贝壳电子书 > 英文原著电子书 > history of the impeachment of andrew johnson >

第31章

history of the impeachment of andrew johnson-第31章

小说: history of the impeachment of andrew johnson 字数: 每页4000字

按键盘上方向键 ← 或 → 可快速上下翻页,按键盘上的 Enter 键可回到本书目录页,按键盘上方向键 ↑ 可回到本页顶部!
————未阅读完?加入书签已便下次继续阅读!



with the settled and uniform practice of each and every President of the United States; the said Stanton then became; and so long as he should continue to hold the said office of Secretary for the Department of War must continue to be; one of the advisers of the President of the United States; as well as the person intrusted to act for and represent the President in matters enjoined upon him or entrusted to him by the President touching the department aforesaid; and for whose conduct in such capacity; subordinate to the President; the President is; by the Constitution and laws of the United States; made responsible。

And this respondent; further answering; says he succeeded to the office of President of the United States upon; and by reason of; the death of Abraham Lincoln; then President of the United States; on the 13th day of April; 1865; and the said Stanton was then holding the said office of Secretary for the Department of War under and by reason of the appointment and commission aforesaid; and; not having been removed from the said office by this respondent; the said Stanton continued to hold the same under the appointment and commission aforesaid; at the pleasure of the President; until the time hereinafter particularly mentioned: and at no time received any appointment or commission save as above detailed。

And this repondent; further answering; says that on and prior to the 5th day of August; A。 D。 1867; this respondent; the President of the United States。 responsible for the conduct of the Secretary for the Department of War; and having the constitutional right to resort to and rely upon the person holding that office for advice concerning the great and difficult public duties enjoined on the President by the Constitution and laws of the United States; became satisfied that he could not allow the said Stanton to continue to hold the office of Secretary for the Department of War without hazard of the public interest; that the relations between the said Stanton and the President no longer permitted the President to resort to him for advice; or to be; in the judgment of the President; safely responsible for his conduct of the affairs of the Department of War; as by law required; in accordance with the orders and instructions of the President; and thereupon; by force of the Constitution and laws of the United States; which devolve on the President the power and the duty to control the conduct of the business of that executive department of the government; and by reason of the constitutional duty of the President to take care that the laws be faithfully executed; this respondent did necessarily consider and did determine that the said Stanton ought no longer to hold the said office of Secretary for the Department of War。 And this respondent; by virtue of the power and authority vested in him as President of the United States by the Constitution and laws of the United States; to give effect to such his decision and determination; did; on the 5th day of August; A。 D。 1867; address to the said Stanton a note; of which the following is a true copy:

Sir:Public considerations of a high character constrain me to say that your resignation as Secretary of War will be accepted。

To which note the said Stanton made the following reply:

War Department; Washington; August 5; 1867。

Sir:…Your note of this day has been received; stating that public considerations of a high character constrain you 〃to say that my resignation its Secretary of War will be accepted。〃

In reply I have the honor to say that public considerations of a high character; which alone have induced me to continue at the head of this department; constrain me not to resign the office of Secretary of War before the next meeting of Congress。

Very respectfully yours。 Edwin M。 Stanton。


This respondent; as President of the United States; was thereon of opinion that; having regard to the necessary official relations and duties of the Secretary for the Department of War to the President of the United States according to the Constitution and laws of the United States; and having regard to the responsibility of the President for the conduct of the said Secretary; and having regard to the permanent executive authority of the office which the respondent holds under the Constitution and laws of the United States; it was impossible; consistently with the public interests; to allow the said Stanton to continue to hold the said office of Secretary for the Department of War; and it then became the official duty of the respondent; as President of the United States; to consider and decide what act or acts should and might lawfully be done by him; as President of the United States; to cause the said Stanton to surrender the said office。

This respondent was informed and verily believed that it was practically settled by the first Congress of the United States; and had been so considered and uniformly and in great numbers of instances acted on by each Congress and President of the United States; in succession; from President Washington to; and including President Lincoln; and from the first Congress to the thirty…ninth Congress; that the Constitution of the United States conferred on the President; as part of the executive power and as one of the necessary means and instruments of performing the executive duty expressly imposed on him by the Constitution of taking care that the laws be faithfully executed; the power at any and all times of removing from office all executive officers for cause to be judged of by the President alone。 This respondent had; in pursuance of the Constitution; required the opinion of each principal officer of the executive departments; upon this question of constitutional executive power and duty; and had been advised by each of them; including the said Stanton; Secretary for the Department of War; that under the Constitution of the United States this power was lodged by the Constitution in the President of the United States; and that consequently; it could be lawfully exercised by him; and the Congress could not deprive him thereof; and this respondent; in his capacity of President of the United States; and because in that capacity he was both enabled and bound to use his best judgment upon this question; did。 in good faith and with an earnest desire to arrive at the truth; come to the conclusion and opinion; and did make the same known to the honorable the Senate of the United States by a message dated on the 2nd day of March; 1867; that the power last mentioned was conferred and the duty of exercising it; in fit cases; was imposed on the President by the Constitution of the United States; and that the President could not be deprived of this; power or relieved of this duty; nor could the same be vested by law in the President and the Senate jointly; either in part or whole。

This respondent was also then aware that by the first section of 〃An act regulating the tenure of certain civil offices;〃 passed March 2; 1867; by a constitutional majority of both houses of Congress; it was enacted as follows:

〃That every person holding any civil office to which he has been appointed by and with the advice and consent of the Senate; and every person who shall hereafter be appointed to any such office; and shall become duly qualified to act therein; is and shall be entitled to hold such office until a successor shall have been in like manner appointed and duly qualified; except as herein otherwise provided: Provided; That the Secretaries of State; of the Treasury; of War; of the Navy; and of the Interior; the Postmaster General; and the Attorney General shall hold their offices respectively for and during the term of the President by whom they may have been appointed; and one month thereafter; subject to removal by and with the advice and consent of the Senate。〃

This respondent was also aware that this act was understood and intended to be an expression of the opinion of the Congress by which that act was passed; that the power to remove executive officers for cause might; by law; be taken from the President and vested in him and the Senate jointly; and although this respondent had arrived at and still retained the opinion above expressed; and ver

返回目录 上一页 下一页 回到顶部 0 0

你可能喜欢的