areopagitica-第2章
按键盘上方向键 ← 或 → 可快速上下翻页,按键盘上的 Enter 键可回到本书目录页,按键盘上方向键 ↑ 可回到本页顶部!
————未阅读完?加入书签已便下次继续阅读!
primely to the discouragement of all learning; and the stop of
truth; not only by disexercising and blunting our abilities in what
we know already; but by hindering and cropping the discovery that
might be yet further made both in religious and civil wisdom。
I deny not; but that it is of greatest concernment in the Church
and Commonwealth; to have a vigilant eye how books demean
themselves as well as men; and thereafter to confine; imprison; and
do sharpest justice on them as malefactors。 For books are not
absolutely dead things; but do contain a potency of life in them to
be as active as that soul was whose progeny they are; nay; they do
preserve as in a vial the purest efficacy and extraction of that
living intellect that bred them。 I know they are as lively; and as
vigorously productive; as those fabulous dragon's teeth; and being
sown up and down; may chance to spring up armed men。 And yet; on
the other hand; unless wariness be used; as good almost kill a man
as kill a good book。 Who kills a man kills a reasonable creature;
God's image; but he who destroys a good book; kills reason itself;
kills the image of God; as it were in the eye。 Many a man lives a
burden to the earth; but a good book is the precious life…blood of
a master spirit; embalmed and treasured up on purpose to a life
beyond life。 'Tis true; no age can restore a life; whereof perhaps
there is no great loss; and revolutions of ages do not oft recover
the loss of a rejected truth; for the want of which whole nations
fare the worse。
We should be wary therefore what persecution we raise against
the living labours of public men; how we spill that seasoned life
of man; preserved and stored up in books; since we see a kind of
homicide may be thus committed; sometimes a martyrdom; and if it
extend to the whole impression; a kind of massacre; whereof the
execution ends not in the slaying of an elemental life; but strikes
at that ethereal and fifth essence; the breath of reason itself;
slays an immortality rather than a life。 But lest I should be
condemned of introducing license; while I oppose licensing; I
refuse not the pains to be so much historical; as will serve to
show what hath been done by ancient and famous commonwealths
against this disorder; till the very time that this project of
licensing crept out of the Inquisition; was catched up by our
prelates; and hath caught some of our presbyters。
In Athens; where books and wits were ever busier than in any
other part of Greece; I find but only two sorts of writings which
the magistrate cared to take notice of; those either blasphemous
and atheistical; or libellous。 Thus the books of Protagoras were
by the judges of Areopagus commanded to be burnt; and himself
banished the territory for a discourse begun with his confessing
not to know WHETHER THERE WERE GODS; OR WHETHER NOT。 And
against defaming; it was decreed that none should be traduced by
name; as was the manner of Vetus Comoedia; whereby we may guess how
they censured libelling。 And this course was quick enough; as
Cicero writes; to quell both the desperate wits of other atheists;
and the open way of defaming; as the event showed。 Of other sects
and opinions; though tending to voluptuousness; and the denying of
divine Providence; they took no heed。
Therefore we do not read that either Epicurus; or that libertine
school of Cyrene; or what the Cynic impudence uttered; was ever
questioned by the laws。 Neither is it recorded that the writings
of those old comedians were suppressed; though the acting of them
were forbid; and that Plato commended the reading of Aristophanes;
the loosest of them all; to his royal scholar Dionysius; is
commonly known; and may be excused; if holy Chrysostom; as is
reported; nightly studied so much the same author and had the art
to cleanse a scurrilous vehemence into the style of a rousing
sermon。
That other leading city of Greece; Lacedaemon; considering that
Lycurgus their lawgiver was so addicted to elegant learning; as to
have been the first that brought out of Ionia the scattered works
of Homer; and sent the poet Thales from Crete to prepare and
mollify the Spartan surliness with his smooth songs and odes; the
better to plant among them law and civility; it is to be wondered
how museless and unbookish they were; minding nought but the feats
of war。 There needed no licensing of books among them; for they
disliked all but their own laconic apophthegms; and took a slight
occasion to chase Archilochus out of their city; perhaps for
composing in a higher strain than their own soldierly ballads and
roundels could reach to。 Or if it were for his broad verses; they
were not therein so cautious but they were as dissolute in their
promiscuous conversing; whence Euripides affirms in Andromache;
that their women were all unchaste。 Thus much may give us light
after what sort of books were prohibited among the Greeks。
The Romans also; for many ages trained up only to a military
roughness resembling most the Lacedaemonian guise; knew of learning
little but what their twelve Tables; and the Pontific College with
their augurs and flamens taught them in religion and law; so
unacquainted with other learning; that when Carneades and
Critolaus; with the Stoic Diogenes; coming ambassadors to Rome;
took thereby occasion to give the city a taste of their philosophy;
they were suspected for seducers by no less a man than Cato the
Censor; who moved it in the Senate to dismiss them speedily; and to
banish all such Attic babblers out of Italy。 But Scipio and others
of the noblest senators withstood him and his old Sabine austerity;
honoured and admired the men; and the censor himself at last; in
his old age; fell to the study of that whereof before he was so
scrupulous。 And yet at the same time Naevius and Plautus; the
first Latin comedians; had filled the city with all the borrowed
scenes of Menander and Philemon。 Then began to be considered there
also what was to be done to libellous books and authors; for
Naevius was quickly cast into prison for his unbridled pen; and
released by the tribunes upon his recantation; we read also that
libels were burnt; and the makers punished by Augustus。 The like
severity; no doubt; was used; if aught were impiously written
against their esteemed gods。 Except in these two points; how the
world went in books; the magistrate kept no reckoning。
And therefore Lucretius without impeachment versifies his
Epicurism to Memmius; and had the honour to be set forth the second
time by Cicero; so great a father of the Commonwealth; although
himself disputes against that opinion in his own writings。 Nor was
the satirical sharpness or naked plainness of Lucilius; or
Catullus; or Flaccus; by any order prohibited。 And for matters of
state; the story of Titus Livius; though it extolled that part
which Pompey held; was not therefore suppressed by Octavius Caesar
of the other faction。 But that Naso was by him banished in his old
age; for the wanton poems of his youth; was but a mere covert of
state over some secret cause: and besides; the books were neither
banished nor called in。 From hence we shall meet with little else
but tyranny in the Roman empire; that we may not marvel; if not so
often bad as good books were silenced。 I shall therefore deem to
have been large enough; in producing what among the ancients was
punishable to write; save only which; all other arguments were free
to treat on。
By this time the emperors were become Christians; whose
discipline in this point I do not find to have been more severe
than what was formerly in practice。 The books of those whom they
took to be grand heretics were examined; refuted; and condemned in
the general Councils; and not till then were prohibited; or burnt;
by authority of the emperor。 As for the writings of heathen
authors; unless they were plain invectives against Chr