a history of science-1-第47章
按键盘上方向键 ← 或 → 可快速上下翻页,按键盘上的 Enter 键可回到本书目录页,按键盘上方向键 ↑ 可回到本页顶部!
————未阅读完?加入书签已便下次继续阅读!
e sun (reversing the point of view in accordance with modern discoveries) does lie at one focus of the earth's elliptical orbit; and therefore away from the physical centre of that orbit; in other words; the observations of Hipparchus were absolutely accurate。 He was quite correct in finding that the sun spends more time on one side of the equator than on the other。 When; therefore; he estimated the relative distance of the earth from the geometrical centre of the sun's supposed circular orbit; and spoke of this as the measure of the sun's eccentricity; he propounded a theory in which true data of observation were curiously mingled with a positively inverted theory。 That the theory of Hipparchus was absolutely consistent with all the facts of this particular observation is the best evidence that could be given of the difficulties that stood in the way of a true explanation of the mechanism of the heavens。 But it is not merely the sun which was observed to vary in the speed of its orbital progress; the moon and the planets also show curious accelerations and retardations of motion。 The moon in particular received most careful attention from Hipparchus。 Dominated by his conception of the perfect spheres; he could find but one explanation of the anomalous motions which he observed; and this was to assume that the various heavenly bodies do not fly on in an unvarying arc in their circuit about the earth; but describe minor circles as they go which can be likened to nothing so tangibly as to a light attached to the rim of a wagon…wheel in motion。 If such an invisible wheel be imagined as carrying the sun; for example; on its rim; while its invisible hub follows unswervingly the circle of the sun's mean orbit (this wheel; be it understood; lying in the plane of the orbit; not at right… angles to it); then it must be obvious that while the hub remains always at the same distance from the earth; the circling rim will carry the sun nearer the earth; then farther away; and that while it is traversing that portion of the are which brings it towards the earth; the actual forward progress of the sun will be retarded notwithstanding the uniform motion of the hub; just as it will be accelerated in the opposite arc。 Now; if we suppose our sun…bearing wheel to turn so slowly that the sun revolves but once about its imaginary hub while the wheel itself is making the entire circuit of the orbit; we shall have accounted for the observed fact that the sun passes more quickly through one…half of the orbit than through the other。 Moreover; if we can visualize the process and imagine the sun to have left a visible line of fire behind him throughout the course; we shall see that in reality the two circular motions involved have really resulted in producing an elliptical orbit。 The idea is perhaps made clearer if we picture the actual progress of the lantern attached to the rim of an ordinary cart…wheel。 When the cart is drawn forward the lantern is made to revolve in a circle as regards the hub of the wheel; but since that hub is constantly going forward; the actual path described by the lantern is not a circle at all but a waving line。 It is precisely the same with the imagined course of the sun in its orbit; only that we view these lines just as we should view the lantern on the wheel if we looked at it from directly above and not from the side。 The proof that the sun is describing this waving line; and therefore must be considered as attached to an imaginary wheel; is furnished; as it seemed to Hipparchus; by the observed fact of the sun's varying speed。 That is one way of looking at the matter。 It is an hypothesis that explains the observed factsafter a fashion; and indeed a very remarkable fashion。 The idea of such an explanation did not originate with Hipparchus。 The germs of the thought were as old as the Pythagorean doctrine that the earth revolves about a centre that we cannot see。 Eudoxus gave the conception greater tangibility; and may be considered as the father of this doctrine of wheelsepicycles; as they came to be called。 Two centuries before the time of Hipparchus he conceived a doctrine of spheres which Aristotle found most interesting; and which served to explain; along the lines we have just followed; the observed motions of the heavenly bodies。 Calippus; the reformer of the calendar; is said to have carried an account of this theory to Aristotle。 As new irregularities of motion of the sun; moon; and planetary bodies were pointed out; new epicycles were invented。 There is no limit to the number of imaginary circles that may be inscribed about an imaginary centre; and if we conceive each one of these circles to have a proper motion of its own; and each one to carry the sun in the line of that motion; except as it is diverted by the other motionsif we can visualize this complex mingling of wheelswe shall certainly be able to imagine the heavenly body which lies at the juncture of all the rims; as being carried forward in as erratic and wobbly a manner as could be desired。 In other words; the theory of epicycles will account for all the facts of the observed motions of all the heavenly bodies; but in so doing it fills the universe with a most bewildering network of intersecting circles。 Even in the time of Calippus fifty…five of these spheres were computed。 We may well believe that the clear…seeing Aristarchus would look askance at such a complex system of imaginary machinery。 But Hipparchus; pre…eminently an observer rather than a theorizer; seems to have been content to accept the theory of epicycles as he found it; though his studies added to its complexities; and Hipparchus was the dominant scientific personality of his century。 What he believed became as a law to his immediate successors。 His tenets were accepted as final by their great popularizer; Ptolemy; three centuries later; and so the heliocentric theory of Aristarchus passed under a cloud almost at the hour of its dawning; there to remain obscured and forgotten for the long lapse of centuries。 A thousand pities that the greatest observing astronomer of antiquity could not; like one of his great precursors; have approached astronomy from the stand…point of geography and poetry。 Had he done so; perhaps he might have reflected; like Aristarchus before him; that it seems absurd for our earth to hold the giant sun in thraldom; then perhaps his imagination would have reached out to the heliocentric doctrine; and the cobweb hypothesis of epicycles; with that yet more intangible figment of the perfect circle; might have been wiped away。 But it was not to be。 With Aristarchus the scientific imagination had reached its highest flight; but with Hipparchus it was beginning to settle back into regions of foggier atmosphere and narrower horizons。 For what; after all; does it matter that Hipparchus should go on to measure the precise length of the year and the apparent size of the moon's disk; that he should make a chart of the heavens showing the place of 1080 stars; even that he should discover the precession of the equinox;what; after all; is the significance of these details as against the all…essential fact that the greatest scientific authority of his centurythe one truly heroic scientific figure of his epochshould have lent all the forces of his commanding influence to the old; false theory of cosmology; when the true theory had been propounded and when he; perhaps; was the only man in the world who might have substantiated and vitalized that theory? It is easy to overestimate the influence of any single man; and; contrariwise; to underestimate the power of the Zeitgeist。 But when we reflect that the doctrines of Hipparchus; as promulgated by Ptolemy; became; as it were; the last word of astronomical science for both the Eastern and Western worlds; and so continued after a thousand years; it is perhaps not too much to say that Hipparchus; 〃the lover of truth;〃 missed one of the greatest opportunities for the promulgation of truth ever vouchsafed to a devotee of pure science。 But all this; of course; detracts nothing from the merits of Hipparchus as an observing astronomer。 A few words more must be said as to his specific discoveries in this field。 According to his measurement; the tropic