLN'S¡¡FINAL¡¡INTENTIONS

BIBLIOGRAPHICAL¡¡NOTE



CHAPTER¡¡I

THE¡¡TWO¡¡NATIONS¡¡OF¡¡THE¡¡REPUBLIC


¡¨There¡¡is¡¡really¡¡no¡¡Union¡¡now¡¡between¡¡the¡¡North¡¡and¡¡the¡¡South¡£¡£¡£¡£¡¡No¡¡two¡¡nations¡¡upon¡¡earth¡¡entertain¡¡feelings¡¡of¡¡more¡¡bitter¡¡rancor¡¡toward¡¡each¡¡other¡¡than¡¡these¡¡two¡¡nations¡¡of¡¡the¡¡Republic¡£¡¨

This¡¡remark£»¡¡which¡¡is¡¡attributed¡¡to¡¡Senator¡¡Benjamin¡¡Wade¡¡of¡¡Ohio£»¡¡provides¡¡the¡¡key¡¡to¡¡American¡¡politics¡¡in¡¡the¡¡decade¡¡following¡¡the¡¡Compromise¡¡of¡¡1850¡£¡¡¡¡To¡¡trace¡¡this¡¡division¡¡of¡¡the¡¡people¡¡to¡¡its¡¡ultimate¡¡source£»¡¡one¡¡would¡¡have¡¡to¡¡go¡¡far¡¡back¡¡into¡¡colonial¡¡times¡£¡¡There¡¡was¡¡a¡¡process¡¡of¡¡natural¡¡selection¡¡at¡¡work£»¡¡in¡¡the¡¡intellectual¡¡and¡¡economic¡¡conditions¡¡of¡¡the¡¡eighteenth

century£»¡¡which¡¡inevitably¡¡drew¡¡together¡¡certain¡¡types¡¡and¡¡generated¡¡certain¡¡forces¡£¡¡¡¡This¡¡process¡¡manifested¡¡itself¡¡in¡¡one¡¡form¡¡in¡¡His¡¡Majesty's¡¡plantations¡¡of¡¡the¡¡North£»¡¡and¡¡in¡¡another¡¡in¡¡those¡¡of¡¡the¡¡South¡£¡¡¡¡As¡¡early¡¡as¡¡the¡¡opening¡¡of¡¡the¡¡nineteenth¡¡century£»¡¡the¡¡social¡¡tendencies¡¡of¡¡the¡¡two¡¡regions¡¡were¡¡already¡¡so¡¡far¡¡alienated¡¡that¡¡they¡¡involved¡¡differences¡¡which¡¡would¡¡scarcely¡¡admit¡¡of¡¡reconciliation¡£¡¡¡¡It¡¡is¡¡a¡¡truism¡¡to¡¡say¡¡that¡¡these¡¡differences¡¡gradually¡¡were¡¡concentrated¡¡around¡¡fundamentally¡¡different¡¡conceptions¡¡of¡¡laborof¡¡slave¡¡labor¡¡in¡¡the¡¡South£»¡¡of¡¡free¡¡labor¡¡in¡¡the¡¡North¡£

Nothing£»¡¡however£»¡¡could¡¡be¡¡more¡¡fallacious¡¡than¡¡the¡¡notion¡¡that¡¡this¡¡growing¡¡antagonism¡¡was¡¡controlled¡¡by¡¡any¡¡deliberate¡¡purpose¡¡in¡¡either¡¡part¡¡of¡¡the¡¡country¡£¡¡¡¡It¡¡was¡¡apparently¡¡necessary¡¡that¡¡this¡¡Republic¡¡in¡¡its¡¡evolution¡¡should¡¡proceed¡¡from¡¡confederation¡¡to¡¡nationality¡¡through¡¡an¡¡intermediate¡¡and¡¡apparently¡¡reactionary¡¡period¡¡of¡¡sectionalism¡£¡¡¡¡In¡¡this¡¡stage¡¡of¡¡American¡¡history£»¡¡slavery¡¡was¡¡without¡¡doubt¡¡one¡¡of¡¡the¡¡prime¡¡factors¡¡involved£»¡¡but¡¡sectional¡¡consciousness£»¡¡with¡¡all¡¡its¡¡emotional¡¡and¡¡psychological¡¡implications£»¡¡was¡¡the¡¡fundamental¡¡impulse¡¡of¡¡the¡¡stern¡¡events¡¡which¡¡occurred¡¡between¡¡1850¡¡and¡¡1865¡£

By¡¡the¡¡middle¡¡of¡¡the¡¡nineteenth¡¡century¡¡the¡¡more¡¡influential¡¡Southerners¡¡had¡¡come¡¡generally¡¡to¡¡regard¡¡their¡¡section¡¡of¡¡the¡¡country¡¡as¡¡a¡¡distinct¡¡social¡¡unit¡£¡¡¡¡The¡¡next¡¡step¡¡was¡¡inevitable¡£¡¡The¡¡South¡¡began¡¡to¡¡regard¡¡itself¡¡as¡¡a¡¡separate¡¡political¡¡unit¡£¡¡¡¡It¡¡is¡¡the¡¡distinction¡¡of¡¡Calhoun¡¡that¡¡he¡¡showed¡¡himself¡¡toward¡¡the¡¡end¡¡sufficiently¡¡flexible¡¡to¡¡become¡¡the¡¡exponent¡¡of¡¡this¡¡new¡¡political¡¡impulse¡£¡¡¡¡With¡¡all¡¡his¡¡earlier¡¡fire¡¡he¡¡encouraged¡¡the¡¡Southerners¡¡to¡¡withdraw¡¡from¡¡the¡¡so¡­called¡¡national¡¡parties£»¡¡Whig¡¡and¡¡Democratic£»¡¡to¡¡establish¡¡instead¡¡a¡¡single¡¡Southern¡¡party£»¡¡and¡¡to¡¡formulate£»¡¡by¡¡means¡¡of¡¡popular¡¡conventions£»¡¡a¡¡single¡¡concerted¡¡policy¡¡for¡¡the¡¡entire¡¡South¡£

At¡¡that¡¡time¡¡such¡¡a¡¡policy¡¡was¡¡still¡¡regarded£»¡¡from¡¡the¡¡Southern¡¡point¡¡of¡¡view£»¡¡as¡¡a¡¡radical¡¡idea¡£¡¡¡¡In¡¡1851£»¡¡a¡¡battle¡¡was¡¡fought¡¡at¡¡the¡¡polls¡¡between¡¡the¡¡two¡¡Southern¡¡ideasthe¡¡old¡¡one¡¡which¡¡upheld¡¡separate¡¡state¡¡independence£»¡¡and¡¡the¡¡new¡¡one¡¡which¡¡virtually¡¡acknowledged¡¡Southern¡¡nationality¡£¡¡¡¡The¡¡issue¡¡at¡¡stake¡¡was¡¡the¡¡acceptance¡¡or¡¡the¡¡rejection¡¡of¡¡a¡¡compromise¡¡which¡¡could¡¡bring¡¡no¡¡permanent¡¡settlement¡¡of¡¡fundamental¡¡differences¡£

Nowhere¡¡was¡¡the¡¡battle¡¡more¡¡interesting¡¡than¡¡in¡¡South¡¡Carolina£»¡¡for¡¡it¡¡brought¡¡into¡¡clear¡¡light¡¡that¡¡powerful¡¡Southern¡¡leader¡¡who¡¡ten¡¡years¡¡later¡¡was¡¡to¡¡be¡¡the¡¡masterspirit¡¡of¡¡secessionRobert¡¡Barnwell¡¡Rhett¡£¡¡¡¡In¡¡1851¡¡he¡¡fought¡¡hard¡¡to¡¡revive¡¡the¡¡older¡¡idea¡¡of¡¡state¡¡independence¡¡and¡¡to¡¡carry¡¡South¡¡Carolina¡¡as¡¡a¡¡separate¡¡state¡¡out¡¡of¡¡the¡¡Union¡£¡¡¡¡Accordingly¡¡it¡¡is¡¡significant¡¡of¡¡the¡¡progress¡¡that¡¡the¡¡consolidation¡¡of¡¡the¡¡South¡¡had¡¡made¡¡at¡¡this¡¡date¡¡that¡¡on¡¡this¡¡issue¡¡Rhett¡¡encountered¡¡general¡¡opposition¡£¡¡¡¡This¡¡difference¡¡of¡¡opinion¡¡as¡¡to¡¡policy¡¡was¡¡not¡¡inspired£»¡¡as¡¡some¡¡historians¡¡have¡¡too¡¡hastily¡¡concluded£»¡¡by¡¡national¡¡feeling¡£¡¡Scarcely¡¡any¡¡of¡¡the¡¡leaders¡¡of¡¡the¡¡opposition¡¡considered¡¡the¡¡Federal¡¡Government¡¡supreme¡¡over¡¡the¡¡State¡¡Government¡£¡¡¡¡They¡¡opposed¡¡Rhett¡¡because¡¡they¡¡felt¡¡secession¡¡to¡¡be¡¡at¡¡that¡¡moment¡¡bad¡¡policy¡£¡¡¡¡They¡¡saw¡¡that£»¡¡if¡¡South¡¡Carolina¡¡went¡¡out¡¡of¡¡the¡¡Union¡¡in¡¡1851£»¡¡she¡¡would¡¡go¡¡alone¡¡and¡¡the¡¡solidarity¡¡of¡¡the¡¡South¡¡would¡¡be¡¡broken¡£¡¡¡¡They¡¡were¡¡not¡¡lacking¡¡in¡¡sectional¡¡patriotism£»¡¡but¡¡their¡¡conception¡¡of¡¡the¡¡best¡¡solution¡¡of¡¡the¡¡complex¡¡problem¡¡differed¡¡from¡¡that¡¡advocated¡¡by¡¡Rhett¡£¡¡¡¡Their¡¡position¡¡was¡¡summed¡¡up¡¡by¡¡Langdon¡¡Cheves¡¡when¡¡he¡¡said£»¡¡¡¨To¡¡secede¡¡now¡¡is¡¡to¡¡secede¡¡from¡¡the¡¡South¡¡as¡¡well¡¡as¡¡from¡¡the¡¡Union¡£¡¨¡¡¡¡On¡¡the¡¡basis¡¡of¡¡this¡¡belief¡¡they¡¡defeated¡¡Rhett¡¡and¡¡put¡¡off¡¡secession¡¡for¡¡ten¡¡years¡£

There¡¡is¡¡no¡¡analogous¡¡single¡¡event¡¡in¡¡the¡¡history¡¡of¡¡the¡¡North£»¡¡previous¡¡to¡¡the¡¡war£»¡¡which¡¡reveals¡¡with¡¡similar¡¡clearness¡¡a¡¡sectional¡¡consciousness¡£¡¡¡¡On¡¡the¡¡surface¡¡the¡¡life¡¡of¡¡the¡¡people¡¡seemed£»¡¡indeed£»¡¡to¡¡belie¡¡the¡¡existence¡¡of¡¡any¡¡such¡¡feeling¡£¡¡¡¡The¡¡Northern¡¡capitalist¡¡class¡¡aimed¡¡steadily¡¡at¡¡being¡¡non¡­sectional£»¡¡and¡¡it¡¡made¡¡free¡¡use¡¡of¡¡the¡¡word¡¡national¡£¡¡¡¡We¡¡must¡¡not¡¡forget£»¡¡however£»¡¡that¡¡all¡¡sorts¡¡of¡¡people¡¡talked¡¡of¡¡national¡¡institutions£»¡¡and¡¡that¡¡the¡¡term£»¡¡until¡¡we¡¡look¡¡closely¡¡into¡¡the¡¡mind¡¡of£»¡¡the¡¡person¡¡using¡¡it£»¡¡signifies¡¡nothing¡£¡¡¡¡Because¡¡the¡¡Northern¡¡capitalist¡¡repudiated¡¡the¡¡idea¡¡of¡¡sectionalism£»¡¡it¡¡does¡¡not¡¡follow¡¡that¡¡he¡¡set¡¡up¡¡any¡¡other¡¡in¡¡its¡¡place¡£¡¡¡¡Instead¡¡of¡¡accomplishing¡¡anything¡¡so¡¡positive£»¡¡he¡¡remained¡¡for¡¡the¡¡most¡¡part¡¡a¡¡negative¡¡quantity¡£

Living¡¡usually¡¡somewhere¡¡between¡¡Maine¡¡and¡¡Ohio£»¡¡he¡¡made¡¡it¡¡his¡¡chief¡¡purpose¡¡to¡¡regulate¡¡the¡¡outflow¡¡of¡¡manufactures¡¡from¡¡that¡¡industrial¡¡region¡¡and¡¡the¡¡inflow¡¡of¡¡agricultural¡¡produce¡£¡¡¡¡The¡¡movement¡¡of¡¡the¡¡latter¡¡eastward¡¡and¡¡northward£»¡¡and¡¡the¡¡former¡¡westward¡¡and¡¡southward£»¡¡represents¡¡roughly¡¡but¡¡graphically¡¡the¡¡movement¡¡of¡¡the¡¡business¡¡of¡¡that¡¡time¡£¡¡¡¡The¡¡Easterner¡¡lived¡¡in¡¡fear¡¡of¡¡losing¡¡the¡¡money¡¡which¡¡was¡¡owed¡¡him¡¡in¡¡the¡¡South¡£¡¡¡¡As¡¡the¡¡political¡¡and¡¡economic¡¡conditions¡¡of¡¡the¡¡day¡¡made¡¡unlikely¡¡any¡¡serious¡¡clash¡¡of¡¡interest¡¡between¡¡the¡¡East¡¡and¡¡the¡¡West£»¡¡he¡¡had¡¡little¡¡solicitude¡¡about¡¡his¡¡accounts¡¡beyond¡¡the¡¡Alleghanies¡£¡¡¡¡But¡¡a¡¡gradually¡¡developing¡¡hostility¡¡between¡¡North¡¡and¡¡South¡¡was¡¡accompanied¡¡by¡¡a¡¡parallel¡¡anxiety¡¡on¡¡the¡¡part¡¡of¡¡Northern¡¡capital¡¡for¡¡its¡¡Southern¡¡investments¡¡and¡¡debts¡£¡¡¡¡When¡¡the¡¡war¡¡eventually¡¡became¡¡inevitable£»¡¡200£»000£»000¡¡were¡¡owed¡¡by¡¡Southerners¡¡to¡¡Northerners¡£¡¡¡¡For¡¡those¡¡days¡¡this¡¡was¡¡an¡¡indebtedness¡¡of¡¡no¡¡inconsiderable¡¡magnitude¡£¡¡¡¡The¡¡Northern¡¡capitalists£»¡¡preoccupied¡¡with¡¡their¡¡desire¡¡

·µ»ØĿ¼ ÏÂÒ»Ò³ »Øµ½¶¥²¿ ÔÞ£¨0£© ²È£¨0£©

Äã¿ÉÄÜϲ»¶µÄ