north america-1-第3章
按键盘上方向键 ← 或 → 可快速上下翻页，按键盘上的 Enter 键可回到本书目录页，按键盘上方向键 ↑ 可回到本页顶部！
————未阅读完？加入书签已便下次继续阅读！
〃 That； I say； was not a very noble idea； but it was natural enough； and certainly has done somewhat in mitigating that grief which the horrors of civil war and the want of cotton have caused to us in England。 Such certainly had been my belief as to the country。 I speak here of my opinion as to the ultimate success of secession and the folly of the war； repudiating any concurrence of my own in the ignoble but natural sentiment alluded to in the last paragraph。 I certainly did think that the Northern States； if wise； would have let the Southern States go。 I had blamed Buchanan as a traitor for allowing the germ of secession to make any growth； and as I thought him a traitor then； so do I think him a traitor now。 But I had also blamed Lincoln； or rather the government of which Mr。 Lincoln in this matter is no more than the exponent； for his efforts to avoid that which is inevitable。 In this I think that Ior as I believe I may say we； we Englishmenwere wrong。 I do not see how the North； treated as it was and had been； could have submitted to secession without resistance。 We all remember what Shakspeare says of the great armies which were led out to fight for a piece of ground not large enough to cover the bodies of those who would be slain in the battle； but I do not remember that Shakspeare says that the battle was on this account necessarily unreasonable。 It is the old point of honor which； till it had been made absurd by certain changes of circumstances； was always grand and usually beneficent。 These changes of circumstances have altered the manner in which appeal may be made； but have not altered the point of honor。 Had the Southern States sought to obtain secession by constitutional means； they might or might not have been successful； but if successful； there would have been no war。 I do not mean to brand all the Southern States with treason； nor do I intend to say that； having secession at heart； they could have obtained it by constitutional means。 But I do intend to say that； acting as they did； demanding secession not constitutionally； but in opposition to the constitution； taking upon themselves the right of breaking up a nationality of which they formed only a part； and doing that without consent of the other part； opposition from the North and war was an inevitable consequence。 It is； I think； only necessary to look back to the Revolution by which the United States separated themselves from England to see this。 There is hardly to be met； here and there； an Englishman who now regrets the loss of the revolted American colonies； who now thinks that civilization was retarded and the world injured by that revolt； who now conceives that England should have expended more treasure and more lives in the hope of retaining those colonies。 It is agreed that the revolt was a good thing； that those who were then rebels became patriots by success； and that they deserved well of all coming ages of mankind。 But not the less absolutely necessary was it that England should endeavor to hold her own。 She was as the mother bird when the young bird will fly alone。 She suffered those pangs which Nature calls upon mothers to endure。 As was the necessity of British opposition to American independence； so was the necessity of Northern opposition to Southern secession。 I do not say that in other respects the two cases were parallel。 The States separated from us because they would not endure taxation without representationin other words； because they were old enough and big enough to go alone。 The South is seceding from the North because the two are not homogeneous。 They have different instincts； different appetites； different morals； and a different culture。 It is well for one man to say that slavery has caused the separation； and for another to say that slavery has not caused it。 Each in so saying speaks the truth。 Slavery has caused it； seeing that slavery is the great point on which the two have agreed to differ。 But slavery has not caused it； seeing that other points of difference are to be found in every circumstance and feature of the two people。 The North and the South must ever be dissimilar。 In the North labor will always be honorable； and because honorable； successful。 In the South labor has ever been servileat least in some senseand therefore dishonorable； and because dishonorable； has not； to itself； been successful。 In the South； I say； labor ever has been dishonorable； and I am driven to confess that I have not hitherto seen a sign of any change in the Creator's fiat on this matter。 That labor will be honorable all the world over as years advance and the millennium draws nigh； I for one never doubt。 So much for English opinion about America in August last。 And now I will venture to say a word or two as to American feeling respecting this English opinion at that period。 It will of course be remembered by all my readers that； at the beginning of the war； Lord Russell； who was then in the lower house； declared； as Foreign Secretary of State； that England would regard the North and South as belligerents； and would remain neutral as to both of them。 This declaration gave violent offense to the North； and has been taken as indicating British sympathy with the cause of the seceders。 I am not going to explainindeed； it would be necessary that I should first understandthe laws of nations with regard to blockaded ports； privateering； ships and men and goods contraband of war； and all those semi…nautical； semi…military rules and axioms which it is necessary that all attorneys…general and such like should； at the present moment； have at their fingers' end。 But it must be evident to the most ignorant in those matters； among which large crowd I certainly include myself； that it was essentially necessary that Lord John Russell should at that time declare openly what England intended to do。 It was essential that our seamen should know where they would be protected and where not； and that the course to be taken by England should be defined。 Reticence in the matter was not within the power of the British government。 It behooved the Foreign Secretary of State to declare openly that England intended to side either with one party or with the other； or else to remain neutral between them。 I had heard this matter discussed by Americans before I left England； and I have of course heard it discussed very frequently in America。 There can be no doubt that the front of the offense given by England to the Northern States was this declaration of Lord John Russell's。 But it has been always made evident to me that the sin did not consist in the fact of England's neutralityin the fact of her regarding the two parties as belligerentsbut in the open declaration made to the world by a Secretary of State that she did intend so to regard them。 If another proof were wanting； this would afford another proof of the immense weight attached in America to all the proceedings and to all the feelings of England on this matter。 The very anger of the North is a compliment paid by the North to England。 But not the less is that anger unreasonable。 To those in America who understand our constitution； it must be evident that our government cannot take official measures without a public avowal of such measures。 France can do so。 Russia can do so。 The government of the United States can do so； and could do so even before this rupture。 But the government of England cannot do so。 All men connected with the government in England have felt themselves from time to time more or less hampered by the necessity of publicity。 Our statesmen have been forced to fight their battles with the plan of their tactics open before their adversaries。 But we in England are inclined to believe that the general result is good； and that battles so fought and so won will be fought with the honestest blows and won with the surest results。 Reticence in this matter was not possible； and Lord John Russell； in making the open avowal which gave such offense to the Northern States； only did that which； as a servant of England； England required him to do。 〃What would you in England have thought；〃 a gentleman of much weight in Boston said to me； 〃if； when you were in trouble in
